ML20207B551

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:11, 27 December 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Monthly Status Rept on plant-specific Backfitting Activities Current Through 861031,including Summary of Changes in Status Since Last Rept
ML20207B551
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/21/1986
From: Funches J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20205H658 List:
References
FOIA-87-68 NUDOCS 8612040500
Download: ML20207B551 (30)
v • d • e


Text

_ _ _______ ___ _______ __- __ ._ _. ._

s 21 NOV 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR: Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Jesse L. Funches, Director Planning and Program Analysis Staff

SUBJECT:

MONTHLY STATUS REPORT ON PLANT-SPECIFIC '

BACKFITTING ACTIVITIES - OCTOBER 1986 '

Enclosed is NRR's monthly status report on plant-specific backfitting activities current through October 31, 1986. Enclosure 1 provides a sumary of changes in the status of backfit issues that have occurred since the last report. Enclosure 2 provides the status of active issues listed by the Division responsible for resolving the backfit issue. This section also includes a listing of all the backfit issues that have been closed since 1983.

Enclosure 3 provides information on the backfit issues currently under evalua-tion or review. This infomation is obtained from the agency-wide backfit tracking system.

Starting with this month's report, additional information is being added to Enclosure 1 to highlight backfit issues needing increased attention to complete outstanding action.

J. Clifford, x28041, is the NRR point of contact for _backfit issues.

O WasWMD .... nuaba

} Jesse L. Funches, Director Planning and Program Analysis Staff '

l Enclosures-

! Summary of Changes Sumary of Backfit Issues h g ..

Master Listing of Active Issues cc: H. Thompson DISTRIBUTION:

T. Novak T05B R/F F. Miraglia R. Vollmer J. Funches R. Bernero J. Lyons J. Clifford T. !peis P. Tam K. Jabbour W. Russell D. Hood J. Pastis C. Rossi M. Licitra R. Dudley D. Crutchfield H. Rood B. Buckley G. Lainas E. Reeves E. Doolittle T. Cox MSROP-SBA-0CT 1986 s /

OFC :TOSB:PPAS :TOSB:PPAS :DI :PPAS :WIR:NR  :

-._____:..\-./......:...........:......-..___:._________

..--_.f...:._qj......:  :  :

NAME :JCliD 6rd :JLyo p :JFu ches :RVoj1mer  :  :  :

:-------:bak-:--- .

DATE:11/VL/_86 --------:------------:I-/

11/N/86 :11/J //86 : 86  :  :  :

Y \

~0YFICIALRECORDCO 2(o/2 0 W @ O ! N

c .

^b Enclosure 1

SUMMARY

OF SIGNIFICANT BACKFIT ISSUES -

BEAVER VALLEY 2: The backfit determination for the issue on fire protection.

for the cable spreading room was issued in July, 1985. The licensing action for this issue has not been completed.

CATAWBA 1 and 2, and MCGUIRE 1 and 2: The backfit determination for the issue of SPD5 parameter selection was issued in June,1986. The licensee has not yet indicated whether or not they intend to appeal, nor has a schedule been provided for adding parameters to the SPDS. <

FARLEY 1 and 2: The licensee and staff have verbally agreed on a technical specification. change that will satisfy the staff concern regarding testing of containment purge and vent valves. The licensee is scheduled to submit proposed TS in mid-December,1986.

SHEARON HARRIS: The licensee and staff have agreed on a general resolution to the issue of having RG 1.97 instrumentation for the safety injection accumulator. Tne licensee has agreed'in principle to add either a qualified level or pressure instrument to monitor the tank condition. No specific proposal has been submitted by the licensee.

MILLSTONE 3: A backfit analysis has been prepared, and is currently undergoing O revision. Issuance of the backfit is expected before the next monthly report. '

OCONEE 1, 2, and 3: The regulatory analysis for this staff identified backfit showed that further changes to the seismic qualification of the auxiliary feedwater system are not justified. The analysis was completed in August, 1986. The SER closing out this issue has not yet been sent to the licensee.

PALISADES: Region III imposed an immediately effective backfit requiring the -

correction of a number of equipment and programmatic problems prior to restart.

SAN ONOFRE 1, 2, and 3: The NRC response to the licensee's backfit claim was sent to the licensee on October 31, 1986, indicating the staff position was not a backfit. The licensee has not yet indicated if they intend to appeal.

f 4

e 4

O 9

D' l

Enclosure 2 9

9 SlMMARY OF BACKFIT ISSUES O

e 9

- - - - -.e r --- - - - -,.

SUMMARY

OF Ati!VE BACKFIT ISSUES FOR DIEECTOR

, DIVISION OF PNR LICENSING - A CCDE PLANT ISSUE DATE BACKFIT NEIT ACT10N BACKFli ID ID AS DIRMhAIN APPEAL kUMBER BACEFIT EATE L 84-10 SEAVER VALLEY 2 CABLE R00M FIRE PROT 05/20/84 07/11/95C // 5'TAFF RLEEAV2E5007 DR85-07 FARLEY 1/2 LEAK TEST PURGE / VENT VALVES 04/19/85 01/17/S6C // LIC TS RGST RLFARL185002 OR86-01 CATAN84 1 SPDS PARAMETERS 03/25/86 06/13/86C // LIC RESPONS RLCATA125003 ORB 6-02 CATAN8A 2 SPDS PARAMETERS 03/25/86 06/13/86C // LIC RESPONS RLCATA285002 L 86-04 SHERON HARRIS 1 LEVEL MON 1 TOR FDR ACCUMULATOR 02/06/86 06/06/96C // Llc RESPONS RLHARR186002 ORB 6-05 MC80!RE I SPDS PARAE IERS 02/25/86 06/13/86C // LIC RESPONS RLMC8U185001 0F.E6-06 MC8UIRE 2 SPDS PARAMETERS 03/25/86 06/13/86C // LIC RESPONS RLMC8U285001 OR86-08 SAN ONOFRE I R0 LICENSE REQUIREMENTS 06/20/86 10/31/86C / / LIC RESPONS RLSAN0186001 L 86-16 MILLSTONE 3 STATION BLACEDUT UPBRADES 09/15/86 09/15/86R // RESANALYSIS RRMILL386001 O

e l

SUMMARY

OF ACTIVE BACKFIT ISSUES FOR DIRECTOR

g. DIVISION OF PNR LICENSINS - B CODE FLANT ISSUE DATE WCEFIT NEIT ACTION EACKFIT ID 10 AS .OTRMhAih AFPEAL NU.9BEP.

