IR 05000146/1986001
| ML20212Q126 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saxton File:GPU Nuclear icon.png |
| Issue date: | 08/28/1986 |
| From: | Elsasser T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20212Q121 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-146-86-01-MM, 50-146-86-1-MM, NUDOCS 8609040009 | |
| Download: ML20212Q126 (18) | |
Text
I"
, .
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No.: 86-01 Docket No.: 50-146 License No.: DPR-4 Licenseo: Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation
-
100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, New York 07054 Facility Name: Saxton Nuclear Experimental Facility Meeting At: Region I Office, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania Meeting Conducted: July 25, 1986 NRC Personnel: See Meetin ep Details Approved By: .
T. C. Elsay nW -
hief, Reactor Projects Section 3C 8h/N Date'
Meeting Summary:
Special licensee requested meeting on July 25, 1986 between representatives of GPU Nuclear Corporation, in behalf of Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation, and NRC Region I staff members to discuss current operations at the Saxton Nuclear Experi-mental Facility and planned liquid waste removal (water discharge) activities.
^
8609040009 860828
{DR ADOCK 05000146 PDR
,, ._. _. - -
.
. .
DETAILS 1. Meeting Attendees GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPUN)
Mr. J. R. Thorpe, Director - Licensing and Regulatnry Affairs Mr. R. J. McGoey, Manager, PWR Licensing Mr. J. C. Auger, PWR Licensing Engineer Nuciear Regulatory Commission Mr. D. R. Haverkamp, Project Engineer, Reactor Projects Section 3C Mr. J. A. Schumacher, Reactor Engineer, Reactor Projects Section 3C Mr. R. L. Nimitz, Senior Radiation Specialist, Facilities Radiation Protection Section, DRSS Mr. H. J. Bicehouse, Radiation Specialist, Effluents Radiation Protection Section, DRSS 2. Discussion On July 25, 1986, a meeting was held at the NRC Region I office to discuss current operations at the Saxton Nuclear Experimental Facility and planned liquid waste removal (water discharge) activities. The meeting had been re-quested by licensee representatives to brief the NRC Region I staff of (1) near-term plans for disposal / discharge of groundwater from the radioactive waste disposal facility (RWDF) and pipe tunnel at Saxton, (2) subsequent characterization and contamination control of the RWDF basement and pipe tunnel, (3) future longer-term plans for decontamination / dismantlement of the RWDF, control and auxiliary building, refueling tank and filled drum storage area enclosure bunker, and (4) the status of plans for the containment vessel.
Licensee representatives commenced the meeting with a discussion of the pur-i pose of the briefing, a summary of recent conversations with NRC Headquarters licensing staff personnel, and a summary of discussions with other parties including State and local officials and the public. Following this introduc-
.
tion, the licensee representatives presented an overview of the Saxton plant
!
'
history, facility layout, and current status. Ensuing discussions focused on those Saxton activities which licensee representatives considered could be performed under the Technical Specifications definition of allowed "Prin-cipal Activities." Discussions also focused on the licensee's plans for dis-posal/ discharge of groundwater and touched briefly on future activities, as l enumerated above.
The licensee representatives provided NRC Region I staff members with a writ-ten agenda for the July 25, 1986 meeting, a one pag'e background summary of the Saxton Nuclear Experimental Facility, a three page chronological record of SNEC, and other background information and sketches (figures). The docu-ments provided by the licensee are attached to this meeting report. Shortly following the licensee /NRC Region I meeting, by letter dated July 30, 1986 l
l l
!
i
'
i
. .
from SNEC to Mr. James Flescher, Chief, Pennsylvania Department of Environ-mental Resources, the licensee described their plans for removing groundwater from the basement of the RWDF and attached pipe tunnel, and requested permis-sion from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to dispose of this water to the Juniata River. A copy of this letter was sent to Mr. T. Elsasser of the NRC Region I staff. As this letter provides further details of information pre-sented during the licensee's July 25, 1986 meeting with NRC Region I personnel, a copy of that letter is also attached to this report.
