ML24163A352

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:26, 4 October 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Meeting Feedback from May 14, 2024, Meeting with Constellation on Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units Nos. 2 and 3
ML24163A352
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/15/2024
From: Samir Darbali
NRC/NRR/DEX/ELTB
To: Richard Stattel
General Electric Co
Klett, AL
References
Download: ML24163A352 (1)


Text

From: Samir Darbali To: Stattel, Richard (GE Vernova)

Subject:

RE: RE: Approved FPGA based Platforms Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 3:09:28 PM Attachments: image001.png

Hi Rich,

Jack asked the question on ISG-04 because the licensee mentioned they would be meeting IEEE 7-4.3.2-2003 and not the 2016 version.

We are still considering how to sunset ISG-04.

Regards, Samir

From: Stattel, Richard (GE Vernova) <Richard.Stattel@ge.com>

Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 4:56 PM To: Samir Darbali <Samir.Darbali@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: Approved FPGA based Platforms

Hey Samir,

I have one other question regarding the pre-application meeting.

Jack asked a question about compliance with ISG4. Isnt ISG4 now superseded since the communications criteria has been incorporated into IEEE 7-4.3.2 and endorsed via RG 1.152?

It seems to me that ISG4 should be withdrawn from use just like ISG2 was withdrawn when its criteria were relocated to BTP 7-19. Right?

Richard Stattel Senior Engineer Systems Engineering (Product Development and Testing)

+1 240-682-9191 Richard.stattel@ge.com

From: Samir Darbali < Samir.Darbali@nrc.gov>

Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 12:43 PM To: Stattel, Richard (GE Vernova) < Richard.Stattel@ge.com>

Subject:

EXT: RE: Approved FPGA based Platforms

WARNING: This email originated from outside of GE. Please validate the sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe.

Hi Rich,

Its good to hear from you.

Yes, we recognize we have approved other FPGA-based platforms. The licensee had requested that we list the licensing actions where FPGA technology was used in an application, so we focused on the main licensing approvals where the FPGA was performing a major portion of the safety system logic. Given that the licensee already has selected an FPGA platform, we didnt see the value in listing other FPGA platforms. Sorry if I didnt make that message clear when talking about the side.

I hope all is well with you, Linda, and the kids/grandkids. I look forward to seeing you at NPEC 24-02.

Best regards, Samir

From: Stattel, Richard (GE Vernova) < Richard.Stattel@ge.com>

Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 10:15 AM To: Samir Darbali < Samir.Darbali@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[External_Sender] Approved FPGA based Platforms

Samir,

ALS and HIPS are not the only approved FPGA based designs.

Your presentation fails to list the following approved FPGA based platforms,

RADIY HFC-FPGA NUPAC

Additionally, all microprocessor based platforms use FPGAs in their circuit board designs including NUMAC and Common Q.

Richard Stattel Senior Engineer Systems Engineering (Product Development and Testing)

+1 240-682-9191 Richard.stattel@ge.com