ML13329A426
| ML13329A426 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/14/2013 |
| From: | Bauer E Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13329A422 | List: |
| References | |
| NL-13-147 IP-CALC-13-00063, Rev 2 | |
| Download: ML13329A426 (42) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 3 TO NL-13-147 IP-CALC-13-00063, R2 HYDRAULIC EVALUATION OF IDENTIFIED INDICATION IN IP3 SERVICE WATER 10" LINE #1093 ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 DOCKET NO. 50-286
ATTACHMENT 9.2 ENGINEERING CALCULATION COVER PAGE Sheet 1 of 2 E] ANO-1 El ANO-2 El GGNS nl IP-2 [ IP-3 El PLP 17 JAF El PNPS E] RBS 0 VY E[ W3 El NP-GGNS-3 Fl NP-RBS-3 CALCULATION EC # 4766_...5 Page 1 of 9 COVER PAGE Design Basis Calc. n- YES [*NO [*CALCULATION - EC Markup Calculation No: IP-CALC-13-00063 Revision: 2
Title:
Hydraulic Evaluation of Identified Indication in IP3 Service Editorial Water 10" Line #1093 []YES [ENO System(s): Service Water Review Org (Department): Design Engineering Safety Class: Component/Equipment/Structure Type/Number:
[ Safety / Quality Related
-- Augmented Quality Program L- Non-Safety Related Document Type: Calculation Keywords (Description/Topical Codes):
Hydraulic, flow, PROTO-FLO, service water, flaw, indication REVIEWS Nam e/Sinature/Date Name/Signature/Date Name/Signature/Date e rL .' K Alfien *ri ers 13 Responsible Engineer ZDesigý Verifier E Supervisor/Aproval 13 Reviewer
___IComments Attached 1- Comments Attached EN-DC-126 REV 4
ATTACHMENT 9.3 CALCULATION REFERENCE SHEET Sheet 1 of 3 CALCULATION CALCULATION NO: IP-CALC-13-00063 REFERENCE SHEET REVISION: 2 I. EC Markups Incorporated (N/A to NP calculations) 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
II. Relationships: Sht Rev Input Output Impact Tracking Doc Doc Y/N No.
- 1. CR-IP3-2013-04174 0 x 0 _
- 2. IP3-UT-13-058 0 x 0
- 3. IP-CALC-06-00017 1 x 01
- 4. 9321-F-27033 11 x 0
- 5. 209-100000314 0 x 0
- 6. 8399.164-F-SW-081 0 x 0
- 7. 6604.219-8-SW-018 0 x 0_
- 8. CN-SEE-03-53 0 x []
- 9. CR-IP3-2013-04416 10 0 III. CROSS
REFERENCES:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
IV. SOFTWARE USED:
Title:
PROTO-FLO Version/Release: 4.5 Disk/CD No.
V. DISKICDS INCLUDED:
Title:
None. Version/Release Disk/CD No.
VI. OTHER CHANGES:
Ii i... ..
EN-DC-126 REV 4
ATTACHMENT 9.4 RECORD OF REVISION Sheet 1 of 1
- Revision Record of Revision Initial issue.
0 Revision 1 of IP-CALC-13-00063 re-evaluates Cases 3 and 21 for the indication on the essential header with a less degraded SW pump curve in order to meet the Fan Cooler Unit (FCU) minimum flow requirements that were not met using an 18% degraded SW Pump Curve. Additionally, the 1 model was run as if line #1093 was the non-essential service water header supply. This was done to determine if the minimum flow requirements to the non-essential header loads would still be met in the event that the Service Water headers were swapped and water was lost through the indication.
Revision 2 of IP-CALC-13-00063 re-evaluates Cases 3, 8, 17, 21 and 32 for an indication twice the size of the indication evaluated in Revision 1. These 2 cases are the bounding design basis cases for the essential header, non-essential header and Appendix R cooldown.
EN-DC-126 REV 4
Calculation IP-CALC-13-00063 Revision 2 Page 4 of 9 4.0 Table of Contents 5.0 Purpose 5 6.0 Conclusion 5 7.0 Input and Design Criteria 5 8.0 Assumptions 6 9.0 Method of Analysis 6 10.0 Calculations 6 11.0 References 9 12.0 Attachments Attachment 1: Summary of Results For The Original Indication (11 Pages)
Attachment la: Summary of Results For The 2.4" Diameter Indication (5 Pages)
Attachment 2: IST Full Flow Test Data For 31SWP, 32SWP & 33SWP (2 Pages)
Attachment 3: Proto-Flo - Leakage Pipe Data Sheets (2 Pages)
Attachment 4: Proto-Flo - SN 0586017 10% & 15% Degraded Pump Head (2 Pages)
Attachment 5: Proto-Flo - Flow Summary Sheets For Cases 3, 8, 17, 21 & 32 (10 Pages)
Calculation IP-CALC-13-00063 Revision 2 Page 5 of 9
5.0 Purpose
The purpose of this calculation is to evaluate the effect on service water flow due to an indication identified in the IP3 10" Service Water (SW) line #1093 (Reference 1). The indication was evaluated in UT report IP3-UT-13-058 as Area 3 (Reference 2). Originally, the Area 3 indication results yield a postulated 0.75" x 3" location below pressure stress minimum wall in the 10" service water header. Further visual examination of 10" line #1093 revealed that the corroded area was no more than twice that originally found (Reference 3). The effects of the postulated loss of service water through the larger indication on system hydraulic performance needs to be evaluated.
Revision 2 of this calculation evaluates the impact of a potential service water leak due to the identified indication on the most limiting design basis cases documented in the service water hydraulic model (Reference 4). The impact of the indication on 10" line #1093 was evaluated with this flow path on the essential and non-essential headers.
6.0
Conclusion:
Based on the results of this calculation, all IP3 service water system safety related components will receive sufficient service water to perform their intended safety functions with a postulated 2.4" diameter hole in the 10" EDG supply line.
This evaluation requires that 31SWP, 32SWP and 33SWP be no more than 10% degraded from their manufacture's design curves and 34SWP, 35SWP and 36SWP can be no more than 15%
degraded as long as the Operability Evaluation for this indication is in effect.
In order to ensure Backup 38SWP has adequate net positive suction head (NPSH) for Appendix R Cooldown, the CCW heat exchanger outlet valves SWN-35-1 & SWN-35-2 must be throttled to no more than 16.5% (150) open should a pipe leak develop at the reported indication. The results of this calculation are summarized in Attachment la.
7.0 Inputs and Design Criteria:
The existing IP3 service water system hydraulic model (Reference 4) is used to evaluate system performance. The model was changed to include a hole at the location of the indication in the 10" EDG supply line. Based on the above, the hole size being evaluated is two times the original indication size of 0.75" x 3" that was evaluated in Revision 0 and 1 of calculation IP-CALC 00063.