BACKFIT DATE CR86-09 CAN DN0FRE 2 R0 LICENSE REQUIREMENTS 06/20/86 10/31/86C // LIC RESPONS RLSAN0266001 ORB 6-10 SAN ON3FRE 3 R0 LICENSE REQUIREMENTS 06/20/86 10/31."MC / / . Lit RESPONS RLSAN33E6001 DRB6-!! DCONEE 1 . AFN SEISMIC UP6RADE 12/16/B5 01/15/86C // I'SSUE SER RR0CONii6001 OR86-12 DCONEE 2 AFN SEISMIC UP6RADE 12/15/85 01/15/86C i / ISSUE SER RRDCON56001 DR86-13 OCONEE 3 AFM SEISMIC UP6RADE 12/16/B5 Ol/15/06C // ISSUE SER RR0 CON!86001 OR86-14 PALO VERDE 2 REMOTE SHUTDOWN TEST 07/16/B6 07/23/86C I / LICENSEE RRFALO296001 L 86-15 PALO VERDE 3 REMOTE SHUTDOWN TEST 07/16/86 07/23/66C // LICENSEE RRFALG386001 O

1 1

l I

SUMMARY

OF ACTIVE BACLFli ISSUES FOR DIFICTCR DIVISION OF BWR LICEhSING CODE PLANT ISSUE DATE BADJIT NEIT ACTION EACKFIT ID ID AS DIRP.haiN AFPEAL NUP.5ER BACKFIT DATE i

l O

l f

SUMMAF.Y OF ACTIVE BACLFli !! SUES FOR DIRECT D DIVISION OF HliMAN FACTORS SAFETY COLE FLANT' ISSUE DATE BACKFli NEIT ACTION- BAD: FIT ID ID AS DTRRNATN APPEAL N'JnPER BACKFli DATE OR86-08 SAN ONOFRE I RD LICENSE RE0'J1REMENTS 06/20/86 10/31/86C // LICRESPONSRLSAN0186001 OR86-09 SAN ONGFRE 2 RDLICENSEREQUIREMENTS 06/20/96 10/31/86C // U C RESPONS RLSANO:66001 ORB 6-10 SAN ONOFRE 3 R0 LICENSE REGulREMENTS 06/20/86 10/31/86C / / LIC RESP 0h5 RLSAN0186001 1

O 9

e 1

A ,g i r -

r

^~ '

SilHRARY OF ET!vt BEKFli ISSUES FOR DIREtiOR

~

' I! VISION OF SAFETY REVIEW AllD DVERSIGHT

' ~ DATE, fl*: , . CDE ~ PLAlli) ' ISSUE SACKFIT 'NEIT E T!D C 'BACLFIT 10

'18 AS BTRnilAIN APPEAL lt.'HIER BACKFIT DATE e

e' l

e i'

4 J

.O v

l O

,.'~ SumARf 0F Ati!VE BACKFli ISSUES F D DIRECTOR OFFICE DF NUCLEAR REACIDF. RESULATION

'C0CE- KANT ISSUE' DATE BACKFli NEIT- ' ACTION BACKFIT ID ID AS likREATN APPEAL NURSER BACKFli DATE

~L B6-16 P!LLS10ht 3 STAi!ON R ACKDUT UF6RADES '09/15/86 09/15/86R // RE6ANALYSISERRILL386001 O

4 3

-Page No.- 1-11/12/06 SUMARY OF CLOSD BACKFli ISSUES CODE PLANT ISSUE' DATE OF TYPE OF APPEAL DECISION BACEFli 10 CLDSE-0UT CLOSE-0UT PCSli10N UPHELL NUMER SAS3-02 PAllSA M S MSIV SINGLE FAILUAE 09/24/84 TECH RESDLUTION N/A DAB 3-03 RANCHO SECO AFNS MISSILES- 10/05/84 TECH RESOLUTION N/A -

ORS 344 ~ OCONEE 1/2/3 STA DESEE 01/20184 TECH M SOLUTION N/A DRB345 HATCH 1 & 2 TURI BYPASS HI WATER TRIP 15 10/28/83 REFERRED TO CR6R N/A L 03-06 PALO VER E 1/2/3 SOURCE RANGE N MONITOR 06/25/84 AD APPER M SOLUTION LICENSEE L 13-07 N]NE MILE PDINT 2 PMP 09/09/84 TECH RESOLUTION N/A L 03-00 LASALLE 1 4 2 WATER LEVEL-TEMP. MON. ISOL 11/22/63 TECH RESOLUTION N/A L 83-09 SHOREHAM ECCS FLOODING 04/30/B4 REFERRED TO M 610N 1 N/A L 83-10 Sh0RENAM RS!V LEAKAGE CONTROL 07/02/04 TECH RESOLUTION N/A L B3-11 -SHOREHAM PASS 03i30/04 TECH KSDLUTION N/A OR83-12 FARLEY l n 2 TURB.'OVERSPEED PROTECT IS 01/27/84 50 APPEAL RESOLUil0N COMPROMISE L B441 LASRLE 1 & 2 EDC 1 FIRE PROTECTION 06/14/84 AD APPER RESOLUTION STAFF L 8442 LASALLE 1 & 2 NFPA CODES 03/28/84 AD APPEAL RESOLUTION LICENSEE L 8443 LASALLE 1 & 2 FIRE PU E S & B MPERS SURVEll. 06/14/04 AD APPEAL RESOLUTION STAFF L 84-04 LASALLE 1 & 2 FIRE NATCH TRAINING M/14/04 AD APPEAL RESOLUTION STAFF OR8445 DAVIS BESSE AFNS TS 05/10/04 TECH RESOLUTION N/A OR84-06 TURKEY POINT 3 64 VIT E AREA ALARM / BARRIERS 07/12/84 TECH RESOLUTION N/A OR8447 TURKEY POINT 3 64 VITE AREA ID 07/12/84 .1ECH RESOLUTION N/A OR84-08.KEWAUNEE RETS 08/01/04 TECH RESOLUTION N/A 3 DRB4-09 KENAUNEE ESFFILTERSTS 08/01/84 TECHRESOLUTION N/A L I4-il MAVER VALLEY 2 SPENT FUEL COOLING 03/29/85 TECH RESOLUTION N/A L B4-12 MAVER VALLEY 2 AIR STARTING SYS./ED6 06/07/05 TECH ESOLUTION N/A O t 4-i3 KaviR v = lev 2 S6 LEVEL CONTROL L 84-14 MAVER VALLEY 2 MOV FAILURE 05iO9/i5 appeal REiOLuTiON 43/29/05 TECH E 50LUT10N tiCENSti N/A L 04-15 MAYER VALLEY 2 Ll6HTIN6/COM. SYS/IE 02/13/85 TECH RESOLUTION N/A j L M-!& IEAVER VELEY 2 PROB. MAI. PRECIP. 04/09/05 TECH RESOLUT10N N/A L I4-17 MAYER VALLEY 2 LUBE DIL R ARM /ED6 03/29/05 TECH RESOLUTION N/A OR84-18 MILLSTONE 2 MSLI/56 100E RUPTURE ANALYSIS 09/14/M TECH RESOLUTION N/A OR84 19 MILLSTONE 2 H2 PURSE VRVE CLOSURE 01/14/85 TECH RESOLUTION N/A OR84-20 MILLSTO E 2 DVERilME 15 ll/09/M TECH K SOLUTION N/A .-

