IR 05000315/1991013
| ML18005A029 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 06/04/1991 |
| From: | Creed J, Kniceley J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17329A041 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-315-91-13, 50-316-91-13, NUDOCS 9106100038 | |
| Download: ML18005A029 (8) | |
Text
U.. S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Reports No. 50-315/91013(DRSS)
. 50-316/91013(DRSS)
Docket Nos. 50-315, 50-316 Licensee:
Indiana Michigan Power Company 1 Riverside Plaza Columbus, OH 43216 Licenses No. DPR-58; DPR-74 Facility Name:
Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and
Inspection At:
Donald C.
Cook Plant Site, Bridgman, Michigan Inspection Conducted:
May 20-24, 1991 Inspector:
J es R. Knice ey Physical Security Inspector Date Approved By:
mes
.
ree
,
se afeguards Section a
e Ins ection Summar Ins ection on Ma 20-24 1991 (Re orts No. 50-315/91013(DRSS);
0.
d:
i, dply
lyi p n i
1 ig Management Support, Protected and Vital Area Barriers; Access Control-Personnel, Packages, and Vehicles; Alarm Stations and Communications; Power Supply; Testing, Maintenance and Compensatory Measures; Training and gualification; and a review of previous inspection findings.
Results:
The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements went w>n the ar eas examined.
lie have concluded that the security program is well implemented and is well managed.
Licensee management attention and involvement are strong resulting in a high level of security awareness and performance.
The licensee continues to be proactive regarding upgrades to and evaluation of their existing security system.
These evaluations and upgrades are being considered as means to increase efficiency, improve human factors and enhance the overall physical security as it pertains to regulatory compliance and Regulatory Effectiveness Review (RER) issues.
9106100038 910604 PDR ADQCK 0500031 5 Q
DETAILS 1.
Ke Persons Contacted In addition to the key members of the licensee's staff listed below, the inspector interviewed other licensee employees and members of the security organization.
The asterisk (*) denotes those present at the Exit Interview conducted on Hay 24, 1991.
- A. Blind, Plant Manager
- L. Matthias, Administrative Superintendent
- W. Hodge, Security Manager
- J. Bradshaw, Administrative Compliance Coordinator
- H. Horvath, Site g.A. Superintendent
- J. Fletcher, Site Manager, Stanley Smith Security (SSS)
- A. Hemerling, Senior Captain, SSS J.
Isom, Senior Resident Inspector, NRC Region III
- D. Passehl, Resident Inspector, NRC Region III 2.
Entrance and Exit Interviews a.
At the beginning of the inspection, Hr. Walt Modge, Security Manager, was informed of the purpose of this visit and the functional areas to be examined.
b.
The inspector met with the licensee representatives denoted in Section 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on Hay 24, 1991.
A general description of the scope of the inspection was provided.
Briefly listed below are the findings discussed during the exit interview.
The details of each finding discussed are referenced, as noted, in this report.
Included below is a statement provided by or describing licensee management's response to each finding.
(1)
The licensee was informed of and acknowledged the inspector's comments that no violations, deviations or unresolved items were identified during this inspection.
(2)
The inspector commented that the plant manager's support for
'he security program continues to be a program strength and has led to outstanding performance by plant personnel towards implementation of security requirements.
(3)
The inspector commented that the guality Assurance audits have been performance based and have concluded that security force personnel were knowledgeable of their assigned duties and responsibilities and that security program requirements are adequately being implemented.
(4)
The inspector commented that the planned upgrades of the security system will greatly enhance the overall progra Pro ram Areas Ins ected Listed below are the core inspection areas which were examined by the inspector within the scope of these inspection activities in which no violations, deviations, unresolved or open items were identified.
These areas were reviewed and evaluated as deemed necessary by the inspector to meet the specified "Inspection Requirements" (Section 02) of NRC Inspection Manual Inspection Procedure 81700 as applicable to the security plan.
Sampling reviews included interviews, observations, testing of equipment, documentation review and, at times, drills or exercises that provide independent verification to meet security commitments.
The depth and scope of activities were conducted as deemed appropriate and necessary for the program area and operational status of the security system.
Number Pro ram Area and Ins ection Re uirements Reviewed 81700 Ph sical Securit Pro ram for Power Reactors a.