2 Flaw Area = 2 x (0.75" x 3") = 4.5 in Flaw Diameter = V[(4A)/Ii] = V[(4 x 4.5)/T[] = 2.4 in
Calculation IP-CALC-13-00063 Revision 2 Page 6 of 9 The minimum required service water flow rate through each CCW heat exchanger is 2350 gpm for Appendix R cooldown and 4700 gpm combined (Reference 7). This flow rate corresponds to use of the CCW heat exchanger enhanced UA that is applicable to the Appendix R cooldown analysis (Case 4.2) to meet the 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> cooldown limit.
Blowdown flow through the backup service water pump strainer with the blowdown valves full open is about 400 gpm at a total CCW heat exchanger flow of 5000 gpm (Reference 6).
The suction bell of the Appendix R pump is located at elevation -10'-11" (Reference 9) and the impeller centerline is 11-3/16" above the suction bell according to Reference 8. As a result, the pump centerline is then at elevation -9.98'. To account for this change the pump suction node Pmp39Suct in the Proto-Flo model was changed from -4.42' to -9.98' and the corresponding static pressure was changed from 14.7 psia to 17.05 psia (14.7 psia + 5.42' of static head above pump centerline) so that Proto-Flo could calculate the correct available NPSH.
The NPSH ratio (NPSHA/NPSHR) calculated by Proto-Flo must be greater than or equal to one.
8.0 Assumptions
There are no assumptions used in this calculation.
9.0 Method of Analysis:
As stated above, a calculation is needed to documentthe effects of a potential loss of service water through the above indication. The existing Proto-Flo hydraulic model for the IP3 service water system (Reference 4) will be used to evaluate the effects on service water system flows as a result of the loss of service water due to the postulated flaw in the 10" EDG supply line. The results of these re-evaluations will be compared to the acceptance criteria established in the service water hydraulic model in Reference 4. The most limiting cases (3, 8, 17, 21 and 32) were reevaluated for this indication size.
10.0 Calculations:
In Revision 0 of the calculation, the following cases were specifically rerun for the essential header with the standard 18% degraded pump curve:
Case 3: Essential Header Post LOCA Injection, Loss of Instrument Air (with single active failure of a service water pump).
Case 21: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, Active Failure Case 23: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 24" Ess Hdr Crack Case 24: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 20" Ess Hdr Crack
Calculation IP-CALC-13-00063 Revision 2 Page 7 of 9 Case 26: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 18" Ess Hdr Crack Case 27: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 10" Ess Hdr Crack Case 8: Essential Header Normal Operation, 2 SWPs, TB Seismic Break.
Note that the cases evaluated in Revision 0 also cover those cases contained in the IP3 UFSAR Section 9.6. The results of these runs showed that for all cases evaluated with leakage modeled at the location of the postulated indication, all safety related components on the essential header met their minimum required flows using the standard 18% degraded pump curve with the exception of minor flow deficiencies on one of the fan cooler units (FCUs) in Case 3 and 2 FCUs in Case 21 that were slightly below the minimum required flow of 1400 gpm.
These two cases were rerun in Revision 1 using a 15% degraded pump head curve instead of the original 18% degraded pump head curve. The 15% degraded curve was developed using the curves that are currently in the Reference 4 hydraulic model. Using pump test data from the quarterly tests, it was confirmed that the SWPs are currently not degraded more than 10%,
therefore using a 15% degraded pump curve is acceptable and provides margin. Revision 1 demonstrated that the required 1400 gpm FCU minimum flow requirements are met using a 15% degraded pump curve. The results from Revision 0 and Revision 1 are summarized in .
Revision 1 of this calculation also evaluated the following cases with the indication assumed on the non-essential header:
Case 17: Non-Essential Header Post LOCA Switchover, LWL, 1 SWP Case 18: Non-Essential Header Post LOCA Switchover, LWL, 2 SWP Case 21: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, Active Failure Case 25: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 20" Non-Ess Hdr Crack Case 28: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 10" Non-Ess Hdr Crack Case 32: Non-Ess Header During Appendix R Cooldown with Backup SWP 39 and 2 CCW Hxs Note that these cases also cover those cases contained in the IP3 UFSAR Section 9.6.
The non Appendix R cases were run using the standard 18% degraded pump curve and the Appendix R Case 32 was run with the standard back up SW pump curve. All minimum flow requirements were met for these cases as summarized in Attachment 1.
Calculation IP-CALC-13-00063 Revision 2 Page 8 of 9 In order to evaluate the impact of a larger indication size in Revision 2, the cases analyzed in Revision 1 for the original indication were reviewed. By observation, it was determined that Case 3, Case 8 and Case 21 are the limiting essential header cases, Case 17 and Case 21 are the limiting non-essential header cases and Case 32 is the limiting Appendix R case. These cases were rerun for the larger postulated 2.4 inch flaw size in Revision 2.
The model was revised to include a leak path based on a flaw diameter of 2.4 inches in the 10" line supplying the EDG's. The leakage path was modeled by adding a 2.4 in diameter pipe of zero length discharging to atmosphere. The pipe adds a gate valve with zero pressure drop (C,=
lx10 6) that is opened or closed to control leakage out the hole. This pipe was added at node EssToCRAC-Q3 in the essential header and at node NEssToCRAC-5T2 in the non-essential header. The Proto-Flo data sheet for the leakage pipes are provided in Attachment 3.
The results for each of these cases are summarized in Attachment la and the Proto-Flo "Flow Summary" reports for each case are provided in Attachment 5. The results of these runs show that for the limiting cases evaluated, all safety related components on the essential and non-essential header met their minimum required flows with a 2.4 inch hole in the 10" supply line to the EDG coolers using a 10% degraded pump curve. The Proto-Flo analysis shows that the SWPs on the essential and non-essential headers. are operating well below maximum flow and have adequate NPSH margin.
A 10% degraded pump head curve was developed using the limiting pump curve SN 0586017 in the hydraulic model. Examination of the full flow pump test data from the quarterly tests in confirmed that the SWPs on the 123 header are currently not degraded more than 3% as shown in Table 1 by comparison to the design pump SN 0586017, therefore using a 10% degraded pump curve is acceptable and provides margin.
Table 1 - Comparison Of Latest IST Full Flow Test Data To Design Pump Curve SN 0586017 Pump Recorded Flow Recorded Head SN 0586017 Head Degradation (Attachment 2) (Attachment 2) (Reference 5) (%)
(gpm) (ft) (ft) 31SWP 5000 213.1 210 0 32 SWP 5000 213.9 210 0 33 SWP 5300 199.12 205 3 Since the indication is located on 10" line #1093 upstream of valve SWN-30 (DG HDR SUPPLY INLET ISOL FROM SWP'S 31, 32, 33 DISCH HDR) only 31SWP, 32SWP and 33SWP are limited to
Calculation IP-CALC-13-00063 Revision 2 Page 9 of 9 10% pump head degradation. 34SWP, 35SWP & 36SWP are limited to the same 15% head pump degradation determined in Revision 1 of this calculation. Original performance data for the six SWP's and one spare is documented in Reference 5. Performance data for the 10% degraded pump is provided in Attachment 4.
