ML20058J811

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:48, 6 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
GG-2020-02 Public Forms
ML20058J811
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/10/2020
From: Greg Werner
Operations Branch IV
To:
Entergy Operations
References
Download: ML20058J811 (17)
v • d • e


Text

EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Chief: Clyde Osterholtz Facility: Grand Gulf Date of Written Exam: 1/31/2020 U/1: Start of Op Test: 2/3/2020 End of Op Test: 2/11/2020 Written Exam Developed By: NRC I Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC I Facility uue uate oescnpt1on uate comp1a1e lnltl81S Notes For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made 5/31/2019 Examination administration date confirmed 5 )'1 } II/ &u for the facility to submit reference materials 7/5/2019 NRC examiners and facility contact assigned s / 'l? /J'J M 7/5/2019 Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements 5" ( ~ //1 1.;,

7/5/2019 Reference material due for NRC prepared exams ,JJi1 ES-201 Att-3

/11/IJ 7/5/2019 Corporate Notification Letter sent s / ~ /!'I 6o ES-201 Att-4 produced by CE NRC developed written examination outline sent to facility 7/19/2019 contact S/ 8)/'I (!It{) ES-401-1/2 and ES-401-3 8/30/2019 Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due 3 /30/1'1 I'1...A ES-201-2, 201-3, 301-1, 301-2, 301-5, D-1 Operating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback 9/13/2019 provided to facility licensee 'Jh~Jtq /I~

I ES-201-2 signed by CE & BC Proposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and Exams prepared by the NRC are approved by

~

,~

11/15/2019 reference materials due. I/ /2, /J 'I BC and forwarded for facility licensee review 11/22/2019 Peer review of written exam complete )./ Document review on ES-401-9

(

,J/A 12/13/2019 Written exam and operating test reviews completed /2 / $'/;9 !AJ Document review on ES-401-9 12/27/2019 Feedback approved by Branch Chief I.J..h 9/J9 ILi Examination review results discussed between NRC and facility 12/27/2019 licensee tJ../t '!/; </ !.1tll 1/3/2020 Preliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due II~ /J D  ;(,fl() NRC Forms 398/396 1/6/2020 On-site validation & 10% audit of license applications

// b/'2.o ti~

1/10/2020 Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed d q l..i o l~tP 1/17/2020 Final license applications & waiver/excusal requests due j /~In" /1,,;J ES-201-4 prepared by LA 1/24/2020 , Written exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief 1/~ ~lzo a~

1/24/2020 Request facility licensee management feedback on the exam  ; /11'Q'/-2..., l/1__;)

1/24/2020 Final applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and waiver/excusal letters sent - I I

l 2t ~hZ,0 ~

LA produces / BC signs Exam Approval Letter (ES-201 Att-5) 1/24/2020 Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee I

1/ 2-~ :1o

'h ~

1/24/2020 Approved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners ')/;_db, ~

2/3/2020 Administer Operating Test  :,_;Jul) ~

2/18/2020 Examiner's document op test results on ES 303's 1 fdihn 6o 3/2/2020 Post exam comments and graded exams received L£1u '1u {!,.() ES-403-1 to BC Post exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and 3/10/2020 NRC grading completed  ?--/:)II U> M 3/10/2020 Post exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 updated i /z;fie ~

3/17/2020 Chief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam grading completed ~lulu tJ) Signed ES 303's to BC 3/24/2020 Branch Chief review of exam results completed 7,./-ziR/~o ~JJ 3/31/2020 Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision i fai,/~ ~

3/31/2020 License/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results

-;,~ fiillu> /1/L_t\

3/31/2020 RPS/IP number of examinees updated '"7J?:9'ho / :J print Report-21 4/21/2020 Final Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review) 'tJ(A-, .<l/n- 21 days after proposed denial letters mailed.

4/28/2020 Examination Report Issued l~/~/J!;Cl (1~ produced by CE 5/5/2020 Ref Mat'I Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals ;f/A- ~/Ir '

6/2/2020 SUNSI checklist complete and exam docs to ADAMS p/).(z,o /I~ SUNSI checklist to LA Replaces NUREG-1021 , Revision 11, Form/ES-201-1 and ES-501-1 Rev.9

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION Date of Examination: FEBRUARY 3, 2020 Initials Item Task Description a b* c..

1. a. Verify that the oulline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.

w b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

I T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

T E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

N

2. a. Using Form ES-301 *5, verity that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 *4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific Instructions tor the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including overlap) .

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301*2:

).1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form .

A ~ Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

L ~ No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).

