IR 05000315/1991026
| ML17329A264 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 11/20/1991 |
| From: | Creed J, Kniceley J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17329A263 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-315-91-26, 50-316-91-26, NUDOCS 9112030052 | |
| Download: ML17329A264 (6) | |
Text
. U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Reports No. 50-315/91026(DRSS);
50-316/91026(DRSS)
Docket Nos'.
50-315; 50-316 Licensee Indiana Michigan Power Company 1 Riverside Plaza Columbus, OH 43216 Licenses No.
Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and
Inspection At:
Donald C.
Cook Plant Site, Bridgman, Michigan Inspection Conducted:
November 4-8, 1991 Inspector:
mes R; Kniceley hysical Security Inspector I(~/~r Date Approved By:
ames R. Creed, Chief afeguards Section Date Ins ection Summar Ins ection on November 4-8 1991 Re orts No. 50-315/91026 DRSS
'o.
50-316/91026 DRSS Management Support, Protected and Vital Area Barriers; Access Control-Personnel, Packages, and Vehicles; Alarm Stations and Communications; Power Supply; Testing, Maintenance and Compensatory Measures; Training and gualification; and a review of previous inspection findings.
Results:
The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the areas examined.
Me have concluded that the security program is well implemented and is well managed.
Licensee management attention to and involvement in the security program are strong, resulting in a high level of security awareness and performance.
The licensee continues to be proactive regarding upgrades to and evaluation of their existing security system.
These upgrades were done to increase efficiency, improve human factors and enhance the overall physical security as it pertains to regulatory compliance.
91120S005a 9>>~~0 PDR ADOCK 050003i5
j
Management's dedication to improving security performance is good as demonstrated through improved personnel performance and equipment.
Additionally, there is extensive prior planning and oversight for proposed changes, and upgrades to the security program.
Licensee resources are adequate and the Training and gualification program is effective.
Tactical training exercises exceed regulatory requirements and appear beneficial and realistic.
Licensee performance meets and in some areas exceeds regulatory requirement DETAILS 1.
Ke Persons Contacted In additioh to,the key members of the licensee's staff listed below, the inspector interviewed other licensee employees and members of the security organization.
The asterisk (*) "denotes those present at.the Exit Interview conducted on November 8, 1991.
- A. Blind, Plant Manager
- L. Matthias, Administrative Superintendent
- W. Hodge, Security Manager
- J. Bradshaw, Administrative Compliance Coordinator
- M. Horvath, Site Q.A. Superintendent
- K. Baker, Assistant P.lant Manager-Production
- S. Gane, Q.A. Auditor
- J. Fletcher, Site Manager, Stanley Smith Security (SSS)
- J. Isom, Senior Resident Inspector, NRC Region III
- D. Passehl, Resident Inspector, NRC Region III
- J. Creed, Chief, Safeguards Section, NRC Region III 2.
Entrance and Exit Interviews a.
At the beginning of the inspection; Mr. Halt Hodge, Security Manager, was informed of the purpose, of this visit and the functional areas to be examined.
b.
The inspector met with the licensee representatives denoted in Section I at the conclusion of the inspection on November 8, 1991.
A general description of the scope of the inspection was provided.
Briefly listed below are the findings discussed during the exit interview.
The details of each finding discussed are referenced, as noted, in this-report.
Included below is a statement provided
'y or describing licensee management's response to each finding.
( I)
The licensee was informed of and acknowledged the inspector's comments that no violations, deviations or unresolved items were identified during this inspection.
(2)
The inspector commented that the plant manager's support for the security program continues to be a program stren'gth and has led to outstanding performance by plant personnel in implementing of security requirements.
'I (3)
The inspector commented that the security program is well implemented and well manage (4)
The inspector commented that the contract security force members who were questioned and observed during this inspection were knowledgeable and proficient -in performing their assigned duties.
(5)
The, inspector commented that the plant housekeeping practices were very good.
The protected area as well as in-plant security areas were well maintained.
3.
Pro ram Areas Ins ected Listed below are the core inspection areas which were examined by the inspector within the scope of these inspection activities in which no violations, deviations, unresolved or open items were identified.
These areas were reviewed and evaluated as deemed necessary by the inspector to meet the specified "Inspection Requirements" (Section 02) of NRC Inspection Manual Inspection Procedure 81700 as applicable'o the security plan.
Sampling reviews included interviews, observations, testing of equipment, documentation review and, at times, dri lls or exercises that provided independent verification of meeting security commitments.
The depth and scope of activities were conducted as deemed appropriate and necessary for the program area and operational status of the security system.
Number 81700 Pro ram Area and Ins ection Requirements Reviewed Physical Security Pro ram for Power Reactors a.
Mana ement Su ort:
(02.0la)
Degree of Management Support; ange to Security Plans Properly Reported and Do Not Reduce Security Effectiveness; (02.01c) -Program and Corrective Action System for Annual Audits; gualifications and Independence of Auditors.
b.
Protected and Vital Area Barriers:
(02.02a)
PA and VA Barriers eet Commitments an rovided Required Penetration
'Resistance; (02.02b) Isolation Zones Adequately Maintained; (02.02d)
Assessmen't Aids Functional and Effective and'Meet Commitments.
C.
Access Control-Personnel, Packa es and Vehicles:
2.
3a Positive Access Contro to inc u e:
Proper Identification; Adequate Search Upon Entering PA; Badges Displayed; Visitors Escorted; Emergency Access to Vital Equipment; VA Access is Duty Related; (02.03b)
Packages Searched and Properly Authorized; Controls for Containment Access; (02.03c) Vehicles Properly Authorized, Searched, and Controlled; Access to Vehicle Gates Controlle d.
Alarm Stations and Communications:
(02.04a)
Alarm ta ions equa e y quippe wit Alarm, Surveillance, and Communications; Continuously Manned and Independent Functioning Capability; (02.04b)
No CAS 'Interfering Operational Activities; (02.04c)
Alarm Stations Have Continuous Communication Capability with Guards and LLEA.
e.
Power Su ly:
(02.05a)
Secondary Power Source for Alarm an Communication System; (02.05b)
Emergency Ingress and Egress During Loss of Power.
f.
Testin
, Maintenance and Com ensatory Measures:
0.0 a
Adequate Insta ation Testing an Maintenance of Security Equipment; (02.06b)
Compensatory Measures Implemented and Effective.
g.
Trainin and qua'lification:
(02.07a) Officers Trained, quippe
,
an ua i ie
02.07b) Officers Possess Adequate Knowledge and Ability to Perform Duties; (02.07d).Required Armed Response and Supervisor(s)
Ava i lab le.