ENS 50887
From kanterella
Revision as of 18:18, 24 September 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
ENS Event | |
|---|---|
15:00 Mar 13, 2015 | |
| Title | |
| Event Description | On March 13, 2015, Watts Bar determined that information received from Westinghouse represented an unanalyzed condition. The information challenged the current Unit 1 Fire Protection Report (FPR) analysis for 10 CFR 50 Appendix R. The current FPR analysis used a duration of 120 seconds before a low pressurizer pressure safety injection (SI) signal would be received due to a postulated failed open pressurizer power operated relief valve (PORV) from an Appendix R fire outside of the control building. During discussions with Westinghouse, Watts Bar determined that the 120 second value was non-conservative and not intended for this application. Recent information from Westinghouse indicates that a Sl signal would be received in approximately 34 seconds.
This information places Watts Bar Unit 1 in an unanalyzed condition because the original analysis assumed that a Sl signal would not be received from fire-induced failures in the associated fire areas. While the existing Watts Bar Unit 1 Appendix R procedures direct operators to isolate the pressurizer PORV, the procedures did not have steps to mitigate and terminate the Sl. Without mitigating actions, the Sl would likely challenge the reactor coolant system boundary due to water relief through the remaining pressurizer PORV and/or safety valves. As a compensatory measure, Watts Bar has established administrative equipment controls to preclude the consequences of a spuriously opening pressurizer PORV. In addition, a compensatory measure in the form of fire watches has been established in areas where a fire could result in a spurious opening of a pressurizer PORV. This issue is being reported under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), 'unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety.' The Watts Bar Resident Inspector has been notified. |
| Where | |
|---|---|
Watts Bar  Tennessee (NRC Region 2) | |
| Reporting | |
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | |
| Time - Person (Reporting Time:+-0.58 h-0.0242 days <br />-0.00345 weeks <br />-7.94484e-4 months <br />) | |
| Opened: | Henry Taylor 14:25 Mar 13, 2015 |
| NRC Officer: | Daniel Mills |
| Last Updated: | Mar 13, 2015 |
| 50887 - NRC Website
Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"mappingservice":"leaflet","width":"350px","height":"250px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":6,"defzoom":14,"layers":["OpenStreetMap"],"image layers":[],"overlays":[],"resizable":false,"fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":true,"cluster":false,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clustermaxradius":80,"clusterspiderfy":true,"geojson":"","clicktarget":"","imageLayers":[],"locations":[{"text":"\u003Cb\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Ca class=\"mw-selflink selflink\"\u003EENS 50887\u003C/a\u003E - \u003Ca href=\"/Watts_Bar\" title=\"Watts Bar\"\u003EWatts Bar\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E\u003C/b\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Ca href=\"/Unanalyzed_Condition\" title=\"Unanalyzed Condition\"\u003EUnanalyzed Condition\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E","title":"ENS 50887 - Watts Bar\n","link":"","lat":35.60199166666666,"lon":-84.7889388888889,"icon":"/w/images/c/ce/Tennessee_Valley_Authority_icon.png"}],"imageoverlays":null} | |
Unit 1 | |
|---|---|
| Reactor critical | Critical |
| Scram | No |
| Before | Power Operation (100 %) |
| After | Power Operation (100 %) |
WEEKMONTHYEARENS 569102023-12-28T16:29:00028 December 2023 16:29:00
[Table view]10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition ENS 565412023-05-25T17:45:00025 May 2023 17:45:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition of Emergency Diesel Generator ENS 538012018-12-20T05:00:00020 December 2018 05:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Containment Air Return Fan System Inoperable ENS 533492018-04-19T23:44:00019 April 2018 23:44:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Related to Emergency Core Cooling Gas Accumulation Acceptance Criteria ENS 528502017-07-12T16:38:00012 July 2017 16:38:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Related to Gdc-5 (General Design Criterion-5) for Dual Unit Operation ENS 519952016-06-08T19:26:0008 June 2016 19:26:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition That Could Potentially Degrade Plant Safety ENS 509602015-04-06T21:00:0006 April 2015 21:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Volume Control Tank Isolation Time Analysis Error ENS 508872015-03-13T15:00:00013 March 2015 15:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition ENS 505962014-11-05T18:10:0005 November 2014 18:10:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Regarding Appendix R Procedures ENS 505402014-10-15T21:00:00015 October 2014 21:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Appendix R Unanalyzed Condition Affecting the Turbine Driven Aux Feedwater Pump ENS 502452014-07-01T02:46:0001 July 2014 02:46:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition That Could Have Resulted in an Increased Maximum Flood Level ENS 498182014-02-11T23:00:00011 February 2014 23:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Nonconservative Operator Manual Actions Identified in Appendix R Analysis ENS 495412013-11-14T21:00:00014 November 2013 21:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(C), Loss of Safety Function - Release of Radioactive Material Postulated Fire Induced Failure of Centrifugal Charging Pumps ENS 493892013-09-27T16:45:00027 September 2013 16:45:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Calculation Error Resulted in Unanalyzed Condition for Appendix R Event ENS 480562012-06-29T14:28:00029 June 2012 14:28:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Increase in Probable Maximum Flood Level ENS 487232009-07-28T05:00:00028 July 2009 05:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition That Could Have Resulted in an Increased Maximum Flood Level 2023-05-25T17:45:00 | |
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ENS_50887&oldid=83736"