IR 05000206/1987028
| ML13316B839 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/07/1987 |
| From: | Johnson P, Qualls P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13316B838 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-206-87-28, 50-361-87-30, 50-362-87-30, NUDOCS 8712220323 | |
| Download: ML13316B839 (4) | |
Text
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
Report Nos. 50-206/87-28, 50-361/87-30, 50-362/87-30 Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 License Nos. DPR-13, NPF-10, NPF-15 Licensee:
Southern California Edison Company P. 0. Box 800 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Facility Name:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, 3 Inspection at:
San Clemente, California Inspection Conducted:
November 2-6 and 27, 1987 Inspector:
ls,
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
. M. Q a s, Reactor Inspector Date Signed Approved By:
<
P. H.,U hnson, Chief ate Sgned Reactdr Projects Section 3 Inspection Summary:
Inspection on November 2-6 and 27, 1987 (Report Nos. 50-206/87-28, 50-361/87-30,'
50-362/87-30)
Areas Inspected:
Routine project inspection in the areas of training program implementation, nuclear safety concern program implementation, and follow-up of licensee Open Items review. Inspection procedures 41400, 41701, 30703, and 92701 were use Results:
Of the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie E11220323 87,2076 PDR ADOCK'
pDR
1. Persons Contacted
- H. E. Morgan, Station Manager
- S. W. McMahan, Assistant Maintenance Manager
- M. P. Short, Nuclear Training Manager
- J. A. Harmon, QA Supervisor
- C. Olvera, Independent Safety Engineering Group (ISEG)-Engineer
- W. M. Whaley, QA Training Coordinator
- R. D. Plappert, Compliance Engineer
- C. A. Couser, Compliance Engineer
- Attended exit meeting on November 6, 1987
In addition, other members of the licensee's Staff were contacted during the course of the inspectio. Training (Inspection Procedures 41701 and 41400)
The inspector reviewed the status of INPO accreditation of the training programs at San Onofre. The licensee completed final accreditation of all areas in late June 1987. The licensee has since been accorded full membership in the National Academy for Nuclear Trainin The inspector reviewed maintenance procedures detailing the job training requirements needed prior to performing maintenance, and the computerized listings available to the licensee's supervision for training review and verification. The licensee's procedures and computer systems appeared to be adequate to ensure that an employee is properly trained prior to performing a work activity. The easy access to the computer training listing appeared to be a very useful tool to allow licensee supervisors to check and verify employee training and qualifications prior to making work assignment The inspector had selected several plant events which had occurred to complete the inspection procedure. However, upon closer investigation none of the events selected appeared to have training as a significant factor. This portion of the inspection module will be completed during a later inspectio No violations or deviations were identifie. Inspector Follow-up on Previously Identified Items a. 50-206/87-06-02, Reporting of ESF Actuations (CLOSED)
Licensee procedure S0123-0-14 has been changed to be more specific about the reportability of ESF actuations. The licensee's policy has also been implemented as evidenced by the reports reviewed by the NRC subsequent to Inspection Report 87-06. This item is CLOSE b. 50-361/85-22-01, Correlation of Training Records (CLOSED)
The licensee uses a computer program to monitor and correlate employee training and job assignments. The report, called a TQRS
Report, provides a detailed status of an employees trainin This item is CLOSE c. 50-361/87-19-01 and 87-19-02, Maintenance Training (CLOSED)
The inspector reviewed the licensee's actions regarding training of maintenance workers and supervision.on documentation of work package steps which, for various reasons, were not completed. These items are CLOSE d. 50-362/86-33-01, Review of Technical Specifications Interpretations (CLOSED)
The licensee completed a review of the technical specification interpretations and determined that there were no interpretations which would require that the Technical Specifications be change The inspector reviewed 25 of the 111 interpretations and concluded that, in the sample reviewed, they were conservative and in accordance with NRC requirements and policies. Item 86-33-01 is CLOSED. The inspector noted however, that the interpretations book was not controlled by a licensee procedure and that many of the interpretations were reviewed by the compliance staff only. The inspector commented that the utility should consider making these more formally controlled, having the earlier interpretations reviewed for applicability, and having management review the Technical Specifications interpretations which are implemented. The licensee acknowledged the inspector's comment e. 50-362/87-04-02, ISEG Review of IE Notices (CLOSED)
The inspector reviewed the licensee's method of using the Independent Safety Engineering Group (ISEG) to review Information Notices as well as other operating event reports. The ISEG reviews each Notice or event, compares recommended actions against existing licensee practices, and then issues action letters, if require The ISEG also monitors actions and response times. The review appeared to the inspector to be independent. This item is CLOSE f. 50-362/87-21-01, Unsigned QC Witness Point (CLOSED)
The inspector reviewed, on November 27, 1987, the licensee's response to the violation. The actions completed appeared adequate to prevent recurrence. This item is CLOSE g. Allegation RV-87-A-051 (Nuclear Safety Concern 87-43) (OPEN)
Nuclear Safety Concern (NSC) 87-43 was also provided separately to the NRC, and treated as an allegation. The allegation board determined that the licensee's NSC program should be allowed to address this issue, related to control of fire barrier impairment The licensee originally scheduled actions to be complete in September 1987. The new projected completion date is February 198 This item will be followed up at that tim No violations or deviations were identifie.
Plant Tour During the inspection the inspector toured all three units at various times. The inspector noted no items of concer. Exit Meeting An exit meeting was held on November 6, 1987. The items listed in this report were discussed at that time.