05000266/FIN-2014004-04
From kanterella
Revision as of 08:59, 25 September 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
---|---|
Title | Incomplete Prompt Operability Determination of Non-Seismic Block Wall |
Description | The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance due to the licensees failure to follow procedure ENAA2031001, Operability Determinations/Functionality Assessments. Specifically, when the licensee identified that the north non-vital switchgear (NVSGR) block wall was found to be non-seismic and potentially susceptible to collapsing and blocking the flood relief dampers, they failed to evaluate all potential water sources that could spray or flood the NVSGR and cascade into the vital switchgear room below. Following questions by the inspectors, the licensee evaluated the additional water sources; isolated two additional fire protection hose reels on the south side of the NVSGR; and updated the prompt operability determination (POD). The finding was determined to be more than minor because the failure to evaluate and disposition each potential flood source in the POD was associated with the Mitigating Systems cornerstone attribute of Protection Against External Events (Seismic) and affected the cornerstone objective of preventing undesirable consequences (i.e., core damage). The inspectors determined the finding could be evaluated using the SDP in accordance with IMC 0609, Significance Determination Process, Attachment 0609.04, Initial Characterization of Findings, dated June 19, 2012, and Appendix A, The Significance Determination Process for Findings At-Power, Exhibit 4, External Events Screening Questions, dated June 19, 2012. The inspectors answered Yes to question 1 of External Events screening questions since the finding could potentially degrade one train of the emergency power system. The inspectors consulted the regional SRA, who completed a detailed risk evaluation, and determined that the finding was of very low safety-significance. This finding has a cross-cutting aspect of Identification (P.1), in the area of problem identification and resolution, for failing to identify issues completely, accurately, and in a timely manner in accordance with the program. |
Site: | Point Beach |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000266/2014004 Section 1R15 |
Date counted | Sep 30, 2014 (2014Q3) |
Type: | Finding: Green |
cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
Identified by: | NRC identified |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.15 |
Inspectors (proximate) | D Oliver J Beavers J Cameron J Rutkowski K Barclay M Learn R Edwards R Morris V Myers |
CCA | P.1, Identification |
INPO aspect | PI.1 |
' | |
Finding - Point Beach - IR 05000266/2014004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Point Beach) @ 2014Q3
Self-Identified List (Point Beach)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||