05000305/LER-1983-007, Forwards LER 83-007/01T-0.Detailed Event Analysis Submitted

Forwards LER 83-007/01T-0.Detailed Event Analysis Submitted

ML20073F471
Person / Time
Site:	Kewaunee
Issue date:	04/07/1983
From:	Giesler C WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORP.
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20073F481	List: 05000305/LER-1983-007, Forwards LER 83-007/01T-0.Detailed Event Analysis Submitted 05000305/LER-1983-007-01, /01T-0:on 830308,after Completing Containment Vent During Full Power Operation,Rm 11/12 Sample Point Not Switched from Vent to Containment Position.Caused by Operator Error.Sample Point Switched to Containment
References
CON-NRC-83-74 NUDOCS 8304150495
Download: ML20073F471 (2)

LER-1983-007, Forwards LER 83-007/01T-0.Detailed Event Analysis Submitted

Event date:
Report date:
3051983007R00 - NRC Website

text

_ _ _ _ _ - _

NRC-83-74 WISCONSIN P U B LIC S ERVICE CORPORATIO N P.O. Box 1200, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54305 Apri1 7, 1983 Mr. J. G. Keppler, Regional Administrator Region Ill U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

Dear Mr. Keppler:

Docket 50-305 Operating License DPR-43 Reportable Occurrence 83-007/01 T-0 In accordance with the requirements of the Technical Specifications, Section 6.9, the attached Licensee Event Report (LER) for reportable occurrence 83-007/01T-0 is being submitted.

This event was originally determined to be a thirty-day written reportable occurrence by the plant operations review com-mittee (PORC). However, during the corporate review process it was discovered that our Technical Specifications required a prompt notification with a two-week written followup report.

Since this event was reported via the Emergency Notification System (ENS) we are submitting this LER as our two-week written followup report. We have contacted our Resident inspector and have advised him of the situation.

Although our Technical Specifications require prompt notification this event lacks sufficient safety significance to warrant it.

As discussed in the attachment to the LER several other reactor coolant leak detection systems were available, thus minimizing the significance of the loss of R-11 and R-12.

Therefore, we feel that this event should have been a thirty-day reportable occurrence. As such we will be reviewing the reporting requirements of Section 6.9 and will propose an amendment to the Technical Specifications if appropriate.

l.

I 8304150495 030407 0500030 gDRADOCK l

IdM

Mr. J. G. Keppler April 7, 1983 Page 2 Very truly yours,

&% r0W &O C. W. Giesler Vice President - Nuclear Power js

Attach, cc - Dir, Office of Inspection & Enforcement US NRC, Washington, DC 20555 Dir, Office of Mgt Info & Program Control US NRC, Washington, DC 20555 INPO Records Center Suite 1500, 1100 Circle 75 Parkway Atlanta, GA 30339 Mr. Robert Nelson, NRC Resident inspector RR #1, Box 999, Kewaunee, WI 54216 Mr. S. A. Varga, Chief US NRC, Washington, DC 20555