IR 05000247/1982027
| ML20028F148 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 01/13/1983 |
| From: | Dunlap J, Gody A, Madden W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028F139 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-247-82-27, NUDOCS 8301310187 | |
| Download: ML20028F148 (5) | |
Text
.
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No.
50-247/82-27 Docket No.
50-247 License No.
DPR-26 Safeguards Group IV Licensee: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
4 Irving Place New York, New York 10003 Facility Name:
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Inspection At:
Buchanan, N. Y.
Date of Last Physical Protection Inspection:
July 26-30, 1982 Type of Inspection:
Routine Unannounced Physical Protection n
It<pectors:
//
8,8
..
J Dunlap, Physical Protection Inspector d' ate
'
4. M L Jhin W.
. Madden, Physical Protection Inspector
' dat e'
/
//383 Approved by:
,
,
A W Gody, Chie g Safeg and Fuel Facilities j/ dap -
Section, Nuclear Materia and Safeguards Branch Inspection Summary:
Routine Unannounced Physical Protection Inspection on November 29 - December 3, 1982 (Report No. 50-247/82-27)
Included an inspection of the Physical Barriers (Protected Areas Inspec W ):and Vital A' ear ; Security System Power Supply; Lighting; Assessment Access Con'.rol (Personnel Packages and Vehicles); Detection Aids (Protected and Vital Arer3); Alarm Stations; and Communications. Also included followup to a previously identified violation. The inspection involved 74 inspector hours onsite by two NRC regional-based inspectors.
The inspection began during regular dayshift hours; 3 inspection hours were performed during the offshift period.
Results:
The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in 11 of the 12 areas inspected. One violation was noted; the failure to follow access control procedures.
8301310187 830117 PDR ADOCK 05000247 (D PDR
-
.
DETAILS 1.
Key Persons Contacted Kevin Burk, General Manager, Administrative Services
- Michael Blatt, Acting Director, Regulatory Affairs
- Michael Scotzko, Security Administrator Thomas Elsroth, Security Shift Supervisor
- denotes those present at exit interview The inspectors also interviewed other licensee personnel and members of
,
the Pinkerton contract guard force.
2.
30703B-Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives at the conclusion of the inspection on December 3, 1982.
At that time, the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the findings presented. Additionally, the commitments expressed by the licensee in paragraph 16 of this report were discussed and reaffirmed.
3.
81152B - Physical Barriers (Protected Areas)
No violations were noted. The licensee maintained the physical barriers surrounding the protected area in accordance with the physical security plan. The barriers were adequate and appropriate for the intended function.
4.
811548 - Physical Barriers (Vital Areas)
No violations were noted. The licensee maintained the vital area physical barriers in accordance with the Physical Security Plan. The barriers observed were of adequate construction and were appropriate for the intended function.
5.
81158B - Security System Power Supply No violations were noted. The licensee maintained an adequate power supply system to provide emergency power to physical security equipment, in accordance with security plan commitments. The power supply system was maintained and tested at the required intervals.
6.
81162B - Lighting No violations were noted.
The licensee's lighting of the isolation zones and protected area met the minimum illumination requirement contained in the security plan and was appropriate for its intended function. The lighting was sufficient to monitor and observe persons and activities within the protected area and isolation zones via closed circuit tele-vision or direct visual surveillance for existence of a threat or unau-thorized activitie.
.'
.
.
7.
81166B - Assessment Aids No violations were noted.
The assessment aids utilized by the licensee conformed to security plan requirements and were adequate and appropriate for their intended function.
8.
811708 - Access Control (Personnel)
THIS PARAGRAPH CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION, AND IS NOT BE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE, IT IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT'
BLANK.
9.
811728 - Access Control (Packages)
No violations were noted.
The licensee controlled the entry of packages and material to the protected area in conformance with the physical security plan. The search equipment used was adequate and appropriate for the intended function.
!
10. 811748 - Access Control (Vehicles)
'
No violations were noted.
The licensee controlled access of vehicles to the protected area and vital areas in conformance with the security plan and regulatory requirements.
Vehicles entering the protected area were l
properly searched and escorted.
l 11. 81178B - Detection Aids (Protected Area)
l No violations were noted. The perimeter intrusion alarm system detected penetration tests of the protected area and isolation zones, as required by the security plan.
l l
!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
______ ________ -_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
..
-
.
i 12.
811808 - Detection Aids (V. ital Areas)
No violations were noted. The licensee's intrusion detection system detected penetration tests of vital areas in accordance with the physical security plan.
13.
S1184B - Alarm Stations No violations were noted. The onsite central and secondary alarm stations (CAS/SAS) established by the licensee were maintained in conformance with security plan requirements.
14.
811888 - Communications No violations were noted. The internal and external communication links established by the licensee conformed to security plan requirements and were adequate and appropriate for their intended functions.
15.
927138 - Independent Inspection Effort - Safeguards During the inspection, the Site Ganeral Manager, Administrative Services, requested a meeting with the inspectors to review the site security program. During this meeting the General Manager related the following act;ons intended to enhance the effectiveness of the Physical Protection Prcgram:
a.
Exit Portal Radiation Monitors:
Whenever a radiation monitor alarms at a security exit point; security personnel on duty wil provide direct support of the Site Radiation Protection Program by:
(1) Summoning assistance from the health physics function t'.e.,-H. P.
Technician.
(2) Isolating and containing the material (s) person (s) suspected of being contaminated until arrival of the responding H. P.
'
Technician.
b.
Security Personnel Duty Performance Fitness:
The licensee has restricted the security contract organization to posting security guards for no more than 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> duty within a consecutive 24-hour period. The licensee intends to use the existing proprietary Security Shift Supervisor to monitor the contractor's compliance with this restriction.
c.
Security Personnel Supervision:
To improve supervisory controls of the contract security organi-zation, the licensee has directed that all security personnel assigned to security positions be checked by supervisors at least
.
.,. _
..
.
twice during each 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> duty period occuring during irregular hours.
The post checks will confirm personnel alertness, job knowledge and accomplishment of communications checks with the CAS/SAS.
d.
Security Organization Management The licensee will review all guard /watchperson positions required by the Security Program and then issue guidance in the form of an instruction to each guard /watchperson for each post. The guidance will address all security requirements in the form of duties and responsibilities and will be available to security personnel at their work locations. These instructions will be developed, approved and issued no later than January 15, 1983.
e.
Management Organization:
The licensee has directed the security contract organization to develop their organization structure so it is consistent with the workload requirements.
Span of control and supervision will follow designated lines of
authority. This project will be completed no later than 6-8 weeks after the current outage, f.
General Employee Security Education Training:
.
The licensee will review and upgrade the Annual Security Indoctrin-ation Training Program for all site employees granted non-escorted access privileges.
The program will be formalized to emphasize Access Controls, Locks and Keys, Physical Barriers, Lighting, Use of Alarms, and Response and Communications. This new program will be in place no later than 6-8 weeks after the current outage.
g.
Security Response / Computerized Access Control Program: The licensee will assure that the security organi-zation has the capability to access the security computer program to extract all investigatory data relevant to the receipt and resolution of unannounced alarms. The li.censee will also review the possibil-ities of upgrading._ security softwear and making the program more discriminatory in providing automated feedback to the CAS/SAS in terms of identifying the cause of alarms.
.