IR 05000321/2011501

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IR 05000321-11-501, 05000366-11-501; 10/31/2011 - 11/04/2011; Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Exercise and Baseline Inspection
ML113410451
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 12/06/2011
From: Brian Bonser
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1
To: Madison D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
References
IR-11-501
Download: ML113410451 (13)


Text

December 6, 2011

SUBJECT:

EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT - NRC EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000321/2011501 AND 05000366/2011501

Dear Mr. Madison:

On November 4, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on November 3, 2011, with Mr. W.

Bargeron and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

No findings were identified during this inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Brian Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No.: 50-321, 50-366 License No.: DPR-57, NPF-5

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 05000321/2011501 and 05000366/2011501 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

REGION II==

Docket Nos: 05000321, 05000366 License Nos: DPR-57, NPF-5 Report Nos: 05000321/2011501 and 05000366/2011501 Licensee: Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc Facility: Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Location: Baxley, GA Dates: October 31, 2011, through November 4, 2011 Inspectors: M. Speck, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector W. Loo, Senior Health Physics Inspector D. Hardage, Resident Inspector T. Lighty, Project Engineer Approved by: Brian Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000321/2011501, 05000366/2011501; 10/31/2011 - 11/04/2011; Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear

Plant, Units 1 and 2; Exercise and baseline inspection.

The report covered an announced inspection by one emergency preparedness inspector, one resident inspector, one project engineer, and one health physics inspector. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process.

NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

None

Licensee-Identified Violations

None

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

1EP1 Exercise Evaluation

a. Inspection Scope

Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).

This inspection activity represents one sample on a biennial cycle.

The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment:

  • The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise conducted on November 2, 2011, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards (RSPSs) in 10 CFR 50.47 (b)(4), (5), (9), and (10), which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.
  • The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room simulator, Operations Support Center (OSC), Technical Support Center (TSC), and Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
  • Other performance areas besides the RSPS, such as the emergency response organizations (ERO) recognition of abnormal plant conditions, command and control, intra- and inter-facility communications, prioritization of mitigation activities, utilization of repair and field monitoring teams, interface with offsite agencies, and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.
  • The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on November 3, 2011, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix E.IV.F.2.g.

The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1EP4 Emergency Action Level (EAL) and Emergency Plan Changes

a. Inspection Scope

Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, Revision 31, of the Radiological Emergency Response Plan was implemented based on the licensees determination, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), that the changes resulted in no decrease in the effectiveness of the Plan, and that the revised Plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspector conducted a review of the Plan changes and a sampling review of the implementing procedure changes made between October 1, 2010, and October 31, 2011, to evaluate for potential decreases in effectiveness of the Plan. This review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes.

Therefore, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety.

The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114, 04, Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes. The applicable planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) and related requirements contained in 10 CFR 50.54(q) and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50 were used as reference criteria.

This inspection activity represents one sample on an annual cycle.

The inspector reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the two performance indicators (PI) listed below. For each of the submittals, the inspectors reviewed the period from July 1, 2010, through September 30, 2011. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, were used to verify the basis in reporting for each data element.

  • Emergency Response Organization Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
  • Emergency Response Organization Readiness (ERO)

The inspectors reviewed portions of the raw PI data developed from monthly performance indicator reports and discussed the methods for compiling and reporting the PIs with the responsible emergency preparedness personnel. The inspectors also independently screened drill and exercise opportunity evaluations, drill participation reports, and drill evaluations. Selected reported values were calculated to verify their accuracy. The inspectors compared graphical representations from the most recent PI report to the raw data to verify that the data was correctly reflected in the report.

Reviewed documents are listed in the Attachment.

The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, Performance Indicator Verification. This inspection activity represents two samples on an annual cycle.

The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

On November 3, 2011, the lead inspector for the emergency preparedness inspection presented the inspection results to Mr. W. Bargeron and other members of the licensee management. The inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided or taken during the inspection.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee personnel

W. Bargeron, Plant Manager
S. Grantham, Training Manager
B. Duvall, Site Support Manager
T. Marioneaux, Emergency Preparedness
T. Hendrix, Emergency Preparedness
J. Butler, Emergency Preparedness
B. Anderson, Health Physics Manager
C. Coop, Emergency Preparedness Supervisor
S. Grantham, Training Manager
P. Underwood, Operations Training Supervisor
J. Love, Fleet Oversight Supervisor
K. Long, Operations Superintendent

ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED