IR 05000315/1980002
| ML17318A667 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 02/11/1980 |
| From: | Boyd D, Masse R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17318A665 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-315-80-02, 50-315-80-2, 50-316-80-02, 50-316-80-2, NUDOCS 8004040444 | |
| Download: ML17318A667 (7) | |
Text
U.ST NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-315/80-02; 50-316/80-02 Docket No. 50-315; 50-316 License No. DPR-58; DPR-74 Licensee:
American Electric Power Service Corporation Indiana and Michigan Power Company 2 Broadway New York, NY 10004 Facility Name:
D.
C.
Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and
Inspection At:
D.
C.
Cook Site, Bridgman, MI Inspection Conducted:
December 1,
1979 - January ll, 1980 Inspector:
R. E. Masse, Senior Resident Inspector Approved By:
D.
C. Boyd, Chief Reactor Projects, Section 3-1-li'-8u Ins ection Summar Ins ection on December
1979 - Januar ll 1980 (Re ort No. 50-315/80-02.
50-316/80-02)
Areas Ins ected:
Review of plant operations, security, Licensee Event Reports LER's
, surveillance, IE Bulletins, records, independent inspection, and License Conditions.
The inspection involved 104 inspector-hours onsite by the Senior Resident Inspector.
Results:
Of the eight areas inspected, no items of noncompliance were identified in seven.
In the independent inspection effort, one item of noncompliance was identified as follows:
Control of Standing Orders-Infraction (Paragraph 11).
DETAILS Persons Contacted D. Shaller, Plant Manager
-"B. Svensson, Assistant Plant Manager-E. Townley, Assistant Plant Manager-R. I,ease, Operations Superintendent E. Smarrella, Technical Superintendent R. Dudding, Maintenance Superintendent R. Keith, Outage Coordinator-J. Stietzel, Quality Assurance Supervisor T. Beilman, Quality Assurance Supervisor C. Murphy, Production Supervisor, Unit 2 H. Chadwell, Production Supervisor, Unit
Plant 0 erations The inspector reviewed the plant operations including examinations of control room log books, routine patrol sheets, shift engineer log book, equipment outage logs, special operating orders, and jumper and tagout logs for the month of December.
The inspector observed plant operations during several offshifts during the month of December.
The inspector also made visual observations of the routine surveill-ance and functional tests in progress during the period.
This review was conducted to verify that facility operations were in conformance with the requirements established under Technical Specifications, 10 CFR, and Administrative Procedures.
A review of the licensee's deviation reports for the period was conducted to verify that no violations of the licensee's Technical Specifications were made.
The inspector conducted a tour of the containments,the auxiliary buildings, and turbine building throughout the period and noted that the monitoring instrumentation was recorded as required, radiation controls were established, fluid leaks and pipe vibra-tions were minimal, seismic restraint oil levels appeared adequate, equipment caution and hold cards agreed with control room records, plant housekeeping conditions/cleanliness were adequate, and fire hazards were minimal.
The inspector observed shift turnovers to verify that plant and component status and problem areas were being turned over to relieving shift personnel.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Ph sical Protection - Securit Or anization The inspector verified by observation and personnel interview that at least one full time member of the security organization who has the authority to direct the physical security activities of the
security organization was onsite at all times; verified by obser-vation that the security organization was prope'rly manned for all shifts; and verified by observation that members of the security organization were capable of performing their assigned tasks.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifed.
4.
Ph sical Protection - Ph sical Barriers The inspector verified that certain aspects of the physical barriers and isolation zones conformed to regulatory requirements and commit-ments in the physical security plan (PSP); that gates in the pro-tected area were closed and locked if not attended; that doors in vital area barriers were closed and locked if not attended; and that isolation zones were free of visual obstructions and objects that could aid an intruder in penetrating the protected area.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Ph sical Protection - Access Control (Identification Authorization Bad in Search and Escortin The inspector verified that all persons and packages were identified and authorization checked prior to entry into the protected area (PA), all vehicles were properly authorized prior to entry into a PA, all persons authorized in the PA were issued and displayed identifica-tion badges, records of access authorized conformed to the PSP, and all personnel in vital areas were 'authorized access; verified that all persons, packages, and vehicles were searched in accordance to regulatory requirements, the PSP, and security procedures; verified that persons authorized escorted access were accompanied by an escort when within a PA or vital area; verified that vehicles authorized escorted access were accompanied by an escort when within the PA; and verified by review of the licensee's authorization document that the escort observed above was authorized to perform the escort function.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Ph sical Protection - Communications The inspector verified by observation (during each operating shift)
that communications checks were conducted satisfactorily during the security personnel work shifts and that all fixed and roving posts, and each member of the response team successfully communicate from their remote location; and verified that equipment was operated consistent with requirements in the PSP and security procedures.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie ~
Review and Followu on Licensee Event Re orts Through direct observations, discussions with licensee personnel, and of records, the following event reports were reviewed to de-termine that reportability requirements were fulfilled, immediate corrective action was accomplished, and corrective action to prevent recurrence had been accomplished in accordance with Technical Spec-ifications.
