ML20137W193

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:01, 13 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Application for Amend to License NPF-3,changing Tech Spec Sections 6.5.1.7.c,6.5.1.8,6.5.2.9,6.5.2.10,6.7.1.c & 6.7.1.d to Reflect Administrative Organizational Change Already in Place.W/Safety Evaluation
ML20137W193
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 12/05/1985
From: Williams J
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20137W175 List:
References
TAC-59934, NUDOCS 8512100196
Download: ML20137W193 (4)


Text

r- .

la .

APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATI:G LICENSE NO. NPF-3 FOR DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR PO'n'EK STATION UNIT NO. 1 Enclosed are forty-three (43) copics of the requested changes to the Davis-Ilesse Nuc1 car Power Station Unit No. I Facility Operating Licenne No. NPF-3, together with the Safety Evaluation for the requested change.

The proposed changes include Sections 6.5.1.7.c, 6.5.1.8. 6.5.2.9, 6.5.2.10, 6.7.1.c. and 6.7.1.d.

hy /s/ Terry D. Murray Terry D. Murray, Assistant Vice Presider.t. Nuclear For . foe Williams, fr.

Senior Vice President, Nuc1 car Sworn and nubscribed before me this 5th day of December, 1985.

/s/ 1aurio A. Illnkle, noe (firudzinnki)

Notary Public State of Ohio My Commission Expirca May 16, 1986 SEAL f,hgg >)1

, i. _

1

Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1215 Attachment

1. Changes to Davis-Besse Nuc1 car Power Station Unit 1. Appendix A Technical Specification Sections 6.5.1.7.c. 6.5.1.8. 6.5.2.9 l 6.5.2.10, 6.7.1.c and 6.7.1.d.

l A. Time required to implement. This change is to be effective upon NRC approval.

B. Reason for Change (Facility Change Request 85-0122 Rev. B).

The proposed change in to revise whom the Company Nuc1 car Review ,

Board (CNRB) reports to and advises from the President and Chief Operating Officer to Senior Vice President. Nuclear. This results from restructuring of the CNRB and recent corporate reorganization. This is also in accordance with the Standard .

Technical Specifications for B&W plants. l C. Safety Evaluation (See Attached) l D. Significant llazard Consideration (See Attached)

I e

I i

J i

1 Safety Evaluation

, The proposed amendmnt request is to revise Sections 6.5.2.9. 6.5.2.10, 6.5.1.7. 6.7.1.c. 6.5.1.8, and 6.7.1.d to reflect Toledo Edison organiz-

, ation and management responsibility changes. Section 6.5.2.9 states "The j Company Nuclear Review Board" (CNRB) shall report to and advise the *

President and Chief Operating Officer on those areas of responsibility 1 specified in Section 6.5.2.7 and 6.5.2.8". Sections 6.5.2.7 and 6.5.2.8 i define the Reviews and Audits of facility activitico to be performed '

] under the cognizance of the CNRB. Section 6.5.2.10 requires records of  ;

the CNRB activities shall be prepared, approved and distributed to CNRB members and to the President and Chief Operating Officer. These records 1 (Section 6.5.2.10) are minutes of the CNRB Hooting, Reviews (Section 6.5.2.7) atd Audits (Section 6.5.2.8). The proposed change will replace ,

i the Pigredent and Chief' Operating Officer with Senior Vice President, i Nuclear to reflect the organizational changes in title.

The Safet/ Function of Section 6.5.2.9 " Authority", 6.5.2.10 " Records", l 6.5.1.8 "ttecords" and 6.7.1 " Safety Limit Violation" is to provide management oversight of the minutes, audits and reviews to verify that  ;

operation of the facility is performed in a safe manner and is consistent i

! with Company policy, approved procedures and license provisional to i review important proposed changes to the facility, tests and procedurent i and to verify that unusual events are promptly investigated and their j causes are corrected in a manner that reduces the probability of ,

recurrence. When the Technical Specifications were issued, the Vice i

, Presidents were members of the CNRB. Because of their membership on the l l Board, the President and Chief Operating Officer was designated in l Section 6.5.2.9 and 6.5.2.10. With the issuance of License Amendment 76, 4

dated November 5,1984, (Log No.1643) the Vice Presidents were removed from the CNRB providing separation of executive management from the CNRB duties.

On July 1, 1985, management organization change occurred at Toledo Edison i in which the President and Chief Operating Officer retired and a new replacement was named. A new position of Senior Vice President, Fuclear ,

was established replacing Vice President Nuclear. The Senior Vice  !

3 President, Nucicar reporte directly to the Chairman and Chief fxecutive Officer.

This revision to the Technical Specifications changes the CNRB raporting
requirements for Audits and Reviews (Section 6.5.2.9) and Records (Section 6.5.2.10) from the President and Chief Operating Officer to Senior Vice President Nuclear. The Senior Vice President, Nuclear will I. assume this duty from the Pre'aident and Chief Operating Officer. The ,

i proposed amendment request is consistent with the Standard Technical >

Specifications for B&W plants. Revision to Section 6.5.1.7, 6.5.1.8 and 3

6.7.1 is only a title change to reflect the current position. This Amendment Request is administrative only and there are no physical or l

. safety related functional changens therefore, this is not an unreviewed safety question. '

Significant liarard Consideration This amendment request revises Section 6.5.1.7.c. 6.5.1.8, 6.5.2.9, 6.5.2.10, 6.7.1.c and 6.7.1.d. of the Technical Specifications which requires the Company Nucicar Review Board (CNRB) to report to and advise the President and Chief Operating Officer. Under the proposed change the CNRB would report to and advise the Senior Vice President, Nuclear. This amendment request does not involve a Significant Hazard.

When the Technical Specifications were issued for Davis-Besse, the Vice Presidents were members of the CNRB. Because of the Vice President, Nuclear membership on the Board, the President and Chief Operating Officer was designated in these sections. With the issuance of 1,1 cense Amendment 76 dated November 5, 1984, the Vice Presidents were removed from the CNRB providing separation of management from CNRB duties. On July 1, 1985, a management reorganization occurred at Toledo .

Edison and a new position of Senior Vice President Nuclear was established. The Senior Vice President, Nuclear, reports directly to the Chairman and 1:hief Executive Officer.

The proposed amendment request only changes who the CNRB reports to and advises in relationship to operation of Davis-Desse. This request is consistent with the Standard Technical Specifications for B&W plants.

The granting of the request would not:

1) Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated (10 CFR 50.92(c)(1)).

This amendment request only changes who the CNRB reports to and advises in relationship to the operation of Davis-Besse. This change is administrative and in accordance with the B&W Standard Technical Specifications. This amendment request does not increase the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.

2) Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident previously evaluated (10 CFR 50.92(c)(2)).

All accidents are still bounded by previous analysis and no new accidents are involved.

3) Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety (10 CFR 50.92 (c) (3)) .

All margins of safety assumed in previous analysis remain unchanged.

On the basis of the above Toledo Edison has determined that the amendment request does not involve a significant hazard consideration.