0CAN080401, Fitness-for-Duty Performance Data for the Period January - June 2004

Fitness-for-Duty Performance Data for the Period January - June 2004

ML042380293
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	08/13/2004
From:	James D Entergy Operations
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
0CAN080401
Download: ML042380293 (5)

Text

-- En

, Entegy Entergy Operations, Inc.

1448 S.R. 333 Russellville, AR 72802 Tel 501 8585000 I OCFR26.71 (d)

OCAN080401 August 13, 2004 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Mail Station OPl-17 Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368 License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6 Fitness-for-Duty Performance Data

Dear Sir or Madam:

In accordance with 10CFR26.71 (d), attached is the Arkansas Nuclear One Fitness-for-Duty Program performance data for the period January - June 2004.

The attachment contains no commitments.

Sincerely, ae ames r, Licensing Attac ment AC)A

OCAN080401 Page 2 cc: Dr. Bruce S. Mallett Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Arkansas Nuclear One P.O. Box 310 London, AR 72847 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Tom Alexion Mail Stop 0-7 DI Washington, DC 20555-0001 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Drew Holland Mail Stop 0-7 DI Washington, DC 20555-0001

Attachment to OCAN080401 Page 1 of 3 FITNESS-FOR-DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO IOCFR26 Entergy Operations, Inc. June 30, 2004 Company 6 Months Ending Arkansas Nuclear One Location S. A. Kaufmann, Security Coordinator (479) 858-7846 Contact Name Phone (Include Area Code)

Cutoffs: Screen / Confirmation 0 Appendix A to IOCFR26 Marijuana 50 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 / 500 N/A /

Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 25 / 25 N/A Opiates 300 / 300 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04% N/A Licensee Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Employees Contractor Contractor Personnel Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access 1037 N/A 483 Categories #

Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 30 0 N/A N/A 762 6/4 For-Cause (Post accident) 0 0 N/ A N/ A 0 0 For-Cause (Behavior) 1 0 N /A N /A 0 0 Random 267 0 N/A N/A 103 0 Follow-Up 1 0 N/A N/A 1 0 Other 0 0 N/A N/A 1 0 Total 299 0 N/A N/A 867 6/4

1, Attachment to OCAN080401 Page 2 of 3 I

BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES January - June 2004 Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol Refusal 1 2 3 4 5

__ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _t o T e st _ _ _ __ _ _

Licensee Employees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A Long-Term :

Contractor N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Short-Term Contractor 4/4 0 0 1 0 1 I N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 4/4 0 j 0 j I 1 0 JI 1 1 NN/A N/AN/AI N/AI N/A 1 7

Attachment to OCAN080401 Page 3 of 3 Fitness-for-Duty Program Six Month Performance Report

'January - June 2004 PROGRAM

SUMMARY

The Arkansas Nuclear One annual random testing rate is 50 percent. During this reporting period, approximately 24.3 percent of the population was randomly tested. The rate of positive tests from random testing was 0.0 percent.

POSITIVE RESULTS:

During this six month reporting period, 1166 samples were collected and tested. Ten of these samples were confirmed positive for illegal drugs or alcohol. One contractor refused to test and an additional contractor submitted an adulterated sample that could not be tested for drugs.

MANAGEMENT ACTIONS:

Eight contractors submitted pre-access samples that were positive for THC (four at the Entergy cutoff level and four at the NRC cutoff level). All eight contractors were denied access.

One pre-access contractor tested positive for alcohol and another tested positive for amphetamines. Both were denied access.

One pre-access contractor refused to test and was denied access. Another pre-access contractor submitted a sample that confirmed the presence of an adulterant and was denied access.

An Entergy employee and a contractor each submitted a follow-up sample that tested negative.

One for-cause test was administered to an Entergy employee due to behavioral observations. This test returned negative results.

Two fitness-for-duty appeals were submitted. One denial was upheld and the other was overturned.

EVENTS REPORTED TO THE NRC:

During this reporting period, there were no reportable violations of the fitness-for-duty program.

PROGRAM EVALUATION:

No programmatic problems were identified during this reporting period.