05000281/LER-2011-001, Regarding Auto Reactor Trip on Low Coolant Flow Due to Loop Stop Valve Failure

From kanterella
(Redirected from 05000281/LER-2011-001)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Regarding Auto Reactor Trip on Low Coolant Flow Due to Loop Stop Valve Failure
ML11105A032
Person / Time
Site: Surry Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 04/01/2011
From: Gerald Bichof
Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LER 11-001-00
Download: ML11105A032 (6)


LER-2011-001, Regarding Auto Reactor Trip on Low Coolant Flow Due to Loop Stop Valve Failure
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications
2812011001R00 - NRC Website

text

1 OCFR50.73 Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Power Station 5570 Hog Island Road Surry, Virginia 23883 April 1, 2011 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Serial No.:

SPS:

Docket No.:

License No.:

11-112 JSA 50-281 DPR-37

Dear Sirs:

Pursuant to 10CFR50.73, Virginia Electric and Power Company hereby submits the following Licensee Event Report applicable to Surry Power Station Unit 2.

Report No. 50-281/2011-001-00 This report has been reviewed by the Station Facility Safety Review Committee and will be forwarded to the Management Safety Review Committee for its review.

Very truly yours, A<a 7f&

Gerald T. Bischof, Site Vice President Surry Power Station Enclosure Commitment contained in this letter: None

cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower, Suite 1200 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station

NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY IMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES 08/31/2010 (9-2007)

, the NRC may (See reverse for required number of not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the digits/characters for each block) information collection.

3. PAGE Surry Power Station 05000. 281 1 OF 4
4. TITLE Auto Reactor Trip on Low Coolant Flow Due to Loop Stop Valve Failure
5. EVENT DATE
6. LER NUMBER
7. REPORT DATE
8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED SEQUENTIAL REV M

FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR NUMBER NO.

MONTH DAY YEAR 05000 0

FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 02 02 11 2011 -

001 00 04 01 11 05000

9. OPERATING MODE
11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 4: (Check all that apply)

[]

20.2201(b)

EJ 20.2203(a)(3Xi) 11 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C)

E] 50.73(a)(2)(vii)

N E] 20.2201(d)

El 20.2203(a)(3)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A)

[] 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

[] 20.2203(a)(1)

[]

20.2203(a)(4)

[]

50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)

[]

50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A)

El 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 50.73(a)2)(ix)(A)

10. POWER LEVEL El 20.2203(a)(2)(ii)

EJ 50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A)

El 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) 11 50.73(aX2Xx)

[] 20.2203(a)(2)(iii)

[]

50.36(c)(2)

[]

50.73(aX2)(v)(A)

E] 73.71 (a)(4) 98.3%

El 20.2203(a)(2)(iv)

[] 50.46(a)(3)(ii)

[] 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B)

El 73.71(aX5)

El 20.2203(a)(2)(v)

El 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A)

[] 50.73(aX2)(v)(C)

El OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(vi) 50.73(a)(2)(i)(g) 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)

Specify in Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A

12. LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER FACILITY NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)

B. L. Stanley, Director Safety and Licensing (757) 365-2003MANU-REPORTABLE MANU-REPORTABLE

CAUSE

SYSTEM COMPONENT FACTURER TO EPIX

CAUSE

SYSTEM COMPONENT FACTURER TO EPIX B

AB ISV A391 Y

14. SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED
15. EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR EL YES (If yes, complete 15. EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE)

W NO SUBMISSION DATE ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines)

On February 2, 2011, at 0533, the Unit 2 reactor automatically tripped from 98.3% power as a result of low flow in the "C" loop of the reactor coolant system (RCS). The plant responded to the reactor trip as designed. All three auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pumps automatically initiated on low-low steam generator (SG) water level providing flow to the SGs. The AFW pumps were secured by 0613. At 1222, the reactor coolant pump for "C" loop was stopped. With no flow, compliance with Technical Specification (TS) 3.17.1 was not maintained and a 30 hour3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br /> action statement to place the unit in a cold shutdown condition was entered in accordance with TS 3.0.1. A preliminary root cause evaluation (RCE) determined that the low flow condition in the "C" RCS loop resulted from a separation of a loop stop valve's disc assembly from the stem, which allowed the disc assembly to drop into the flow stream. Approved RCE recommendations, designed to prevent the recurrence of a similar event, will be implemented through the corrective action program. This report is being submitted pursuant to 10CFR50.73 (a)(2)(iv)(A) as an event that resulted in the automatic actuation of engineered safety features and the reactor protection system and pursuant to 1 OCFR50.73 (a)(2)(i)(B) for operation prohibited by TS 3.17.1.

1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE EVENT On February 2, 2011, at 0533, control room annunciator [EIIS-IB] 2E-B10, "Loss of Coolant Flow > P-8" alarmed, indicating low flow in the "C" reactor coolant loop. All three reactor coolant system (RCS) loop flow indicators [EIIS-AB, FI] for the "C" RCS loop had decreased to approximately 30% indication. As a result of the low flow condition, the Unit 2 reactor [EIIS-JC] automatically tripped from 98.3% power and was followed by an automatic turbine trip. Control room operators promptly initiated the appropriate emergency operating procedures.

The plant responded to the reactor/turbine trip as designed: all three auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pumps [EIIS-BA, P] automatically initiated on low-low steam generator (SG) water level providing flow to the SGs and the Anticipated Transient Without Scram Mitigation System Actuation Circuitry (AMSAC) armed and initiated.

