05000247/FIN-2010005-07
From kanterella
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | |
| Description | A Green self-revealing NCV of 10 CFR 50.54, Conditions of Licenses, paragraph (q), was identified because Entergy staff did not adequately implement the requirements of the IPEC Emergency Plan. On the evening of November 7, 2010, the Unit 2 operators declared an Alert emergency at 1849 hours0.0214 days <br />0.514 hours <br />0.00306 weeks <br />7.035445e-4 months <br />. The technical support center (TSC) was staffed and declared operational at 2008 hours0.0232 days <br />0.558 hours <br />0.00332 weeks <br />7.64044e-4 months <br />, and the operations support center (OSC) was staffed and declared operational at 2015 hours0.0233 days <br />0.56 hours <br />0.00333 weeks <br />7.667075e-4 months <br />. Both of these activation times exceeded the 60-minute staffing requirement in the IPEC Emergency Plan. This issue was entered into Entergy\'s CAP as CR-IP2-2010-6813, CR-IP2-2010- 6831, and CR-IP2-2010-6871. This finding is more than minor because it affected the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) attribute of the EP cornerstone to ensure that Entergy personnel are capable of implementing adequate measures to protect the public health and safety in the event of a radiological emergency. Entergy personnel did not meet the requirements of the IPEC Emergency Plan in that the TSC and OSC were not staffed nor declared operational within 60 minutes of the Alert emergency declaration on November 7,2010. In accordance with IMC 0609, Appendix B, Emergency Preparedness Significance Determination Process, the inspectors determined the finding to be of very low safety significance (Green). Using IMC 0609, Appendix B, Section 4.2 and Sheet 2, Actual Event lmplementation Problem, the inspectors determined that the failure to comply with an aspect of the Emergency Plan related to ERO augmentation (10 CFR 50.47 (b) (2) was a non-risk-significant planning standard problem which occurred during an Alert emergency and is therefore of very low safety significance (Green).This finding has a cross-cutting aspect in the area of human performance associated with the work practices attribute of defining and effectively communicating expectations regard ing proced u ral com pliance and personnel following proced ures. Specifically, Entergy staff did not comply with ERO expectations and procedures regarding prompt reporting to an assigned emergency response facility during an actual event. |
| Site: | Indian Point  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000247/2010005 Section 4OA3 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2010 (2010Q4) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Emergency Prep |
| Identified by: | Self-revealing |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71153 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | T Burns T Hedigan D Caron D Jones J Noggle M Gray M Halter P Cataldo P Prescott R Latta S Barr |
| CCA | H.8, Procedure Adherence |
| INPO aspect | WP.4 |
| ' | |
Finding - Indian Point - IR 05000247/2010005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Indian Point) @ 2010Q4
Self-Identified List (Indian Point)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||