|
|---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20210U4531999-08-12012 August 1999
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide (Ki) in Emergency Plans.Urges NRC to Retain Current Policy for Ki Usage
GO2-97-089, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Power Plant Security Requirements1997-05-0707 May 1997
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Power Plant Security Requirements
ML17292A7151997-02-25025 February 1997
Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communications, Effectiviness of Ultrasonic Testing Sys in ISI Program.
ML20134L3351997-02-14014 February 1997
Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty Re Licensee Activities Conducted from 960628-960904
ML17291A9101995-07-0707 July 1995
Comment on Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style. NRC Insp Repts Should Provide Balanced Perspective, Reflecting Licensee Strengths & Positive Aspects of Programs & Activities Reviewed
GO2-95-080, Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves. Util Believes That Ability to Justify Actuator Capability by Analysis Should Not Be Restricted to Population of Small Valves1995-04-26026 April 1995
Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves. Util Believes That Ability to Justify Actuator Capability by Analysis Should Not Be Restricted to Population of Small Valves
GO2-94-187, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to FFD Requirements1994-08-0808 August 1994
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to FFD Requirements
ML20058L9561993-07-26026 July 1993
Decommissioning Trust,Consisting of Asset Summary for Period Ending 930630,asset Summary Adjusted for Accurals for Period Ending 930630 & List of Assets as of 930630
ML20045D7551993-06-18018 June 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Supports Rule W/Listed Exceptions
ML20044E1511993-05-30030 May 1993
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercises from Annual to Biennial
ML17290A3901993-05-21021 May 1993
Comments on Proposed Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp.
ML17289A9151992-10-0909 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Changes to SALP Program.Util Supports Comments Being Filed by NUMARC & Legal Firm of Winston & Strawn
GO2-92-164, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Detailed Comments Submitted by Numarc,As Representing Licensee Views1992-07-10010 July 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Detailed Comments Submitted by Numarc,As Representing Licensee Views
GO2-92-136, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR19 & 20 Re Extension of Implementation Date Concerning 10CFR201992-06-0404 June 1992
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR19 & 20 Re Extension of Implementation Date Concerning 10CFR20
ML20091D1631992-04-0303 April 1992
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Policy & Procedure for Enforcement Actions.Concerned That Policy Seems to Be Creating New Requirements Through Examples Given
ML20091Q8661992-01-31031 January 1992
Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting
ML17289A2931992-01-24024 January 1992
Comment on Draft Reg Guide Task DG-8007 (Proposed Rev 1 to Reg Guide 8.7) Re Instructions for Recording & Reporting Occupational Radiation Exposure Data
ML17289A2541992-01-0606 January 1992
Comment on Draft Reg Guide Task DG-8004 Re Radiation Protection Programs.Reg Guide Provides Good Guidance for Maintaining Effective Radiation Protection Programs Aimed at Achieving Occupational Doses That Are ALARA
GO2-91-103, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery1991-05-16016 May 1991
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery
GO2-90-181, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty. Rev Would Restrict Licensee from Taking Appropriate Action on Preliminary Positive Test1990-10-30030 October 1990
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty. Rev Would Restrict Licensee from Taking Appropriate Action on Preliminary Positive Test
ML17285B3701990-07-0505 July 1990
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Frequency of FSAR Revs,Per 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Requirements
GO2-89-115, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Util Accepts NUMARC Comments1989-07-0606 July 1989
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Util Accepts NUMARC Comments
ML20247N7531988-07-28028 July 1988
Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Requesting NRC Action to Review Undue Risk Posed by BWR Thermal Hydraulic Instability.Nrr Should Issue Order Requiring All GE BWRs to Be Placed in Cold Shutdown for Stated Reasons
ML17279A8041987-10-19019 October 1987
Endorsement 28 to Nelia Policy NF-270
ML20098C8851984-08-24024 August 1984
Undated marked-up Transcript of Jj Stein Testimony Re Util Financial Qualifications to Design & Construct Nuclear Reactor
ML20082K0471983-10-14014 October 1983
Show Cause Petition Requesting Revocation of CP & Denial of OL
ML20082K0301983-10-13013 October 1983
Affidavit of Sandler in Support of Coalition for Safe Power 831014 Show Cause Petition
ML20072N4411983-07-0808 July 1983
Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20072H2981983-03-25025 March 1983
Brief in Opposition to Coalition for Safe Power Appeal from ASLB 830222 Memorandum & Order Dismissing 820223 Petition to Intervene.Petitioner Failed to Particularize & Support Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20069D3441983-03-10010 March 1983
Brief Supporting Appeal from ASLB 830222 Memorandum & Order. ASLB Erred in Concluding Petitioner Failed to Show Dilatory Conduct by Util & Was Not Entitled to Hearing on CP Extension.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20069D2761983-03-10010 March 1983
Notice of Appeal of ASLB 830222 Memorandum & Order on Issue of Util Delay
ML20070M6521983-01-24024 January 1983
Response in Opposition to Coalition for Safe Power 820223 Request for Hearing on Amend to CPPR-93.Petitioner Failed to Establish Interest in Proceeding or How Interest Will Be Affected by Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20028C7851983-01-10010 January 1983
Suppl to Request for Hearing & Petition for Leave to Intervene,Listing Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20070J0401982-12-22022 December 1982
Response Supporting Coalition for Safe Power 821209 Motion for 1-wk Delay of Prehearing Conference Scheduled for 830119-20.Applicant Does Not Concede That Basis for Request Constitutes Good Cause.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20070D0001982-12-0909 December 1982
Motion for Delay of 830119 & 20 Prehearing Conference. Schedule Burdensome Due to Two Major Holiday Periods.Four Days of Preparation Lost.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20049J2331982-03-10010 March 1982
Answer Opposing Coalition for Safe Power 820223 Request for Hearing on CP Amend.Cp Amend Involves No Significant Hazards Consideration.Alternatively,Petitioner Failed to Meet Interest,Affects & Aspect Stds.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20049H5231982-02-22022 February 1982
Requests for Public Hearing Re Order Extending Const Completion Date.States Interest & Specific Aspects & Contentions Affecting Petitioners.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20009E3061981-07-23023 July 1981
Response Opposing Porter County Chapter Intervenors' 810519 Fourth Request for Production of Documents.Request Is W/O Merit & Should Be Denied
ML20098D0881980-04-25025 April 1980
MOU Between WPPSS & Doe,Acting by & Through BPA Re Roles & Responsibilities Under Project Agreements Concerning Const & Operation of Net Billed Projects
ML17272A8861980-02-0606 February 1980
Transcript of 800206 Briefing to NRC in Bethesda,Md Re Sacrificial Shield Wall,Pipe Whip Restraints & Related Structures.Pp 1A-122
ML19261C0571979-02-15015 February 1979
Util Opposes Petitioners Darby,Garrett & Hanford Conversion Project Addl Contention & Legal Argument.Intervention Petition Should Be Disposed of on Basis of Existing Record as Previously Stipulated.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML19274D7801979-02-0606 February 1979
Applicant'S Proposed Corrections to Transcript of 790125 Prehearing Conference.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML19263C4481979-02-0101 February 1979
Addl Contention & Legal Argument Pursuant to ASLB 790125 Permission.Contends Inadequate Assessment of Safety Risks. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML17272A2691979-01-19019 January 1979
Applicant Answer in Opposition to Petitioners Darby Garrett & Hanford Conversion Project Request for Waiver of 10CFR2.708(b).W/encl Certificate of Svc
ML19261A6791979-01-10010 January 1979
Second Amended Petition to Intervene,Supplementary Except Where Noted,To 781115 Petition.Addresses Contentions Re Need for Power,Alternatives.Notice of Withdrawal,Affidavit & Certificate of Svc Encl
ML19261A6841979-01-10010 January 1979
Requests Waiver of double-spacing Requirement for Filed Documents Because of Added Expense.Assures That Documents Will Be Legible.W/Encl Certificate of Svc
ML17272A2231978-12-15015 December 1978
Applicant'S Answer in Opposition to Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene Submitted by SM Garrett,H Vozenilek & Hanford Conversion Project.Asserts That Latter Has No Legal Interest in Proceedings.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20062G4631978-12-14014 December 1978
NRC Staff'S Response to Amended Petition to Intervene Submitted by SM Garrett,H Vozenilek & Manford Conversion Proj.Asserts That Only Manford Conversion Proj Has Met Interest Criteria of 10CFR2.714.Cert of Svc Encl
ML20062E0581978-11-15015 November 1978
Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene. Indicates That Intervenors Have Evidence That Has Dev Since 1973 & Other Info Not Considered in the Constr Permit Proc Held in 1973. W/Encl 781107 Appl for Membership in Hanford
ML20062E0601978-11-15015 November 1978
Memo in Support of Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene Presents Evidence Dev Since 1973 & Other Info Not Considered in Those Constr Permit Proc.Cert of Svc Plus Insert to Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene. Encl
1999-08-12
[Table view]
Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20210U4531999-08-12012 August 1999
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide (Ki) in Emergency Plans.Urges NRC to Retain Current Policy for Ki Usage
GO2-97-089, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Power Plant Security Requirements1997-05-0707 May 1997
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to Power Plant Security Requirements
ML17292A7151997-02-25025 February 1997
Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communications, Effectiviness of Ultrasonic Testing Sys in ISI Program.
ML17291A9101995-07-0707 July 1995
Comment on Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style. NRC Insp Repts Should Provide Balanced Perspective, Reflecting Licensee Strengths & Positive Aspects of Programs & Activities Reviewed
GO2-95-080, Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves. Util Believes That Ability to Justify Actuator Capability by Analysis Should Not Be Restricted to Population of Small Valves1995-04-26026 April 1995
Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves. Util Believes That Ability to Justify Actuator Capability by Analysis Should Not Be Restricted to Population of Small Valves
GO2-94-187, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to FFD Requirements1994-08-0808 August 1994
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to FFD Requirements
ML20045D7551993-06-18018 June 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Supports Rule W/Listed Exceptions
ML20044E1511993-05-30030 May 1993
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercises from Annual to Biennial
ML17290A3901993-05-21021 May 1993
Comments on Proposed Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp.
ML17289A9151992-10-0909 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Changes to SALP Program.Util Supports Comments Being Filed by NUMARC & Legal Firm of Winston & Strawn
GO2-92-164, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Detailed Comments Submitted by Numarc,As Representing Licensee Views1992-07-10010 July 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Detailed Comments Submitted by Numarc,As Representing Licensee Views
GO2-92-136, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR19 & 20 Re Extension of Implementation Date Concerning 10CFR201992-06-0404 June 1992
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR19 & 20 Re Extension of Implementation Date Concerning 10CFR20
ML20091D1631992-04-0303 April 1992
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Policy & Procedure for Enforcement Actions.Concerned That Policy Seems to Be Creating New Requirements Through Examples Given
ML20091Q8661992-01-31031 January 1992
Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting
ML17289A2931992-01-24024 January 1992
Comment on Draft Reg Guide Task DG-8007 (Proposed Rev 1 to Reg Guide 8.7) Re Instructions for Recording & Reporting Occupational Radiation Exposure Data
ML17289A2541992-01-0606 January 1992
Comment on Draft Reg Guide Task DG-8004 Re Radiation Protection Programs.Reg Guide Provides Good Guidance for Maintaining Effective Radiation Protection Programs Aimed at Achieving Occupational Doses That Are ALARA
GO2-91-103, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery1991-05-16016 May 1991
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery
GO2-90-181, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty. Rev Would Restrict Licensee from Taking Appropriate Action on Preliminary Positive Test1990-10-30030 October 1990
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty. Rev Would Restrict Licensee from Taking Appropriate Action on Preliminary Positive Test
ML17285B3701990-07-0505 July 1990
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Frequency of FSAR Revs,Per 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Requirements
GO2-89-115, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Util Accepts NUMARC Comments1989-07-0606 July 1989
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Util Accepts NUMARC Comments
1999-08-12
[Table view] |
Text
. . .- ,. . ._ . -.
15 ~ .
.h CW F[215ri5 )7 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM A p.o sax 968 3000 George washington way . Richland, washington 99352-0968 . c509 72-Docket No. 50-397 June 18,1993 G02-93-162 ,
y,j
~
Secretary of the Commission -
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 ATrN: Docketing and Services Branch
- Gentlemen
Subject:
MODIFICATIONS TO FITNESS-FOR-DUTY REQUIREMENTS l SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULEMAKING
Reference:
Federal Register Vol. 58, No. 55 pp 15810 - 15812, " Modifications to Fitness-for-Duty Program Requirements," dated March 24,1993 l The Washington Public Power Supply System has reviewed the proposed rulemaking cited in j the reference which modifies current Fitness-for-Duty requirements. The following comments are provided for your consideration.
l We concur with the proposal to randomly test licensee employees at an annual rate equal to at least 50% versus the current 100% rate. This is supported by your data which demonstrates a very low positive rate of 0.25% among licensee employees. ;
You do not propose to reduce the contractor and vendor random testing rate from 100%. Your l decision is based on the premise that the positive rate for this population is twice that oflicensee l
l employees (i.e., >0.50%). We suggest that you reconsider this decision. A positive rate of j less than 1.0% is still sufficiently small to allow a re<luction of the random testing rate.
If the random test results at other plants for contractor and vendor employees persuades you to maintain the 100% random testing rate, we suggest that you consider an alternative which allows a reduction from the 100% rate based on experience at individual plants. The rate might be reduced from 100% if the individual plant experiences a positive rate less than 0.50%, for example.
Should you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Douglas W. Coleman at I (509) 377-4342.
Sincerely i
/E70
.V. Parrish, (Mail Drop 1023)
Assistant Managing Director, Operations l cc: NS Reynolds, W&S i DL Williams, BPA ~'
! 9306300025 930618 PDR PR h
_.26 5B_FR15810 ~._
PDR
_ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