Subsequent to the July 25, 1986 meeting, telephone conversations occurred between Mr. J. Auger, GPUN and Mr. D. Haverkamp, NRC Region I on August 13 and 14, 1986. Mr. Auger indicated that the next routine quarterly surveil-lance of the Saxton facility would be conducted on August 18 and 19, 1986, and that State representatives would be at the facility on August 20, 1986 for an orientation / site familiarization tour. Mr. Auger noted that NRC Region I personnel would be welcome to also accompany the tour. Mr. Haverkamp in-formed Mr. Auger that cognizant Region I personnel were unavailable to parti-cipate, although participation could be arranged for the next Saxton monitor-ing in October / November 1986, provided more notice (at least two weeks in advance) was given.
The NRC Region I staff considered that the licensee's efforts surrounding the July 25, 1986 meeting were effective in establishing NRC Region I awareness of current and planned activities at the Saxton facility. NRC Region I will monitor the radiological aspects of these activities and will conduct inspec-tions, as appropriate and necessary to ensure that the licensee maintains their apparent concern and consideration for public health and safety.
!
!
(
i l
l
. __
_
. _ _
I ' .
.
.. .
'
July 25, 1986 MEETING WITH NRC CONCERNING SAXTON AGENDA I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of Briefing B. Discussions with NRC C. Discussions with other parties (Local and State Officials, Public)
II. SAXTON PLANT OVERVIEW A. History B. Layout C. Current Status III. ACTIVITIES PERFORMED UNDER TECH. SPEC. ALLOWED
" PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES" A. Tech. Spec. Definition of " Principal Activities" B. Activities Under Heading " Periodic Inspections" 1. Surveys 2. Corrosion studies 3. Sampling 4. Characterization o Depth of radioisotopic infiltration o Bond strength of radioisotopes to material
! o Material strength / condition analysis l
l
!
, .
l 3734f
-
i
-.
. . -. . - _
. -- .- - -. -
.
?
..
July 25, 1986 MEETING WITH NRC CONCERNING SAXTON AGENDA (continued)
C, Activities Under Heading " Maintenance" 1. Repair / replace degraded structures / equipment 2. Treatment of material for preservation 3. Structure / equipment disassembly for characterization / preservation 4. Contamination control 5. Maintain or gain adequate access to buildings / equipment IV. DISPOSAL / DISCHARGE OF GROUNDWATER FROM RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY (RWDF) AND PIPE TUNNEL A. Source of Water B. Amount of Water C. Need to Recove from Basement and Tunnel D. Water Quality 1. Radiological 2. Non-Radiological E. Method of Disposal / Discharge F. PaDER Water Quality Control Bureau Approval G. Characterization / Contamination Control of RWDF Basement and Pipe Tunnel V. FUTURE ACTIVITIES AT SAXTON A. Continue Work Allowed under Current Plant Tech. Specs.
B. Future Decontamination / Dismantlement of RWDF, Control and Auxiliary Building, Refueling Tank, and Filled Drum Storage Area Enclosure Bunker C. Status of Plans for the Containment Yessel
_
3734f
_
-
y , w. m ,
e-.+ - - y. -,,-,- - , --,,. - - - - - - - . , , - , - , - - - - - . - , a---e- -
.
.
,
SAXTON NUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL FACILITY OWNER - Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation, a non-profit corporation, whose shares are held by three GPU System companies as follows: Jersey Central Power & Light, 44 percent; Metropolitan Edison Company, 32 percent; Pennsylvania Electric Company, 24 percent. l LOCATION - Liberty Township, Bedford County, Pennsylvania. i Situated north of Saxton Borough along the Raystown Branch of the Juniata River.
REACTOR TYPE - Pressurized water reactor, which attained a maximum electrical generating capacity of approximately 7 megawatts (20 megawatts thermal). Used both plutonium and uranium as fuel.
