05000219/FIN-2010007-02
From kanterella
Revision as of 19:41, 20 February 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Failure to Follow Preventative Maintenance Procedure Leading to Incomplete Fire Diesel Maintenance |
| Description | The inspectors identified a Green non-cited violation of Technical Specification 6.8.1 for Exelon\'s failure to follow MA-MA-716-009, \"Preventive Maintenance Work Order Process.\" Specifically, Exelon closed work order R2120325 without completing the necessary work and did not take action to evaluate the acceptability of this action, contrary to MA-MA-716-009 requirements. Exelon entered this issue into their corrective action program as IRs 1085811 and 1088269 to evaluate the corrective actions needed to address this issue. This finding is more than minor because it affects the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone and affects the cornerstone objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and dependability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. Specifically, the fire diesel is the credited backup source of makeup water to the isolation condensers and the failure to perform scheduled preventive maintenance challenges the availability and reliability of the diesel. This finding affects the fire protection defense-in-depth strategies involving fire suppression and screens to Green using IMC 0609, Appendix F, \"Fire Protection Significance Determination Process.\" Because of the fire diesel function as an isolation condenser makeup source, the inspectors reviewed the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone as well and found it also screened to Green because the finding is not a design or qualification deficiency confirmed not to result in loss of operability, does not represent a loss of system safety function, does not represent the actual loss of safety function of a single train for greater than its allowed outage time, does not represent an actual loss of safety function of one or more non-technical specification trains of equipment designated as risk significant per 10 CFR 50.65 for greater than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, and does not screen as potentially risk significant due to seismic, flooding, or severe weather initiating event. This finding has a cross-cutting aspect in the area of human performance because Exelon personnel did not follow procedures. Specifically, when Exelon did not follow or refer to procedure MA-MA- 716-009, \"Preventive Maintenance Work Order Process,\" they did not develop an evaluation to consider the impacts of omitting portions of the work package for the two-year fire diesel preventive maintenance H.4(b) |
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000219/2010007 Section 4OA2 |
| Date counted | Sep 30, 2010 (2010Q3) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | R Bellamy J Heinly J Ambrosini E Torres |
| CCA | H.8, Procedure Adherence |
| INPO aspect | WP.4 |
| ' | |
Finding - Oyster Creek - IR 05000219/2010007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Oyster Creek) @ 2010Q3
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||