IR 05000289/1988002

Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Repts 50-289/88-02 & 50-320/88-02 on 880111-14 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Noncompliances Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plan & Implementing Procedures,Program Audits & Records & Repts

ML20149G393
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	02/09/1988
From:	Keimig R, Madden T, Galen Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20149G385	List: IR 05000289/1988002 ML20149G381
References
50-289-88-02, 50-289-88-2, 50-320-88-02, 50-320-88-2, NUDOCS 8802180249
Download: ML20149G393 (5)

Text

._ . _ _ . ._ .. __

,

r ::r.n re  ;

'

i

. - . ..-..

3:

1?c h ' $ Wg-

<.::..:;.x)

-

'

.;.. ..~ 5 . $:a"-j. M Y - -

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N

. REGION I i

'

50-289/88-02 Report No /88-02

.

,, 50-289 '

Docket No .

DPR-50 i

License Nos. DPR-73  !

Licensee: Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2

.

Facility Name: Three Mile Island - Unit 1

Irspection At: Middletewn, Pennsylvania -

Inspection Conducted: January 11-14, 1988 j

Type of Inspedtio

R4utine Unannounced Physical Security I

'

)

Irspectors; w./

C Smith, Safeguards $pecialist Af I5 ~

,

M dat(

.

'

/

omm/ .

---

,T. Madden, Physical Security Inspector S 7 date l

l Approved by: _

l k dl> 9, / 4 PP

-

R. R. Keimig, Chief, Safe 4)41rds Section, da'te i Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards i Inspection Summa _ry: Routine Unannounced Physical Security Inspection on

Janua ry 11-14, 1968 (Report Nos. 50-289/88-02 and 50-320/88-02)

.,

i Areas Inspected: Plan and Implementing Procedures; Program Audits; Records j anc Reports; Physical Barriers - Protected Area; Physical Barriers - Vital Areas; Assessment Aids; Access Control - Personnel and Packages; Detection

] Aids; Alarm Stations; Training and Qualifications; and Communication . Results: The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas

? examine !

l r

i d

!,

'

,

8802180249 880210 I a PDR ADOCK 05000289 l

s.o-DCD -

-

'

,. ; w- j

'

i s

'

a DETAILS 1. Key Persons Contacted Licensee and Contractor Personnel:

J. Enders, Security, TMI-1 G. Brandt, Security, THI-1 D. Laudermilch, Support Training Manager R. Wells, TMI-2 Licensing Engineer S. Otte, TMI-1 Licensing Engineer C. Incorvati, TMI-1 Audit Manager U.S. Nu-lear Regulatory Commission Personnel:

R. Conte, Senior Resident Inspector The inspectors also interviewed other licensee and centractor security personne . Follow-up on Previously Identified Item (Closed) Unresolved _ Item (50-289/87-15-01, 50-320/87-11-01): Timely retrieval of security force training record source documents. During this inspection, the inspectors requested the source training c:cumer.ts for three Site Protection Officers, selected randomly, for the previous three year perio The licensee provided the requested records in a timely marner (within five hours). The records contained appropriate docuTentation for all training committed to in the NRC-approved Training and Qualification Pla . Security Plan and Implementing Procedures l l

Tne inspectors met with licensee representatives and discussed the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan (the Plan). As a result of these discassions, and a review of the Plan, it was determined that:

(a) one 10 CFR 50.90 change and one 10 CFR 50.54(p) change have been submitted to the NRC; (b) changes to incorporate the revisions required by the miscellaneous amendments, codified by the NRC on August 4, 1986, were submitted to the NRC, as require The inspectors informed the licensee that the changes are currently being reviewed by the NR All security personnel interviewed denonstrated familiarity with the Plan, Implementing Procedures and the NRC's performance objectives, i

. . . . . - . ._- - .- - -. .-

.

. , ,

3

. I 4, Security Program Audits -

i .

The inspectors reviewed security program audit reports and verified that

,

the audits had been conducted in accordance with the Plan, The review

'

included the response of the security organization to the audit findings and the corrective action taken to remedy any findings, The documented corrective actions appeared appropriate for the findings.

l Communications

<

The inspectors observed tests of all communication capabilities in'both l l the CAS and the SAS. Also, the inspectors reviewed testing records for '

. the various communication capabilities of the security force and found i'

l

,

them to be as committed to in the Plan.

Records and Recorts  !

!

'

The inspectors reviewed testing and matrte4*: .e records and records of security event The inspectors reviewed, and discussed with the licensee, all security

) events that had been reported to the NRC, in accordance witn 10 CFr 1 73.71(c), since Octcber 1987. No discrepancies were identified relative to repo ting the events or the actions take ,

i j Ehysical Barriers - (Protected Area)

i

, The inscecters condweted a ebysical inspection of the prctected area j

'

Oarrier. It was determined, by ceservation, that the barriers mere installed anc maintained as described in the Plan, j Physical Barriers - (Vital Areas)

$ The inspectors observed vital area barriers and determined them to be j iestalled ar -aintained as ccmmitted to in the Plan.

1

4 T:"- " n, 3 1,; r -- . . ,

j p .... . ..

-

i

• ~

'.

-

. . , '

- . .

l . . . . . . _ ,

.

!

1

) i i  !

!

!  !

!

i l

) '

?

l i

.- _ . - ._ - __ - . . .. - . - - . - . . _ . - - _ - - _ _ _ - - - = , - -

_ . _ _ _ - _ _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

,

.

.

,, ,. . - --. ... .- . . . . . . - . - a . , - ng

, . .,

The licensee agreed to conduct a review of all plant areas to ensure that similar conditions did not exis . Assessment Aids The inspectors observed the use of assessment aias in operation at both the Centrai and Secondary Alarm Stations (CAS and SAS).

.

~

- - . .. c- . . ,

.

.- 1 ' ll ,'

1 Access ceatrol - Personnel and Packages The inspectors reviewed the personnel and nackage access control procedures ano determined them to be as committed to in the plan. This determination was made by observing personnel access processing during shif t change, visitor access processing, and through discussions with the licensee about package access procedure . Detection Aids - Protected Area The inspectors observed the protected area perimeter detection aids and, 3 except as noted below, determined that they were installed, maintained, l and operated as committed to in the Pla l

w-i

.

.

.

4 O b y ,

l*,

.\ "7 ..d x ;$ _ ' , s y , M ,

'

. . _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - _ -

.

, 5

"

--

i ." . n . . m. ,,

I'

'

l,' .Y ,ff$?IECUfRD$

1. .

' e t l i'!!.H,jg

"" p y

-

. .

12. Alarm Stations The inspectors observed the operation of both the CAS and SAS and found them to be operating as committed to in the Pla I" ' ' " f,

' O + o . . ,3 g , , . , , ,

-m,~., ,,,~

'

~- .

. . kairir; and Qualification - General Requirements The inspe: tors reviewed source training records for three individual Tnese recorcs incluced a Site Protection Officer, a CAS/SAS Operator, and a superviso Tne inspectors determined that all required training had been concacted in accordance with the Plan and the Training and Qualifi-cation (T&Q) Plan and that it was properly documente Exit Interview The inspectors met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph I at the conclusion of the inspection on January 14, 1988. At that time, the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the findings were presente At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspectors l

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _