IR 05000029/1988025
| ML20235J153 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yankee Rowe |
| Issue date: | 02/15/1989 |
| From: | Russell W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Kadak A YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235J155 | List: |
| References | |
| EA-89-011, EA-89-11, NUDOCS 8902240191 | |
| Download: ML20235J153 (4) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:y y - .
- -
-g'~ m y - - -~ % ^;m l
- p
.
, . , %g.
Q( 4.' ,p- , W .),
,em y a,, Q '; > f February 15, 1989 i: +
' Docket No.
50-29 a-l ^ License No. DPR-3 L' EA 89-11
Yankee Atomic Electric Company-ATTH: Dr. Andrew C.:Kadek, President-and Chief-Operating Officer . 580 Main' Street-Bolton,. Massachusetts,01740-1398 j
_ 3entlemen: , a . SUBJECT: NOTICE.0F VIOLATION ' (NRC Inspection Report No.- 50-29/88-25) .This refers to:the'special-NRC safety inspection conducted on December 27-30c 1988, at the Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Rowe, Massachusetts to review the circumstances-associated with a violation of a technical specification: limiting; condition for operation (LCO) which was identified as a result 'of your operating - and. engineering Lstaff's review of a planned modification at the. facility. The-violation was promptly reported to the NRC. The report of the inspection was sent to you on January 19, 1989. On January 27, 1989,'an enforcement. conference "was conducted with you and members of your staff to discuss the violation, its causes, and your corrective action.
.The violation, which is described in the enclosed Notice of Violation, involved operation of the reactor at low power for indeterminate periods of (time prior to November 1988 with certain reactor protective system power range - and. intermediate power range neutron flux trip values less conservative than the limiting safety system settings required by the technical specifications.
The violation' existed during certain startups and shutdowns of the' reactor, and resulted from improper adjustments by a reactor operator to the fine gains on these' power range and intermediate power range neutron flux instruments.
These adjustments were.made so as to avoid an unnecessary reactor' trip; . however, the adjustments were made without recognizing that they resulted in certain. trip values being less conservative than the settings described in the technical specifications.
The safety significance of this violation was minimized by the fact that other instruments provided backup trips which would have shutdown the reactor prior Lo'any of the required. safety settings being exceeded, although not all of those trips are credited in the safety analysis.
Nonetheless, the NRC is . concerned that these adjustments to safety related instrumentation were made even though procedures lacked guidance concerning gain adjustments during plant startup and shutdown evolutions, and these adjustments had not been covered in training programs.
Furthermore, although there was no caution in the appropri-ate procedure, the operator (s) who made these adjustments did not exhibit a suf ficiently inquisitive attitude toward the making of equipment adjustments without appropriate procedural controls and in this case without adequate OFFICIAL RECORD COPY CP PKG YANKEE R0WE - 0001.0.0 -, 02/14/39 i s 8902240191 890215 PDR ADOCK 05000029 U - O PDC U I\\ f- ... . ~
. . . . . . ! Yankee Atonic Electric Company
knowledge of the full effects of the adjustments.
In addition, the oversight provided by shift supervision and shift technical advisors during the startup and shutdorn evolutions was not sufficient to identify these deficiencies.
The NRC recognizes that this violation appears tt constitute an isolated departure from an otherwise conservative ope"ating philosophy at this facility, as evidenced by Category 1 ratings in the operations area during the six prior SALP assessment periods.
Nonetheless, these adjustments to nuclear instrumentation without appropriate procedural controls represents a signifi-cant regulatory concera, and therefere, is classified at 3everity Level III in accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Apoendix C (1988) (Enforcement Policy).
Although a civil pent.lty is considered for a Severity Level III violation, I have been authorized, after consultation with the Director, Office of ( Enforcement, and the Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Materials Safety, Safeguards, and Operations Support, not to issue a civil penalty in this case because (1) the violation was identified by your staff' and promptly reported to the NRC; (2) your corrective actions upon identification were prompt and extensive; and (3) your prior enforcement history has been good, as evidenced by the prior Category I SALP ratings in the operations area.
You are required to respond to this letter and the enclosed Notice and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.
In your response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter and the enclosed Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511.
l l
Sincerely, l l Or4" 3 Si nnd By
. JSLLL - - . William T. Russell Regional Administrator Enclosure: Notice of Violation , __ _ _ _
ffYhf _,N f I' 'il ' ' ' Y ?/ ' , ' <
Wil'#r h A ' , , I i: ' ipf,'(/ ' h l ' f _ p,_ -; ". ' -
., ..m.
., b,//l . ,. . . 3J j Yankee' Atomic' Electric Company fis y , l cc w/ enc 1: . . . B. Drawbridge,.Vice President and. Manager of Operations , a .N. St. Laurent, F* tant Superintendent / ' G. Papanic, Jr., Senior Project Engineer - 1.icensing P. Agnes, Assistant Secretary of Public Safety, Commonwealth of . "' Massachusetts' .C. Sterzinger, Commissioner, Vermant Departmen; of Public Service Fucient Safety Information Cente:r (NSIC)
- /:
NRC Resident Inspector Comm'anwealth of Massachusetts (2) t L State of Vermont
i 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY CP PKG YANKEE R0WE - 0002.0.0 02/14e39 _ _ _ _ _ - _ _. _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- n ,,,... ,,,,,' O l . - ...,
- i b
.i, y I!' ' [; ;+ . ' ' '
,, h^ ' y ,, , hh lli w tje?
- n:
m - .. , II I' :
[[ ' ' Yankee Atomi.cf ElectMc 'Compafy - 4-yyy - Wy; ' '01STRIB IION: . .
, . -PublicDoc'ument! Room (PDR) E ~ Local Public' DocumentiRoom (LPDR)~ Region 1I/ Dock 9t; Room.(with concurrences).
f < Management A*isistant,,DRMA (w/o: encl).
~0RP. Brnnch Chief - 'DRP Ssctici Chief e LH,'Eichenholz,; SRI,.. Yankee . Ghurant, SRI, Vermont Yankee 'D./Rusc1tto, SRI, Seabrooki , NJ'Faittile, PM,'NRR inobert J. Beres, DRSS 'SECY j' -H. Thompson, DEDS' J.' Lieberman, OE : W. Russel.1, RI - D. Holody, RI L. Chandler, 0GC , Enforcement Directors, RII-III
EnfoNement Officers, RIV-V s W f T. Murley,: NRR - '?. Ingram, PA ,lJ. Bradburne, CA 'E. Jordan, AEOD-B. Jiayes, OI ' S.:Connelly, CIA P, Robinson, OE ' . S..Varga, NRR V. Miller, OGP/SP-
. ' ' 0E File-(3 copies = ltrhd) 'j EDO Rdg' File , "/lDC M j$ ~B. Clayton, EDO .t-r RI: R P _RI:0RP . RI:RC "*% y Holody/k1 Haverkamp Wiggins tz s ane 1/J[/89 1/3I/89 1/3kS9 3/%/89
l RI:R I ' OE DEDRO /0GC an Russell Chandler Liebern;an Tepaar TbP" N R/A/89 2/ /89 M / /89 1/ /89 1/ /89 j , i -- , . 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY CP PKG YANKEE R0WE - 0003.0.0 82/14/89 % \\ DE i b ph*" lb[ 2. f it(B*l d, c.
- o }}