Unit
79-50/03L-0 79-52/03L-0 79-53/03L-0 No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8.
Surveillance of Safet Related S stems/Com onents Re uired b Technical S ecifications The inspector observed Technical Specifications required surveillance testing (other than calibrations and checks)
on the Unit 2 AB and CD diesel generators (ESF actuation-simultaneous blackouts, load shed, etc.
2-THP 4030 STP.
217)
and verified that testing was performed in accordance with technically adequate procedures, that test results were in conformance with Technical Specifications and procedure re-quirements and were reviewed by personnel other than the individual directing the test, and that any deficiencies identified during testing were properly reviewed and resolved by appropriate management personnel.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
9.
IE Bulletin Followu For the IE Bulletins listed below the inspector verified that the written response was within the time period stated in the bulletin, that the written response included the information required to be reported, that the written response included adequate corrective action commitments based on information presentation in the bulletin and the licensee's response, that licensee management forwarded copies of the written response to the appropriate onsite management representatives, that information discussed in the licensee's written response was accurate, and that corrective action taken by the lic-ensee was as described in the written response.
IEB 79-10 79-11 79"23 79-24
79-18 79-25 79-26 No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
10.
Record Retrieval and Retention The inspector verified that the program for the control, storage, retention and retrieval of records and documents was in conformance with Technical Specifications; that drawings were being maintained in accordance with procedures; and that record-keeping of reactor operations and equipment performance was sufficient to permit review by the licensee to detect long term degradation or adverse trends that could result in potential safety hazards as required by Technical Specifications.
Examples of records inspected include the following:
A.
Maintenance history of R-ll and R-12 for Unit 1 (Containment air particulate and gaseous rad monitors).
B.
Releases to the environment for the period of February 20-28, 1979.
C.
Unit 1 pressurizer level chart recorder for March, 1978.
D.
Unit 2 Tavg-Tref chart recorder for June, 1978.
E.
QA audit records for audits conducted in May, 1977.
F.
Control room daily logs (Unit 1) for July, 1977.
G.
Current revision of drawing 1-2-5142-14.
H.
Surveillance test on Unit
CD diesel-generator for March, 1979 (1-OHP 4030 STP. 027).
I.
RO 77-15 (Unit 1) and RO 76-004 (Unit 1)
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
11.
Inde endent Ins ection Effort During followup on various recommendations of NUREG-0578, the in-spector noted that Operations Department Standing Orders (OSO's)
were being used to implement aspects such as shift'turnovers, responsi-bilities of Shift Operating Engineers, etc.
Both Control Rooms contain controlled copies of these OSO's.
PMI-2260 "Standing Orders and Special Instructions" requires personnel to initial and date Standing Orders, or requires that supervisors initial that their
subordinates have had the order communicated to them.
Contrary to this requirement, on January 9,
1980, the inspector observed that the latest OSO's, including those implementing NUREG-0578 recommend-ations, had not been reviewed by Unit 1 or Unit 2 control room oper-ators.
This finding represents an apparent item of noncompliance with Technical Specification 6.8.1 dealing with procedure adherence.
12.
License Conditions Unit 2 The inspector reviewed the licensee's actions relative to Unit 2 license conditions 2.c.(3)(i) and 2.c.(3)(m).
These license con-ditions are described below.
The inspector has determined that these two conditions have been satisfied and may therefore be removed from the Unit 2 license.
A.
Condition 2.c.(3)(i), "Leak Rate Testing of Containment Isolation Valves" required that the licensee install, prior to startup following the 1st refueling, test connections to allow Type C
leak rate testing of certain containment isolation valves.
The inspector verified that the modifications were complete and reviewed the results of the subsequent Type C leak rate testing.
B.
Condition 2.c.(3)(m),
"600 Volt Containment Power Penetrations" required the licensee to modify the 600 volt containment elec-trical power penetration circuits to meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.63 prior to starup following the 1st refuel-ing.
The inspector reviewed associated documentation (J.O.
No.
03698 and RFC 2202) for completeness and verified QA review for installation of the redundant breakers.
Followup on these License Conditions included discussion of findings with the NRC Licensing Project Hanager.
13.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (Denoted in Paragraph 1) at various times during the reporting period.
The scope and findings of the inspection were discussed.
-6-