05000397/FIN-2015007-01
From kanterella
Revision as of 08:58, 25 September 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
---|---|
Title | Failure to Initiate Condition Report for a degraded Condition Outside the Scope of Maintenance Work Order |
Description | The team identified a Green non-cited violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, for the licensees failure to initiate a condition report in accordance with SWP-CAP-01, Corrective Action Program, Revision 22. Specifically, on October 23, 2013, the licensee failed to initiate a condition report to document that the motor operator for valve SW-V-75A had a missing plug and insufficient grease in the limit switch compartment of the valve operator. The licensee initiated Action Request AR 323201 to enter this issue into the corrective action program, following the teams identification of this issue. The licensees failure to initiate a condition report upon discovery of an unexpected degraded or nonconforming condition was a performance deficiency. The performance deficiency is more than minor, and therefore a finding, because it is associated with the equipment performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems cornerstone and affects the associated objectives to ensure availability, reliability, and capability of systems that responds to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. Specifically, the licensees failure to initiate a condition report could have left the condition uncorrected and prevented the valve from meeting its intended safety function. In addition, failure to initiate a condition report for a degraded valve operator could have prevented additional adverse conditions from being identified, because the licensee had not performed an extent of condition review. The finding was of very low safety significance (Green) because although it affected the qualification of one or more mitigating systems, structures, or components (SSCs), these SSCs maintained their functionality. The finding has a cross-cutting aspect in the area of human performance consistent process, in that maintenance personnel did not use an established process for decision making in failing to document an unanticipated degraded condition in the corrective action program [H.13]. |
Site: | Columbia ![]() |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000397/2015007 Section 4OA2 |
Date counted | Mar 31, 2015 (2015Q1) |
Type: | NCV: Green |
cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
Identified by: | NRC identified |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
Inspectors (proximate) | A Allen D Proulx H Freeman J Groom T Hartman |
Violation of: | 10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion V |
CCA | H.13, Consistent Process |
INPO aspect | DM.1 |
' | |
Finding - Columbia - IR 05000397/2015007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Columbia) @ 2015Q1
Self-Identified List (Columbia)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||