ML21287A642

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
10-8-21 Order (D.C. Cir)(Case No. 21-1048)
ML21287A642
Person / Time
Site: Consolidated Interim Storage Facility
Issue date: 10/08/2021
From: Chipley L, Langer M
US Federal Judiciary, Court of Appeals, for the District of Columbia Circuit
To:
Consolidated Interim Storage Facility, NRC/OGC
References
1917338, 21-1048, NRC-CLI-20-13, NRC-CLI-20-14, NRC-CLI-20-15, NRC-CLI-21-09
Download: ML21287A642 (2)


Text

USCA Case #21-1048 Document #1917338 Filed: 10/08/2021 Page 1 of 2 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 21-1048 September Term, 2021 NRC-CLI-20-14 NRC-CLI-20-13 NRC-CLI-20-15 NRC-CLI-21-09 Filed On: October 8, 2021 [1917338]

Don't Waste Michigan, et al.,

Petitioners v.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Respondents Interim Storage Partners LLC, Intervenor Consolidated with 21-1055, 21-1056, 21-1179 ORDER Upon consideration of the motions for leave to intervene filed by: Interim Storage Partners LLC, it is ORDERED that the motions be granted.

Circuit Rules 28(d) and 32(e)(2) govern the filing of briefs by intervenors. A schedule for the filing of briefs will be established by future order. That order will automatically provide briefing only for intervenors on the side of respondents. Any intervenor(s) intending to participate in support of petitioners must so notify the court, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order. Such notification must include a statement of the issues to be raised by the intervenor(s). This notification will allow tailoring of the briefing schedule to provide time for a brief as intervenor on the side of petitioners. Failure to submit notification could result in an intervenor being denied leave to file a brief.

USCA Case #21-1048 Document #1917338 Filed: 10/08/2021 Page 2 of 2 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 21-1048 September Term, 2021 Intervenors supporting the same party are reminded that they must file a joint brief or certify to the court why a separate brief is necessary. Intervenors' attention is particularly directed to D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 39 (2021), which describes "unacceptable" grounds for filing separate briefs. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. See D.C. Cir. Rule 39.

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/

Laura M. Chipley Deputy Clerk Page 2