PURPOSE - Was used for research and development for the Westinghouse Electric Corp. Much of the experimental work done is reflected in the design of currently operating plants. The facility was also used by many other electric utilities for operator training during the early years of commercial nuclesr power.
SITE STRUCTURES - Reactor containment building, control and auxiliary building, radioactive waste disposal building and former staging facility for shipping low level radioactive waste still exist. The reactor containment building is made of eleven-sixteenth inch steel and extends approximately 50 feet above ground and 50 feet below ground. Some structures have been removed.
CURRENT STATUS - In a "mothb'alled" condition. Fuel core has been removed and shipped away from the site. All equipment inside the reactor containment building, including the defueled reactor vessel, remains intact. License expires February 11, 2000.
l l
{ '
l l
l
3432f I
. _ _ _ _
II...
.
Page 1 of 3 CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD OF SAXTON NUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL CORPORATION Dec. 31,1958 - Letter from Westinghouse setting forth firm basis of understanding - signed by Mr. E. W. Morehouse.
Jan.14,1959 - Information letters sent to Senator Clinton Anderson, Mr.
McCone, Mr. Ramey, and Dr. Pittman by Mr. Morehouse.
Ma r. 12, 1959 - Information letter sent to Dr. Pittman by Mr. R. L. Wells, General Manager, Westinghouse Atomic Power Department.
Mar. 17, 1959 - First draf t of Preliminary Hazards Summary Report review with AEC Hazards Evaluation Branch.
May 4, 1959 - Order of Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, Pennsylvania, approving Charter consisting of Articles of Incorporation, and the Certificate of Registration of Corporate name.
June 4, 1959 - Revised draft of Description and Characteristics of Site reviewed with AEC Hazards Evaluation Branch.
June 8, 1959 - First Board Meeting of Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation: Adopted Corporate Seal, By-Laws, Common Stock Certificate, elected Chairman of the Board, Officers, Executive Committee, and appointed General Manager of Project.
'
June 8, 1959 - Agreement executed between Saxton and the four domestic operating companies of GPU.
July 24, 1959 - Application for Construction Permit and Operating License filed with AEC, Division of Licensing & Regulation.
(Letter of July 31, 1959 frcm AEC, Mr. E. R. Fleury, assigned Docket No. 50-146 to above application.)
July 27, 1959 - Agreement executed between Saxton and Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
.
(Mr. C. H. Rice advised on July. 27, 1959 that Westinghouse assigned to Saxton Project General Order AL ( Allentown)
80,000.)
Aug. 18, 1959 - Application to the Securities & Exchange Commission under Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (Form U-1) filed.
Sept. 3, 1959 - Application for a ruling as to Federal income tax aspects of Saxton filed with Office of the Collector of Internal
'
,
Revenue.
,
3432f
.- -_ -. - , - _ _ _. -_ . - _ _ _ _ _
{N
,-
.
. .
Page 2 of 3 Chronological Record of Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation Sept. 10, 1959 - Application for Construction Permit and Operating License reviewed by AEC Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
Oct. 2, 1959 - Application to Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission by Metropolitan Edison Company, dated October 2,1959.
Oct. 5, 1959 - Application to Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission by Pennsylvania Electric Company, dated October 5,.1959.
Oct. 5, 1959 - Amendment No.1, dated October 2,1959, to Application for Reactor Construction Permit and Operating License, filed with AEC (re allocation of fuel).
Oct. 23, 1959 - Application to Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey by New Jersey Power & Light Company and Jersey Central Power & Light Company, dated October 22, 1959.
Oct. 29, 1959 - Amendmen No. 2, dated October 23, 1959, to Application for Reactor :onstruction Permit and Operating License, filed with AEC (re: By-Laws of Saxton, excerpts from Board
. Meetings of four domestic operating companies and Saxton, and unanimous consent of Saxton Board).
Nov.13,1959 - Notice of formal hearing by AEC on SNEC Application for Construction Permit published in Federal Register.
Feb.11,1960 - Received Construction Permit from AEC Feb. 15, 1960 - Excavation for the Reactor Containment Building started.
Nov. 18, 1961 - AEC issued Provisional Operating License April 13,1962 - Initial Criticality of Reactor Nov. 1962 to - Electrical Generation May 1972 April 16,1969 - Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of SNEC and Order of Berks County Court of Common Pleas amending the corporate existence for a term of 15 years commencing May 4, 1959. ( Attached to copy of Articles of Incorporation -
Folder 1).
May 1, 1972 - Final Shutdown r
A 3432f
. --_ . . -- ._ __ - ___
N . o. .
s.
Page 3 of 3 Chronological Record of Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation July 1972 to - Nuclear Fuel and other removable special nuclear materials November 1972 shipped offsite to the AEC's Savannah River facility in South Cirolina.
April 8,1974 - Shareholder Member Consent amending the Corporate existence to "in perpetuity".
March 29,1974 - Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of SNEC filed with the PA Dept. of State dated 3-29-74, amending Paragraph Fourth thereof to read "The corporation is to exist in perpetuity."
.
i 3432f i. .
' *
_.. - , . . . - - - - _ _ - _ _ ,
I .. .
>. ..- ., 3 c. c cem - . . .
.~n&hze. Ow .
.
ye n.
,w
..~ _ .: a,m. e u. g,. ~ h .
. , . -. .+. . w t. a. .. < , n . g%
g. . * .k Y'
.
. . . .
r ,
.
- . Y '$ Q $. .
. . .
. m
~
s - ~ ;. , k$ '$ . 4
.
.
- -~-
'
GOOe .NE>J_
Saxton Nuclear - ; *+9atal Corporation Introduction The Saxton nuc! ear power plant was a pioneer in the deve!opment of this country's nuc! ear energy. program.
Primarily a research and training reactor, Saxton operated 10 years, from 1962 to 1972, and provided valuable information on operations and training to General Pub!!c Utilities Corporation (GPU) and the domestic nuclear energy industry.
Saxton is owned by the Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation, a subsidiary of GPU. The p: ant is currently under the administration of GPU Nuclear Corporation, GPU's nuc! ear operations subsidiary. Three other GPU subsidiaries own Saxton: Jersey Central Power & Light Company,44 percent; Metropolitan Edison Company,32 percent, and Pennsylvania Electric Company, 24 percent.
Although Saxton was a research and training reactor, the electricity it produced was used cy the GPU System. In the 10 years it ocerated. Saxton prcduced more than 9G.000 megawatthours of electricity. Its maximum generating capaci: ty was 7 megawatts. By comparison, some of today's nuclear power p! ants have generating capacities of 1,000 megawatts or more.
Many of GPU Nuc: ear's operations and management personnel receivec their training at the Saxton p! ant.
Currently, the olant is shut down. The uranium fuel rods were removec in 1972 and shiccea to the federal facility at Savannah River, S. C.
t
- - .
f.
.
..
,
-2-
.
'
What remains at Saxton are the building that housed the reactor, the control and auxiliary building, the radioactive waste disposal building, a water storage tank, and an earthen structure that was used to stage waste before it was shipped off site.
The next steo GPU plans to ask the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) for permission to spend dismantlement funds on a nine-month project,
'
beginning in 1986 and extending into 1987, to decontaminate and dismantle four of the five buildings on the site at a cost of $1.5 million.
These funds already have been collected and are being held in escrow.
The project also includes draining approximately 250,000 gallons of water from the basement of the radioactive waste disposal building and releasing the water into the Raystown Branch of the Juniata River. The water has seeped into the basement of the building from the surrounding groundwater.