L H -21 WOLF CR EK SS OUTS! K CONTROL ROOM 08/23/84 TECH RESOLUTION N/A L 84-22 CALLANAY I SS OUTSIDE CONTROL ROOM 08/23/M TECH E SOLUTION N/A OR84-23 Fi. CALHOUN 1 AFNSPUMPS/VALVESTESTING 04/12/05 TECH RESOLUTION N/A OR84 24 MIE YAMEE AFM PUMP START 07/02/05 TECH RESOLUTION N/A ORB 4-25 MIE YANKEE AFU PUMP LC0 08/26/05 Lit CANCELLED CLAIM N/A OR84-26 MIE YANKEE DNST LEVEL ALARM 07/17/86 TECM RESOLUTION LICENSEE L I4-20 WATTS SAR FlK PROTECTION CABLE ROOM lil27/M A8 APPEAL RESOLUTION CorROMISE L 84-31 MAVER VALLEY 2 EDS LUM FILL PROC. 03/29/05 TECH RESOLUTION N/A L I4-32 MAYER VALLEY 2 APPLIC. OF SOC 4 TO LIGHT SYS. 03/29/85 TECH RESOLUTION N/A L B4-33 MAYER VALLEY 2 APPLI. OF GDC 2/410 COM SYS 03/29/85 TECH RESOLUTION N/A L B4-34 MAVER VALLEY 2 APPLI 0F SOC 5 TO COM SYS 03/29/85 TECH MSOLUTION N/A L 84-35 MAVER VALLEY 2 DOSE PROJECil0N 03/29/85 TECHRESOLUTION N/A L 84-36 MAVER VALLEY 2 ILLUMINAfl0N LEVELS 05/0 M 5 TECH MSOLUTION N/A L B4-37 MAVER VALLEY 2 APPLit. OF R.6.1.26 05/14/85 TECH E SOLUTION N/A OR85-03 FARLEY l n 2 RVLIS 03/21/85 AD APPEAL RESOLUTION LICENSEE L 85-04 MAVER VALLEY 2 SNON AND ICE LOADS 03/29/85 TECH RESOLUTION N/A OR85-05 TMI 1 CONTAINMENT PUR6ING REPORT 02/04/05 APPEAL CANCELLED N/A OR8546 TM11 IST PRO 6 RAM -VALVES 11/13/05 TECHNICAL RESOLUTION N/A L B5-08 NATIS BAR EL 83-28 ITER 2.2 11/06/05 LICENSEE COM liTED TO N/A STAFF POSN

~

Pa;e No, 2

!!/12/06 -

Si;MMARY OF CLOSED BACKFIT ISSUES CC:~ PLhai ISSUE DATE OF TYFE OF AFFEAL DECISION 6ACKFit 10 CLOSE-0UT CLOSE-0UT F0i! TION UPHELD NUMBER L B5-09 SE0VOYAH SL 83-23 ITEM 2.2 11/06/B5 LICENSEE CORP.ITIED TO N/A STAFF POSM OFS5-10 BROWNS FERRY SL B3-28 ITEM 2.2 11/06/85 LICENSEE COMMITTED TO N/A STAFF POSN L 66-03 SHERON HARRIS 1 CONTAINP.ENT PUR6E LIMITS 08/15/86. LICENSEE AGREEMENT TO RLHARR186001 STAFF POSN L 86-07 8EAVER VALLEY 2 56 LEVEL INSTRUMENTAfl0N -08/15/86 STAFF AGREEMENT TO RLEEkV286001 LICENSEE POSN O

e

0 4

Enclosure 3 MASTER LISTING OF CURRENT ISSUES O

e

4 i .

o .

~

i I

NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC 8ACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO : 1 1 MASTER FILE LISTING ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/88 1 81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 l BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

BACKFIT ID: RLSEAV28500T REQMT IDENTIFIED IN 02/54 SER: 05/20/84 APPLICANT BKFT CLAIM

10/05/84 MTG; 11/06/04 STAFF POSITION; 11/20/84 APPLIC LTR-DOCKET NO.
050-00412 09/28/84 - 01/10/85 STAFF POSITION j 02/13/85 AD LEVELMEE APPLICANT MTG.i!NG REQUEST- 02/28/85 DD MEETING FACILITY: BEAVER VALLEY 2 03/13/85 DD SITE VISIT FOR DD POSIiION DETERMINATION l 10/08/85 APPLICANT LETTER JUSTIFYING POSITION BACKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

INE APPLICANT'S DESIGN IS A DEVIATION FROM THE SRP (SECTION.

C.7.C OF BTP CME 8 9.5-1) WHICH THE APPLICAfsT HAS NOT JUSTIFIED AS REQUIRED SV 10CFR50.34(G). APPLICANT BELIEVES ITS CO2 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM IN THE CABLE SPREADING ROOM MEETS THE INTENT OF STP-CME 8 9.5-1 AND COMPLIES WITH 10CFR50 DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 85/0T/11 REQUIREMENTS.

l j DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED l: 85/07/11 REF. DL CODE: L-84-10

{ BACKFIT DETERMINED: NO

! DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DL DIR/DL ACCEntu USE OF CO2 AS MAIN FIRE SUPPRESSION SYS IN CABLE SPREADING RM WITH FIRE BRGD BACKUP. RECODG4 ENDED HW DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: THOMPSON. H. CHANGES TO FACILITATE FIRE BRGD PASSAGE. REQD ACCEPTA8LE MEANS FOR REACHING FIRE IN NW CORNER OF CA8LE SPREADI.4G RM.

REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE: APPL. PROVIDED DtSCRIPTION OF MEANS ON 10/8/85 l

l

{ APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS

{ APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

l APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

l APPEAL OFFICIAL:

l l

l CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/08/15 1

CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION:

i CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED): STAFF REVIEWING APPLICANT'S DESCRIPTION OF BEANS TO FIGHT FIRE IN NW CORNER OF CA8LE SPREADING ROOM.

i CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/DPLA l

CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: THOMPSON, H e

l -

i NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC 8ACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO.: '5 l MASTER FILE LISTING i

J ALL FACILITIES -RUN DATE: 11/12/88

81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 i BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION

j BACKFIT ID: RLCATA185003 3/25/84 DPC PROVIDED N RIPTION.5/14/85 NRC AUDITED

1. DOCKET NO.: 050-D0413 SPDS.11/7/85 NRC ISSUED AUDIT REPORT. 2/28/86 NRC ISSUED SER. 3/25/88 DPC LETTER CLAIMING BACKFIT. SAME AS I MCGU185001 MCGU285002, CATA285002.6/13/86 NRC LETTER FACILITY: CATAWBA 1 DENYING BAdKFIT.

