IR 05000402/2005010

Notice of Violation from Insp on 850402-0510

ML20128K878
Person / Time
Site:	Harris, Farley
Issue date:	06/10/1985
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20128K846	List: IR 05000402/2005010 ML20128K842 ML20128K914
References
50-348-85-20, NUDOCS 8507110147
Download: ML20128K878 (4)

Text

.:

,

.

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Alabama Power Company Docket No. 50-348 Farley License No. NPF-2 The following violations were identified during an inspection conducted on April 2 - May 10, 1985. The Severity Levels were assigned in acccrdance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C). Technical Specification 3.9.4(b) requires that a minimum of one door in each containment airlock shall be closed during movement of irradiated fuel within the containmen Contrary to the above, on April 15, 1985, the inner and outer doors of the containment auxiliary hatch were open and unlatched for a period of about four hours while irradiated fuel was being move This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1) Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that written procedures shall be established and implemente Contrary to the above, procedures were not followed which caused the loss of both residual heat removal (RHR) loops for 52 minutes. Precaution and Limit steps which require the interlock with RHR valves and reactor coolant system pressure to be disabled and inoperative had not been adhered to. This resulted in a 700 psig test signal closing the RHR suction valves and l rendering both trains of the RHR system inoperable.

I This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1) Technical Specification 3.1.2.3 requires that one charging pump in the boron

'

injection flow path required by Specification 3.1.2.1 shall be operable and capable of being powered from an operable emergency bus in modes 5 and 6.

l Contrary to the above, on April 15, 1985, while irradiated fuel assemblies

'

were being removed from the reactor core, there were no charging pumps operable for six hour This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I)

l CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II requires that the quality assurance

! program shall provide control over activities affecting the quality of the identified structures, systems, and components.

!

l Contrary to the above, spacers were not installed as required by the i vendor's drawings and manuals between the cells of the service water l

"

8507110147 850610 PDR G

ADOCK 05000348 PDR L

. _ _ . . _ . ._

,

. . 08

.

.

Alabama Power Company 2 Docket No. 50-348 Farley License No. NPF-2 batteries and the ur.interruptible power supply batteries to the Units 1 and 2 turbine-driven auxiliary feed punips. The spacers had not been inserted at the time of the original installatio This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieve Security or safeguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to facilitate withholding it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d)

or 10 CFR 73.2 Date:

j d

- - - ~ g - e , - . , _ . , , . . - . - , , _ . - - _ - - - - - - - _ - . -

. _ .

-

.

.

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Alabama Power Company Docket No. 50-348 Farley License No. NPF-2 The following violations were identified during an inspection conducted on April 2 - May 10, 1985. The Severity Levels were assigned in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C). Technical Specification 3.9.4(b) requires that a minimum of one door in each containment airlock shall be closed during movement of irradiated fuel within the containmen Contrary to the above, on April 15, 1985, the inner and outer doors of the containment auxiliary hatch were open and unlatched for a period of about four hours while irradiated fuel was being move This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1) Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that written procedures shall be established and implemente Contrary to the above, procedures were not followed which caused the loss of both residual heat removal (RHR) loops for 52 minutes. Precaution and Limit steps which require the interlock with RHR valves and reactor coolant system pressure to be disabled and inoperative had not been adhered to. This resulted in a 700 psig test signal closing the RHR suction valves and rendering both trains of the RHR system inoperabl This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1) Technical Specification 3.1.2.3 requires that one charging pump in the boron injection flow path required by Specification 3.1.2.1 shall be operable and capable of being powered from an operable emergency bus in modes 5 and Contrary to the above, on April 15, 1985, while irradiated fuel assemblies were being removed from the reactor core, there were no charging pumps operable for six hour This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I) CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II requires that the quality assurance program shall provide control over activities affecting the quality of the identified structures, systems, and component Contrary to the above, spacers were not installed as required by the vendor's drawings and manuals between the cells of the service water

.

.

Alabama Power Company 2 Docket No. 50-348 Farley License No. NPF-2 batteries and the uninterruptible power supply batteries to the Units 1 and 2 turbine-driven auxiliary feed pumps. The spacers had not been inserted at the time of the original installatio This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to . avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieve Security or safeguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to facilitate withholding it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d)

or 10 CFR 73.2 Date:

A

%

- - - . , , . . . - -