(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
---|
Category:Legal-Order
MONTHYEARML24038A0242024-02-0606 February 2024 State of Texas V. NRC (5th Cir. 21-60743) Order ML23044A0012023-02-10010 February 2023 2-10-23 Published Opinion (10th Cir.)(Case No. 21-9593) ML22342A5322022-11-17017 November 2022 Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187) ML22334A0542022-11-15015 November 2022 11-15-22 Order (10th Cir.)(Case No.21-9593)(FILED) ML22306A0012022-10-28028 October 2022 10-28-22 Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048) ML22306A0002022-10-27027 October 2022 10-27-22 Order Re Oral Argument (10th Cir.)(Case No. 21-9593) ML22305A7052022-10-24024 October 2022 10-24-22 Order Dismissing Public Citizen (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048) ML22256A0712022-08-31031 August 2022 8-31-22 Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048) ML22084A6092022-03-25025 March 2022 3-25-22 Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048)(Consolidated) ML22055A7322022-02-23023 February 2022 2-23-22 Order (5th Cir.)(Case No. 21-60743) ML22047A1372022-02-15015 February 2022 2-15-22 Order Consolidating Cases (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1229) ML22019A2302022-01-18018 January 2022 1-18-22 Scheduling Order (10th Cir.)(Case 21-9593) ML22019A2192022-01-11011 January 2022 1-11-22 Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048) ML22019A2142022-01-10010 January 2022 1-10-22 Order (10th Cir.)(Case No. 21-9593) ML22006A3242022-01-0303 January 2022 Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048) ML21327A3482021-11-19019 November 2021 11-19-21 Order (Memo to Counsel or Parties)(5th Cir.)(Case No. 21-60743) ML21327A3352021-11-18018 November 2021 11-18-21 Court Order (5th Cir.)(Case No. 21-60743) ML21322A3372021-11-15015 November 2021 11-15-21 Court Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1230) ML21321A2452021-11-10010 November 2021 11-10-21 Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048) ML21293A1072021-10-15015 October 2021 10-15-21 Petition for Review (Fifth Cir.)(Case No. 21-60743) ML21287A6422021-10-0808 October 2021 10-8-21 Order (D.C. Cir)(Case No. 21-1048) ML21271A2742021-09-24024 September 2021 9-24-21 Order (DC Cir.) (Case No. 21-1048) ML21243A2262021-08-26026 August 2021 8-26-21 Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048) ML21173A1482021-06-22022 June 2021 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-21-09) ML21091A0882021-04-0101 April 2021 Letter from NRC Secretary to Glenn Lemunyon for Fasken Oil and Ranch ML21043A1612021-02-18018 February 2021 2-11-21 Scheduling Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1055) ML21049A1712021-02-10010 February 2021 Case Consolidation Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048)(Consolidated) ML21035A2252021-02-0303 February 2021 Scheduling Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048) ML21029A0842021-01-29029 January 2021 Memorandum and Order (Denying Motions to Reopen and for Leave to File) (LBP-21-02) ML20352A3592020-12-17017 December 2020 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-20-14) ML20352A3602020-12-17017 December 2020 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-20-15) ML20339A5192020-12-0404 December 2020 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-20-13) ML20317A2972020-11-12012 November 2020 Letter from NRC Secretary Annette Vietti-Cook to Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear, Et Al ML20283A7132020-10-0909 October 2020 Letter from NRC Acting Secretary Richard J. Laufer to Dr. Elliot J. Trester of Texas Physicians for Social Responsibility ML20192A0512020-07-0909 July 2020 7-9-20 Underlying Decisions from Which Petition Arises (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187 (Consolidated with 20-1225)) ML20143A2392020-05-22022 May 2020 Order (Extending Time to Intervene, Request a Hearing, and File New Contentions) Based on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML19347A3812019-12-13013 December 2019 Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Motion for Leave to File Late-Filed Contention and Terminating Proceeding) (LBP-19-11) ML19345E9842019-12-11011 December 2019 Letter from NRC Secretary, Annette Vietti-Cook, to Tommy Taylor of Fasken Oil and Ranch ML19345E9872019-12-11011 December 2019 Letter from NRC Secretary, Annette Vietti-Cook, to A. James Mayer of Green Century Exploration and Production ML19322C5992019-11-18018 November 2019 Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Amend Contention 13) (LBP-19-9) ML19317E0792019-11-13013 November 2019 Referral Memorandum from the Secretary to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel 2024-02-06
[Table view] |
Text
USCA Case #21-1048 Document #1917338 Filed: 10/08/2021 Page 1 of 2 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 21-1048 September Term, 2021 NRC-CLI-20-14 NRC-CLI-20-13 NRC-CLI-20-15 NRC-CLI-21-09 Filed On: October 8, 2021 [1917338]
Don't Waste Michigan, et al.,
Petitioners v.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Respondents Interim Storage Partners LLC, Intervenor Consolidated with 21-1055, 21-1056, 21-1179 ORDER Upon consideration of the motions for leave to intervene filed by: Interim Storage Partners LLC, it is ORDERED that the motions be granted.
Circuit Rules 28(d) and 32(e)(2) govern the filing of briefs by intervenors. A schedule for the filing of briefs will be established by future order. That order will automatically provide briefing only for intervenors on the side of respondents. Any intervenor(s) intending to participate in support of petitioners must so notify the court, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order. Such notification must include a statement of the issues to be raised by the intervenor(s). This notification will allow tailoring of the briefing schedule to provide time for a brief as intervenor on the side of petitioners. Failure to submit notification could result in an intervenor being denied leave to file a brief.
USCA Case #21-1048 Document #1917338 Filed: 10/08/2021 Page 2 of 2 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 21-1048 September Term, 2021 Intervenors supporting the same party are reminded that they must file a joint brief or certify to the court why a separate brief is necessary. Intervenors' attention is particularly directed to D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 39 (2021), which describes "unacceptable" grounds for filing separate briefs. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. See D.C. Cir. Rule 39.
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/
Laura M. Chipley Deputy Clerk Page 2