IR 05000213/1982010
| ML20053E895 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/21/1982 |
| From: | Elsasser T, Tanya Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053E890 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-213-82-10, NUDOCS 8206100187 | |
| Download: ML20053E895 (7) | |
Text
,
'
DCS Nos. 50213-820120
-
-
50213-820423 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report No.
50-213/82-10 Docket No.
50-213 Category C
License No.
DPR-61 Priority
--
Licensee:
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company P.O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06101 Facility Name:
Haddam Neck Plant Inspection at:
Haddam, Connecticut
Inspection conducte i arch 29 - May 9, 1982 Inspectors:
n +/u 5//3/S}
T.H. Smith, Senior Resident Inspector date signed date signed
>
/,
'
date signed Approved by:
[
/#M4e e'
I W/f2 T.C. Elsas'ser, Chief, Reactor Projects date signed Section 18, Division of Resident and Project Inspection Inspection Summary:
Inspection on March 29 - May 9, 1982 (Report No. 50-213/82-10)
Areas Inspected:
Routine inspections by the resident inspector of plant operations including tours of the facility, log and record review, Licensee Event Reports, review of periodic and special reports, surveillance, main-tenanc.e and onsite review committee activities. The inspection involved 76 hours8.796296e-4 days <br />0.0211 hours <br />1.256614e-4 weeks <br />2.8918e-5 months <br /> by the resident NRC inspector.
Results: No violations were identified.
r2061oo187 820524 PDR ADOCK 05000213 O
PDR Region I rorm 12 (Rev. April 77)
.
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted The below listed technical and supervisory personnel were among those contacted:
G.H. Bouchard, Maintenance Supervisor R.E. Brown, Operations Supervisor N.A. Burnett, Operating Assistant T.W. Campbell, Instrument and Control Supervisor H.E. Clow, Health Physics Supervisor J.H. Ferguson, Unit Supervisor
R.L. Gracie, Operations Assistant R.H. Graves, Station Superintendent G.R. Hallberg, Security Supervisor D.J. Ray, Engineering Supervisor R.Z. Test, Station Services Superintendent Other licensee staff and operating personnel were also interviewed during the course of the inspection.
2.
Shift Logs and Operating Records a.
The inspector reviewed selected operating logs and records against the requirements of the following procedures:
ADM 1.1-5, Control Room Operating Log;
--
QA 1.2-14.1, Bypass and Jumper Control;
--
N0P 2.2-2, Steady State Operation and Surveillance;
.
--
ADM 1.1-44, Shift Relief and Turnover;
--
QA 1.2-2.4, Housekeeping Requirements;
--
QA 1.2-16.1, Plant Infonnation Reports; and
--
QA 1.2-14.2, Equipment Control,
--
b.
Shift logs and operating records were reviewed to verify that:
Control Room log sheet entries are filled out and initialed;
--
--
Auxiliary log sheets are filled out and initialed; Control Room Log entries involving abnormal conditions provide
--
sufficient detail to comunicate equipment status, lockout status, correction and restoration;
.
_ _.
..
..
.--
.
.
Operating Orders do not conflict with Technical Specifications;
--
Plant Information Reports confirm there are no violations of
--
Technical Specification requirements; and Logs and records are maintained in accordance with Technical
--
Specifications and.he procedures noted above.
c.
The following operating logs and records were reviewed:
N0P 2.2-2, Log sheets which consist of Control Room, Part 1
--
and 2, Primary Side Surveillance Form, Secondary Side Surveillance Form, and Radiation Monitoring System Daily Log;
--
Shift Turnover Sheets.
Jumper Log. All active entries were reviewed.
--
Tag Log. All active entries were reviewed.
--
Control Room Operating Log.
--
Plant Operations Review Committee meeting minutes 82-17 to
--
82-26, covering the period March 4 to April 8,1982.
d.
No unsatisfactory conditions were identified.
3.
Review of Plant Operation - Plant Inspections a.
During the course of the inspection, the inspector conducted multiple tours of the following plant areas:
Control Room
--
Primary Auxiliary Building
--
Vital Switchgear Room
--
--
Diesel Generator Rooms Turbine Building
--
Intake Building
--
,
Control Point
'
--
l
--
Security Building Yard Areas
--
b.
The following observations /deterrinations were made:
Radiation protection controls. The inspector reviewed or
--
observed the following: Radiation Work Permits (RWP) in use, personnel compliance with RWP's, routine radiation area surveys, posting of radiation and high radiation areas, control of locked high radiation areas, and use of protective clothing and personal monitoring devices. No unsatisfactory
!
conditions were identified.
,
,
__.
.
. _.
.
.
Monitoring instrumentation. Control room instruments were
--
observed for proper operation, correlation between channels and that the displayed parameters were within technical specification limits. No unsatisfactory conditions were identified.
Equipment lineups. The inspector verified that selected valves
--
and breakers were in a position or condition required by the technical specifications.
Control room annunciators. Lighted annunciators were discussed
--
with control room operators to verify that the reasons for them were understood and corrective action, if required, was being taken. On average, only one or two annunciators were lighted on each control room visit.
Plant housekeeping controls.
