ML20028C455

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:58, 20 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Agrees W/Div of Operating Reactors Proposed Acceptance Criteria for BWR Offgas Explosion Prevention,In Response to 790130 Memo.Scope of Criterion 2 Should Be Modified Per Scope of Responses to IE Bulletin 78-03
ML20028C455
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/13/1979
From: Robert Lewis
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Jordan E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML20027A594 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-82-545, REF-SSINS-3620 IEB-78-03, IEB-78-3, NUDOCS 8301100206
Download: ML20028C455 (1)


Text

'

c4, & & L..~.

km atog UNITED STATES

~'

/.'

  • n r, Io, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION u,

d -f %.,* <

101 M ARI T sT E E T, N.W.

  • N b
  • M E f[f

..k Q' b.--

o ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 9

~

% - @ '4 FEB 131979 gg b

SSINS 3620 MEMORANDUM FOR:

E. L. Jordan, Assistant Director for Technical Programs, Office of Inspection and Enforcement FROM:

R. C. Lewis, Acting Branch Chief, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch, Region II

SUBJECT:

INFORMATION REGARDING PROPOSED 00R ACTION ON PREVENTION OF OFFGAS EXPLOSIONS This is in response to your memorandum dated January 30, 1979. As reported to C. J. DeBevec on February 9 and 12, 1979, we agree wi-th the 00R proposed Acceptance Criteria for BWR Offgas Explosion Prevention.

However, in the case of Criterion 2, second sentence, we feel it should be recognized that the action and review required by IEB No. 78-03 may not have caused an evaluation by the licensee and/or IE inspector to a commensurate depth.

Indeed,a discussion with involved inspectors in this Region has indicated the action and review required by the Bulletin did not include a specific assessment of sensors, monitors and control devices ~ relating to offgas operating parameters. Therefore, it appears that the scope of Criterion 2 should be modified to the extent that its aphlication will be consistent with the scope of responses to IEB 78-03.

One means of achieving that modification would be to eliminate the second sentence,of Criterion 2.

$. l.

R. C. Lewis Acting. Branch Chief cc:

C. J. DeBevec CONTACT:

H. C. Dance 242-5533 8301100206 821207 I

PDR FOIA HIATT82-545 PDR

_.