05000416/LER-2012-002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER-2012-002, Manual Reactor Scram Due to a Steam Supply Motor Operated Valve Failure that Resulted in the Inability to Maintain Reactor Water Level
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 05000 416 1 Of 4
Event date: 02-19-2012
Report date: 04-19-2012
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications
4162012002R00 - NRC Website

A. REPORTABLE OCCURRENCE

This LER is being submitted pursuant to 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) for a manual initiation of the Reactor Protection System (RPS) (JC) and a manual initiation of Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) (BM). Telephonic notification was made on February 19, 2012, to the NRC Emergency Notification System (ENS) within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of the event pursuant to 10 CFR 72(b)(2)(iv)(B) and 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A).

B. INITIAL CONDITIONS

At the time of the event, the reactor was in operational mode 1 with reactor power at approximately 22 percent. There were no additional inoperable structures, systems, or components at the start of the event that contributed to this event. Post event it was discovered that the High Pressure Steam Inlet valve (SB) to the B Reactor Feed Pump (B RFP) (SJ) was failed ninety percent closed.

C. DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE

On February 19, 2012, at 1904 hours0.022 days <br />0.529 hours <br />0.00315 weeks <br />7.24472e-4 months <br /> Central Standard Time (CST), during a planned plant shutdown, a manual reactor scram was initiated at approximately +14 inches narrow range reactor pressure vessel (RPV) (AC) level prior to reaching the low RPV level automatic scram setpoint of +11.4 inches. Prior to the scram, with the reactor at approximately 22 percent thermal power, and main turbine load at approximately 220 megawatt electric (MWe), the Reactor Operator began decreasing load by decreasing speed demand on the main turbine generator (TB). When the turbine bypass valves (TBPV) (JI) began to open and reached approximately 16% combined open on all 3 TBPVs, the B RFP began to reduce speed. This resulted in water level decreasing in the RPV. As level decreased, the Control Room Supervisor directed a manual scram be inserted prior to reaching the low level scram set point of +11.4 inches. After the scram, the RCIC system was initiated to inject water into the RPV and the A Reactor Feedwater Pump (A RFP) (SJ) was restarted to restore RPV level. All withdrawn control rods inserted to the full in position; twenty-three (23) control rods did not indicate a position of 00, but did have their green "full-in" indication. Subsequent investigation determined these twenty-three rods fully inserted past position 00 but did not settle back to position 00.

The steam supply for the Reactor Feed Pump Turbines (RFPTs) is normally superheated, low pressure, steam from the Moisture Separator/Reheater (MSR) (SB) outlets. Each RFPT has an additional supply line from the main steam equalizing header for startup and low power operation. Each of the steam supply lines has a motor-operated isolation valve. During a plant shutdown, the steam pressure exiting the MSR decreases and the RFPT governor opens allowing additional Low Pressure (LP) steam from the MSR to the RFPT. When the governor reaches approximately fifty percent open the High Pressure (HP) steam from the main steam equalizing header is admitted to the RFPT effectively transferring the RFPT steam supply from the MSR to the main steam equalizing header.

The High Pressure Steam Inlet valve to B RFPT was out of position at ten percent open versus the normal one hundred percent open. This condition precluded the transfer of the B RFPT to high pressure steam when the normal steam supply became inadequate due to the TBPVs opening as designed. As a result, the B RFPT did not have enough energy to ensure the B RFP maintained reactor water level. The William Powell Company is the manufacturer of the model 19023WE valve which uses a Limitorque model SMB-0- 25 valve operator.

No loss of offsite or Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) power occurred. No Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) initiation setpoint was reached and no Safety Relief Valves (SRVs) lifted. All safety related equipment operated as expected. The normal heat sink (main condenser) remained available during this event. After the scram, the RCIC system was initiated to inject water into the RPV and the A RFP was restarted to restore RPV level.

D. ROOT CAUSE

The cause of the event was that equipment deficiencies prevented the High Pressure Steam Inlet valve to B RFPT from fully opening.