?

} 8.'.CKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

j NRC AUDIT IDLRIIFIED NEED TO ADD 5 ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS 4

TO DPC SPDS AS IDENTIFIED IN 2/28 86 SER. LICENSEE POSI-

}' TION IS THAt LICENSEES ARE RESPONS BLE FOR PARAMETER SELEC-TION. AS STATED IN GL 82-33 ITEM 4.I(F). LICENSEE 8ASED PARAMETER SELECTION ON WOG EMERGENCY PROCEDURE GUIDELINES

$ DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/08/30 EPGS NRC SELIEVES 5 ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS ARE PART OF PG-S CIFIED PARAMETERS.

DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 88/08/13 j BACKFIT DETERMINED: NO NRR CODE: OR 88-01 4

1 DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

j DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DIR GL 82-33 A6 LOW 5 LICENSEES TO SELECT PARAMETERS SUT THEY i DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: DENTON, H. STILL HAVE SURDEN TO SHOW ADEQUACY. GL 82-33 ISSUED 12/17/

82 SEFORE DPC INSTALLED SPDS. STAFF .'OSITION IDENTIFIED IN MTd WITH NUTAC GROUP EARLY 1982 AND IN DRAFT LETTER SENT TO j REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE: NUTAC GROUP 12/28/84 (DPC REPRESENTED ON GROUP . SINCE INFO AVAILABLE BEFORs SPDS IMPLEMENTED, BACKFIT CLA M DENTED.

APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPT?ON/ STATUS:

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

1 APPEAL ORGANIZATION: '

l i APPEAL OFFICIAL:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): ,

I CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED): '

CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/DPL-A  ;

i

! CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: THOMPSON. H. l

-l l

l i

I PM O -

NRC-1215302-001

^

PLANT SPECIFIC BACKFIT TRACKINO SYSTEM PAGE NO.: 6 MASTER FILE LISTINO ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/86 81/01/01 TO 85/11/12 BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

BACKFIT ID: RLCATA285002 3729/84 DPG PROVTDED SPDS DESCRIPTION. 5/14/85 NRC AUDITED SPDS. 11/7/85 NRC ISSUED AUDIT REPORT. 2/28/86 NRC ISSUED l DOCKET NO.: 050-00414 SER. 3/25/86 DPC LETTER CLAIMING BACKFIT. SAME AS l

MCGU185001, MCOU285001, CATA185003.6/13/86 NRC LETTER i FACILITY: CATAWBA 2 DENYING BACKFIT.

l l

BACKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE!

NRC AUDIT IDENTIEIE N TO ADD 5 ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS l TO DPC SPOS AS IDENTIFIED IN 2/28/86 SER. LICENSEE POSI- l TION IS THAt LICENSEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PARAMETER SELEC-TION, AS STATED IN GL 82-33 ITEM 4.1(F). LICENSEEBASED PARAL?ETER SELECTION ON WOG EMERGENCY PROCEDURE GUIDELINES DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 86/06/30 (EPGS). NRC BELIEVES 5 ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS ARE PART OF EPG-SPECIFIED PARAMETERS.

DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 86/06/13 BACKFIT DETERMINED: NO NRR CODE: OR 86-02 DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DIR GL 82-33 ALLOWS LICENSEES TO SELECT PARAMETERS, BUT THEY STILL HAVE BURDEN TO SHOW ADEQUACY. GL 82-33 ISSUED 12/17/

DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: DENTON, H. 87 BEFORE DPC INSTALLED SPDS. STAFF POSITION IDENTIFIED IN MTd WITH NUTAC GROUP EARLY 1982 AND IN DRAFT LETTER SENT TO REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE: NUTAC GROUP 12/26/84 (DPC REPRE$ENTED ON GROUP). SINCE INFO AVAILABLE BEFORE SPDS IMPLEMENTED, BACKFIT CLAIM DENIED.

APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPTIDM/ STATUS:

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

APPrAL ORGANIZATION:

APPEAL OFFICIAL:

1 CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED):

CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION: '

j CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED): i CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/DPL-A CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: THOMPSON, H.

~

O .

NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC 8ACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO.: 7 MASTER FILE LISTING ALL FACILITIES PUN DATE: 11/12/86 81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 8ACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION: j BACKFIT ID: RLFARL185002 11/75 LLTItu To ALL LIcEnstrS AND PRIOR STAFF POSITIONS {

SRP 6.2.4 BTP CS8 6-4 4/19/85 LICENSEE LTR CLAIMED BACKFIT DOCKET NO.: 050-00348 7/24/85 LICENSEE LTR CLAIMED BACKFIT. 1/17/86 LICENSEE AGREE TO TS CHANGE THAT WILL RESOLVE ISSUE PENDING NRC APPROVAL, FACILITY: FARLEY 1 6/19/86 NRC LTR PROPOSING ALTERNATIVd TS.

BACKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

CONTAIpW4ENT VENT AND PURGE OPERATION IS DONE CONTINUOUSLY THROU"H 8 IN. MINI-PURGE VALVES. LICENSEE PERFORMS LEAKAGE TESTING OF THESE 8 IN. NORMALLY OPEN VALVES AS WELL AS 48 '

IN. NORMALLY CLOSED VALVES WITH RESILIENT SEALS AT 18 MO.

INTERVALS. THE STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE 8 IN. VALVES SHOULD dei 2MINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 85/06/30 BE TESTED EVERY 3 MOS. AND THE 48 IN. VALVES EVERY 6 MOS.

DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 86/01/17 REF. DL CODE: OR-85-07 BACKFIT DETERMINED: NO DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DPL-A LICENSEE AGREEMENT TO Ts CHANGE. PENDING NRC APPROVAL, SATIS FIED BACKFIT CLAIM.

l DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: NOVAK, T.

REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE:

APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

APPEAL OFFICIAL:

CLOSING ACTION DATE # PREDICTED): 87/06/01 CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED): TSS h tL BE E OSEC UPDF TSSUANCE OF TS FOR CONTAINMENT PURGE SYSTEM. LICENSEE SCHEDULED TO SU8MIT TS CHANGE REQUEST CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/DPL-A 12/5/86.

CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: THOMPSON, H

i O -

3 N

4 NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC 8ACKFIT TRACXING SYSTEM PAGE NO.- 8-

. MASTER FILE LISTINd

. ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/86 I

i 81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 i

BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

BACKFIT ID: RLFARL285001 11/75 LETIER TO ALL LICLnsEES AND PRIOR STAFF POSITIONS SRP 6.2.4 BTP CSB 6-4. 4/19/85 LICENSEE LTR CLAIMING BACKFT j DOCKET NO.: 050-00364 1/17/86 LICENSEE LTR AGREES TO TS CHANGE TO RESOLVE ISSUE.

