ML16230A358

A. Buford/D. Grinnell E-mail Thread Subj: C-10 Request

ML16230A358
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	08/15/2016
From:	Angela Buford NRC/NRR/DLR/RASB
To:	Grinnell D - No Known Affiliation
References
2016-SST-0548
Download: ML16230A358 (3)

Text

1From:Buford, AngelaSent:Monday, August 15, 2016 4:29 PMTo:'Deborah Grinnell'Cc:Bower, Fred; Poole, Justin

Subject:

RE: Re: C-10 request to the NRC on the June 15, 2016 Cat 1 meeting to send me the NRC questions to NextEraAttachments:RE: NextEra/NRC public meeting ?? [2016-SST-0548]GoodafternoonDebbie!Thankyouforyouremail,andweappreciateyourquestions.Ibelievetheattachedemailisresponsivetoyourquery.AsIstatedbelowinmyAugust11,2016emailandisechoedbyFredBowerintheattachedemailtoyou,theNRCdidnotgeneratea"listofquestions"toaskNextEraduringtheJune15,2016publicmeeting.TheNRCstaffspontaneouslyandinformallyaskedquestionsasNextEragaveitspresentation;assuchthereisnolistavailabletosendtoyouinsuchregard.Fred'sattachedemailalsoprovidesinformationontheassociatedADAMSML#sassociatedwiththisandyourotherconcerns.Ialsowouldliketoremindyouthattechnicalcorrespondence(e.g.,auditreports,requestsforadditionalinformation,safetyevaluationandnonproprietaryinformationsubmittedbyNextEra)betweentheNRC/NRRstaffandNextEraduringthestaff'sreviewoftheNextEralicenseamendmentrequestwillbeavailabletothepublic,andverbalcommunicationofatechnicalnatureistransparentlyconductedthroughapublicmeeting.Thankyou,AngieAngelaBuford,PEStructuralEngineerU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionNRR/DLR/RASB3014153166From:DeborahGrinnell[1]Sent:Monday,August15,20161:19PMTo:Buford,Angela;Bower,Fred

Subject:

[External_Sender]Re:C10requesttotheNRContheJune15,2016Cat1meetingtosendmetheNRCquestionstoNextErasorry SEND me the list of questions requested to NextEra. Debbie On Aug 15, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Deborah Grinnell <grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com> wrote: Hello Angie and Fred, To be clear. Below is the purpose of the June 15 2016 NextEra and NRC Cat 1 meeting in the NRC notice.

2"The purpose of this meeting is for NextEra Energy to present to the NRC staff its plan for a license amendment request regarding revising the licensing basis for Alkali-Silica Reaction at the Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1. " Below is the copy of the NRC letter on page 2. It states what the NRC requested questions to NextEra to answer to the NRC. . I asked you to see me the list of NRC questions your NRC staff asked NextEra staff to answer. I have requested that you send C-10 the list of NRC questions. We also want the NextEra answers to your questions when you receive them

Thank you, Debbie

Docket No. 50-443

Enclosure:

List of Attendees cc w/enclosure: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-2 Resource RidsNrrPMSeabrook Resource RidsNrrLALRonewicz Resource RidsRgn 1MailCenter Resource LPL1-2 R/F TWertz, NRR RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource KManoly, NRR FFarzam, NRR BLehman, NRR RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource GThomas, NRR TTran, NRR FBower, RI BCook, RI JBowen, OEDO The NRC staff had a number of questions on the modeling techniques NextEra would be using to ref On Aug 11, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Buford, Angela <Angela.Buford@nrc.gov> wrote:

3I forwarded your previous email to Fred Bower so that he can consider whether to include a formal response to this question in the letter he is planning to send you responding to all of your other questions, but the short answer is: I don't have knowledge that the NRC had a "list" of questions. NextEra was presenting, and the NRC participants peppered the applicant with clarifying questions during and after they presented their slides (see the "public meetings" section on the Seabrook ASR Public Webpage http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/concrete-degradation.html#mtgs.) If you want to be ensured to have the specifics of any public meeting, we encourage you to call in to public meetings - we always give notice and a way to observe - and that ensures that you are privy to the specifics of public meetings that are not transcribed.I will forward the email below, as you corrected it, to Fred Bower since he has NRC Oversight of Seabrook. Also, I plan to continue to allow your questions to be responded to by the NRC through the proper channel of the Region I Office since they oversee Seabrook, and I provide them engineering support from Headquarters.Thank you!Angie