ML20244B382

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 801202 & 15 Memo Re Enforcement Practices Applicable to Nonlicensees.Two Level Sys for Citations Is Appropriate:Notice of Violation for 10CFR21 Violations & Notice of Nonconformance for QA Violations or Deviations
ML20244B382
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/05/1981
From: Thompson D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Reinmuth G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML20237G454 List:
References
FOIA-87-450 EGM-81-01, EGM-81-1, NUDOCS 8103160020
Download: ML20244B382 (2)


Text

i 1

~

q

. g, l JAN 05 88)

. m

  • d#

l T y.

' ~ ~

Ed> M - ? l-o L *

~

t.

a':*-  ;'

MDIORANDlM ' FOR: . G. W. Reinmuth.' Chief: . . n. - .::. e ..  : ..

J n. : -

.S..  ;

'- Vendor and Special Projects'8 ranch. AARIt 'te:'r i FRN:

n~. .:,- .

Dudley Thompson Director -

j 1 Enforcement and Investigations. .

9 i

. .: v..

SUBJECT:

ENFORCDtENT PRACTICES APPLICABLE TD MON-LICEN i .-

i also discussed this matter wtth Karl Seyfrit:This To deal with your notes in I have respond reverse priate: order ppof

. dates, we believe a two-level system for citations is appro

, ,,3 ,

A Motice failure of Violation to report should be issued for 'all Part 21 violations, either or procedural.

I not there is a clear ifnk to a Part 21 requirement.The key deters 1 natio AP Notice of Nonconformance should be issued for QA vio A pendix E of Part 50..or for deviations from cosaf tments made by the vendor.

i )

j

. to non-licensees, we agree that considerable Part 21

, and conf j that the revised enforcement policy does not help.

l cannot serve to change requirements. defensive, however. I Part 21 is befog pursued with SD. under cognizance of PDR.As you know, s that effort is the place to clarify the applicability of PartWe 21believe that i

i Uldis below. Potapov's questions (enclosed with your 12/2 note) are addressed '

,i .

1.

When a violatt6n of Part 21 is involved, citation of Part 2 is permissible and appropriate.

i non-licensees. Section 182. AEA cannot be used for respond under oath or affirma. tion.Therefore, non-licensees m 1 2. See the response to question 1.

l - - '

l 3 j

j the Notice of Violation should be a separate docts 1

sistent' with our handling of enforcement against other individuals (as in Orders to Cease and Desist) or licensees.  :

il involving However, for cases only Regional enforcement action, we agree that the presen systen is acceptable.

1 Fo't. A41-VSo. .

Ch

[TG~iGTTiiD 9. NA

- s. .

G. **.

  • Reinmuth 4

elevated enforcement actions.We agree, in general, that evalua Ilowever, we recommend their use for Severity Level IV cases to assist in any subsequent decistoms involving possible Enforcement Conferences. '

1 L'e have discussed these matters with ELD,'and hey agree with our position.

Original signed bt Dudley noepson -- . , , . - ,,.

c m.., s. , - - ..

Dudley Thompson, Director :' ' ;

~

Enforcement and Investigations : .

, Office of Inspection and Enforcement. .

l cc: VStello RDeYoung .

l JSniezek .

to'.oseiey

' BGrier, RI

' J0'Reilly, P.II JKeppier, Rill **

KSeyfrit, RIY I REngelken, RV ,

Wetter, RIV

l UPotapov, RIY l JTaylor -
  • l l MPeranich .

~

- i l

. 1

?

.i .

I l

i i

EI:D ELD i DThompson/bts JLiebeman

!