|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20210U4531999-08-12012 August 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide (Ki) in Emergency Plans.Urges NRC to Retain Current Policy for Ki Usage GO2-97-089, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Power Plant Security Requirements1997-05-0707 May 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Power Plant Security Requirements ML17292A7151997-02-25025 February 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communications, Effectiviness of Ultrasonic Testing Sys in ISI Program. ML20134L3351997-02-14014 February 1997 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty Re Licensee Activities Conducted from 960628-960904 ML17291A9101995-07-0707 July 1995 Comment on Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style. NRC Insp Repts Should Provide Balanced Perspective, Reflecting Licensee Strengths & Positive Aspects of Programs & Activities Reviewed GO2-95-080, Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves. Util Believes That Ability to Justify Actuator Capability by Analysis Should Not Be Restricted to Population of Small Valves1995-04-26026 April 1995 Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves. Util Believes That Ability to Justify Actuator Capability by Analysis Should Not Be Restricted to Population of Small Valves GO2-94-187, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to FFD Requirements1994-08-0808 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to FFD Requirements ML20058L9561993-07-26026 July 1993 Decommissioning Trust,Consisting of Asset Summary for Period Ending 930630,asset Summary Adjusted for Accurals for Period Ending 930630 & List of Assets as of 930630 ML20045D7551993-06-18018 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Supports Rule W/Listed Exceptions ML20044E1511993-05-30030 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercises from Annual to Biennial ML17290A3901993-05-21021 May 1993 Comments on Proposed Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. ML17289A9151992-10-0909 October 1992 Comment on Proposed Changes to SALP Program.Util Supports Comments Being Filed by NUMARC & Legal Firm of Winston & Strawn GO2-92-164, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Detailed Comments Submitted by Numarc,As Representing Licensee Views1992-07-10010 July 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Detailed Comments Submitted by Numarc,As Representing Licensee Views GO2-92-136, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR19 & 20 Re Extension of Implementation Date Concerning 10CFR201992-06-0404 June 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR19 & 20 Re Extension of Implementation Date Concerning 10CFR20 ML20091D1631992-04-0303 April 1992 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Policy & Procedure for Enforcement Actions.Concerned That Policy Seems to Be Creating New Requirements Through Examples Given ML20091Q8661992-01-31031 January 1992 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting ML17289A2931992-01-24024 January 1992 Comment on Draft Reg Guide Task DG-8007 (Proposed Rev 1 to Reg Guide 8.7) Re Instructions for Recording & Reporting Occupational Radiation Exposure Data ML17289A2541992-01-0606 January 1992 Comment on Draft Reg Guide Task DG-8004 Re Radiation Protection Programs.Reg Guide Provides Good Guidance for Maintaining Effective Radiation Protection Programs Aimed at Achieving Occupational Doses That Are ALARA GO2-91-103, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery1991-05-16016 May 1991 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery GO2-90-181, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty. Rev Would Restrict Licensee from Taking Appropriate Action on Preliminary Positive Test1990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty. Rev Would Restrict Licensee from Taking Appropriate Action on Preliminary Positive Test ML17285B3701990-07-0505 July 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Frequency of FSAR Revs,Per 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Requirements GO2-89-115, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Util Accepts NUMARC Comments1989-07-0606 July 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Util Accepts NUMARC Comments ML20247N7531988-07-28028 July 1988 Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Requesting NRC Action to Review Undue Risk Posed by BWR Thermal Hydraulic Instability.Nrr Should Issue Order Requiring All GE BWRs to Be Placed in Cold Shutdown for Stated Reasons ML17279A8041987-10-19019 October 1987 Endorsement 28 to Nelia Policy NF-270 ML20098C8851984-08-24024 August 1984 Undated marked-up Transcript of Jj Stein Testimony Re Util Financial Qualifications to Design & Construct Nuclear Reactor ML20082K0471983-10-14014 October 1983 Show Cause Petition Requesting Revocation of CP & Denial of OL ML20082K0301983-10-13013 October 1983 Affidavit of Sandler in Support of Coalition for Safe Power 831014 Show Cause Petition ML20072N4411983-07-0808 July 1983 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20072H2981983-03-25025 March 1983 Brief in Opposition to Coalition for Safe Power Appeal from ASLB 830222 Memorandum & Order Dismissing 820223 Petition to Intervene.Petitioner Failed to Particularize & Support Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069D3441983-03-10010 March 1983 Brief Supporting Appeal from ASLB 830222 Memorandum & Order. ASLB Erred in Concluding Petitioner Failed to Show Dilatory Conduct by Util & Was Not Entitled to Hearing on CP Extension.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069D2761983-03-10010 March 1983 Notice of Appeal of ASLB 830222 Memorandum & Order on Issue of Util Delay ML20070M6521983-01-24024 January 1983 Response in Opposition to Coalition for Safe Power 820223 Request for Hearing on Amend to CPPR-93.Petitioner Failed to Establish Interest in Proceeding or How Interest Will Be Affected by Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028C7851983-01-10010 January 1983 Suppl to Request for Hearing & Petition for Leave to Intervene,Listing Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070J0401982-12-22022 December 1982 Response Supporting Coalition for Safe Power 821209 Motion for 1-wk Delay of Prehearing Conference Scheduled for 830119-20.Applicant Does Not Concede That Basis for Request Constitutes Good Cause.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070D0001982-12-0909 December 1982 Motion for Delay of 830119 & 20 Prehearing Conference. Schedule Burdensome Due to Two Major Holiday Periods.Four Days of Preparation Lost.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049J2331982-03-10010 March 1982 Answer Opposing Coalition for Safe Power 820223 Request for Hearing on CP Amend.Cp Amend Involves No Significant Hazards Consideration.Alternatively,Petitioner Failed to Meet Interest,Affects & Aspect Stds.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049H5231982-02-22022 February 1982 Requests for Public Hearing Re Order Extending Const Completion Date.States Interest & Specific Aspects & Contentions Affecting Petitioners.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20009E3061981-07-23023 July 1981 Response Opposing Porter County Chapter Intervenors' 810519 Fourth Request for Production of Documents.Request Is W/O Merit & Should Be Denied ML20098D0881980-04-25025 April 1980 MOU Between WPPSS & Doe,Acting by & Through BPA Re Roles & Responsibilities Under Project Agreements Concerning Const & Operation of Net Billed Projects ML17272A8861980-02-0606 February 1980 Transcript of 800206 Briefing to NRC in Bethesda,Md Re Sacrificial Shield Wall,Pipe Whip Restraints & Related Structures.Pp 1A-122 ML19261C0571979-02-15015 February 1979 Util Opposes Petitioners Darby,Garrett & Hanford Conversion Project Addl Contention & Legal Argument.Intervention Petition Should Be Disposed of on Basis of Existing Record as Previously Stipulated.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19274D7801979-02-0606 February 1979 Applicant'S Proposed Corrections to Transcript of 790125 Prehearing Conference.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19263C4481979-02-0101 February 1979 Addl Contention & Legal Argument Pursuant to ASLB 790125 Permission.Contends Inadequate Assessment of Safety Risks. Certificate of Svc Encl ML17272A2691979-01-19019 January 1979 Applicant Answer in Opposition to Petitioners Darby Garrett & Hanford Conversion Project Request for Waiver of 10CFR2.708(b).W/encl Certificate of Svc ML19261A6791979-01-10010 January 1979 Second Amended Petition to Intervene,Supplementary Except Where Noted,To 781115 Petition.Addresses Contentions Re Need for Power,Alternatives.Notice of Withdrawal,Affidavit & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19261A6841979-01-10010 January 1979 Requests Waiver of double-spacing Requirement for Filed Documents Because of Added Expense.Assures That Documents Will Be Legible.W/Encl Certificate of Svc ML17272A2231978-12-15015 December 1978 Applicant'S Answer in Opposition to Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene Submitted by SM Garrett,H Vozenilek & Hanford Conversion Project.Asserts That Latter Has No Legal Interest in Proceedings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062G4631978-12-14014 December 1978 NRC Staff'S Response to Amended Petition to Intervene Submitted by SM Garrett,H Vozenilek & Manford Conversion Proj.Asserts That Only Manford Conversion Proj Has Met Interest Criteria of 10CFR2.714.Cert of Svc Encl ML20062E0581978-11-15015 November 1978 Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene. Indicates That Intervenors Have Evidence That Has Dev Since 1973 & Other Info Not Considered in the Constr Permit Proc Held in 1973. W/Encl 781107 Appl for Membership in Hanford ML20062E0601978-11-15015 November 1978 Memo in Support of Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene Presents Evidence Dev Since 1973 & Other Info Not Considered in Those Constr Permit Proc.Cert of Svc Plus Insert to Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene. Encl 1999-08-12
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20210U4531999-08-12012 August 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide (Ki) in Emergency Plans.Urges NRC to Retain Current Policy for Ki Usage GO2-97-089, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Power Plant Security Requirements1997-05-0707 May 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Power Plant Security Requirements ML17292A7151997-02-25025 February 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communications, Effectiviness of Ultrasonic Testing Sys in ISI Program. ML17291A9101995-07-0707 July 1995 Comment on Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style. NRC Insp Repts Should Provide Balanced Perspective, Reflecting Licensee Strengths & Positive Aspects of Programs & Activities Reviewed GO2-95-080, Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves. Util Believes That Ability to Justify Actuator Capability by Analysis Should Not Be Restricted to Population of Small Valves1995-04-26026 April 1995 Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves. Util Believes That Ability to Justify Actuator Capability by Analysis Should Not Be Restricted to Population of Small Valves GO2-94-187, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to FFD Requirements1994-08-0808 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to FFD Requirements ML20045D7551993-06-18018 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Supports Rule W/Listed Exceptions ML20044E1511993-05-30030 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercises from Annual to Biennial ML17290A3901993-05-21021 May 1993 Comments on Proposed Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. ML17289A9151992-10-0909 October 1992 Comment on Proposed Changes to SALP Program.Util Supports Comments Being Filed by NUMARC & Legal Firm of Winston & Strawn GO2-92-164, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Detailed Comments Submitted by Numarc,As Representing Licensee Views1992-07-10010 July 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Detailed Comments Submitted by Numarc,As Representing Licensee Views GO2-92-136, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR19 & 20 Re Extension of Implementation Date Concerning 10CFR201992-06-0404 June 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR19 & 20 Re Extension of Implementation Date Concerning 10CFR20 ML20091D1631992-04-0303 April 1992 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Policy & Procedure for Enforcement Actions.Concerned That Policy Seems to Be Creating New Requirements Through Examples Given ML20091Q8661992-01-31031 January 1992 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting ML17289A2931992-01-24024 January 1992 Comment on Draft Reg Guide Task DG-8007 (Proposed Rev 1 to Reg Guide 8.7) Re Instructions for Recording & Reporting Occupational Radiation Exposure Data ML17289A2541992-01-0606 January 1992 Comment on Draft Reg Guide Task DG-8004 Re Radiation Protection Programs.Reg Guide Provides Good Guidance for Maintaining Effective Radiation Protection Programs Aimed at Achieving Occupational Doses That Are ALARA GO2-91-103, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery1991-05-16016 May 1991 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery GO2-90-181, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty. Rev Would Restrict Licensee from Taking Appropriate Action on Preliminary Positive Test1990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty. Rev Would Restrict Licensee from Taking Appropriate Action on Preliminary Positive Test ML17285B3701990-07-0505 July 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Frequency of FSAR Revs,Per 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Requirements GO2-89-115, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Util Accepts NUMARC Comments1989-07-0606 July 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Util Accepts NUMARC Comments 1999-08-12
[Table view] |
Text
.- -- -. . - - - -.
'o FRCPCSED FULE rn h) s
(% Fi< 3MD WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM ' IIU$'C f
r.o. com oss . sooo arorse svaskington svar auhtand. svanhington voy
~r m no:16 7 Docket No. 50-397 i Yh,&,'Yl*lh']
October 30, 1990 ""% :
^
G02-90-181
- 1 r
Mr. S. J. Chilk, Secretary i U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission !
Washington, D. C. 20555 i Attn: Docketing and Services Branch !
t
Dear Mr. Chilk:
I
Subject:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULE - FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAMS *
(55FR35648) i l
The Washington Public Power Supply System, an NRC Licensee, has reviewed the l l subject proposed rule change and provides the following comments for your i i consideration. :
The Supply System opposes the proposed revision to 10CFR26 primarily on two i grounds: l (1) it unduly restricts the Licensee from taking appropriate action on a !
preliminary positive test; and ?
t (2) by not taking action, the Licensee is at risk and may be placing the public at risk should the employee willfully or accidentally create or contribute to a plant accident.
l Although the Supply System currently does no on-site screening of specimens, I we are of the opinion that the proposed rule represents an intrusion into management's prerogative to use prudent judgement when a presumed positive i is detected. ,
By enacting a fitness-for-duty rule, the NRC has made a decision that public health and safety considerations outweigh the resulting encroachment on i individual rights. To now approve the proposed , rule; the NRC would, in ,
essence, tie the hands of NRC licensees and prevent them from taking prudent i action based on a preliminary screen and reasoned judgement. In situations !
such as this, the scales must tip in favor of public health ai4d' safety. -
The process required to obtain a confirmed positive can consume as much as i a two-week period, during which time a licensee would be required to " sit on :
its hands" while it has substantive knowledge that'an employee with a drug ;
9o11190022 901030
@R55N35648 PDR ,
~M I!
i i
l l l 1 Mr. S. J. Chilk, Secretary {
Page Two j October k , 1990 :
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULE - FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAMS :
(55FR35649) !
i or alcohol problem has unrestricted access to safety equipment. In other ;
areas of enforcement, the NRC applies a very rigid standard of actions expected of a licensee based on what the licensee " knew or should have j known". It seems totally incongruous to apply a lesser standard to an issue as important as drug or alcohol use. While it is recognized that there are i i some legitimate medications or foodstuffs that will account for a posi' ) +
indication for some drugs, there are others for which no legitimate reat ; I exist. The licensee must be provided with the opportunity to make a reasoned j decision in these circumstances. Is the NRC prepared to accept the liability :
l for events that may be caused by an impaired employee while the licensee j awaits a confirmed positive?
l We concur with the position taken by Chairman Carr that the removal of individuals from activities within the scope of Part 26 in those cases where ;
the individuals fitness may be questionable is not inappropriate. Such l actions will be taken only after careful consideration of all- potentially :
mitigating factors and carefully weighing the balsnce between public health 1 and safety and individual rights. ;
In addition, we support the coments being submitted on this issue by NUMARC and the law firm of Winston and Strawn.
We appreciate the opportunity to participate in the NRC's rulemaking process. I Very truly yours,
{
4,b G. C. Sorensen, Manager
GCS:19 1
1 ;
i L
i f
?
.- - . , . . . . . _ _ _ .