0CAN089606, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-51 & NPF-6,allowing Implementation of Approved Option B to 10CFR50,App J

Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-51 & NPF-6,allowing Implementation of Approved Option B to 10CFR50,App J

ML20117G494
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	08/23/1996
From:	Dewease J ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20117G497	List: 0CAN089606, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-51 & NPF-6,allowing Implementation of Approved Option B to 10CFR50,App J ML20117G498
References
0CAN089606, CAN89606, NUDOCS 9609050209
Download: ML20117G494 (3)

Text

-

l Cnt:rgy Cperitirn2, ins.

PO Box 31995 i = ENTERGY secxsom. us 29286-,995 Tel 601368 5760 Fax 601368 5768 l Jerrold G. Dewease vec hewJent opeutws Sga:

August 23,1996

OCAN089606 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I Document Control Desk Mail Station PI-137 Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368 License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6 Modification Of Proposed Technical Specification Change Request Conceming Implementation Of 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, Option B l

Gentlemen:

By letter dated April 11,1996 (0CAN049602), Entergy Operations requested changes to Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications allowing the implementation of the recently approved Option B to 10 CFR 50, Appendix J. In subsequent conversations, the staff requested additional information conceming the visual inspection -

requirements for the type "A" leakage rate tests that were proposed for removal from both units technical specifications by the amendment request. The staff also requested additional information concerning the removal of a note requiring that air lock leak rate results be evaluated against the acceptance criteria of specification 3.6.1.2 in the Unit 2 Technical Specifications. Since these aspects were already required by our leakage rate testing program, we had omitted them from our previous submittal to minimize duplication. Upon further review, we have concluded that these requirements are consistent with that found in the impioved standard technical specifications and should be retained. Attached are the proposed changes to the Unit 1 and 2 Technical Specifications. The attached changes do not affect the conclusions of the no significant hazards determination of the April 11,1996 submittal.

(;;@ AOl 7 f 9609050209 960823 PDR ADOCK 05000313 P PDR

U. S. NRC August 23,1996 OCAN089606 Page 2 Very truly yours,

& , bw_a nA o_ - .

I D/rde l

i Attachments l To the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements contained in this submittal are true.

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me, a Notary Publ'c i in and for 4ils County and the State of Mississippi, this AtA day of da e,. a ,1996.

1 W -

ICTARY PLDLc 01 ATE OF t/l OlSSiPPI AT LARGE  ;

Notary PiWiic ify commC:C:i E gb ~ gat la 1M l My Commission Expires nnNnFD THRU HEiDEN MARCHETTI,1NG.

i l

i i

i I

l l

l 1

1 l

l 1

I l

4 l

U. S. NRC l August 23,1996 i OCAN089606 Page 3 l i

cc: Mr. Leonard J. Callan l Regional Administrator l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 i Arlington, TX 76011-8064 )

i NRC Senior Resident Inspector Arkansas Nuclear One P.O. Box 310 )

London, AR 72847 i Mr. George Kalman '

NRR Project Manager Region IV/ANO-1 & 2 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i NRR Mail Stop 13-H-3 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 l Mr. Bernard Bevill Acting Director, Division of Radiation Control and Emergency Management Arkansas Department of Health j 4815 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72205 l l

l I

r I

i

,