PENDING NRC APPROVAL. 6/19/86 NRC LTR PROPOSING ALTERNATIVE j FACILITY
FARLEY 2 TS.

I a

l BACKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

.I j

CDNTKTHRENT VENT IND- PURGE OPERATION IS DONE CONTINUOUSLY THROUGH 8 IN. MINI-PURGE VALVES. LICENSEE PERFORMS LEAKAGE

TESTING OF THESE 8 IN. NORMALLY OPEN VALVES AS WELL AS 48 1

IN. NORMALLY CLOSED VALVES WITH RESILIENT SEALS AT 18 MO.

INTERVALS. THE STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE 8 IN. VALVES SHOULD

] DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 85/06/30 BE TESTED EVERY 3 MOS. AND THE 48 IN. VALVES EVERY 6 MOS.

DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 86/01/1T REF. DL CODE: OR-85-0T

! 8ACKFIT DETERMINED: NO 1

DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

l, DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DPL-A LICENSEE AGREED TO TS CHANGE. PENDING NRC APPROVAL. BACKFIT CLAIM WITHDRAWN. PENDING ISSUANCE OF TS CHANGE.

DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: NOVAK, T

, REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE:

j l APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

APPEAL ORGANIZATION

) APPEAL OFFICIAL:

l CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): 86/10/31 CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION: -

CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED): ISSUE WILL BE CLOSED UPON ISSUANCE OF TS FOR CONTAINMENT

  • PURGE SYSTEM. LICENSEE SCHEDULED TO SUBMIT TS CHANGE REQUEST.

1 CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/DPL-A 12/5/86.

1 CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: THOMPSON, H .

t i

O -

.i i NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC 8ACKFIT TRACKINO SYSTEM PAGE NO. 11 l

MASTER FILE LISTING ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/86 81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 f BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION-i BACKFIT ID: RLMCGU185001 3/29/s4 DPC PROVIDED SPDS DESCR.5/14/85 NRC AUDITED SPCS

11/7/85 NRC ISSUED AUDIT RPT.2/28/86 NRC ISSUED SER DOCKET NO.
050-00389 3/25/86 DPC LTR CLAIMING BACKFIT. SAME AS MCGU285001 l CATA185003 CATA285002. NRC LETTER DENYING BACKFIT CLAIM.

. FACILITY: MCGUIRE 1 '

l l BACKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

NRC AUDIT IDENTIFIED Ntto TO ADD 5 ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS TO DPC SPDS, AS STATED IN 2/28/06 SER. DPC BELIEVES j SPECIFIC PARAMETER SELECTION UP TO LICENSEE, AS STATED IN GL 82-33 ITEM 4.1 . LICENSEE BASED PARAMETERS ON WOG l EP GUIDELINES. NRC IEVES 5 ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS ARE 1, DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/08/31 PART OF EPG-SPECIFIED PARAMETERS.

j DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 86/06/13

{ .

BACKFIT DETFRMINED: NO NRR CODE: OR 86-05 i

DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE

, DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DPL-A CL 82-33 ALLOWS LICENSEES TO SELECT PARAMETERS BUT THEY 1

DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: DENTON, H. STILL HAVE BURDEN TO SHOW ADEQUACY. GL 82-33 ISSUED 12/17/

i j

82 BEFORE DPC INSTALLED SPDS. STAFF POSITION IDENTIFIED IN MT WITH NUTAC GROUP EARLY 1982 AND IN DRAFT LETTER SENT TO 1 REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE: NUTAC GROUP 12/26/84 . SINCE INFO j AVAILABLE BEFORE IMPLEMENTED, SPDS(DPC BACKFIT REPREEENTED ON GROUP CLA M DENIED.

APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

pp p APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

l APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

APPEAL OFFICIAL:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): ,

] CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED): '

CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION
NRR/DPL-A CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: THOMPSON, H.

l 1

0

gy

! NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC BACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO.: 12 MASTER FILE LISTING ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/86 81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 8ACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

BACKFIT ID: RLMCGU285001 772E784 DPC PROVIDED SPDS DEECRIPTION.5/14/85 NRC AUDITED DOCKET NO.: 050-00370 SPDS.11/7/85 NRC ISSUED AUDIT REPORT. 2/28/86 NRC ISSUED SER. 3/25/86 DPC LETTER. CLAIMING BACKFIT. SAME AS

MCOU185001 CATA185003. CATA285002.6/13/86 NRC LETTER l FACILITY: MCGUIRE 2 DENYING BAdKFIT CLAIM.

1 8ACKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

l NRC AUDIT IDERIIFIED NEED TO ADD 5 ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS j

TO DPC SPDS AS IDENTIFIED IN 2/28/86 SER. LICENSEE POSI-1 TION IS THAt LICENSEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PARAMETER SELEC-

LICENSEE BASED DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED)
88/06/30 TION. AS SELECTION PARAMETER STATEDON INWOGGL EMERGENCY 82-33 ITEMPR.4.1(F)OCEDURE GUIDELINE j

(EPGS). NRC BELIEVES 5 ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS ARE PART OF EPG-SPECIFIED PARAMETERS.

2 i

DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 86/06/13 BACKFIT DETERMINED: NO NRR CODE: OR 86-06 l

DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DIR GL 52-33 ALLOWS LICENSEES TO SELECT PARAMETERS. BUT THEY a

DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: DENTON. H.

STILL HAVE BURDEN TO SHOW ADEQUACY. GL 82-33 ISSUED 12/17/

1 82 BEFORE DPC INSTALLED SPDS. STAFF POSITION IDENTIFIED IN I REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE:

MTd WITH NUTAC GROUP EARLY 1982 AND IN DRAFT LETTER SENT TO NUTAC GROUP 12/26/84 (DPC REPRESENTED ON GROUP) . SINCE INFO l AVAILABLE BEFME SPDS IMPLEMENTED, BACKFIT CLAIM DENIED.

1 APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

l APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

1 i

APPEAL OFFICIAL:

l CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED):

' CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CLOSING ACTION'DATE (COMPLETED):

  • l CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/DPL-A j CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: THOMPSON, H.

