05000316/LER-2018-003, Regarding Manual Reactor Trip Due to High-High Moisture Separator Drain Tank Level
| ML18186A327 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook |
| Issue date: | 07/02/2018 |
| From: | Lies Q Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| AEP-NRC-2018-44 LER 2018-003-00 | |
| Download: ML18186A327 (6) | |
| Event date: | |
|---|---|
| Report date: | |
| Reporting criterion: | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) |
| 3162018003R00 - NRC Website | |
text
s INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER A unit of American Electric Power July 2, 2018 Docket No.: 50-316 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 316/2018-003-00 Indiana Michiyan Power One Cook Place Bridgman, Ml 49106 lndianaMichiganPower.com AEP-NRC-2018-44 10 CFR 50.73 Unit 2 Manual Reactor Trip Due to High-High Moisture Separator Drain Tank Level In accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report (LER) System, Indiana Michigan Power Company, the licensee for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2, is submitting as an enclosure to this letter the following report:
LER 316/2018-003-00: Unit 2 Manual Reactor Trip Due to High-High Moisture Separator Drain Tank Level There are no commitments contained in this submittal.I Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Michael K. Scarpello, Regulatory Affairs Director, at (269) 466-2649.
Sincerely, 1-~i~
a. la: Lies.
Site Vice President SJM/mll
Enclosure:
Licensee Event Report 316/2018-003-00: Unit 2 Manual Reactor Trip Due to High-High Moisture Separator Drain Tank Level
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 c:
R. J. Ancona - MPSC A.W. Dietrich - NRC Washington, DC MDEQ - RMD/RPS NRC Resident Inspector K. S. West, NRC Region Ill A. J. Williamson -AEP Ft. Wayne AEP-NRC-2018-44
Enclosure to AEP-NRC-2018-44 Licensee Event Report 316/2018-003-00 Unit 2 Manual Reactor Trip Due to High-High Moisture Separator Drain Tank Level
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY 0MB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 03/31/2020 (04-2018)
Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />.
- ~&i~
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.
~;...,
~
Send comments regarding burden estimate to the lnfonmation Services Branch (T-2 F43), U.S.
~ *,,,._._:;-.f_)
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail
""-;**-~*-"'"***
(See Page 2 for required number of digits/characters for each block) to lnfocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of lnfonmation and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a (See NUREG-1022, R.3 for instruction and guidance for completing this form means used to impose an infonmation collection does not display a currently valid 0MB control number, the NRG may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the htt12://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nur~s/staff/sr1022/r30 information collection.
- 3. PAGE Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2 05000316 1 OF3
- 14. TITLE Unit 2 Manual Reactor Trip Due to High-High Moisture Separator Drain Tank Level
- 5. EVENT DATE
- 6. LER NUMBER
- 7. REPORT DATE
- 8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED YEAR ISEQUENTIAi REV FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR 05000 NUMBER NO.
FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 05 07 2018 2018 003 00 07 02 2018 05000
- 9. OPERATING MODE
- 11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check all that apply}
D 20.2201 (b)
D 20.2203(a)(3)(i)
D 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A)
D 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 1 D 20.2201 (d)
D 20.2203(a)(3)(ii)
D 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)
D 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)
D 20.2203(a)(1)
D 20.2203(a)(4)
D so.73(a)(2)(iii)
D 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)
D 20.2203(a)(2)(i)
D 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A)
~
50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A)
D 50.73(a)(2)(x)
- 10. POWER LEVEL D 20.2203(a)(2)(ii)
D 50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A)
D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A)
D 73.71(a)(4)
D 20.2203(a)(2)(iii)
D so.36(c)(2)
D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B)
D 73.71(a)(5)
D 20.2203(a)(2)(iv)
D so.46(a)(3)(ii)
D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C)
D 73.77(a)(1) 30 D 20.2203(a)(2)(v)
D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A)
D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)
D 73.77(a)(2)(i)
D 20.2203(a)(2)(vi)
D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B)
D 50.73(a)(2)(vii)
D 73.77(a)(2)(ii)
D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C) 0 OTHER Specify in Abstract below or in NRG Fonm 366A
- 12. LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER LICENSEE CONTACT [TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)
Michael K. Scarpello, Regulatory Affairs Director (269) 466-2649 CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANU-REPORTABLE
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANU-REPORTABLE FACTURER TOEPIX FACTURER TO EPIX
- 14. SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED
- 15. EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR D YES (If yes, complete 15. EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE)
[g) NO SUBMISSION DATE ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 14 single-spaced typewritten lines)
On May 7, 2018, Unit 2 was operating at approximately thirty percent power following completion of a refueling outage.
The control room staff received a high-high level alarm in a moisture separator drain tank (MSDT) and manually tripped the reactor in accordance with plant procedures. Plant systems responded as expected. The plant was stabilized in hot standby conditions.
An investigation discovered condensate heater level column isolation valves were inadvertently left closed and not restored following system testing activities. This condition resulted in a loss of level control in the corresponding heater.
Excess condensate could not drain from the heater and eventually backfilled through a steam supply line into the MSDT.
This caused the drain flow capacity of the MSDT to be exceeded which resulted in corresponding high and high-high level alarms. The level column isolation valves were later returned to the open position which restored the condensate drain flow paths and cleared the alarms.
The manual reactor trip caused actuation of the Reactor Protection System and an automatic actuation of the Auxiliary Feedwater System. Therefore, the event is reportable as a Licensee Event Report in accordance with 10 CFR 50. 73(a)(2)(iv)(A), "Any event or condition that resulted in manual or automatic actuation of any of the systems listed in paragraph (a)(2)(iv)(B)."
NRC FORM 366 (04-2018)
EVENT DESCRIPTION
SEQUENTIAL NUMBER 003 REV NO.
00 On May 7, 2018, Unit 2 was operating at approximately thirty percent power following completion of a refueling outage.
The control room staff received a high-high level alarm in the left moisture separator drain tank (MSDT)[SN][TK] and manually tripped the reactor [RCT] as required by plant annunciator response procedure. The plant trip was not complicated, as plant systems responded as expected. The plant was stabilized in hot standby conditions.
Event Notification 53387 was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as required by 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B) due to the Reactor Protection System [JC] actuation and 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A) for the automatic actuation of the Auxiliary Feedwater System [BA].
Analysis of the Event
On May 6, 2018, Unit 2 was at approximately eleven percent power and in the process of starting up from a refueling outage.
Later in the shift following synchronization of the turbine generator [TG], and with the plant holding at approximately thirty percent power for chemistry analysis, a high-high level alarm activated on the MSDT. Actions were taken to lower the MSDT level to clear the alarm but were unsuccessful, which prompted staff to manually trip the reactor in accordance with procedures.
Following the plant trip, an investigation discovered condensate heater [SD][HX] level column isolation valves M were inadvertently left closed and not restored following system testing activities. The isolated level columns and associated sensors resulted in a loss of level control in the heater. Excess condensate could not drain from the heater due to a false normal level indicated in the isolated condensate heater level columns that prevented the alternate drain valve from opening. Condensate level increased, filled the heater, and backfilled through a steam supply line and eventually into the MSDT. This caused the drain flow capacity of the MSDT to be exceeded, which resulted in corresponding high and high-high level alarms. The condensate heater level column isolation valves were returned to the open position which restored the condensate drain flow paths and cleared the alarms.
ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY CONSEQUENCES
Nuclear Safety The event is characterized as a plant trip following an alarm, with no safety mitigation equipment out of service. The Unit 2 plant response to the manual trip was not complicated. Manual actuation of the Reactor Protection System functioned as expected. Automatic actuation of the Auxiliary Feedwater System functioned as expected. Rapid transfer of the electrical busses from the Auxiliary Transformers [EL][XFMR] to Reserve Feed [EA] functioned as expected. Probabilistic Risk Assessment of the event determined it to have very low safety significance.
Industrial Safety There was no actual or potential industrial safety hazard resulting from the Unit 2 manual reactor trip. Page 2 of 3 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY 0MB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 03/31/2020 (04-2018)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
CONTINUATION SHEET Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />.
Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.
Send comments regarding burden estimate to the Information Services Branch (T-2 F43), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to lnfocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory 1--------------------------1 Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a (See NUREG-1022, R.3 for instruction and guidance for completing this form http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1022/r30 means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid 0MB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2 05000316 Radiological Safety YEAR 2018
- 3. LER NUMBER SEQUENTIAL NUMBER 003 There was no actual or potential radiological safety hazard resulting from the Unit 2 manual reactor trip.
No radiological release resulted from this event.
CAUSE OF EVENT
REV NO.
00 The direct cause was due to condensate heater level column isolation valves that were inadvertently left closed and not restored following completion of system testing. A formal causal analysis of the human performance aspects contributing to the plant trip is in progress at the time of this report. A supplement to this report will be provided if the evaluation will significantly change the reader's perception of the course, significance, implications, or consequences of the event, or, if it results in substantial changes to planned corrective actions.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
Completed Corrective Actions
- 1. Human performance assessment and review of personnel and circumstances involved with the event.
- 2. Status control investigation of the valves that were out of expected position following testing activities.
Planned Corrective Actions
- 1. Revise plant project documents to include directions to validate systems are restored to desired conditions following completion of testing activities.
- 2. Create a case study training lesson plan on the MSDT high level trip event.
PREVIOUS SIMILAR EVENTS
LERs for CNP Unit 1 and Unit 2 were reviewed for the previous five years and found no similar events. Page 3 of 3