The level of radioactivity in the water is well below NRC discharge limits. From a radiological standpoint, the water r.1eets stringent drinking water standards set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Before it is released to the river, the water will be tested and, if necessary, processed. ,
Reactor Buildina The work currently proposed does not include the large dome-topped reactor building. A study completed by GPU Nuclear in 1984 showed that pitting of the steel surfaces below ground level could occur between 1993 and 2006. To verify the earlier study, GPU Nuclear will repeat the analysis in 1987.
, _. - - . . -
d -
] cl(LcGirlATIOt 1-- c peiice .
~
--
I 131t tra totIDE. ,
s. 4 x , -- n x x --- -e ,,--- 4 s.
. a a AFET'f lillE1CTIOtl/ _ . _ . . _ . .
g
/N REFUELINC TAflK *
al
'
1L \ u
,
%_-
g __...__,
= CONTAltlMEN i '
=
i !
"
\r:ODEL
>
v Pipe TLINt1EL ,,
,
,
, I L_T
, o I7AD. Y/ASTE ~
I-g
-
, DIDPotAL CCITT AOL <f AllX. r FAclLITY
-
l
"
C,UILDINCs l~1 L 1._I II .
~
T" . _
_
._
d
_
- ,
,
FILLED ontitA c,TOFIAO& ,
AitEA
.
-
'
k ~ 4 % - ): - JL M-
.,9.iIe .h61 alt /FAClLITY FIGilitE 1
"SAXTON SITC I'LAN"
.
.
.
'o )'-
.
"$ l W
U u k u, so il 3 0 d 4 .g_ =
g E E a #
X
V #
h /
4
.ls
=d n
. . , *
w $
c N e
g 8 a e4N - a e .
.: a e J
-
eI J
EJ p y F.
J d
di I I d
,,
--
- j. .- . . . . .
.
.,
--- .
.
%
,
__. ! - -
a
- ,
l
-
4 0
. ;-
l s. :
-
l .
--
,- ., -- t,
'
I I
,..
= .mo e3 g y .
O
$
, . , * 1
-
- t
.
- .
. .'
.
k
. u
. W e.
,.
\ h a>
.: -.
e
7 T '
8 .
'
0 - t 6i '.
.J e =
l 4 e a t >
t
,
O y .
,e
. . . . . ,
i g s ,
,
. .- .e , ' , - -
.- .
e4
. . .,-
l 6 o
.
h
8
.*
'
-
O'
e e.;.
6 /
J ad '
c $ s
/ '
__
-
-
.
.
uE SAXTON NUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL CORPORATION GENERAL P U B LIC UTILITIES SYSTEM G Jersey Central Power & Light Cornpany P SNEC Pennsylvania Electric Company Wropolitan Edison Company PE JC.
TELEDHONE:
MAluNG ADDRESS: July 30,1986 201 263-6500 100 INTERPACE PARKWAY 5230-86-2061 PARSlPPANY, N.J. 07054 Mr. James Flesher, Chief Pa. Department of Environmental Resources Bureau of Water Quality Control One Ararat Boulevard Harrisburg, PA 17110
Dear Mr. Flesher:
The Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation (SNEC) owns a defueled Thenuclear purpose facility located in Liberty Twp., Bedford County, Pennsylvania.
of this letter is to describe SNEC's proposal for removing groundwater from the basement of the Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (RWDF) and attached pipe tunnel and request permission from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania t dispose of this water to the Juniata River.
Since then groundwater has The pisnt was partially decommissioned in 1974. At infiltrated into the basement of the RWDF and connecting pipe tunnel.
250,000 gallons of water within these present, there is approximately 1 is a summary of radiological and non-radiological structures. Attachment As demonstrated in Attachment 1, the radiological parameters of this water. characteristics of this water are within Federal (10 CFR for discharge.
Incidentally, in regard to requirements necessary for drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act, the quantity of Tritium found was one-quarter the allowable maximum, while the quantity of Cesium-137 was fou to be within the limits. Both Tritium and Cesium-137 values were well below the maximum permissible concentrations (MPC) allowed under Title 25 Chapter 227.25 Based upon the specific water quality criteria for the Raystown Branch of the Juniata River given in Title 25 Chapter 93.7, the data those non-radiological chemical parameters of the water demonstrates that should the water be pumped out of would have no adverse environmental impact the RWDF basement and pipe tunnel.