The analysis for the limiting Appendix R Cooldown Case 32 indicated that flow from the backup SWP will need to be limited to maintain positive NPSH for the backup SWP should a leak develop at the reported indication. In order to ensure Backup 38SWP has adequate NPSH for Appendix R Cooldown and deliver at least 2350 gpm to each CCW heat exchanger, the CCW heat exchanger outlet valves SWN-35-1 & SWN-35-2 must be throttled to no greater than 16.5% (150) open.
11.0
References:
(1) CR-IP3-2013-04174 (2) IP3-UT-13-058: UT report for 10" Line # 1093.
(3) CR-IP3-2013-4416 (4) IP-CALC-06-00017 Rev 1, Service Water System PROTO-FLO Model Expansion (IP3).
(5) Vendor Manual 209-100000314, Installation Operation & Maintenance of 26APK-1 SWPs (6) 8399.164-F-SW-081 Rev 0, Backup SWP Discharge Pressure For Appendix R Operation (7) CN-SEE-03-53 Rev 0, IP3 RHR Cooldown Analysis For The Power Uprate Program (3216 MWt Core Power)
(8) 6604.219-8-SW-018 Rev 0, Back Up SW Pump NPSH Evaluation For 120 F Discharge Canal Water (9) 9321-F-27033 Rev 11, Service Water Piping Back-Up Supply
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 1 Attachment 1 - Summary of Results for The Original Indication Case 3: Essential Header Post LOCA Injection, Loss of Instrument Air Ic i indicatto-m on funa Meader - 6r'g 2 '38" ~ __________
FCU 31 116 *P3 4 FCU 32 125 133.6 FCU 33 log0 141T01 14W0 FCU 3.5404,$6 li T2 .... 5-5 .- ,r FCU 31 MC 15331 KCU 33 wC 1S4 -*'3 12 KCU 34 MC 152 -4412 FCU3SMC 43,3_
EDG31 177 316,09 EDG 32 179 375.2? 330 EiGi33 i ... .3 ........1 6,24 11i CRAC 31 06 53,355 CRAC 32 222 1 S~4_______
IA C"p31 20S 688;2 6 1A C=m32. 203. 6932 StrainerOW 3S 42 381-93 Strainer OW 16 46 j20 (1) Discussed in Section 10.0 Note: Components that are not listed above are not affected by the indication
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 2 Attachment 1 - Summary of Results for The Original Indication Case 21: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, Active Failure FCU 'I _ .e } 140 FCU 31 Mc _______
FiU J* MC .155 *B. 11 FCIJ 3 MC. 154 49.50 12 FCU 34 MC . 152__ _ 41_1,7 _
FCU 35 MC 156 44,99 EDL .3., 177 51037*
ED i 32 179 323.4 13
..................... ED 33 1* . 324,; __ _ _ _ _ _ _
CRAC 31 196 _ _ _ _ _.5_'_
CfAC32 222 67.00 _ _ _s 31 Ms ed i ics S1.211 10.0
()A Fo 32 203 61m32 U(ecruti)
_re.4 CC WVNX 31 91 7 Mr 9ýr6W35 .42 7 ___
slvlinler 1W35 46 39&88__________
(1) Discussed in Section 10.0 (2) On the Non-essential header (3) Required Flow is 302 gpm @ 1940 KW (Injection) and 213 gpm @ 1682 KW (Recirculation) per Ref. (4)
(4) Instrument Air Coolers aligned to the Essential header with TCV-1113 Controlling to 123 gpm.
Note: Components that are not listed above are not affected by the indication
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 3 Attachment 1 - Summary of Results for The Original Indication Case 23: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 24" Ess Hdr Crack C'omponent Pipe 4 Calculated Flow (@-1.8%) Miliffniu Required Flow lRel'. 41 Indication on Essential Header - (Losing 332.97 gpm)
FCU 31 116 1613.45 FCU 32 125 1619.28 FCU 33 108 1600.71 1400 FCU 34 101 1586.73 FCU 35 130 1574.15 FCU 31 MC 153 60.06 FCU 32 MC 155 65.67 FCU 33 MC 154 55.23 12 FCU 34 MC 152 49.94 FCU 35 MC 156 50.20 EDG 31 177 605.17I1)
EDG 32 179 348.17 330 EDG 33 183 348.77 CRAC 31 196 60.27(1)
CRAC32 222 75.00 IAComp 31 205 67.26 IAComp 32 203 67.74 CCW Hx 31 91 3900.15 3721 Strainer BW 35 42 387.94 Strainer BW 36 46 388.84 (1) On the Non-essential header Note: Components that are not listed above are not affected by the indication
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 4 Attachment 1 - Summary of Results for The Original Indication Case 24: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 20" Ess Hdr Crack Collpoetm(.l Pipe U I~tA~I 10W Calculat~ed Flow (Cr i180,1) fMil' Miniitw Required mm *..Requie(
_Flow [Ref. 41 Indication on Essential Header - (Losing 332.74 gpm)
FCU 31 116 1609.87 FCU 32 125 1615.76 FCU 33 108 1597.23 1400 FCU 34 101 1583.27 FCU 35 130 1570.72 FCU 31 MC 153 59.93 FCU 32 MC 155 65.52 FCU 33 MC 154 55.11 12 FCU 34 MC 152 49.83 FCU 35 MC 156 50.09 EDG 31 177 605.60(1)
EDG 32 179 347.60 330 EDG 33 183 348.19 CRAC 31 196 60.23"'5 CRAC32 222 75.00 IA Comp 31 205 67.74 IAComp 32 203 67.26 CCW Hx 31 91 3866.16 3721 Strainer BW 35 42 389.46 Strainer BW 36 46 390.41 1 (1) On the Non-essential header Note: Components that are not listed above are not affected by the indication
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 5 Attachment 1 - Summary of Results for The Original Indication Case 26: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 18" Ess Hdr Crack Pipe 4 Calcultehd I'low 1(0-18%4) Minmu Ref, Component Indication on Essential Header - (Losing 333.39 gpm)
FCU 31 116 1614.68 FCU 32 125 1620.52 FCU 33 108 1601.94 1400 FCU 34 101 1587.94 FCU 35 130 1575.35 FCU 31 MC 153 60.11 FCU 32 MC 155 65.72 FCU 33 MC 154 55.28 12 FCU 34 MC 152 49.98 FCU 35 MC 156 50.24 EDG 31 177 604.39(1)
