IR 05000413/2016502
| ML16130A757 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 05/04/2016 |
| From: | Brian Bonser NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1 |
| To: | Henderson K Duke Energy Carolinas |
| References | |
| IR 2016502 | |
| Download: ML16130A757 (12) | |
Text
May 4, 2016
SUBJECT:
CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT
05000413/2016502 AND 05000414/2016502
Dear Mr. Henderson:
On April 7, 2016, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report (IR) documents the inspection results that were discussed on April 7, 2016, with you and members of your staff.
The NRC inspectors did not identify any findings or violations of more than minor significance.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Brian R. Bonser, Chief
Plant Support Branch 1
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 License Nos. NPF-35 and NPF-52
Enclosure:
NRC IR 05000413 and 05000414/2016502 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information
REGION II==
Docket Nos:
50-413 and 50-414
License Nos:
Report Nos:
05000413/2016502 and 05000414/2016502
Licensee:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Facility:
Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2
Location:
York, SC
Dates:
April 4 - 7, 2016
Inspectors:
Steven Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector
Christopher Fontana, Emergency Preparedness Inspector
John Hickman, Emergency Preparedness Inspector (Trainee)
Andy Hutto, Senior Resident Inspector
Approved by:
Brian R. Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY
Inspection Report (IR) 05000413/2016502 and 05000414/2016502; 4/4/2016 - 4/8/2016;
Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Exercise and Baseline Inspection
This report covers an inspection by three emergency preparedness inspectors, and one senior resident inspector. No findings of significance were identified. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 5.
REPORT DETAILS
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment:
- The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on April 5, 2016, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), (5), (9), and (10); which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.
- The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center, Operations Support Center, and Emergency Operations Facility.
- Other performance areas, such as the emergency response organizations (ERO)recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.
- Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
- The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on April 7, 2016, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise, and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g.
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment. The inspectors also attended the FEMA-sponsored public meeting on April 7, 2016. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes
a. Inspection Scope
Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, there was no revision to emergency action levels and three revisions to the emergency plan. The licensee determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the Plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the emergency plan revisions to evaluate potential reductions in the effectiveness of the plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report, and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety.
The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure (IP)71114, Attachment 04, Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes. The applicable planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and its related requirements in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, were used as reference criteria.
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the emergency action level and emergency plan changes on an annual basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review
a. Inspection Scope
Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the
exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise
Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of
the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs)listed below for the period January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.
Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone
- Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
- Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Readiness
- Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability
For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. The inspectors also interviewed the licensee personnel who were responsible for collecting and evaluating the PI data. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area, are listed in the
.
This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings
On April 7, 2016, the inspection team presented the inspection results to Mr. Henderson and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was provided during the inspection.
ATTACHMENT: Supplementary Information
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee personnel
- S. Andrews, Regulatory Affairs Specialist
- M. Austin, Emergency Preparedness Corporate Facility Area Manager
- E. Benfield, Radiation Protection Supervising Scientist
- D. Brunson, Nuclear Engineer II
- M. Carwile, Chemistry Manager
- C. Fletcher, Regulatory Affairs Manager
- B. Foster, Operations Manager
- M. Hare, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist
- K. Henderson, Site Vice President
- T. Jenkins, Maintenance Manager
- L. Keller, General Manager Nuclear Engineering
- B. Kimray, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist
- B. Leonard, Training Manager
- G. McAllister, Emergency Preparedness Specialist
- M. Nelson, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist
- J. Overly, Fleet Emergency Preparedness Programs Manager
- T. Simril, Plant Manager
- T. White, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist