IA-85-272, Forwards Util Rept Re Investigation of Allegation 4-84-A-15. No Addl Insp Effort Required

From kanterella
(Redirected from IA-85-272)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Util Rept Re Investigation of Allegation 4-84-A-15. No Addl Insp Effort Required
ML20214U680
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 12/03/1986
From: Johnson B
NRC
To: Westerman T
NRC
Shared Package
ML20214U575 List:
References
FOIA-85-272, FOIA-85-594, FOIA-85-728 NUDOCS 8612090353
Download: ML20214U680 (7)


Text

@

g- ,Q-Odi 6

%12@3 #fi'i

- d h%,o For: Ta- We.c7% .- -o x

.. Feo .,, : 8:// J'~~a 4 - s - -

(D 4 94-etO s',,f ed;'AJ/e3 a 6:<.- 4-84 4-ir

.) fkAed o' s a copy e f th e- KGJs~

7's e i n  ; n n esfiy a /:o n . or repod o -

Ve>

m ig h f wro n / fo re vr e ev YA / s-d eder m : <> n wAefne, addi//a m l

\

i s e r k y a y',w e -Pfec-f i s- ceguined.

l~ d o ir o f be/ie us YAaf a dd;+; e n a / ;nspacA'o n ae-nhh -/

is r e y a : ,- e. d sn f4:s a lley ay(w .

Alote fA,f we. .g Jiou fel i n%- fAe.

c> f 7'4e e u f eem e o e ov- r-e.u ; e c allege <-

l i

P/ ease t'e f ,,. k r. ~ iF oI s is < ~Jy

&gc , o d , ; F - e ,a cs% c4

% t-A .

T u,;f/ c., n he/ a//ege,.

8d 0' /f,4?d?'

/ }m /sA' xsm A,45 M 1

m sensmeg gf20 3 861203 STEPHEN 85-594 PDR 1

o & Cc21 U o -

ALLEGATION REVIEW Date; March 12, 1985 CASE NUMBER 4-84-A-015 DATE OPENED 02/07/84 4 3' FACILITY NAME Wolf Creek 50-482 SUBJECT Harrassment of QC

'. Inspectors SOURCE OF ALLEGATION Employee NUMBER OF ALLEG.

ASSIGNED TO OI CROSS REF. NO. Q4-84-018 ACTION SCHEDULED OI review FIRST/LAST NAME R. Herr DATE ASSIGNED REPORT NUMBER 1st:

2nd:

Lst:

FTS NUMBER 8-728-8100 DUE DATE ALLEGATION SUBSTANT SORT CODE C DATE CLOSED ACTION OFFICE RIV MAN HOURS REPORT PREPARATION ASSIST DETAILS:

Mechanical / welding QC inspector was harrassed for writing NCR dealing with improper welding amperage by superintendent. RIV to contact alleger with

.' regard to turning allegation over to licensee for review. 01 has indicated an interest. Report of Inquiry Q4-84-18 issued 4/11/84. KG&E Report provided for OI review and then returned to Licensee. Supplemental Q4-84-185 issued and closes all 01 interest. Need to contact alleger. Supplemental Q issued by 01 on 2/15/85 which closes 01 case. Need to contact alleger.

s'<

REFERENCE:

OIR4-84-A-0027.

h

"<e>"'"*yco

=== 0 tmarriou oATA roam InstructH>ns on reverse s.de O ~"c=" >ss'c~

RECEIVING OFFICE Docket Number (if applicable)

1. Facilityties) Involved: (Name)

Ut mo'* 't<** 3 o' if genenc. wme GENERIC)

(1h p [0ft(K 0 $ () () O 4l ?.2 U R L i d M70 A ) 9 Ae_)S A 5 l

2. Functional Area (s) Involved: [ -

(Check aooropriate bonte.11 operations onsita health and safety 4lio M '

construction offsite health and safety safeguards emergency preparedness other (specifyl 3.

Description:

1.51Eltd stilTl i1VIEl i I I I I I II I I I I I II I IIil l l l l l 1 IIl l l l l l l l l l l l 1!

II IIII II IIIIIII) II I I II I II I l&l V!-li ly l- l ol yl2 l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

/

4. Source of Allegation:

(Chaisocropriate box contractor employee security guard

_ licensee employee news media private citizen New employee organization (specity) 4 other (specity Ef r m- A V. A [ y h e6 MM DD YY 5.' Date A!!egation Received:

0 9 / / 2 4

6. Name of Individual trirst two initi.i. .nd i..t n.me T.D D $ W L Receiving Allegation:
7. Office: g ACTION OFFICE
8. Action Office

Contact:

trirst two initi.is end i t name M[

9. FTS Telephone Number:

7 g .,

p7 j g V

10. Status: .

gu u Open. if followup actions are pending or in progress

_._; Closed. if followup actions are conipleted MM oD YY

11. Date Closed:
12. Remarks: lglg lgl, lgyL j g j, hl4g j j l j l l { j j ,jj ILerut to 50 charactersi ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l !I i ! !l
13. Allegation Number:

ome. v.., w , . ., q q .,

@A

. p v

n L) h

' 1

-l

,4 ALLEGATION REVIEW

( .4_ ,/

QiSi" ,,

CASE NUMBER 4-84-A-094 DATE OPENED 09/11/84 FACILITY NAME Wolf Creek S0-482 ,

SUBJECT (Sensitive) .

SOURCE OF ALLEGATION Former contractor employee NUMBER OF ALLEG. 1

~

ASSIGNED TO 01 -

CROSS REF. NO. Q4-84-042 ACTION SCHEDULED Initial inquiry

, FIRST/LAST NAME R. Herr DATE ASSIGNED 09/11/84 REPORT NUMBER Ist:

2nd:

Lst:

FTS NUMBER 8-492-8110 DUE DATE ALLEGATION SUBSTANT SORT CODE O DATE CLOSED ACTION OFFICE OIRIV MAN HOURS REPORT PREPARATION ASSIST DETAILS: (Sensitive) Ref: Q4-84-042.

So m e ao - y- SY A

  • M l

l l

l l

l ,

4 4 Q44 , v y - e v - it - 95 +J ..

Oz -

0 4- FY-oYa - /.s sa -d d s /r.s flf/mo GLMPs/wn -to ws.cyC3 #n A//p/8 5 '

0afue/ oc oMyw -

9 A.,

/to&4d 6, A%/w .,6,,, , . '

M wm 4

l l

l l

l 4 g

e. .,..

. - ;;. g * . , a . - -

4j';.,,7....b' {

2. . +-

DoctMENT LIST s

\ ( i{ /

, /

.,, 7"'.T Y " ALLEGATION N0. //~ V 4L -A 'Tf - ( 'i

~

D6CUMENT MAME "

RECEIPT RETURN A'//* pf ,L A , e- L-h)Mcg9e -

-4!/~g /<' Ara Gm 8 )g yy;og? y -

e

/

e

~.

i l

L A

u9 g ALLI G M IDr. ' s i! .. ,e . ,a

.o t ,; i .

M CilvihL Di .it Doc k et Numb.e (if a p; I.:,: ie -

1. F.cliitylisi) involved: t h e m.1 suf one o w s. o. n /i3 m I l C< e e H O T O O o 4 6 i
k. .<n. cisimca I

9; d - ~

2. Functional Arsats) Involved:

.,k ter.cs opp op,i.ie t,oit 13 - operations __ onsite health and safety i construction _ offsite health and safety 9...s. f N

.f,' _

anfeguards _ emergency prepar'edness

.: 1.

ftp: __ other (specify1 in.. - '

MN 3. oescription:  :, IslElvlt.InI Alti I Alt,IlIdGW it ilolAilsl IRlalalAla k?- u.p m 'a '" * * '"d Iol f lulcl lRIclticl l4laloI lolvlalt,IiIrlvi lpl,lg

-j jp>

IrlTI I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIl'1III d IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

[w!i. ' 4. Source of Allegation:

,.:4 * (Checi pp,opri.te boul - contractor employes _ security guard j, _ licensee employee __._ news media

)' . _ NRC employee _ private citizen I organization (Specify1

, {-:

[ other (Specify) NrMer E

  • r/ow e. em '

d

'N MM DD YY if~..n

5. Date A!!egation Received:

/ 1-l r 1 4 (/

..p.

'P -

6. Name of Individual tr.est two initisi. .no t.. n.mel A. Arec bt i

.$ . , Receiving Allegation:

'b?,'.:E

7. Office: g g g 18

?,i!.h ,

ACTION OFFICE

8. Action Office Conteet: triest two iniiints ans i.si n.m.1 T* b b 4 b N M f$l,:c'-

S'>{S Telephone Number: p ,,

, g, g j.e.f. \

n. . . .

.E, 10. Stat.as:

hY schect'onel , Open, if followup actions are pending or in progress 4

.T;f _ Closed, if followup actions are completed MM DD YY N 11. Date Closed
1 9 I I l

l in' -(

1

; 12. Remarks
IIl l l l ll l l l l 1l l l l l i l ;[ l l ;

I i s so u x,.,o

', IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I m% m A,m b e r i

. O f f.c. Ye r j ,

13. Allegation Number: lj g pg g , g ,,, j g

4, UNITED STATES

'/  ; NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,h* gr, !

3 OFFICE oF INVESTIG ATsoNS FIELD OFFICE. REGloN IV

'N . ,',$ . A "'

'" " U *E N S TEII' S E E

  • DATE: June 29, 1984 REPORT OF INVESTIGATION )

TITLE: WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR P0k'EP. STATION: ' . . .

ALLEGED INTIMIDATION OF QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR SUPPLEMENTAL NO. DN 50-482 CASE NUMBER: 4-84-003 '

CONTRCL OFFICE: 01 FIELD OFFICE: REGION IV STATUS: CLOSED b

v PERIO: 0F INVESTIGATION: Janua ry 10, 1983 - March 9, 1984 REPORTING INVESTIGATOR: 4 EA Verdel E. Fr'ost, InvestJ(ator Office of Investigations Field Office, Region IV

'ARTICIPATING PERSONNEL: H. Brooks Griffin, Investigator Office of Investigatior.s Field Office, Region IV REVIE'a'ED BY: /) /2 4 RicTiirdT. Her'r, Director Office of Investigatier.s Field Office, Region IV mc E% --do RogerVo tuna , ' Deputy Direct Office Investigations

/

/

APPROVED 8Y: b dirl. Hayes, Di redtpf/

sM[

Office of Investigatichs L

rdS W 8888 0g2 fry.

G

SUMMARY

An allegation was received by the Office of Investigations Field Office, Region IV, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC), that a Daniel International Corporation

. (DI) Quality Control (QC) inspector at the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Burlington, Kansas, had been intimidated by a DI senior QC supervisor. The alleged intimidation caused the DI QC inspector to tenninate his employment because his freedom to report nonconfoming conditions had been eliminated.

The DI QC inspector was interviewed and stated that he had been the subject of a meeting wherein a DI senior QC supervisor made intimidating statements to him, including the statement, " Cooperate with construction." The DI QC inspector stated that he performed all his inspection duties in a proper manner; however, he voluntarily terminated his employment 23 days after the date the alleged intimidation occurred because he believed that his freedom to report nonconforming conditions had been eliminated.

, A DI QC lead hanger inspector who was a witness to the alleged act of intimi-( dation and who kept a diary of the incident was interviewed. This QC lead _

hanger inspector provided the diary to the reporting investigator. The diary reflects the date the meeting took place and the quotes and comments that were made by the DI senior QC supervisor to the DI QC inspector. The quoted wording contained in the diary is, "Everyone in this seg, will cooperate, g including craft" (the word " including" was written using a shorthand symbol) and "These welds will not be held up over nitpick problems."

! The DI senior QC supervisor who allegedly made the intimidating statements was interviewed and denied making any intimidating statements to the DI QC inspector in question. The DI senior QC supervisor stated that statements like, " Cooperate with construction" or any other statements of that type would, '

if stated by a supervisor in his position, be intimidating to QC personnel.

Subsequently, this same DI senior QC supervisor was reinterviewed at his own request the next day and admitted making the following statement to the DI QC inspector in question, "There is no room in this organization for people who

, \

i .

/

cannot work together;" however, he denied making the statement, " Cooperate with construction." The DI senior QC supervisor denied attempting to intimidate the DI QC inspector, even though he acknowledged that a statement like " cooperate with construction" is an intimidating statement.

f \-.

The D1 project QC inspection manager who is the DI senior QC supervisors s imediate superviw was interviewed and stated he was aware that a meeting g occurred between a QC inspector and the senior QC supervisor; however, he N denied having any other knowledge concerning the meeting.

O

.5 5

O i

l

o

+ ;

!j . W -l Ih Tb y ,

ALLEGATION REVIEW CASE NUMBER ~ 4-84-A-23

.DATE OPENED 02/14/64 FACILITY N;ME Wolf Creck'

, 50-482

-SUBJECT Safeg ards Intelligence SOURCE OF ALLEGATION' Erployee NUli3ER OF ALLEG.

. ASSIGNED T0-SP CRDSS REF. N3.

ACTION SCHEDULED Review / Contact FBI 7 Q) _. Q Q b FIRST/LAST NAME R. Hall -

DATE ASSIGNED 02/15/84 REPORT NUMBER 1st:

2nd:

lst:

FTS N'JMBER 8-728-8100 DUE DATE ALLEGATION SUBSTANT

.50RT CODE S

'0 ATE CLOSED

-ACTION OFFICE RIV MAN HOURS REPORT PREPARATION ASSIST DETAILS: Report of potential threat to Fuel Shipeents.

e

'C-FouA C5-5m MC&aL-

.{ .) :( I 1 v.s. N cLt An at cutAtony couuissioN CATE

-NRC ronu 213 Nac c240 b W g TWE , W^ '

,1l O

TELEPHONE OR VERBAL CON ERSATION RECORD COMING CALL O OUTGOING CALL O vis:T f PHONE NUM8ER E XTENSION OF FICE/ ADDRESS PERSON CALLING O M Q ,

3 (o - bi$ '

OF FICE/ ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER l EXTENSe '

PE RSON CALLEO B"I #$U7.d'[' "

SNRc CONVERSATION F3SE O e. A gre E ()W W

~~

tpo

SUMMARY

I bCo kkw c b rey N E co sc hM k '

Q A ci & woc credc kd -urek ha ad sfd.R

-t& & Lo Laa L Q - d a d d - =_ p A d ;.J 40 ,d-b & C ELL og>~mir b udcm(6 FBI S $ w.n g s A.

Mo. m as ,deda g -

W sas CJ33 no,%>culc0 iave > ana acat M ac0 unca K2A oc -

REFERRED TO: R.N M W 2 herso 3 0 d , loo (b Creafc.F.1e_. O mu e ACTION TAKEN.

ACTION REQUESTED i INITIALS l

DATE INITIA d

\

ACTION TAKEN - ,

DATE 3-I N a C F O sit u 218 (4 76)

(n.aes.54

.v-4 {} .'l i i

r . u.s. NU E AR REguL.A70AY CowMissioN DATE  %

.. NRC For$4 218 .

b'l 'C - l 0240 W(2 Pl'.Aa0 (b Nn TELEPHONE OR VERBAL CONVERSATION RECORD ME p

O'6bTGOING CALL O visit QTECOMING CALL OFFICE / ADDRESS PHONE NUMSER l EXTEN PE RSON CALLING l

J kne(h RESS PHONE EXTENSION

, Q ,KC OFF.1CJ/

F( $UQ % 4. b d' CN,, e, m NUM8ERlT. r T P.. oCo

~

du!%c. lib 211_7_

i CONVE TION ' FT<, ~7 s2 - 6so r e 6 -

h ebn N k eO Pcbe :n0 Y ab Nr C S Skowh SUIAMARY d C O s. L 8- O C c% 4e od [ j%(  % ' [ pq ( g g kC;MO b dbruuhc C rac$le cw %

  • E cu ll'1 sc

,S~ 0 0 $ \ b S 'v (b.,b e , k'G & age [

s %a$ Y w bec taas N w k.eb( 'g- fd$cLh g cred st.Ocd.

a c- ON LU' ds (Ase'1was, -

o eep@e..d c_e_, aJ 4Q ,uR s.cacs3 gy Isda,3ed k was c % bu e_: Lc,l aQ

-Et d 4m es 24 wLe a s $ccch10 6 e_. =mg cri e o.ma 4&_.. cJfC it ,

wM eJJe#IC o. suLcsd he_, ha& l (c__. L ,(e s p ,, P &

Mu"~ re. pod dih c(oh kamo .u_Lcro Luc (C Cne[c,,uus ver ua k 4b_ F B .I wuCSLaueguda&cb<~~m.[

c a s,cu . 40u cupL.,.s b oP +fw dL Aer c fDnecRa -Q [a(lou _, e% La c. d m

s- e.

{r N A ,.

ewQ o@h v>ee[<c% e w c_toou$ m M Sup m_ .

ffusw sit ~iab +w_. eua h 3 REFERRED TO- g g gg ,,3 , g.a ms O ADVISE ME~0F ACTION TAKEN.

b NGO Mo E O -w ed O 5 INITIALS h* bg bh OATE ACTION TAKEN s .

DATE

\

\

unc monu ata 14 7en

~

. N

_ _ _ . . _ _ , _ . . _ . . _ . _