EDG 32 179 349.22 330 EDG 33 183 349.81 CRAC 31 196 60.350)
CRAC 32 222 75 IA Comp 31 205 67.74 IA Comp 32 203 67.26 CCW Hx 31 91 3906.40 3721 Strainer 8W 35 42 389.68 Strainer BW 36 46 390.63 (1) On the Non-essential header Note: Components that are not listed above are not affected by the indication
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 6 Attachment 1 - Summary of Results for The Original Indication Case 27: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 10" Ess Hdr Crack Component Pipe #t (C'acuiated1,1w (0-18%) Mifnowum Required Filow [Ref. iie Indication on Essential Header - (Losing 332.02 gpm)
FCU 31 116 1621.92 FCU 32 125 1627.79 FCU 33 108 1609.12 1400 FCU 34 101 1595.07 FCU 35 130 1582.42 FCU 31 MC 153 60.38 FCU 32 MC 155 66.02 FCU 33 MC 154 55.53 12 FCU 34 MC 152 50.20 FCU 35 MC 156 50.47 EDG 31 177 607.78(1)
EDG 32 179 344.34 330 EDG 33 183 345.49 CRAC 31 196 60.08(1) 52.5 CRAC 32 222 76 IA Comp 31 205 67.26 IA Comp 32 203 67.74 CCW Hx 31 91 3943.03 3721 Strainer BW 35 42 389.96 Strainer BW 36 46 390.92 (1) On the Non-essential header Note: Components that are not listed above are not affected by the indication
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 7 Attachment 1 - Summary of Results for The Original Indication I Case 8: Essential Header Normal Operation, 2 SWPs, TB Seismic Break Component Pipe # Calculated Flow -8%) Mini Required
" Flow IRe, ý4: ý Indication on Essential Header - (Losing 326.34 gpm)
FCU 31 116 666.49 FCU 32 125 669.09 FCU 33 108 660.52 570 FCU 34 101 654.40 FCU 35 130 649.12 FCU 31 MC 153 66.86 FCU 32 MC 155 72.15 FCU 33 MC 154 62.18 12 FCU 34 MC 152 56.45 FCU 35 MC 156 56.57 EDG 31 177 390.78 EDG 32 179 400.57 330 EDG 33 183 401.60 CRAC 31 196 58.91 CRAC 32 222 60.84 IA Comp 31 205 68.25 IA Comp 32 203 68.75 Strainer BW 35 42 396.18 Strainer BW 36 46 394.39 1 Note: Components that are not listed above are not affected by the indication
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 8 Attachment 1 - Summary of Results for The Original Indication Case 3: Essential Header Post LOCA Injection, Loss of Instrument Air
[Recalculated using a 15% degraded pump curve]
__________________ onEIsent~ij Indicatfcrnm H~eader- (Lsi 3O1-0S ~mi _________
F0 3.1. 1 11 E ' 142834 14W. 13 1 FCU 32 IZ.5 I 1433.46 " 1.24 1417,01 j
LL _ 10 . 14486
___CU 34 ____ 1404.56 142&01 1.5C3 5312 _____94 _
-44 C-U 32 MC 155__ S____
11.a PiUS3 MC J 154 4&a& 4J.58- 12 FC4MC. 152. 44 , 12 44,83 Fcd 35 Mc 156 43.38 45,06 FOG031 177 316MO 369-92 J EDG 32 I 179 375-27 .379,19 J330 MAC 31____ 196 511 4, t 52:5 C32 ___22__ 5S54 S6:04______________
M -anp 31 205 ________
iA camp 32 203 69.32 0.__________
Straine OtW 35 42 3BL3.1. ... ... S Strainer OW 36 46 280,2 5.
(1) Discussed in Section 10.0 Note: Components that are not listed above are not affected by the indication
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 9 Attachment 1 - Summary of Results for The Original Indication Case 2 1: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, Active Failure W ic iat~n on Essentia I .r -'1W~shg 310-O.1 Rpm.)________
FCUJ31 116 141.43.a fCU2 1 2.1 11442..
Ku 33 lu 14
________130 _ _ __ _
FCU 31 MC 153 53.62 54355 FCU 32 MC 155 58., 1 !"J62 FE5lJ33Mc 154 49,50 r50Ai 12 FCU34 MC T 152 44.7 4 37 KUIs Mc 1.6 4t4¶! ________
PVG 32 119 32384 ___23 E06 33 183 S24,2 W&20W_________
CfiAC 3 2.22 6700 67,00. 52, 5 (A 05 Zop3 61.228 1A Com~p32 7-03 6 ________
CCW NX 31 191.34.3R21 slra'n rerW 35 42 53912k StrainerSW 36 i
46
-dcto n(Wifn 18116 : £ 91,68_________
,4ý,pm StRA~C3 16 56,727 _________ ___________
(1) Discussed in Section 10.0 (2) Required Flow is 302 gpm @ 1940 KW (Injection) and 213 gpm @ 1682 KW (Recirculation) per Ref. (4)
(3) Instrument Air Coolers aligned to the Essential header with TCV-1113 Controlling to 123 gpm.
Note: Components that are not listed above are not affected by the indicationNote: Components that are not listed above are not affected by the indication
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 10 Attachment 1 - Summary of Results for The Original Indication Case 17: Non-Essential Header Post LOCA Switchover, LWL, 1 SWP Calculated 4 Minimum Componlent Ppe # Flow (@-18%) Required
[Ref, 41Flow Indication on Non-essential Header (Losing 312.50 gpm)
CCW HX 31 91 2899.95 2782 CCW HX 32 94 2807.28 2792 Strainer BW 32 30 379.44 180 Circ Pump Seals 246 180 180 Case 18: Non-Essential Header Post LOCA Switchover, LWL, 2 SWP Calculated Minimum Copoent. Pipe Flow0Required Flow Flow opee .'-18%) Ref. 41 Indication on Non-essential Header (Losing 363.10 gpm)
CCW HX 32 94 4314.70 41189M Strainer BW 31 26 411.96 180 Strainer BW 32 30 411.89 ICirc Pump Seals 246 180 180 1 (1) Taken from WCAP-12313 for this alignment and accounting for 5%
degradation due to pump wear.
Case 25: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 20" 32 CCW Hx Non-Ess Hdr Crack Calculated 11"infilur" Comiponent Pipe # Flow (@- Required Flow
__113%) 1Ref. 41 Indication on Non-essential Header (Losing 395.37gpm)
CCW HX 32 I 94 5389.21 4967 CRAC 31 222 74.00 52.5 EDG 31 1 177 552.73 330 Strainer 31 Backwash 26 404.34 180 Strainer 32 Backwash 30 404.19 Strainer 33 Backwash 34 374.78
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 11 Attachment 1 - Summary of Results for The Original Indication Case 28: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, 10" EDG Non-Ess Hdr Crack
{]alul~atei) Mininium Com llent Pie # I Iow (o)- Required Flow
__i L%) IRe. '41 Indication on Non-essential Header (Losing 395.59gpm)
CCW HX 32 94 5470.68 4967 CRAC 31 222 74.64 52.5 EDG 31 177 553.36 330 Strainer 31 Backwash 26 405.78 180 Strainer 32 Backwash 30 405.62 Strainer 33 Backwash 34 376.90 Case 32: Non-Ess Header during Appendix R Cooldown with Backup SWP 39 and 2CCW Hxs Clponlent Pipe # Calculated Miiinium Required Flow Flhow j [@-1.8%)
Rel. CN-SEE-03-53 R10 Indication on Non-essential Header (Losing 321.12gpm)
CCW HX 31 91 3199.77 2850 CCW HX 32 94 3097.51 2850 B/U SWP Strainer - 100
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 Attachment la - Summary of Results For The 2.4" Diameter Indication Page 1 Case 3: Essential Header Post LOCA Injection, Loss of Instrument Air & 2.4" Crack On The Essential Header Safety Relate..CompoIelt Pipe if C.alculated Flow Mininiu Re uied Flow I 1et. 41 Leakage Flow 172.5 639 N/A FCU 31 116 1460 FCU 32 125 1465 FCU 33 108 1448 1400 FCU 34 101 1435 FCU 35 130 1424 FCU 31 MC 153 54 FCU 32 MC 155 59 FCU 33 MC 154 50 12 FCU 34 MC 152 45 FCU 35 MC 156 45 EDG 31 177 366 EDG 32 179 375 330 EDG 33 183 376 CRAC 31 196 54 52.5 CRAC32 222 54 IA Comp 31 205 69 65 IA Comp 32 203 69 Strainer BW 35 42 392 Strainer 8W 36 46 391 180
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 Attachment la - Summary of Results For The 2.4" Diameter Indication Page 2 Case 8: Essential Header Normal Operation, 2 SWPs, TB Seismic Break & 2.4" Crack On The Essential Header Component Pipe # C:dlculateed Flow MiUBUU1l Required Flow [Itf. ..
Leakage Flow 172.5 678 N/A FCU31 116 666 FCU 32 125 669 FCU 33 108 660 570 FCU 34 101 654 FCU 35 130 649 FCU 31 MC 153 65 FCU 32 MC 155 70 FCU 33 MC 154 61 12 FCU 34 MC 152 55 FCU 35 MC 156 55 EDG 31 177 378 EDG 32 179 387 330 EDG 33 183 388 CRAC 31 196 57 CRAC 32 222 57 IA Comp 31 205 68 IA Comp 32 203 69 Strainer BW 35 42 393 Strainer BW 36 46 391 Note: Components that are not listed above are not affected by the indication Case 17: Non-Essential Header Post LOCA Switchover, LWL, 1 SWP & 2.4" Crack On The Essential Header Mi~nimum* R.equire.d Cmllponrlt Pipe Ct -.
ahtdatUkd Flow R v F:-low ItRef. I I Leakage Flow 215.5 667 N/A CCW HX 31 91 2900 2782 CCW HX 32 94 2808 2792 Strainer BW 32 30 386 180 Circ Pump Seals 246 180 180
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 Attachment la - Summary of Results For The 2.4" Diameter Indication Page 3 Case 21: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, Active Failure &
2.4" Crack On The Essential Header Safety Related Conponent Pipe #" Calculated Flow Minimu Required Flow [Ref, i]
Leakage Flow 172.5 660 N/A FCU 31 116 1444 FCU 32 125 1449 FCU 33 108 1433 1400 FCU 34 101 1420 FCU 35 130 1409 FCU 31 MC 153 55 FCU 32 MC 155 60 FCU 33 MC 154 50 12 FCU 34 MC 152 46 FCU 35 MC 156 46 EDG 31 177 523Mii EDG 32 179 320 213(21 EDG 33 183 320 CRAC 31 196 657' 525*
CRAC 32 222 56 IAComp 31 205 61 123(3)
IAComp 32 203 62 CCW Hx 31 91 3125 2811 CCW Hx 32 94 4597(M) 4185 Strainer BW 31 26 407(')
Strainer BW 35 42 398 180 Strainer BW 36 46 397 (1) On the Non-essential header (2) Required Flow is 302 gpm @ 1940 KW (Injection) and 213 gpm @ 1682 KW (Recirculation) per Ref. 4 (3) Instrument Air Coolers aligned to the Essential header with TCV-1113 Controlling to 123 gpm per Ref 4.
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 Attachment la - Summary of Results For The 2.4" Diameter Indication Page 4 Case 21: Ess & Non-Ess Header Post LOCA Recirculation, LWL, Active Failure &
2.4" Crack On The Non-Essential Header Safety Related Component Pipe t C'alcul.atecd H iuhnum RequiFwed HoFw IR ef. it]
Leakage Flow 215.5 761 N/A FCU 31 116 1454 FCU 32 125 1459 FCU 33 108 1442 1400 FCU 34 101 1430 FCU 35 130 1418 FCU 31 MC 153 55 FCU 32 MC 155 60 FCU 33 MC 154 51 12 FCU 34 MC 152 46 FCU 35 MC 156 46 EDG 31 177 46941) 179 353 213(2)
EDG 32 EDG 33 183 353 CRAC 31 196 65 i7 52.5 CRAC 32 222 57 IA Comp 31 205 61 "
IAComp 32 203 62 CCW Hx 31 91 3182 2811 CCW Hx 32 94 4409(1) .4185 Strainer BW 31 26 4087 Strainer BW 35 42 394 180 Strainer BW 36. 46 393 1 (1) On the Non-essential header (2) Required Flow is 302 gpm @ 1940 KW (Injection) and 213 gpm @ 1682 KW (Recirculation) per Ref. 4 (3) Instrument Air Coolers aligned to the Essential header with TCV-1113 Controlling to 123 gpm per Ref 4.
IP-CALC-13-00063 Rev. 2 Attachment la - Summary of Results For The 2.4" Diameter Indication Page 5 Case 32: Non-Ess Header During Appendix R Cooldown with Backup SWP 39 and 2CCW Hxs & 2.4" Crack On The Non-Essential Header Minximum Required Component Pipe # Calculated Flow F:low Leakage Flow 215.5 785 N/A CCW HX 31 91 2515 2350(1)
CCW HX 32 94 2493 2350(1' B/U SWP Strainer - 400 100(2 (1) Minimum SW flow rate of 2350 gpm per heat exchanger (4700 gpm total) to meet the 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> cooldown limit is based on the enhanced CCW heat exchanger UA that was used in Reference 7 for the Appendix R analysis Case 4.2.
(2) Minimum required Back-Up SWP Strainer Flow is 100 gpm (Reference 4)
IP-CALC- 13-00063 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 2 Bauer, Edward F From: Miu, Jarvis Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 7:21 AM To: Bauer, Edward F
Subject:
RE: 34 SWP 31SWP Date WO . Recorded Flow Head 08/21/13 -5249074-4 2130, 5000 05/30/13 52472520 -205,45 5100 04/12/13 311006, 209 20 5200 02/19/13 52454502-" 211.57 51001 11/16/12 52436808 .210.21 Sf0 08/15112 5241851*i 211.13. 5100 32SWP Date WIG_ W1 Recorded Recorded i Flow Head 09/18/13 2 90 2-U.5249832.. 500j 06/19/13 52482002'-- 212.98 4900' 04/06/13 52460415 201.00, 5100 02/15/13 -311007,ý, -202.13 _5000 12/21/12 52444977T', 201 .89 5100~
09/23/12 52426038, 202.30 5000 335WP Recorded Date WIo* i H Head Flow 09/12/13 1524945*5: 1i992**ý 53006o' 06/09/13 -52477297 201,04 5300 04/04/13 311008 197.00 . 5300 03/15/13 52458758, 191-99 5300 12/11/12 52441.03.6 191.06 5500 Thank You, Jarvis Miu From: Bauer, Edward F Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 7:03 AM To: Miu, Jarvis
Subject:
FW: 34 SWP Jarvis
IP-CALC- 13-00063 Attachment 2 Page 2 of 2 Would you be able to send me the same information for 31, 32 and 33 SWP?
Frank Bauer From: De Donato, Anthony .
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:44 AM To: Bauer, Edward F; Beasley, Thomas I
Subject:
34 SWP Test data for 34 SWP since pump replacement in January:
Date W/O Recorded Flow 2 .o .............
!Head(ft) ....... ......i... .... . I60......... .
10/23113 ~ 189.37
... ? .... 5000 08/04/13 52485767 . ... .... : ..... ~i~~...
- -........... . ..........191.96
. ... . . . ... . .L . . 5000 . ..... . . .. .
04/26/13 52473134 191 91 4950 03/25/13 311009
- .-
- ..~ ~ ~ .........-~......~~...... 191.18
.. .. . .....- 5000 , .i 02/22/13 i 52463570 ... 188.15 . ........... ...
5100 0......
01/27/13 52398606 i.186.34: :i. 5000:, .......
2
11/7/2013 I1: PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation -Serial #PFL-1001 Page I of 2 Enterev - Y:',,SW OPERABILITY\REV 0\SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System System Pipe Section Data Sheet for Pipe # 172.50 2.4" Diameter Leakage Pive From: EssToCRAC-03 Elevation: 1.1.50 To: 2.4" EHdrCrack Elevation: 11.50 Diameter: 9.52 Diameter: 2.40
Description:
Drawings:
Fluid: Brackish Water:Salinitv=12not Material Roughness: 0.000833 ConcreteLined 4-10" Modulus of Elasticity = 29.500.0 Inside Diameter: 2.400 Wall Thickness = 0.365 in Length: 0.00 Misc L/D: Misc K Fixed:
Valves: 2.4" EHdrCrack/ I Pipe Flow Summary
Title:
2.4 in Dia. Flaw Tees: Run: Branch Onlv; I Branch Elbows: Welded - 90s. 45s: Threaded - 90s. 45s Bends: with angle = r/d =
with angle = r/d =
Entrances: I Abrupt Reductions from d = 9.520 Exits: I Abrupt Expansions to d =
Notes:
IP-CALC-13-00063 Revision 2 Attachment 3 Natfe I of 2
11/7/2013 I1: PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-1001 Page 2 of 2 Entergy - Y:ý.SW OPERABB[LITYkREV 0\,SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System System Pipe Section Data Sheet for Pipe # 215.50 2.4" Diameter Leakage Pipe From: NEssToCRAC-5T2 Elevation: 11.50 To: 2.4" NEHdrCrack Elevation: 11.50 Diameter: 9.52 Diameter: 2.40 Descriatlon:
Drawinas:
Fluid: Brackish Water:Salinitv=12ont Material Roughness: 0.000833 ConcreteLined 4-10" Modulus of Elasticitv = 29.500.0 Inside Diameter: 2.400 Wall Thickness = 0.365 in Length: 0.00 Misc L/D: Misc K Fixed:
Valves: 2.4" NEHdrCrack / /
Pipe Flow Summary
Title:
2.4 in Dia. Flaw Tees: Run, Branch Only; I Branch Elbows: Welded - 90s. 45s: Threaded - 90s. 45s Bends: with angle = r/d =
with angle = r/d =
Entrances: 1 Abrupt Reductions from d = 9.520 Exits: I Abrupt Expansions to d=
Notes:
IP-CALC- 13-00063 Revision 2 Attachment 3 Page 2 of 2
11/7/2013 11:11 PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-1001 Page I of 2 Enteray - Y:.SSW OPERABILITYkREV 0',SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Pump Curve Data Report 10% Dep - SN 0586017 TDH Speed (RPM): 1,785.00 Total Read (ft) Flow (mim) 274.50 0.00 255.60 1.000.00 234.00 2.000.00 216.00 3.000.00 202.50 4.000.00 189.00 5,000.00 174.60 6,000.00 151.20 7,000.00 123.30 8.000.00 119.70 8,150.00 IP-CALC- 13-00063 Revision 2 Attachment 4 Pamze I of-2
1.1"7/2013 11:1I1 PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-1001 Page 2 of 2 Enterev - Y:\SW OPERABILITYREV 0\SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Pump Curve Data Report 15% Deg - SN 0586017 TDH Speed (RPM): 0.00 Total Head (ft) Flow (gim) 259.25 0.00 241.40 1.000.00 221.00 2,000.00 204.00 3,000.00 191.25 4,000.00 178.50 5,000.00 164.90 6.000.00 142.80 7,000.00 116.45 8,000.00 113.05 8,150.00 IP-CALC- 13-00063 Revision 2 Attachment 4 Paýze 2 of'2
11/8/2013 11:27 PROTO-FLO 4.50 bY Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-0O01 Page I of 2 Enterey - Y:\SW OPERABILITY'REV 0\SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Flow Summary Report Convergnice: Prtssure-O.OE+O Sun Q=1.0.,-3 Friction=O.0E-6 FCV= .OE-6 PCV=1.0E--3 Temperature-5.0l-3 Case 3 With 2.4" Diameter Hole in 10" EDG SuDIlv Line (Essential Header)
Flow Summary Title Diameter Flow Minimum Flow NPSHA NPSH (in) (imm) (Nvm) (ft) Ratio SWP 36 12.625 6,634.86 31.89 1.41 Service Water Str 36 12.625 6,244.20 SWP 35 12.625 6,607.79 31.89 1.42 Service Water Str 35 12.625 6,215.93 Service Water Str 34 12.625 -331.87 Strainer 34 Backwash 2.067 331.87 Strainer 35 Backwash 2.067 391.86 Strainer 36 Backwash 2.067 390.65 Strainer Backwash 7.481 1,114,39 Essential Header 22.500 12,128.26 BFP LOC 32 2.943 1.29.03 BFP LOC 31 21943 129.03 Turbine Oil Cooler 31 9.520 2.230.94 SOC Hx (Air Side) 4.026 96.61.