1 1 -

l k

1 o

tf '

NRC-1215302-OO1 PLANT SPECIFIC BACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM MASTER FILE PAGE NO.- 21 LISTINO i

ALL FACILITIES 81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 RUN DATE: 11/12/86 BACKFIT ID: RLHARR186002 BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

5/3/55 CPL LEIIER IDENTIFIED MEANS OF MCNITORING ACCUMULATOR DOCKET NO.: 050-00400 TANK POST ACCIDENT. 1/21/86 NRC ISSUED SER REQUIRING LEVEL OR PRESSURE INSTRUMENT. 2/6/86 CPL LETTER CLAIMING BACKFIT FACILITY: HARRIS 1 6/6/86 NRC LETTER DENYING BACKFIT CLAIM.

l BACKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

I

, NRC IDLRIIFIED ACCUMUEKTOR LEVEL OR PRESSURE REQUIRED AS

! RG 1.97 CATEGORY 2 INSTRUMENT FOR POST ACCIDENT MONITORING 4

OF ACCUMULATOR. CFL POSITION IS THAT ACCUM. IS PASSIVE SYS THAT IS ISOLATED BASED ON RCS PRESS. NOT ACCUM CONDITIONS, DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 86/06/06 CLAIMING THAT INSTRUMENTS ARE RG 1.97 CATEGCRY 3 (BACK UP VARIABLES). CPL ALSO NOTED THAT CATEGORY 3 ALLOWED FOR CALLAWAY, UNIT 1 UNDER SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES.

, DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 86/06/06 BACKFIT DETERMINED: NO NRR CODE: L 86-04 l

1

{ DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DIR

! RG I.97 U5LD AS BASIS FOR STAFF POSITION WAS ISSUED 12/80.

J DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: DENTON, H. HARRIS APPLICATION DOCKETED 12/22/81. STAFF POSITION IDENTI FIED BEFORE APPLICATION, THUS STAFF POSITION NOT FOUNO TO BE

] BACKFIT.

g REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE: .

l J

i APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

, APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

I APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

APPEAL OFFICIAL

l i

l CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/06/01

! CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED):

ENVIRONMENTALLY QUALIFILD LEVEL OR PRESSURE INSTRUMENT TO BE j CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR\DPL-A INSTALLED BY END OF FIRST REFUELING OUTAGE.

i a

CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: NOVAK, T.  !

i j -

NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC 8ACMFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO.: 22 MASTER FILE LISTING ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/86 81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

8ACKFIT ID: RLSANO186001 I/2/85 REG V NOTIF IED LICEN5EE OF REQUIREMENT FOR ACTUAL PLANT MANIPULATIONS. 6/20/86 SCE SUBMITTED BACKFIT PETITION.

DOCKET NO.: 050-00206 - 6/28/06 NRC LETTER ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT OF BF CLAIM.9/11/86 DHFT DETERMINES NO BACKFIT. 10/31/86 NRC LETTER TO LICENSEE FACILITY: SAN ONOFRE 1 IDENTIFYING NO 8ACKFIT.

l l BACKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

NRC IS REQUIRING EACH RD CANDIDATE TO HAVE 5 REACTIVITY MANIPULATIONS ON ACTUAL PLANT. PAST PRACTICE FOR SCE HAD 1' BEEN TO CONDUCT MANIPULATIONS ON SIMULATOR. AND NRC HAD ACCEPTED THIS AS SUFFICIENT, IAW NUREG-0094, SECTION II, PARA 6.

DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED)
86/07/16 I DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 86/09/11 NRR CODE:OR 86-08 BACKFIT DETERMINED: NO DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DHFT NLLD FOR ACTUAL PLANT MANIPULATIONS REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR PART 55 THUS STAFF POSITION DETERMINED DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: RUSSELL. W. NECESSARY FOR COMPLfANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS, AND NOT A

-l BACKFIT.

j REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE

l i APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

! APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

j APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

i

, APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

I APPEAL OFFICIAL:

1 I

CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): 86/12/15 CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CLOSING ACTION'DATE (COMPLETED): WATTING TOME 5POMsE FROpCEICENSEE FOR WHETHER tnt NOT LICEN-SEE WILL APPEAL CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/DPL-A AND 8 CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: NOVAK/MIRAGLIA 1

i

4 O .

/

i NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC 8ACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO.: '23 l

MASTER FILE LISTING

't ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/86 31/01/01 TO 86/11/12 BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

BACKFIT ID: RLSANO286001 4/2/55 REG V NOTIFIED LICENSEE OF REQUIREMENT FOR ACTUAL PLANT MANIPULATIONS. 6/20/86 SCE SUBMITTED BACKFIT PETITION.

i DOCKET NO.: 050-00361 6/28/86 NRC LETTER ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF BF CLAIM.9/11/86 i

DHFT DETERMINES NO BACKFIT. 10/31/86 NRC LETTER TO LICENSEE

FACILITY
SAN ONOFRE 2 IDENTIFYING NO BACKFIT I

i BACKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

NWC 15 NEQUIRIms EACH RO CANDIDATE TO HAVE 5 REACTIVITY MANIPULATIONS ON ACTUAL PLANT. PAST PRACTICE FOR SCE HAD i BEEN TO CONDUCT MANIPULATIONS ON SIMULATOR. AND NRC HAO J

ACCEPTED THIS AS SUFFICIENT, IAW NUREG-0094, SECTION II, 1

PARA S.

i DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 80/0T/18 DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 88/09/11 NRR CODE: OR 86-DS BACKFIT DETERMINED: NO 4

} DETERMINATTON SUBSTANCE:

! DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DHFT NEED FOR ACTUAL PLANT MANIPULATIONS REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR PART 55 THUS STAFF POSITION DETERMINED DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: RUSSELL. W. NECESSARY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS, AND NOT A BACKFIT.

l REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE:

)

}

l APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

1 APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

APPEAL OFFICIAL:

j i 8 CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/12/15 1

CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION:

j CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED): WATTING FOR RE3PONSE FROM LICENSEE FOR WHETHER OR*NOT LICEN-SEE WILL APPEAL.

, CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/DPL-A AND B CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: NOVAK/MIRAGLIA l

i 4

O .

NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC 8ACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO.: 24 MASTER FILE LISTING ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/86 81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

BACKFIT ID: RLSANO388001 3/2/85 NEGION V NOTIFIED LICENSEE OF REQUIREMENT FOR ACTUAL PLANT MANIPULATIONS. 6/20/86 SCE SUBMITTED BACKFIT PETITION.

DOCKET NO.: 050-00362 6/28/86 NRC LETTER ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF BF CLAIM.9/11/86 l DHFT DETERMINES NO BACKFIT.10/31/86 NRC LETTER TO LICENSEE FACILITY: SAN ONOFRE 3 IDENTIFYING NO BACKFIT.

BACKFIT ISSUE SUSSTANCE:

NWc Is NEQUIRING EACE RD CANDIDATE TO HAVE 5 REACTIVITY

' MANIPULATIONS ON ACTUAL PLANT. PAST PRACTICE FOR SCE HAD BEEN TO CONDUCT MANIPULATIONS ON SIMULATOR, AND NRC HAD ACCEPTED THIS AS SUFFICIENT, IAW NUREG-0094, SECTION II.