K -'4r The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T .Car' The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R 0 b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

u (;11' The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form .

G '2(. At least one task is new or significantly modified.

H '3( No more than one task Is repeated lrom the last two NRC licensing examinations.

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N

c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.

A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

I) Printed ~ ignA re a.

b.

Author Facility Reviewer (*)

~etfi I ~ f'..e-

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor I
  • Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Grand Gulf Date of Exam: 2/03/2020 Item Description Exam Level: RO a

  • b*

SRO Initial D

c*#

1.

2.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

a. NRG K/As are referenced for all questions.

=fl / &1J

~

~ &<J

b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.
c. Correct answer explanation and distractor analysis provided (ES-401, D.2.g)
3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 4 The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four RO or two SRO 5.

questions were repeated from the last two NRG licensing exams, consult the NRR/NRO OL program office).

Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated 5((.

/ C1i) below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate.

_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or

_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started, or

_ the examinations were developed independently, or sf< ~

_ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication, or 6.

_ other (explain).

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the

/

Bank Modified New bank, at least 10% new, and the rest new or modified);

ft~<:-..a.$). ~ 5(2 ~ {!.~

enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution(s) at right. - 0/0

7. Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the Memory C/A RO exam and at least 13 questions of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the 3S 4-0 comprehension/analysis level (see ES-401, D.2.c); s(Z_

~ ~

enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution(s) r34.'4~  !~tf~

at right.

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors. Sl2. -/ ~
9. Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the lier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

5((.. / &<)

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in Appendix B.

~ / M 11 . The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet. Sf<. / t!,a Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Author S-\-e.~ euues I ~~ lo/u/,q
b. Facility Reviewer (*) ~~p / ~ ~-:-* ~ :1(.(<f

{!,fv/e ().sferltolfl:./ /1£nv~ /J.{ (]~ ,/ii-/-_

~u,

c. NRG Chief Examiner(#}
d. NRG Regional Supervisor ~ t7 r; I

t-* v{Ul'ir //_ ~ , . ;...,J/. . _:_ 0 I I V

Note:

  • The facility reviewer's initials or signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRG reviewer initials items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required 0

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Grand Gulf Date of Exam: 2/03/2020 Exam Level: RO D SRO

  • Initial Item Description a b* c*#

1.

2.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.

s~ . / U) 3.

b.

c.

Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

Correct answer explanation and distractor analysis provided (ES-401, D.2.g)

SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401

~

~ "/

/ 1kt)

{!,t:,

4 The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four RO or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR/NRO OL program office).

~ -/ (JfJ

5. Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate.

_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or

_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started, or

  • _ the examinations were developed independently, or /

&I)

/

_ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication, or

_ other (explain).

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the Bank Modified New bank, at least 10% new, and the rest new or modified); )

enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution(s) at right. 7/28% 1 /4% 17 /68% s~ . / {!d£}

7. Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the Memory CIA RO exam and at least 13 questions of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the 9 /(p comprehension/analysis level (see ES-401, D.2.c);

enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution(s) at right.

-8/92~ '17/6~ sf<.

/ '~

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors. / ~
9. Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified. - /J ~
10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in Appendix B. // 00
11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet. '/

~

Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Author S-f.eve ~ s / ~ f.e..*-- 10/,1/,,
b. Facility Reviewer (*) l f!J..;J~ I 'j
c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) tj-zzhou:>
d. NRC Regional Supervisor D 'J '

l~'J I 'l:_0}</

l_

Note: The facility reviewer's initials or signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations.

  1. Independent NRC reviewer initials items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required0

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilit : GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION Date of Examination: 2/3/2020 0 eratin Test Number: GGNS 2-2020 Initials

1. General Criteria a b*
a. The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sam lin re uirements e. ., 10 CFR 55.45, o erational im ortance, safel function distribution).
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durin this examination .

C. Theo eratin test shall not du licate items from the a licants' audit test s) (see Section D.1.a . .

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acce table limits.
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a licants at the desi nated license level.
2. Walkthrough Criteria I -- I
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions

  • initiating cues
  • references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include-detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of steps, if a licable
b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walkthrough outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations s ecified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4, and a co is attached.
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
d. NRC Supervisor
  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. The inde endent NRG reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner concurrence is re uired.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: GGNS Date of Exam: 2/3/2020 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 Operating Test No.: GGNS 2-2020 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c*

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. ~ l. & ~
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ~ -~
3. Each event description consists of the following:
  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event s(J.. 6J the the the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew expected operator actions (by shift position) event termination point (if applicable)

V

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ~ ~ ~
5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ~~ / ~
6. 1f time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

sl.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given. / ~)

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. st ., ~ 1;)
8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d) , any open simulator performance 5((

deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. / Ct)

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. 15£( ~ c:fu
10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). sR / 1D
11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) ~ / dw
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). st.. / ~
13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

sf< "/ ~

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. se /  !,.e")

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- i

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I 2 / 2 / 2 ,q_ ~ ~
2. Abnormal events (2-4) 4 I 4 I 4 / 3 g1 ~~ ,1~
3. Major transients (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2 / 3 4' /  ;-fa
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 I 1 / 2 / 2 q_ / 1,/)

I 1 / 1 I 2 q_ ~

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (2. 1 per scenario set) 2

/

6. Preidentified critical tasks (2! 2) 3 , J., 12

/ 2 s~ "/ w

  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required .

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: G,f:,,JS Date of Exam:2/o/.z.o Exam Level: RO ~SRO D Item Description Initials a b C 1.

~

Clean answer sheets copied before grading ffi1

2. Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted) ~ &,b
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) 5R-
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in detail sfl-.
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified N/,. ~ (!JI)
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants sR ~ ti)

Date Printed Name/Signature

a. Grader S-b>e l<eeves~ z./,o /r.oz.o
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRG Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRG Supervisor(*)

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRG; two independent NRG reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: (;, f:/Af5 Date of Exam:'1/co/tt,1,1> Exam Level: RO D SRO [al(

Item Description Initials a

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
2. Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted) sR..
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for alt borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader $~~ ~~ I
b. Facility Reviewer(*) ..:,h &,,
c. NRG Chief Examiner (*) z .),1fec
d. NRG Supervisor(*) 01/11~ i 7

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRG reviews are required.

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2019 to 09/01/2020 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4

  1. Candidates Exam Site / Docket # / lnsp Rpt # RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiners Assigned Week 01/05/2020 Grand Gulf/ 05000416 / 2020301 FB-OR- Osterholtz, Clyde Clayton.Kelly CAC #: 000956 ONSITE Doyle,Matthew VALIDATI Hayes.Mahdi ONOF Osterholtz,Clyde INITIAL LICENSE EXAMIN ATION (OV) 02/02/2020 Grand Gulf/ 05000416 / 2020301 6 0 2 0 FB-OR- NFF Osterholtz, Clyde Clayton,Kelly CAC #: 000500 INITIAL Doyle.Matthew LICENSE Hayes,Mahdi EXAM Osterholtz,Clyde ADMINIS TRATION (EXAD)

Sites: GG Orgs: ALL Exam Author. ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV 1/31/2020 5:59:53 PM Page 1 of 4

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Sc~edule From 10/01/2019 to 09/01/2020 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 Summary by Date RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 02/2020 6 2 0 0 8 Sites: GG Orgs: ALL Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV 1/31/2020 5:59:53 PM Page 2 of 4

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2019 to 09/01/2020 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Reg ion: 4 Summary by Site RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Grand Gulf 6 2 0 0 8 Sites: GG Orgs: ALL Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV 1/31/2020 5:59:53 PM Page 3 of 4

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2019 to 09/01/2020 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 Summary by Region RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Region 4 6 2 0 0 8 Sites: GG Orgs: ALL Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV 1/31/2020 5:59:53 PM Page 4 of 4

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre--Examination I acknowledge that J have acquired specialized knowledge about lhe U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of FEBRUARY 3. 2020 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG (e.g., acling as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore. I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions or this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. l will immediately repor1 to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination

~ To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during N the week(s) of of FEBRUARY 3, 2020. From the date that I entered info this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I dtd

~ not instruct, evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations. except as specff1cally noted

-o below and authorized by the NRC.

lll I.O (l) PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE

(,)

o 1.~,t~VC5 L<W. 6-. U . , ~

z; 2. * *fJJJ~.... l\.<Llzp., &:fhzj_r_<-

3. IUiLt..L.~SL .ra:"ic..a:L~
4. lf,,. ,c.1::e t QJ.6 ___Q_eve-lQi2_ _ _ __
5. ~'le..~ fi~~Ry _(!~~~~~E "VH.C1~,,,_;-
6. _ _L(~(___ OIZJ"1~~:"iifW .
7. ..... ~~

~: t&loc.. k'.'.i-~* i... ~ gAM t.~A i)

~~-

12._.i,;:,;.,L.l..~::u:::J:!-,-.~

!/FIN ~ -- - -

13._ _ --5,=',?o~

go -:c__

J.i.o NOTES: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION 0 f-ncved fet'" l-f('(>.'* I

~~J.. fer {tj,eCPt- ES-201, Page 31 of 32

ES-201 1 Form ES-201-3 -

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of FEBRUARY 3, 2020 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of FEBRUARY 3. 2020. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

16. :5\-,0.. </ /J v C-C I
11. Se ~ 5 o
18. W +f5 19,.~.!=£c.:..___.:,_......J..,~~

20.---1.A~L..L..!-.!nc~~-

21 **~ .-:C-'-'----;-.1+-'-t'~,..__._

22 . ----b~~I--J,...,,......,._,,__,'--t-23.

24. '©14!0 Mc,=yE£ AoM
25. ,a.£.11>/e lf:d,ZJl~ro/ s,,..,* ~ e"~r
26. LP.,,r~ 73e,Jl,',.,, c.ts 7 s1,.-; -H ~ 3'oir.f 27.
28. $.J4:?? #' c;..- 2 7.t!_~ 5-~ .. -*

1)/>J//<~

o'f'?-_ Tr'i:"'~

~

29. ~*Bec11 .kl.11 ~

so. /VliY14iti J'tiMb5 30~.s-7 NOTES:

© ~(>(Jed fei £- M~,/

ES-201 1 Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRG) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of FEBRUARY 3, 2020 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRG licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of FEBRUARY 3, 2020. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY DATE

~;:&rtt1!1iw"1k~

  • 33.~_;r.-'*,:;:}

QPS§__~ * **- -- - ______ ______ .. __ _

-~ -C,.... ttl-b#----* ------ .. ... -

--~ Lt' 7Z""('!/.LA!~ . -- - *- - .

34. -- -<~~.-l!.&~ _ .. ..6m.QJ: . - --- ---- -- --
35. __ /Y\OJ"ll~ ;_l_ ____ _ __ _T(=:/\,~~ ---- .. -- . ---- **-***- ....
36. _ ...Jo.£.."_J-2.A~.~-=,. __ .. ~,f.(ft!_~!f{&,_ .. -- *- - .. --
37. !J/iO-r#(.l,f)JIO~iE.f' __{)PS_ T.R.Ac~lJl.f:. __ ______ ___

3s.;a\~.t:~ --~:, ~J~_l,Y~- --

39.

~

_tlo- -* V#f""' *a)

.. .. Y:'-_t .. -*~f~~.~r.o&-_-__ -.-

~ ~ "'

40..

41 . ...

t'f1C"46C::L S::- ~ --;,~ ~ - . .-

*-** ;*-* "'t'L _-::-~

42._fst'i.1'..~ -~ . . . o ( D **. **

=~~

43.~~-t'-P~Bv"~. ... o~ _____ :1'<~'.'Y':1."t\.5_(1 __ ~ - --~-----:~ ...

44 . . _ _ . _ .. -*---- .......... .

45. ___ ------- *-* -----*-

NOTES O ~(W eiJ pet s.,'l\AAI (

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION Date of Exam: 2 / 3 / 2020 Operating Test No.:GGNS 2-2020 A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION I

C A S A B S A B S A B S A B M A T L R T O R T O R T O R T O U N Y O C P O C P O C P O C P M(*)

T P E R I U RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 6 4 10 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 3 5 2 2 1 TS 2 2 4 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 3 2 5 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 3 5 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 0 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 3 3 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 3 5 2 2 1 TS RX NOR I/C MAJ TS Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Grand Gulf Date of Examination: 2/03/2020 Operating Test No.:GGNS 2/2020 APPLICANTS RO RO RO RO SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO ATC ATC ATC ATC BOP BOP BOP BOP CRS CRS CRS CRS 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 2, 4, 2, 5, 1, 3, 1, 3, ALL ALL Interpret/Diagnose Events 5, 6, 6, 8, 6, 4, 7, 7, 8 and Conditions 2, 4, 2, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, ALL ALL Comply with and 5, 6, 5, 6, 3, 6, 4, 7, 7, 8 8, Use Procedures (1) 2, 4, 2, 4, 1, 3, 3, 4, N/A N/A Operate Control 5, 6, 5, 6, 6, 7, 8, 7

Boards (2) 2, 4, 2, 4, 1, 2, 1, 2, ALL ALL Communicate 5, 6, 5, 6, 3, 4, 3, 4, 7, 8 8, 6 5, 7, and Interact 8, N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ALL ALL Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1, 4 1, Comply with and Use TS (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes TS compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES 303 1 and ES 303 3 describe the competency rating factors.)

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20058J811&oldid=3079871"