GO2-07-036, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Technical Specifications Associated with AC and DC Electrical Power

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Technical Specifications Associated with AC and DC Electrical Power
ML070650322
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/2007
From: Oxenford W
Energy Northwest
To:
Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR/ADRO
References
GO2-07-036
Download: ML070650322 (4)


Text

  1. ý Ml'YNORTHWEST ENERGY Paeople
  • Vision - Solutions PO. Box 968 Richiand, WA 99352-0968 February 22, 2007 G02-07-036 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Subject:

COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION, DOCKET NO. 50-397 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH AC AND DC ELECTRICAL POWER

References:

1) Letter dated, May 31, 2005 G02-05-099, WS Oxenford (Energy Northwest) to NRC, "License Amendment Request to Technical Specifications Associated with AC and DC Electrical Power"
2) Letter dated, February 8, 2006 G02-06-019, WS Oxenford (Energy Northwest) to NRC, "Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Technical Specifications Associated with AC and DC Electrical Power"
3) Letter dated, January 5, 2007 G02-07-008, WS Oxenford (Energy Northwest) to NRC, "Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Technical Specifications Associated with AC and DC Electrical Power"
4) Letter dated, February 13, 2007 G02-07-027, WS Oxenford (Energy Northwest) to NRC, "Supplemental Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Technical Specifications Associated with AC and DC Electrical Power"

Dear Sir or Madam:

Transmitted herewith in the Attachment is the Energy Northwest summary of and response to a Request for Additional Information. This response provides additional clarifying information as discussed with the Staff in a February 21, 2007 teleconference.

No new commitments are provided in this response. The responses provided herein do not result in any changes to the proposed license amendment request as amended by the references.

,,4oo

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH AC AND DC ELECTRICAL POWER Page 2 If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Greg Cullen at (509) 377-6105.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the date of this letter.

Respectfully, WS Oxen rd Vice Pr ide , Technical Services Mail Drop PE04

Attachment:

Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Technical Specification Change Request.

cc: BS Mallett - NRC RIV CF Lyon - NRC NRR NRC Senior Resident Inspector/988C RN Sherman - BPA/1 399 WA Horin - Winston & Strawn

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH AC AND DC ELECTRICAL POWER Attachment Page 1 of 2 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Technical Specification Change Request NRC Question 1 Given that the submittal indicates that for some grid conditions the testing performed to meet the Surveillance Requirement (SR), "...shall be performed at a power factor as close to the single largest post-accident load as possible," why are the power factors in The Technical Specifications Bases and previous RAI question 3 (of Reference 2), not the same post-accident load value for a given EDG as specified in Technical Specifications SRs? Explain and quantify the margin mentioned in the Bases and whether it is included in the SR value (would expect that it be in the SR value).

Energy Northwest Response The power factor values for SR 3.8.1.9 specified in the Technical Specifications Bases represent the reactive loading expected to support the single largest post-accident load for the respective EDGs. These values would be used for meeting SR 3.8.1.9. The power factor values for SRs 3.8.1.10 and 3.8.1.14 specified in the Technical Specifications Bases represent the reactive loading expected to support the full post-accident load for the respective EDGs.

The power factor values in the proposed Technical Specifications for SR 3.8.1.10 and SR 3.8.1.14 and in RAI question 3 (of Reference 2), provide a test value parameter for performing these SRs while synchronized to the electrical grid. These power factor parameters include exciter capacity to carry the reactive load as well as the exciter capacity needed to match the electrical grid voltage for synchronizing. For example, during the surveillance test for SR 3.8.1.14, EDG-1 is loaded to 4400 kW and 2200 kVAR which is a power factor of 0.894. The indicated reactive output during the test approximates the accident load power factor for this divisional load group as noted in the Technical Specifications Bases. However, the exciter field current is running at nearly 98.3% of its full load rating (i.e., the generator is rated 5812.5 kVA at 0.8 power factor or 4650 kW and the exciter rated output is 142.4 amps). The EDG exciter must provide the capacity both to reach desired reactive output and match electrical grid voltage while the EDG is synchronized to the electrical grid. Therefore, as illustrated in this example, using a value of 0.9 power factor for SR 3.8.1.14 is simple, inclusive, and can be implemented without undue reliance on the exception note in the SR.

The margin referred to in the proposed TS Bases insert... "In such cases, the power factor shall be maintained as close as practicable to these levels, allowing margin for changing grid conditions, without exceeding the EDG excitation limits," is operational margin to avoid routine overloading of the EDG exciter during SR testing. The testing procedures require the reactive load during testing to be as close as possible to the reactive load associated with the approximate analyzed power factor without exceeding

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH AC AND DC ELECTRICAL POWER Attachment Page 2 of 2 the rated limit for exciter current. In all cases the field current is required to be greater than or equal to 90% of the rated limit for exciter current.

NRC Question 2 Explain how SR testing at other than the post-accident load power factor demonstrates the capacity and capability of the EDG excitation system/AVR/generator field current.

Energy Northwest Response At rated voltage, load, and power factor the design excitation current is 142.4 amps (for EDG-1 and EDG-2). Performing EDG testing against the electrical grid involves increasing generator terminal voltage to match electrical grid voltage in order to parallel to the offsite electrical grid. Increasing field current to achieve the higher voltage needed to parallel requires field current that would be used for increased reactive loading during accident conditions (when isolated from the grid). During testing, when the EDG is paralleled to the electrical grid, the reactive loading is limited by field current to within the manufacturer's rating. Maintaining the reactive loading to achieve a power factor as close as practicable to the SR limit with field current approaching rated current demonstrates the EDG's capability to power its accident loads when operating in the isochronous mode, even if the exact power factor value (derived from indicated reactive load while synchronized) is not achieved. Therefore, demonstration of the EDG's capability to power design accident loads when operating isolated from offsite power is demonstrated 100% of the time. This basic principal is also true for EDG-3.

As discussed above, the testing procedures require the reactive load during testing to be as close as possible to the reactive load associated with the approximate analyzed power factor without exceeding the rated limit for exciter current. In all cases the field current is required to be greater than or equal to 90% of the rated limit for exciter current and is allowed to approach the limit without exceeding it. This ensures the power factor limit specified in the TS will be met except when precluded by existing grid (i.e., higher voltage) conditions.