Seal Oil CIr (-12 Side) 2.067 52.39 FCU-34 10.020 1.435.39 FCIJ-33 10.020 1,448.10 FCU-31 10.020 1.459.66 FCU-32 10.020 1,464.90 FCIU-35 10.020 1.423.97
!1 Reverse Flow"fhroutJm Check Valve && Pump Flow is Past End of Curve
- Flow Below Minimum $$ NPSH Available Below NPSH1 Reauired IP-CAI..C-13-00063 Revision 2 Attachment 5 Pate I of 10
11/8/2013 11:27 PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-1001 Page 2 of 2 Enterev - Y:\SW OPERA BILITYREV O\SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Flow Summary Report Convergtence: PrtessureL0.0E.+0 Sum Q=L.OE-3 Friction= 1.0E.-6 FCV=I.0E4'-6 PCV= 1.0E-3 Tempemture=5.01_-3 Case 3 With 2.4" Diameter Hole in 10" EDG Suoviv Line (Essential Header)
Flow Summary Title Diameter Flow Minimum Flow NPSHA NPSH (in) (Qpm) (apm) (1f) Ratio FCU-34 Motor 1.947 45.12 FCU-31 Motor 1.947 54.29 FCU-33 Motor 1.947 49.91 FCU-32 Motor 1.947 59.36 FCU-35 Motor 1.947 45.36 Rad Monitor 2.067 46.71 2.4 in Dia. Flaw 2.400 639.35 EDG 31 3.526 365.97 EDG-32 3.526 375,15 EDG-33 3,526 376.11 CRAC 32B 1.245 26.80 CRAC 32A 1.245 26.81 IAC-32 2.469 69.48 IAC-31 2.469 68.98 Bio Box 0.546 2.00 CRAC 31 B 1.245 26.78 CRAC 3 ]A 1,245 26.75 Reverse Flow Throuah Check Valve && Pump Flow is Past End of Curve
1/8/2013 11:33 PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-1001 Page I of 2 EnterYv - Y:",,SW OPERABILITYREV 0\SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Flow Summary Report Convergemce: Prcssure-O.OE+0 Sum Q=I.OE-3 Friction= .OE.-6 FCV= 1.01*-6 PCV- 1.0t2-3 "reratu5.01-3 Case 8 With 2.4" Diameter Hole in 10" EDG Supnlv Line (Essential Header)
Flow Summary Title Diameter Flow Minimum Flow NPSHA NPSH (in) (6pm) (apm) (ft) Ratio SWP 36 12.625 7,494.17 31,89 1.14 Service Water Str 36 12.625 7,103.34 SWP 35 12.625 7,462.34 31.89 1.1.5 Service Water Str 35 12.625 7,069.63 Service Water Str 34 12.625 -342.29 Strainer 34 Backwash 2.067 342.29 Strainer 35 Backwash 2.067 392.70 Strainer 36 Backwash 2.067 390.83 Strainer Backwash 7.481 1,125.82 Essential Header 22.500 13,830.68 FCU-34 10.020 654.17 FCU-33 10.020 660.29 FCU-31 10.020 666.24 FCU-32 10.020 668.82 FCU-35 10.020 648.89 FCU-34 Motor 1.947 54.98 FCt.-3 1 Motor 1.947 65. 13 FCU-33 Motor 1,947 60.56 FCU-3 2 Motor 1.947 70.29 FCU-35 Motor 1.947 55.10 Reverse Flow Throueh Check Valve && Pumrp Flow is Past End of Curve
- Hlow Below Mitimum $$ NPSH Available Below NPSH Recuired IP-CALC-13-00063 Revision 2 Attachment 5 Paue 3 of 10
11/8/2013 11:33 PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-1001 Page 2 of 2 Enterev - Y:ASW OPERABILITYMREV 0\,SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Flow Summary Report Convergence: Pr'csure=i OtE÷OSum Q= I.OE-3 Friction= I.OE-6 FCV I .OE-6 PCV= I 0E-3 T'em[rature 5.OE-3 Case 8 With 2.4" Diameter Hole in 10" EDG Suvolv Line (Essential Header)
Flow Summary Title Diameter Flow Minimum Flow NPSHA NPSH (inll (gpm) (.Vini) (ft) Ratio Rad Monitor 2.067 60.41 2.4 in Dia, Flaw 2.400 677.66 EDG 31 3.526 377.90 EDG-32 3.526 387.37 EDG-33 3.526 388.37 CRAC 32B 1.245 28.48 CRAC 32A 1.245 28.49 IAC-32 2.469 68.75 IAC-31 2.469 68.25 Bio Box 0.546 2.00 CRAC 31B 1.245 28.45 CRAC 31A 1.245 28.42 Reverse Flow'ThrouVh Check Valve && Pump Flow is Past End of Curve
11/8/2013 11:40 PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial APFL-I001 Page I of I Enterzv - Y:-SW OPERABILITY'\REV O\SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Flow Summary Report Convergence: Presure-4).OE+() Sum Q= OE-3 Friction=L.OE-6 FCVý 1.01--6 1'CV= ,0E-3 Tcmerrature=5.0E-3 Case 17 With 2.4" Diameter Hole in 10" EDG Supplv Line (Non Essential Header)
Flow Summary Title Diameter Flow Minimum Flow NPSHA NPSH (in) (Upm) (apm) (1f) Ratio SWP 32 12.625 6,941.57 31.89 1.26 Service Water Str 32 12.625 6.555.91 Strainer 32 Backwash 2.067 385.66 Strainer Backwash 7.481 385.66 CCW Hx 31 16.625 2,900.61 CCW Hx 32 16.625 2,807.91 2.4 in Dia. Flaw 2.400 667.38 NonEssential Header 22.500 6,375,91 Circ Pumps 3.068 180.00 I! Reverse Flow Through Check Valve && Pump Flow is Past End of Curve Flow Below Minimum $S NPSH Available Below NPSH Required IP-CALC- 13-00063 Revision 2 Axttachmcrrt 5 Pane 5 of 10
11/8/2013 11:46 PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-1001 Page I of 2 Enterev - Y:\SW OPERABILITY\REV 0\SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Flow Summary Report Convergence: Pressure--0.0.+O Sum Q=.OE-3S Friction=I.OE-6 F:CV=I .OE-6 PCV=1.OE-3 Temperature=5 OE-3 Case 21 With 2.4" Diameter Hole in 10" EDG Supply Line (Essential Header)
Flow Summary Title Diameter Flow Minimum Flow NPSHA NPSH (in) (Npm) (pmo) (if) Ratio SWP 36 12.625 6,419.25 31.89 1.47 Service Water Str 36 12.625 6.021.91 SWP 35 12.625 6.393.83 31.89 1.48 Service Water Str 35 12.625 5,995.47 SWP 31 12,625 5,594.78 31.89 1.56 Service Water Str 31 12.625 5,187.81 Strainer 31 Backwash 2.067 406.97 Strainer 35 Backwash 2.067 398.37 Strainer 36 Backwash 2.067 397.34 Strainer Backwash 7.481 1,202.67 Essential Header 22.500 12,017.38 CCW Hx 31 16.625 3,125.46 CCW Hx 32 16.625 4,597.45 FCU-34 10.020 1,420.25 FCU-33 10,020 1.432.83 FCU-31 10.020 1,444.29 FCU-32 10.020 1.449.46 FCU-35 1.0.020 1,408.93 FCU-34 Motor 1.947 45.59 FCU-31 Motor 1.947 54.82
!! Reverse Flow Through Check Valve && Pumo Flow is Past End of Curve
I1/8/2013 1:46 PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-1001 Page 2 of 2 Entergv - Y:",SW OPERABILITY\REV 0\SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Flow Summary Report Convergen*e: Presscire"*.0f'+O Sum Q= I.OE-3 Friction:=I OE-6 I'CV= .0E-6 PCV= l 0E-3 "hrnt~erature5.0E-3 Case 21 With 2.4" Diameter Hole in 10" EDG Suvolv Line (Essential Header)
Flow Summary Title Diameter Flow Minimum Flow NPSHA NPSH (in) (trpm) (,zpm) (11) Ratio FCU-33 Motor 1.947 50.42 FCU-32 Motor 1.947 59.90 FCU-35 Motor 1.947 45.83 Rad Monitor 2.067 47.28 2.4 in Dia. Flaw 2.400 660.53 EDG 31 3.526 523.36 EDG-32 3.526 319.90 EDG-33 3.526 320.38 CRAC 32B 1.245 27.88 CRAC 32A 1.245 27.90 IAC-32 2.469 61.72 IAC-31 2.469 61.28 Bio Box 0.546 2.00 CR AC 31B 1.245 32.50 CRAC 31 A 1.245 32.50 NonEssential Header 22.5 00 5.187,81 Reverse Flow ThroWtd, Check Valve && Pump Flow is Past End of Curve
[P-CALC-13-00063 Revision 2 Atiachient. 5 PaLe 7 of 10
11/8/2013 11:50 PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-100l Page I of 2 Enterav - Y:\SW OPERABILITY"REV O\SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Flow Summary Report Convergence: Iliessure=0.0E+0 Sum Q=I1.E-3 Friction= 1.OE-6 FCV= 1.OE-6 PCV=I1,E-3 "'cmnpraturc=S.0E-3 Case 21 With 2.4" Diameter Hole in 1.0" EDG Supolv Line (Non Essential Header)
Flow Summary Title Diameter Flow Minimum Flow NPSHA NPSH (in) (lpm) (gpm) (ft) Ratio SWP 36 12.625 6.169.84 31.89 1.54 Service Water Str 36 12.625 5.776.98 SWP 35 12.625 6.145.23 31.89 1.55 Service Water Str 35 12.625 5,751.45 SWP 31 12.625 6,114.61 31.89 1.42 Service Water Str 31 12.625 5,706.60 Strainer 31 Backwash 2.067 408.01 Strainer 35 Backwash 2.067 393.79 Strainer 36 Backwash 2.067 392.86 Strainer Backwash 7.481 1,194.67 Essential Header 22.500 11,528.42 CCW Fix 31 16.625 3,182.17 CCW Hx 32 16.625 4,409.80 FCU-34 10.020 1,429.61 FCU-33 10.020 1,442.27 F'_C -3 I 10.020 1.453.80 FCU-32 10.020 1,459.00 FCU-35 10.020 1.418,22 FCU-34 Viotor 1.947 45.90 FCU-31 Motor 1.947 55.18 Reverse Flow Throuah Check Valve && Pump Flow is Past End of Curve
- Flow Below Minimum $$ NIPSH Availahle Below NPSIH Reauired IP-CAI-C- 13-00063 Revision 2 Attachment 5 PNie 8 of 10
11/8/2013 11:50 PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-1001 Page 2 of 2 Entermv - Y:\SW OPERABILITY\REV O\SW OPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Flow Summary Report Conver.Lcive: Prcs.sur=O.OHE.+ Sum Q=I.OE-3 Frictwon=l.0F,-6 fCV=I 01.-6 IPCV=I.0IE-3 Temperature=5.0F,-3 Case 21 With 2.4" Diameter Hole in 10" EDG Supplv Line (Non Essential Header)
Flow Summary Title Diameter Flow Minimum Flow NPSHA NPSH (in) ('sm)m) (gpm) (fi) Ratio FCU-33 Motor 1.947 50.76 FCU-32 Motor 1.947 60.30 FCU-35 Motor 1.947 46.13 Rad Monitor 2.067 47.44 EDG 31 3.526 469.05 EDG-32 3.526 352.60 EDG-33 3.526 352.92 CRAC 32B 1.245 28.56 CRAC 32A 1.245 28.00 IAC-32 2.469 61.72 IAC-31 2.469 61.28 2.4 in Dia. Flaw 2.400 760.77 Bio Box 0.546 2.00 CRAC 31 B 1.245 32.50 CRAC 3IA 1.245 32.48 NonEssential Header 22.500 5,706.60 Reverse Flow Through Check Valve && Pump) Flow is Past End of Curve
- Flow Below Minimum $$ NPSH Available Below NPSI- Reouired IP-CALC-13-00063 Revision 2 Attachment 5 Paoe 9 of 10
11/13/2013 16:00 PROTO-FLO 4.50 by Proto-Power Corporation - Serial #PFL-1001 Page I of I Entergy - Y:\SW OPERABILITY\REV 0\SWOPERABILITY.PDB - Revision 0 Indian Point 3 - Service Water System Flow Summary Report Convernence: Pressurtr=OOE+O Sum 0=1,OE-3 Friction=I.0E-6 FCV=I.OE-6 PCV=1.OE-3 Temperature=5.OE-3 Case 32 With 2.4" Diameter Hole in 10" EDG Supply Line (Non-Essential Header)
Flow Summary Title Diameter Flow Minimum Flow NPSHA NPSH (in) (apm) (gpm) (ft) Ratio CCW Hx 31 16.625 2,515.41 CCW Hx 32 16.625 2,492.64 2.4 in Dia. Flaw 2.394 785.04 Service Water Pump 39 12.625 6.193.09 37.30 1.00 B/U Pump Flow to NEssential Hdr 22.500 5,793.09 U Reverse Flow Through Check Valve && Pump Flow is Past End of Curve