IR 05000277/1978030
| ML19270E994 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 12/05/1978 |
| From: | Greenman E, Mccabe E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19270E993 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-277-78-30, 50-278-78-33, NUDOCS 7901100460 | |
| Download: ML19270E994 (4) | |
Text
"
'
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT 50-277/78-30 Report No.
50-278/78-33
,
50-277 bocket No.
50-278 DPR-44 C
License No.
DPR-56 Priority
--
Category C
Licensee:
Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Facility Name:
Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Inspection at:
Delta, Pennsylvania Inspection conducted:
November 13-17, 1978 Inspectors:
//bw // / bur 9xMt J
/2/Tl-]n E. G. Greenrdn, Readtor Inspecfor~
date signed
~
E. C. McCabe. Jr., Chief. Reactor Projects Section No. 2, RO&NS Branch date signed Other Accompanying Personnel D. M. Verrelli, NRR LPM date signed Approved by:
C. C. (L Q.,1 b_
n.1 s l 7 7 E. C. McCabe, Jr., Chief, Reactor Projects date signed Section No. 2, RO&NS Branch Insoection Summary:
Inspection on November 13-17,1978 (Combined Report Nos. 50-277/78-30; 50-278/78-33)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection by an NRC regional based inspector of plant operations including tours of the facility; log and record reviews; revised inspection program coordination; observation of medical emergency drill; pre-briefing; drill and critiques; and, independent effort.
The inspection involved 22 hours2.546296e-4 days <br />0.00611 hours <br />3.637566e-5 weeks <br />8.371e-6 months <br /> at Unit 2 and 22 hours2.546296e-4 days <br />0.00611 hours <br />3.637566e-5 weeks <br />8.371e-6 months <br /> on site at Unit 3 by one NRC regional inspector and NRC regional management.
Resul ts:
No items of noncompliance were identified.
.
Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
7 9 0110 0W
.
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Principal Licensee Fepresentatives C. E. Anderson, Ope.ations Engineer B. Clark, Assistant Engineer - Maintenance
- R. Fleischmann, Assistant Station Superintendent N. Gazda, HP&C R. Hughes, Information Center J. Tucker, Information Center W. T. Ullrich, Station Superintendent Other licensee employees were contacted during the course of the inspec tion.
These included engineering personnel, reactor operators, shift supervision, security personnel, health physics personnel, con-tractor personnel (RMC - medical drill observers and administrative personnel).
denotes those present at the exit interview
2.
Loas and Records The following logs and records were reviewed pursuant to the licensee's administrative requirements.
Management review of logs was evidenced by frequent initialing of entries.
No unacceptable conditions were identified.
a.
Shift Supervision Log - November 1-15, 1978 b.
A0 Round Sheets - November 12-15, 1978 (Inside)
c.
A0 Round Sheets - November 13-15,1978 (Outside)
d.
P0 Round Sheets - November 12-15, 1978 e.
Operation Work and Information - November 3-17, 1978 f.
Unit 2 Jumper Log - current entries
Unit 3 Jumper Log - current entries
.
.
3.
Tours Facility tours were conducted at both Unit 2 and Unit 3 on numerous occasions during the course of this inspection.
Areas examined included the turbine building, reactor building, control room and exterior areas including access controls.
Inspections were conducted to determine the general state of cleanliness, housekeeping, adherence to fire protection guidelines and to observe plant conditions.
No significant fluid leakage was identified.
The inspector checked equipment status and operability and verified by comparison of selected control room instrumentation that limiting conditions for operation were being satisfied.
The status of off-normal alarms were discussed with various operating personnel.
Operators were knowledgeable of plant conditions regarding these alarms.
Minimum staffing require-ments were also verified based on control room manning.
The inspector selected an annunciated condition for the Unit 2 Standby Liquid Control System (SBLC) and confirmed by examination of instru-mentation in the facility and comparison of concentration and curves that the limiting conditions for operation were being satisfied.
Dis-cussions were held with a cognizant licensee representative regarding the status of several instrument drawers not secured in their respective cabinets, for example, TIP drawers and radiation monitoring instrumenta-tion.
The seismic qualification of drawers and cabinets for this configuration was discussed.
The licensee acknowledged the inspector's concerns.
Subsequent re-inspection indicated that all such drawers had been secured.
During tours of exterior areas, the inspector noted an open manway over one Diesel Generator Oil Storage Tank and an un-covered flange. The licensee secured this flange area. No unacceptable conditions were identified.
4.
Radiation Emergency Medical Drill The inspector attended a pre-briefing and critique of the licensee's Radiation Emergency Medical Drill.
On site aspects of the drill were observed in detail.
The drill postulated two men involved in an ac-cident situation involving a fork lift operation in the waste treatment area.
The individuals involved with the simulated situation were briefed with the scenario and moulages were used by the licensee for realism.
Outside contractor services were used, acting as umpires, and medical consultation was provided.
Inspector observations were limited to on-site activities.
No unacceptable conditions were identified with re-spect to PA audibility and clarity.
Disposition of any necessary cor-rections or improvements resulting from drill and review and manage-ment directives, including employee response, posting, contamination control, medical assistance (nurse), door control, response in high radiation areas, and PA announcements will be reviewed further during a subsequent inspection (277/78-30-01; 278/78-33-01).
,
.
5.
Miscellaneous On November 15, 1978, a meeting was conducted with a local media representative to discuss the Revised Inspection Program and de-ployment of a Resident Inspector at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power S ta tion.
6.
Exit Interview At periodic intervals during the course of this inspection, meetings were held with facility Senior Management denoted in Detail 1 to discuss inspection scope and findings.
Licensee representatives acknowledged inspection findings.