ML20244B382
ML20244B382 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 01/05/1981 |
From: | Thompson D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
To: | Reinmuth G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
Shared Package | |
ML20237G454 | List:
|
References | |
FOIA-87-450 EGM-81-01, EGM-81-1, NUDOCS 8103160020 | |
Download: ML20244B382 (2) | |
Text
i 1
~
q
. g, l JAN 05 88)
. m
- d#
l T y.
' ~ ~
Ed> M - ? l-o L *
~
t.
a':*- ;'
MDIORANDlM ' FOR: . G. W. Reinmuth.' Chief: . . n. - .::. e .. : ..
J n. : -
.S.. ;
'- Vendor and Special Projects'8 ranch. AARIt 'te:'r i FRN:
n~. .:,- .
Dudley Thompson Director -
j 1 Enforcement and Investigations. .
9 i
. .: v..
SUBJECT:
ENFORCDtENT PRACTICES APPLICABLE TD MON-LICEN i .-
i also discussed this matter wtth Karl Seyfrit:This To deal with your notes in I have respond reverse priate: order ppof
. dates, we believe a two-level system for citations is appro
, ,,3 ,
A Motice failure of Violation to report should be issued for 'all Part 21 violations, either or procedural.
I not there is a clear ifnk to a Part 21 requirement.The key deters 1 natio AP Notice of Nonconformance should be issued for QA vio A pendix E of Part 50..or for deviations from cosaf tments made by the vendor.
i )
j
. to non-licensees, we agree that considerable Part 21
, and conf j that the revised enforcement policy does not help.
l cannot serve to change requirements. defensive, however. I Part 21 is befog pursued with SD. under cognizance of PDR.As you know, s that effort is the place to clarify the applicability of PartWe 21believe that i
i Uldis below. Potapov's questions (enclosed with your 12/2 note) are addressed '
,i .
1.
When a violatt6n of Part 21 is involved, citation of Part 2 is permissible and appropriate.
i non-licensees. Section 182. AEA cannot be used for respond under oath or affirma. tion.Therefore, non-licensees m 1 2. See the response to question 1.
l - - '
l 3 j
j the Notice of Violation should be a separate docts 1
sistent' with our handling of enforcement against other individuals (as in Orders to Cease and Desist) or licensees. :
il involving However, for cases only Regional enforcement action, we agree that the presen systen is acceptable.
1 Fo't. A41-VSo. .
Ch
[TG~iGTTiiD 9. NA
- s. .
G. **.
- Reinmuth 4
elevated enforcement actions.We agree, in general, that evalua Ilowever, we recommend their use for Severity Level IV cases to assist in any subsequent decistoms involving possible Enforcement Conferences. '
1 L'e have discussed these matters with ELD,'and hey agree with our position.
Original signed bt Dudley noepson -- . , , . - ,,.
c m.., s. , - - ..
Dudley Thompson, Director :' ' ;
~
Enforcement and Investigations : .
, Office of Inspection and Enforcement. .
l cc: VStello RDeYoung .
l JSniezek .
to'.oseiey
' BGrier, RI
' J0'Reilly, P.II JKeppier, Rill **
KSeyfrit, RIY I REngelken, RV ,
Wetter, RIV
- l UPotapov, RIY l JTaylor -
- l l MPeranich .
~
- i l
. 1
?
.i .
I l
i i
EI:D ELD i DThompson/bts JLiebeman
!