ML20204D381

From kanterella
Revision as of 03:08, 30 May 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/03L-0 on 781206:noted That a Procedure Change Rept Had Not Been Reviewed by the PORC W/In 14 Days of Being Generated.Caused by Personnel Oversight
ML20204D381
Person / Time
Site: Maine Yankee
Issue date: 12/13/1978
From: Patricia Anderson
Maine Yankee
To:
Shared Package
ML20204D380 List:
References
LER-78-028-03L, LER-78-28-3L, NUDOCS 7812200254
Download: ML20204D381 (1)


Text

-

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT d *

NT

'Oce i 1 i i i i i 10 6

-'NT Oa T- A'uEOu-O iNP-ATiON>

10 til8 l9 MI El 7 Ml Yl LICENSEE COOE Pl 1l@l 150 l 0 l -l 0 l LICENSE 14 0 l 0 NUMBER l 0 l 0 l - l 0 l 025l@l . 28 4 l LICENSE 1 l 1 TYPE l 1 lJO1 l@l 57 CAT 58l@

l CON'T

  • 10111 I n 3E l L60@l 0l61 S l Ol DOCKET 01013 l 0 l 9 l@l'i NUMBER 68 l692 l OEVENT l 6DATg l' 7 l 8 @l 74 175 l 9 REPORT l 1 l 1DATEl 7 l 680l@

EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROB ABLE CONSEQUENCES h A l During a review of outstanding Procedure Change Reports (PCR). it was determined 1 O

l that one PCR had not been reviewed by the PORC within 14 days of being generated asJ l o 14 l l required by T.S. #5.8.3.C. A meeting of the PORC was held and the PCR was reviewed 1 10 I s i l and approved. Because the PCR review was only five days late for review and was l ITTs I I ultimately approved, there was no effect on the oublic health or safety. I 10171 l l 10181I l 7 8 9 80 E CO E SU C E COMPONENT CODE SUS DE SU '

uusj l Z] Zi@ LAJ@ l x l@ Iz Iz Iz Iz Iz-lz l@ LZJ@ BJ @

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 - 18 19 20 -

,,, SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE REPORT REVISION LE R/RO EVENT YEAR REPORT NO. CODE TYPE

( -j NO.

@ 4Eg l '01 21 8j d 10 l3 l y [-- -j l0 l

, l217 22l8 l 23 24 2i, 27 28 29 30 31 32 N AC ON PL NT ME HOURS 22 58 i FOR 8.

^

SUPPLI MANUF C RER l33 Z gl4Zl@3 lZl@

35 y@

36 l0l0l0l0l 31 W@ W@ lZ l@ lZ l9 l9 l9 l@

40 41 42 43 44 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS h j i o lThe lack of PORC review of a PCR within the'soecified time was due to an oversight I g ion the part of personnel responsible for the timely review. Those eersonnel hava 1 1 l been reminded of the importance of complying with the required review schedule I i 3 l -l U 14j l I 7 8 9 80 SAS  % POWER OTHER STATUS of O Y DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION y (Z ,,J @ l O 1 9 l 7 l @ l NA l U @l Review of procedure change reports l A T!VITY CO TENf KELEASED F RELE ASE AMOUNTOF ACTIVITY l t 6 W W@l NA l l

'OCATION OF RELEASE NA l PERSONNEL EXPOS ES NUM8ER TYPE DESCRIPTION y ]0l0l0l@ QJ@L NA l PERSONNE L INJU IES NUMBER DESCRIPTION

' Q l0]0]Ol@l 7 8 9 11 12 NA 80 l

-L OFOR DAM G TO FACILITY E Lz.J@l 7 8 9 to NA l 80 DE CRIPTION

  • I.

[IIi] ii.SUEf@t 7 89 n 40 Ni i i i i i i i i i i i i i I :,

'- 68 69 80 .

i Peter L. Anderson 207-442-8766 0 NAME OF PREPARER PHONE: I.

7-84 2 2 0 0 Es4