Mana ement Su ort:
(02.0la} Degree of Management upport; 0.01 Change to Security Plans Properly Reported and do not Reduce Security Effectiveness; (02.0lc) Program and Corrective. Action System for Annual Audits; gualifications and Independence of Auditors.
b.
Protected and Vital Area Barriers:
(02.02a)
PA and VA Barriers Neet Commitments an rovide Required Penetration Resistance; (02.02b) Isolation Zones Adequately Maintained; (02.02d)
Assessment Aids Functional and Effective and Neet Commitments.
c ~
d.
Access Control-Personnel Packa es and Vehicles:
a ositive Access ontro to inc u e:
roper Identification; Adequate Search Upon Entering PA; Badges Displayed; Visitors Escorted; Emergency Access to Vital Equipment; VA Access is Duty Related; (02.03b)
Packages Searched and Properly Authorized; Controls for Containment Access; (02.03c) Vehicles Properly Authorized, Searched, and Controlled; Access to Vehicle Gates Controlled.
'
Alarm Stations and Communications (02.04a)
Alarm Stations A equate y
quippe wit Alarm, Surveillance,.
and Communications; Continuously Manned and Independent Functioning Capability; (02.04b)
Ho CAS Interfering Operational Activities; (02.04c)
Alarm Stations Have Continuous Communication Capability with Guards and LLEA.
e.
Power Su l
(02.05a)
Secondary Power Source for Alarm an ommunication Systems; (02.05b)
Emergency Ingress and Egress During Loss of Power.
f.
Testin Maintenance and Com ensator Measures:
02.06a Adequate Instal ation, Testing an Maintenance of-3
'
'
Security Equipment; (02.06b)
Compensatory Measures Implemented and Effective.
g.
Trainin and Oualification:
(02.07a) Officers Trained, quippe
, an
.
ua >>e
02.07b) Officers Possess Adequate Knowledge and Ability to Perform Duties; (02.07c)
Responses are Consistent with Plans and Procedure Requirements; Safeguards Capabilities in SCP are Available, Effective, and Functional; (02.07d)
Required Armed Response and Supervisor(s)
Available.
4.
Ph sical Securit for Power Reactors (IP 81700):
The following positive o servations an p anne security system upgrades were noted concerning the licensee's security program.
a ~
b..
C.
The licensee has improved their contingency response training by completing a vulnerability analysis which was done to identify the most critical areas of the plant necessary for. safe shutdown.
They also developed and trained all security officers on a pre-deployment contingency plan which better utilizes concealment and cover techniques for better protection of personnel against an intruder.
The licensee continues to perform and evaluate tactical movement exercises.
In addition, to assist in tactical training, the licensee is planning on constructin'g a tactical team training faci lity.
During this inspection the licensee was in the process of completely renovating their indoor weapons range.
The licensee contracted with PSC, Inc. to give an independent evaluation of their current security system.
This evaluation was performed to assist the licensee in making decisions which will hopefully lead to increased efficiency, improve human factors and to enhance physical security as it pertains to regulatory compliance and Regulatory Effectiveness Review (RER) issues and cost-benefit trade-offs as they apply to the security program.
PSC has completed their evaluation of the licensee's security program and is preparing their report.
The licensee's security program was evaluated against their Security Plan, NRC rules and regulations, guidance and staff positions dealing with security at nuclear power plants which includes current NRC guidance being used by NRC Plant Protection Analysts.
When completed, the licensee should have a comprehensive evaluation of their entire security program with suggested improvements and upgrades.
The licensee agreed to share the results of this report with the inspector.
The following are some of the upgrades to the security system which are being considered by the licensee.
1.
2.
3.
4, 5.
6.
Upgrade firearms range.
Install a
new security computer and associated hardware.
Install a second protected area fence.
Install a back-up intrusion detection system.
Upgrading and/or replacement of alarm stations.
Construction of a tactical training,facilit.
Firearm replacements.
8.
Installation of a new perimeter intrusion detection system.
The licensee has a multiple year plan for replacement and/or upgrades of the security system which allows them to budget and plan for replacement of aging or inadequate equipment as needed.
The inspector concluded that the support for the security program is excellent and that the proposed upgrades will enhance the security program.