In order to continue the decommissioning program on the RWDF, the Department the water must grant SNEC be removed. It is therefore requested that the RWDF basement and pipe tunnel and discharge this permission to pump out Due to the low water into the Raystown Branch of the Juniata River.
radioactive isotopic composition and favorable chemical characteristics ii of this water, we do not believe pretreatment would produce any sign f improvement in water quality. We will water into a tank and sample each tank and volume before discharge.
have a standby filter system available to remove radiological constituents
.
(_
.
.
5230-86-2061
-
2- July 30, 1986 should it become necessary. This system will ensure that the radiological constituents of the water will be below the allowable discharge concentrations allowed under 10 CFR 20 and Title 25 Chapter 227.25. We will provide you with a report on the discharge after completion of the pumping.
Subsequent to the removal of the water, there will be a need to maintain dry structures by pumping any subsequent water which infiltrates in. The need for keeping these structures dry is to allow work on the characterization, maintenance, decommissioning and dismantlement of the RWDF and pipe tunnel.
It is thus requested that the Department grant SNEC permission to discharge that additional water since it will only be groundwater and thut will meet the Pennsylvania Water Quality Standards.
I trust you will find this information adequate to render a favorable decision for the discharge of the RWDF basement and pipe tunnel water. Should you require further information in regard to this subject, please contact Mr.
Thomas A. Grace at (717) 948-8793.
Sincerely, Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation
,
f WW0 R. W. Heward, Jr.
President RWH/ TAG /bth CC:T. Elsasser - U.'S. NRC R. Sell - U. S. Army Corps of Engineers T. Gerusky - PADER D. Tondi - U. S. NRC M. Shanbecky - U. S. NRC 06189/13/14
i n
, .
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 3
! SAXTON RWDF WATER DATA SUP91ARY .
i l Non-Radiolo;ical Information:
} Sample i Lot No. Sample Identification i
i 1 84-08719 RWDF, 1984 , Uncirculated Water l 136702 RWDF, 5/30/86, Uncirculated Water
'
137569 RWDF, North, 6/24/86, Circulated Water 137570 RWDF, South, 6/24/86, Circulated Water 137571 RWDF, Elevator Room, 6/24/86, Circulated Water 137572 Juniata River, 6/24/86 i Sample No.
Non-Radiological Analysis Parameter 84-08719 136702 137569 137570 137571 137572
'
Acidity (mg/l CACO3 ) -
0 0 0 0 7.73 pH 7.85 8.37 7.85 7.72 7.69 6.05 Alkalinity (mg/l CACO3) -
88.0 89.6 89.0 86.2 7.00 Chloride (mg/1) 3.75 3.6 5.3 4.9 6.2 5.3 Sulfate (mg/l) 285 180 181 181 175 169 Nitrate-Nitrogen (mg/l NO3-N) -
1.3 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Flouride (mg/1) -
0.25 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.17 Phosphate-Phosphorus (mg/l PO4 -P) <1.0 0.02 0.017 0.020 0.018 <0.010 Total Suspended Solids (mg/1) 7 1 7 2 1 26 Total Dissolved Solids (mg/1) -
417 423 416 416 269
,
- (-) indicates sample analysis unavailable at time of submittal, i Notes: (1) Uncirculated water was sampled without agitation.
(2) Circulated water was sampled after the water was completely agitated by a 400 gpm pump.
(3) Water quality of pipe tunnel water is the same as RWDF water as determined by analysis of
- radiological constituents.
-. - -- . . -. ..-. . .- -.. .- . . . .
. .
p Page 2 of 3 . ..
,
Non-Radiological 137571 137572 84-08719 136702 137569 137570 Analysis Parameter 418 430- 422 417 298 Total Solids (mg/1) -
105 160
134 104 103 104
]
Hardness (mg/l CACO 3) 375 646 641 633 631 634
! Conductivity (umhos/cm) 7 7
<5 <5 <5 COD (mg/l) -
0.20 3.17 l Total Aluminum (mg/1) - <0.1 0.45 0.45
!
0.001 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 Total Arsenic (mg/1) -
0.039 Total Barium (mg/1) - 0.020 0.022 0.018 0.020
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Total Cadmium (mg/1) -
37.4 Total Calcium (mg/1) - 31.8 31.5 31.6 31.7
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Total Chronium (mg/1) -
0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Total Copper (mg/1) -
0.35 1.21 Total Iron (mg/1) <0.1 0.31 0.59 0.48 0.007 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.002
] Total Lead (mg/1) -
6.2 16.1 Total Magnesium (mg/l) - 6.0 6.0 6.1
{ 0.02 0.013 0.012 0.009 1.56 l
Total Manganese (mg/1) -
i
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 Total Mercury (mg/1) -
0.102 l
Total Nickel (mg/1) - <0.01 0.015 0.002 0.001 i
0.002 <0.001 0.003 0.001 < 0.001 i Total Selenium (mg/1)q -
<0.01 Total Silver (mg/1) - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 i
28.0 25.8 25.8 26.0 26.1 3.1 l Total Sodium (mg/1)
i 0.05 0.066 0.038 0.035 0.190 i Total Zinc (mg/1) -
I Turbidity (NTUs) 28 6.5 - - - -
- (-) indicates sample analysis unavailable at time of submittal .
i i
I
!
i
_
_ . - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ -
- _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . .
_
__ ___
. .
Page 3 of 3 ", ,
Radiological Information:
Sample Lot No. Sample Identification 84-0668 RWDF,1934, Uncirculated Water 66671 RWDF, 5/30/86, Uncirculated Water 033572 RWDF, 6/24/86, North, Circulated . Water 033573 RWDF, 6/24/86, South, Circulated Water 033574 RWDF, 6/24/86, Elevator _ Room, Circulated Water 68944 Juniata River, 6/24/86 Sample No.
Radiological 66671 033572 033573 033574 68944 LLD 84-0668 LLD Analysis Parameter
-
i -
5.2 E-06 4.1 E-07 - -
i H-3 (uCi/ml) <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Sr 90 (uCi/ml) 5.7 E-08 <LLD 1.0 E-09 <LLD
- - -
-
-
Ag-110m (uCi/ml) 1.0 E-07 <LLD -
<4.0 E-09 <4.0 E-09 <4.0 E-09 <4.0 E-09
>
(uCi/ml) 7.5 E-08 <LLD 1.0 E-09 <LLD
<5.0 E-09 Co-58 1.0 E-09 <LLD <4.0 E-09 <4.0 E-09 <3.0 E-09 Co-60 (uCi/ml) 1.1 E-07 <LLD
<4.0 E-09 <4.0 E-09 <4.0 E-09 8.2 E-08 <LLD 1.0 E-09 <LLD <4.0 E-09 Cs-134 (uCi/ml) 6.0 E-08 1.62 E-07 1.66 E-07 1.67 E-07 <4.0 E-09 Cs-137 (uCi/ml) 2.1 E-07 1.0 E-09 <2.2 E-08 2.0 E-08 <LLD <2.3 E-08 <2.5 E-08 <2.2 E-08 I-131 (uCi/ml) 5.9 E-08 <LLD 2.6 E-07 2.2 E-07 2.4 E-07 2.4 E-09 (uCi/ml) 2.7 E-07 1.0 E-08 1.5 E-07 1.1 E-09 Grc:c. Beta 6.6 E-09 6.6 E-09 4.1 E-09 Gross' Alpha (uCi/ml) 2.0 E-09 <LLD
! * (-) indicates sample analysis unavailable at time of submittal.
I I
-- _ - - -