Contributing to the root cause was: Operations lacked rigor in the application of the operator fundamental of control and conservatism as evidenced by the acceptance of the low standards used in implementation of the caution tag on the control switch for the High Pressure Steam Inlet valve to the B RFPT and acceptance of not having an additional tracking mechanism for positioning the valve. Operations did not display appropriate conservative decision making in regards to the B RFPT High Pressure Steam Inlet valve dual indication and in the decision making process during the removal of the RFPTs from service.

E. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

Reactor water level was restored and the plant was placed in a stable condition. Condition Report (CR) CR­ GGN-2012-01842 was written to document and investigate the event and a root cause evaluation was conducted. The root cause evaluation resulted in several immediate actions to address the contributing cause: all caution tags were reviewed for quality; an action was issued to update selected caution tags to improve quality; and a training evaluation analysis request (TEAR) TEAR-GGNS-2012-145 was issued to develop training (both classroom and simulator) on this event to improve Operator performance and decision making. As an interim corrective action, the Operations Manager issued a letter of expectations to the Operations Department to reinforce the importance of and the need to maintain high standards. Long term corrective actions will address the root cause by troubleshooting and repair of the High Pressure Steam Inlet valve to B RFPT during Refueling Outage 18 (RF18). Using the results of the troubleshooting, a corrective action to prevent reoccurrence (CAPR) will be developed. Additional long term actions are: develop and implement a configuration control program to enable the tracking of off normal components in a readily accessible database; institutionalize and reinforce the expectation to review outstanding danger tags, caution tags, and component position control (CPC) tags prior to performing select evolutions; perform an assessment on operator fundamentals in which the assessment should be performed at least 6 months after the Corrective Action Review Board approval of this root cause; perform observations of operator standards of excellence in application of the operator fundamentals of conservatism and control for a 5 month period; provide refresher High Impact Training (driven by TEAR-GGNS-2012-209 in the areas of operator fundamental conservatism; perform an in-depth review with Operations on selected systems to identify unknown or longstanding equipment issues that pose a challenge to safe operations of the plant; perform an in-depth review with the Radwaste Supervisor to identify unknown or longstanding equipment issues that pose a challenge to Radwaste Operations; and complete work to troubleshoot and repair N62F024B Steam Jet Air Ejector B motor operated valve manual disengage not working and 1P44F021A motor operated valve indication issue.

F. SAFETY ASSESSMENT

Immediate actions performed by the Operations staff were adequate and appropriate in placing and maintaining the reactor in a safe shutdown condition. The lowest reactor level indicated was -38 inches Wide Range level indication. Reactor vessel water level never dropped to the ECCS initiation setpoint.

Reactor water level was restored and maintained by the condensate and feedwater system following the restart of the A RFPT. The Group 2 Residual Heat Removal (RHR) to Radwaste and Group 3 RHR Shutdown Cooling automatic isolations were received at +11.4 inches reactor level, however no valves isolated because they were in their normally closed position prior to the event.

SAFETY ASSESSMENT (continued) No Safety Relief Valves lifted as a result of this event and all other systems performed as required.

The manual reactor scram resulted in all the systems performing as intended. A level 3 isolation signal was generated due to RPV water level falling below the initiation setpoint of +11.4 inches which is also a setpoint for Group 2 (Residual Heat Removal (RHR) to Radwaste) and Group 3 (Shutdown Cooling Isolation). No valves isolated in these systems due to their being in their normally closed position. The appropriate off­ normal event procedures were implemented to mitigate the transient with all systems responding as designed after the scram. The lowest reactor water level observed was approximately -38 inches as indicated on Wide Range level. There were no safety system functional failures. Based on the discussion provided above, the health and safety of the public was not compromised by this event.

G. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Previous Similar Events: Pursuant to 10CFR50.73 (b)(5) this issue is considered an infrequent event. There has not been any occurrence of the same underlying concern in the past three years at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. Although GGNS has experienced RFPT transients and/or scrams in the past, this event was caused by a circumstance involving a failed steam supply valve in conjunction with removing a reactor feed water pump from service for a planned shutdown. Condition Report (CR) GGN-2010-01503 documented Automatic Reactor Scram On Decreasing Reactor Water Level Due To Inadvertent Reactor Feed Pump Trip that was caused by a unique combination of circumstances involving both trains (i.e., steam leaks inducing electrical faults on train 'B' along with control valve linkage binding on train 'A') and did not have the same underlying concern as this scam.