IR 05000410/1983009
| ML20024A816 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/1983 |
| From: | Keimig R, Kister H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20024A813 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-410-83-09, 50-410-83-9, NUDOCS 8307010005 | |
| Download: ML20024A816 (2) | |
Text
n-
'
.
.
-
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No. 50-410/83-09 Docket No. 50-410
'
License No.
CPPR-ll2 Priority
--
Category A
Licensee:
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Bou,levard, West Syracuse, New York 13202 Facility Name:
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Meeting at:
USNRC Region I, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania Meeting conducted:
May 23, 1983 NRC Personnel:
d 6 7 fd H. tl K19ter, Chiet, Reactor Projects dats signed Section 2C
.
date signed dat sig ed b /3 D Approved by:
." R. Keiinid, Chief, Projects Branch date sitJned No. 2, DPRP Meeting Summary:
Management Conference on May 23, 1983 (Report No. 50-410/83-09)
Summary: Special management conference convened by NRC Region I management to dis-cuss NRC concerns relating to Niagara Mohawk's overview of contractor performance at the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 construction site. The meeting was two hours in duration.
8307010005'830614 PDR ADOCK 05000 G
Region I Form 12-1 (Rev. February 1982)
!
,
.
_
s
.
.,
k DETAILS 1.
Attendees
'
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation D..P. Dise, Vice President, Quality Assurance
,
S. F. Manno, Vice President, Nuclear Construction D.' Palmer, Manager, Quality Assurance
-
,
G.-L. Rhode, Senior Vice President, System Project Management
'
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission S.'D. Ebneter, Chief, Eng'ineering Pro * grams Branch (Part-time)
R. R. Keimig, Chief, Projects Branch No. 2 r
H.-B. Kister, Chief, Reactor Projects Sect, ion 2C R. W. Starosteck1, Director, Division of Project and Resident Programs
,
2.
Discussion j,,
Region I opened by stating that the purpose of the meeting was to obtain a
,
more firm understanding of Niagara Mohawk's (NMPC) approach and progress re-
'
garding resolution of previously noted problems with contractor performance in the Quality Assurance / Quality Control area; especially.in view of recent ITT Grinnell QA/QC problems currently under review by NRC.- j.
~
NMPC responded by describing the status of their ongoing acti6ns noting that communications were improving and NMPC surveillance of contractors was in- -
creasing.
,
<
ITT Grinnell QA/QC staffing was discussed. NMPCstatedthatduetothIedif-ficulties in recruiting, the QA Manager position was not yet filled. Region I urged that NMPC take a more active role in assuring that this key position be filled promptly.
' ^
,
The meeting c6ncluded with the understanding that.NMPC would be prepared to meet again in six weeks to discuss the~ status of their ongoing actions for improving contractor perfonnance.
t I
$
'
,
,1
,
j ) ; ';
l
/
-
1'l
,
,
,
.
,
,
'l
.1
-
___