The RCS temperature decreased to approximately 5390F due to the main turbine cylinder heating steam control valves being manually bypassed in conjunction with full AFW flow. The RCS cooldown resulted in a decrease in Pressurizer level.

RCS letdown isolated and Pressurizer heaters tripped as designed due to low Pressurizer level. The cylinder heating steam was isolated and AFW was reduced to mitigate RCS cooldown. Operators increased charging flow to restore Pressurizer level and letdown was restored at 0555. The AFW pumps were secured by 0613. The RCS temperature subsequently stabilized at approximately 5480F. Shutdown margin was calculated to ensure that Technical Specification (TS) and administrative shutdown margin limits were satisfied. The NRC was notified pursuant to a four hour notification of 10 CFR 50.72 (b)(2)(iv)(B) and eight hour notification of 10 CFR 50.72 (b)(3)(iv)(A).

The Source Range Nuclear Instrument (SRNI) detectors failed to energize automatically due to undercompensation of Intermediate Range Nuclear Instrument N-36 [EIIS-IL, RI]. The SRNIs were energized manually.

At 1222, the reactor coolant pump (RCP) [EIIS-AB, P] for "C" loop was stopped and no flow was indicated in "C" loop. With no flow in RCS loop "C", compliance with TS 3.17.1 requiring loop stop valves to be open unless the reactor is in cold shutdown or refueling shutdown was not maintained. Therefore, an action statement was entered in accordance with TS 3.0.1, requiring the unit to be placed in a cold shutdown condition within 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />. The unit reached cold shutdown on February 3, 2011 at 0144, and the TS 3.0.1 action statement was exited.

This report is being submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73 (a)(2)(iv)(A) as an event that resulted in the automatic actuation of engineered safety features and the reactor protection system and pursuant to 1 OCFR50.73 (a)(2)(i)(B) for operationU. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (9-2007)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

CONTINUATION SHEET

1. FACILITY NAME
2. DOCKET
6. LER NUMBER
3. PAGE Y

SEQUENTIAL REV IYEAR NUMBER NO.

3o Surry Power Station 05000-281 3 of 4 2011 001 00o prohibited by TS 3.17.1.

2.0

SIGNIFICANT SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS

This event resulted in no safety consequences or implications. Appropriate operator actions were taken in accordance with emergency operating procedures and the unit was quickly brought to a stable condition. Therefore, the health and safety of the public were not affected at any time during this event.

3.0

CAUSE

A Root Cause Evaluation (RCE) team was assembled to determine the cause of this event and to recommend corrective actions. The preliminary RCE determined that the low flow condition in the "C" RCS loop resulted from the separation of the 2-RC-MOV-2595 cold leg valve's disc assembly from the stem, which allowed the disc assembly to drop into the flow stream. An inspection of the valve internals revealed the wedge pin had been sheared and the upper wedge female threads had wear resulting in disengagement of the stem to upper wedge. The preliminary RCE determined the connection of the valve stem and upper wedge of the valve internals may be susceptible to failure in a high vibration environment created from the flow turbulence of the RCP discharge when not adequately torqued after the stem and upper wedge of the valve internals are assembled. The RCE will be finalized during the upcoming refueling outage with further evaluations of old parts, additional valve diagnosis and vibration analysis.

4.0 IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION(S)

Following the reactor trip, control room operators acted promptly to place the unit in a safe, shutdown condition in accordance with emergency operating procedures.

The Shift Technical Advisor monitored the critical safety function status trees to ensure that plant parameters remained satisfactory.

5.0

ADDITIONAL CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

The other Unit 2 loop stop valves were stroked and data was obtained. The troubleshooting results did not conclude degradation on the other valves.

The internals were removed from 2-RC-MOV-2595 (new disc assembly was not available) and a new stem was installed.U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (9-2007)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

CONTINUATION SHEET

1. FACILITY NAME
2. DOCKET
6. LER NUMBER
3. PAGE YEAR SEQUENTIAL REV YEA NUMBER NO.

Surry Power Station 05000 - 281 U

4 of 4 2011 001 00 6.0 ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE The RCE will be finalized.

Based on the preliminary RCE, cold leg loop stop valves will undergo inspection, be properly assembled including torquing the stem into the wedge and hardening of the connection of the loop stop valve stem to the upper wedge to prevent loosening of the connection. Hot leg loop stop valves will be evaluated to determine if corrective actions are required.

7.0

SIMILAR EVENTS

LER No. 50-281/1999-003-00 Auto Reactor Trip on Low Coolant Flow Due to Loop Stop Valve Failure A similar event occurred in 1999 and the RCE team concluded inadequate lubrication of the valve stem was resulting in excessive torque being applied, breaking the anti-rotation pin and allowing the stem to unscrew from the upper wedge.

The preliminary RCE evaluated the 1999 RCE and concluded that while stem lubrication would reduce excessive torque, the actual cause of the 1999 event may be more similar to the current RCE.

8.0 MANUFACTURER/MODEL NUMBER Anchor/Darling Valve Company Double-Disc Gate Valve S350-W-DD 9.0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Unit 1 was at 100% power and remained unaffected by the Unit 2 reactor trip.

Although there have been no failures of Unit 1 loop stop valves in this manner, they will be evaluated to determine if corrective actions are required.