Plant housekeeping controls were
--
observed including control and storage of flamable material, control of potential safety hazards and licensee action to control the spread of surface and airborne contamination. No unsatisfactory conditions were identified.
Fluid leaks, piping vibrations. All areas toured were examined
--
for evidence of fluid leaks and piping vibrations. None were found.
Fire protection / prevention. The inspector examined the condition
--
of selected pieces of fire fighting equipment. No unsatisfactory conditions were identified. Combustible materials were being controlled and were not found near vital areas. Selected cable penetrations were examined and fire barriers were found intact.
Cable trays were clear of debris.
Control room manning. The inspector verified that control room
--
manning requi.ements of the technical specifications were being met.
Several watch turnovers were observed by the inspector.
No unsatisfactory conditions were identified.
Security.
During the inspection, observations were made of plant
--
security including adequacy of physical barriers, access control, vehicle control, and searches. No unacceptable conditions were identified.
_.
-
- -
-
- - - -
-
.
.
,
.
.
4.
Review of Periodic and Special Reports Upon receipt, periodic and special reports submitted by the licensee pursuant to Technical Specification requirements were reviewed by the inspector. This review included the following considerations: the report includes the information required to be reported by NRC require-ments; planned corrective action is adequate for resolution of identified problems; determination whether any information in the report should be classified as an abnormal occurrence; and the validity of reported information. Within the scope of the above, the following periodic rports were reviewed by the inspector:
Monthly Operating Report 82-3 for the month of March,1982.
--
Annual Environmental Operating Report, Part B, for the period
--
January 1, 1981 to December 31,1981.
5.
Plant Maintenance During the inspection period, the inspector observed various maintenance and problem investigation activities. The inspector reviewed these activities to verify compliance with regulatory requirements, including those stated in the Technical Specifications; compliance with the administrative and maintenance procedures; compliance with applicable codes and standards; required QA/QC involvement; proper use of safety tags; proper equipment alignment and use of jumpers; personnel qualifi-cations; radiological controls for worker protection; fire protection; retest requirements and ascertain reportability as required by Technical Specifications. The following activities were included during this review:
Replace tube sheet divider plate of inboard heat exchanger of
--
emergency diesel generator 2B (MA 3201).
-- Inspect cooling water heat exchanger of emergency diesel generator 2B (MA 3176).
-- Perfonn preventive maintenance on diesel generator 28 air start motors (MA 3174).
No unsatisfactory conditions were identified.
6.
Surveillance Activities The inspector observed technical specification required surveillance testing of selected components and verified that:
testing was performed using approved procedures; the procedures were sufficiently detailed to assure performance of a satisfactory surveillance; test instrumentation was calibrated and in use; technical specification requirements were satisfied prior to the removal of the system from service; the test was
.-
-.
-.
_ _. -
. _.
.
._
_
._
.
__
.
-
-
__ _
_
-
....
.
.
performed by qualified personnel; and test results satisfied technical specification and test procedure requirements or identified deficiencies were reviewed and resolved by appropriate management personnel. The inspector witnessed performance of:
SUR 5.2-65, " Safety Grade Automatic Initiation of Auxiliary
--
Feedwater," dated April 15, 1982.
SUR 5.2-24 " Safeguards Equipment Timer Test," dated January 28,
--
1982.
'
No unsatisfactory conditions were identified.
7.
Licensee Event Reports (LER's)
The following LER's were reviewed to verify that the details of the event were clearly reported, including the accuracy of the description of the cause and the adequacy of the corrective action. The inspector determined whether further information was required, and whether there were generic implications. The inspector also verified that the reporting requirements of Technical Specifications and Station Administrative and Operating Procedures had been met, that appropriate corrective action had been taken and that the continued operation of the facility was conducted within Technical Specification limits.
82-02 Feedwater flow transmitter failed high. The loop 2 feedwater flow transmitter failed high due to a failed 400 cycle invertor. The failed invertor was replaced and the feedwater flow transmitter was returned to service.
82-03 Main steam line isolation valve failed surveillance test. The number one main steam line isolation valve did not move the required amount to satisfy the surveillance test acceptance criteria. The valve packing gland was adjusted and the valve was cycled successfully.
i 8.
Onsite Review Committee The inspector examined the onsite review functions conducted by the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) during the period of this report
'
to verify conformance with technical specifications and other regulatory requirements. This review included:
review group membership and
,
qualifications; review group meeting frequency and quorum. Activities
'
reviewed including proposed technical specification changes, noncompliance items and corrective action, proposed facility changes and proposed tests
'
and experiments conducted per 10 CFR 50.59, and other items required by technical specifications.
!
.,
. -
-
.
-
...
-. -
- - - -,..... _ -. - - - -.
..
.
.
. -. - - -
- -
....
.
.
The inspector attended a PORC Meeting on April 30, 1982 as a nonparticipant to observe the conduct of the meeting. The inspector also reviewed PORC meeting minutes from meetings 82-17 to 82-26 covering the period March 4 to April 8,1982.
No unsatisfactory conditions were identified.
9.
Exit Interview At periodic intervals during the course of the inspection, meetings were held with senior licensee management personnel to discuss inspection scope and findings.
!
1