PARA 6 OETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/0T/18 4

DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 88/09/11 i NRR CODE: OR 86-10

BACKFIT DETERMINED
NO I

I l DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

i DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DHFT NEEDTOR ACTUAL PLANT MKNIPULATIONS REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR PART 55 THUS STAFF POSITION DETERMINED I DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: RUSSELL. W. NECESSARY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS, AND NOT A

,' BACKFIT.

REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE:

1 APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

4 APPEAL GFFICIAL:

i CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/12/15 CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED): WAIIING FOR RESPONSE FROM LICENSEE FOR WHETHER OR NOT LICEN-SEE WILL APPEAL.

{ CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/DPL-A Ale 8 CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: NOVAK/MIRAGLIA I

I

O

~

NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC 3ACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO.: 25 MASTER FILE LISTING ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE:- 11/12/88 81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 SACNFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

BACKFIT ID: RRMILL386001 IT/I5/55 50.54(F ) LEITER REOCODG4ENTS ON REG ANAL 3/18/86 LICENSEE LTR-IDENTIFYING NO LICENSEE IDENTIFIED ACTIONS DOCKET NO.: 050-00423 7/11/86 NRR IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL BF.

FACILITY: MILLSTONE 3 8ACKFTT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

REVILW OF MILLSTONE 3 PROSABALISTIC SAFETY STUDY IDENTIFIED STATION BLACKOUT AS LARGE CONTIBUTOR TO CORE DAMAGE FREONCY.

STAFF FEELS IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED BEFORE RESOLUTION OF GENERIC ISSUE A-44 DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/10/01 DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 88/09/23 BACKFIT DETERMINED: YES DETERMINATION SUSSTANCE:

DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DPL-A Casu1RIBUTION OF STATION BLACKOUT TO CORE MELT FREQUENCY nfARRANTS MODIFICATIONS. BASED ON COST-BENEFIT FROM REGULA-DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: NOVAK. T. TORY 8.;sALYSIS.

REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE:

APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPFAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

APPEAL OFFICIAL:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED):

CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CLOSING ACTIOID DATE (COMPLETED): - '

CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION:

CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL:

O NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC 8ACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO.: 28 MASTER FILE LISTINO ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/88 81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

l BACKFIT ID: RROCON186001 2/10/ss Nuc ISSUED GL si-14 1/28/82 DPC RESPONSE 12/26/84 NRC LETTER ESTA8LISHING STAFF POSITION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DOCKET NO.: 050-00289 MODIFICATIONS. 4/9/85 DPC RESPONSE 12/16/85 NRC STAFF INTER-NALLY IDENTIFIES 8ACKFIT NEED FOR SPECIFIC PLANT MODIFICA-FACILITY: OCONEE 1 TIONS.8/5/88 NRC SER TO M FINDS FURTHER PLANT MODIFICATIONS

} NOT COST-SENEFICIAL.

BACKFIT ISSUE SU87,TANCEr GL si-14 NEqu1xE5 UPGWADING OF AFW SYSTEMS TO CURRENT SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA. DPC DESIGN NOT FOUNO ACCEPTABLE FROM INITIAL SU8MITTALS. DPC FEELS CURRENT DESIGN ACCEPTABL BASED ON FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITIES OF PLANT. NRC POSITION IS THAT EFW SYSTEM AS WHOLE NOT SEISMICALLY QUALIFIED. ALTERNAT DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 85/01/31 SYSTEMS NOT REDUNDANT THEREFORE EFW NEEDS TO 8E UPGRADED TO SEISMIC CRITERIA.

DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 88/01/15 BACKFIT DETERMINED: YES DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DPL-A STAFF POSITION IS THAT SPECIFIC CHANGES ARE NECESSARY.

l REGULATORY ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATES THAT FURTHER PLANT I DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: MIRAGLIA, F. MODIFICATIONS ARE NOT COST-8ENEFICIAL.

REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE: 88/08/05

)

] APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

J APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

1 APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

APPEAL OFFICIAL:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/10/15 CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CLOSING ACTION.DATE (COMPLETED): TESUE LEIILR TO LICEN5ETTORWARDING SER THAT CtOSES OUT BACKFIT ISSUE.

CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/PWR-8 CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: MIRAGLIA, F.

I S

p .-

O

~

NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC BACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO.: 27 ASTER FILE LISTING ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/86 81/01/01 TO 86/11/12 SACMFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

BACKFIT ID: RROCON286001 2/10/55 NRC I5SUEDTal 51-14 1/28/82 DPC RESPONSE. 12/26/84 -

NRC LETTER ESTABLISHING STAFF POSITION. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DOCKET NO.: 050-00270 MODIFICATIONS. 4/9/85 DPC RESPONSE. 12/16/85 NRC STAFF INTER NALLY IDENTIFES BACKFIT, NEED FOR SPECIFIC PLANT MODIFICA-FACILITY: OCONEE 2 TIONS.8/5/86 NRC SER TO PM FINDS FURTHER PLANT MODIFICATIONS NOT COST-BENEFICIAL.

SACKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

GL 51-14 REQUIRES urwADING OF AFW SYSTEMS TO CURRENT SEIS-MIC DESIGN CRITERIA. DPC DESIGN NGT FOUND ACCEPTA8LE FROM INITIAL SUOMITTALS. DPC FEELS CURRENT DESIGN ACCEPTA-BLE SASED ON FUNCTIONAL CAPA8ILITIES OF PLANT. NRC POSITION IS THAT EFW SYSTEM AS WHOLE NOT SEISMICALLY QUALIFIED DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 85/01/31 ALTERNATE SYSTEMS NOT REDUNDANT, THEREFORE EFW NEEDS f0 SE UPGRADED TO SEISMIC CRITERIA.

DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 86/01/15 BACKFIT DETERMINED: YES DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DPL-B STAFF POSITION 15 THAT SPECIFIC CHANGES ARE NECESSARY.

REGULATORY ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATES THAT FURTHER PLANT DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: MIRAGLIA, F. MODIFICATIONS APE NOT COST-BENEFICIAL.

REG ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE: 86/08/05 APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

APPEAL OFFICIAL:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): 86/10/15 CLOSIMO ACTION DESCRIPTION:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED): T5sut LLIItu TO LIctnset FORWARDING SER THAT CLOSES OUT BACKFIT ISSUE.

CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/PWR-B CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: MIRAGLIA, F. '

O NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC BACKFIT TRACKING MASTER SYSTEM PAGE NO.: 28 FILE LI$TINO ALL FACILITIES 81/01/01 TO 86/11/I2 RUN DATE: 11/12/86 BACKFIT ID: RROCON386001 BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

27I0/s5 NurcESTABLISHING NRC LETTE2 IsauG GL 81-14. I/28/82 STAFF DPC REcopmENDATIONS POSITION, RESPONSE.12/26/84 FOR DOCKET NO.: 050-0028T MODIFICATIONS. 4/9/85 DPC RESPONSE. 12/I6/85 NRC STAFF FACILITY: OCONEE 3 INTERNALLY IDENTIFIES SACKFIT NEED FOR SPECIFIC PLANT MODIFICATIONS.8/5/86 NRC SER iO PM FINDS FURTHER PLANT MODIFICATIONS NOT COST-BENEFICIAL.

SACKFIT ISSUE SUBST'-TE!

CL El-14 NEQUIRES Uc%RADING OF AFW SYSTEMS TO CURRENT SEISMIC DESIGN CRIIeniA. E SC DESIGN NOT FOUND ACCEPTABLE FROM INITIAL SUOMITTALS. DPC FEELS CURRENT DESIGN ACCEPTA-BLE BASED ON FUNCTIONAL CAsABILITIES OF PLANT. NRC ISSUED DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 85/0I/31 IS THAT EFw SYSTEM AS WHOLE NOT SEISMICALLY OUALIFIED ALTERNATE SYSTEMS NOT REDUNDANT. THEREFORE EFW NEEDS to BE DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 86/01/15 UPGRADED TO SEISMIC CRITERIA.

BACKFIT DETERMINED: YES DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/DPL-B DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE-STAFF POSITION IS THAT SPECIFIC CHANGES ARE NECESSARY.

DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: MIRAGLIA. F. REGUALTORY ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATES THAT FURTHER PLANT MODIFICATIONS ARE NOT COST-BENEFICIAL.

REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE: 88/08/05 APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETEDI: APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

AFPEAL ORGANIZATION:

APPEAL OFFICIAL:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/10/15 CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED): CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTTON:

ISEUELLIILK SACKFIT TO LICEntL FORWARDING SER TNAT CLOSES OUT ISSUE.

CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: NRR/PWR-B CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: MIRAGLIA. F.

O -

I 1

I NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC 3ACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE MO.: 28 MASTER FILE LISTINO l

ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/88 81/01/01 TO 88/11/12 BACKFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION:

BACKFIT ID: RRPALO286001 7/15/55 AD/FWR-B IDtnIIrIts POTENTIAL BACKFIT.9/5/86 MEMD FROM AD TO PM FORWARDS REGULATORY ANALYSIS.10/9/86 LETTER 9 DOCKET NO.: 050-00529 TO LICENSEE FORWARDING REGULATORY ANALYSIS, FACILITY: PALO VERDE 2 2

BACKFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

F5AR FUK UNIT 5 2 AND 3 TOOK EXCEPTION TO STAFF POSITION THAT TEST OF REMOTE SHUTDOWN CAPABILITY NEEDED FOR FOLLOWON UNITS

]

STAFF ISSUED OPERATING LICENSE FOR UNIT 2 WITHOUT ADDRESSING

< NEED FOR TEST. STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED OVERSIGHT. AM NOW IS I EVALUATING NEED TO REQUIRE TESTS ON UNITS 2 AND 3.

l DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 89/08/15 DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 88/07/23 4

3 BACKFIT DETERMINED: YES i

l DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE:

I DETERMINATION ORG: NRR/PWR-B TLs1 Is war I-IURY TO ASSURE OPERABILITY Ate PROVIDE i TRAINING ON REMDTE SHUT 00WN CAPABILITY. NEED EMPHASIZED BY l DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: MIRA8LIA, F. EVENTS AT PALO VERDE 2 AND CATAWBA 2 INVOLVING REMOTE SHUT-DOWN SYSTEM. REGULATORY ANALYSIS SHOWS TEST IS COST-SENEFI-REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE: 89/06/05 CIAL. TEST IDENTIFIED IN R.G. 1.88 REV. 1 WHICH WAS CopeqITTED TO BY LICENSEE, WITH EXEEPTION 80R UNITS 2 A80 3.

l APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED):

APPEAL ORGANIZATION

l APPEAL OFFICIAL: ,

CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED):

CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION: *

) CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED):

f CL%ING ACTION ORGANIZATION:

CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL: ,

I 1

s, .

NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC BACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO.: 30 MASTER FILE LISTING ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/88 81/01/01 TO 88/11/12 BACWFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION-BACKFIT ID: RRPALO388001 7/I5/55 AD/PWit-5 IDENTIFIES POTENTIAL BACKFIT. ?/*/96 MEMO FROM AD TO PM FORWARDS REGULATORY ANALYSIS.10/9/06 LETTER DOCKET NO.: 050-00530 TO LICENSEE FORWARDING REGULATORY ANALYSIS.

FACILITY: PALO VERDE 3 SACNFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE-FSAN rour usix Ts 2 AND 3 TOOK EXCEPTION TO STAFF POSITION THAT TEST OF REMOTE SHUTDOWN CAPABILITY NEEDED FOR FOLLOWON UNITS STAFF ISSUED OPERATING LICENSE FOR UNIT 2 WITHOUT ADORESSING NEED FOR TEST. STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED OVERSIGHT AND NOW IS EVALUATING NEED TO REQUIRE TESTS ON UNITS 2 AIO 3.

DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/08/15 DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 86/07/23 BACKFIT DETERMINED: YES DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE-DETERMINATION ORG: NRW/PWR-3 M ASSURE OPERASILITY AND PROVIDE TRAINING ON REMOTE SHUTDOWN CAPASILITV. NEED EMPHASIZED BY DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: MIRAGLIA. F. EVENTS AT PALO VERDE 2 A80 CATAWSA 2 INVOLVING REMOTE SHUT-DOWN SYSTEM. REGULATORY ANALYSIS SHOWS TEST TO BE COST-SENE REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE: 88/09/05 FICIAL. TEST IDENTIFIED IN R.G. 1.68 REV. 1. WHICH WAS Cope 9ITTED TO BY LICENSEE WITH EXCEPTIONS FOR UNITS 2 AND 3.

APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED]:

APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

APPEAL OFFICIAL:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED):

CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION:

  • CLCSING ACTION OATE (COMPLETEDI:

CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION:

CLOSING ACTION OFFICIAL:

~

o-O -

NRC-1215302-001 PLANT SPECIFIC BACKFIT TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE NO.: 31 MASTER FILE LISTING i ALL FACILITIES RUN DATE: 11/12/88

81/01/01 TO 88/11/12 SACNFIT/ PETITION DESCRIPTION

SACKFIT ID: 33PALIS$6001 N 5/21/55 PALISADE 5 WA5 DIRECTED TO S/D PENDING AN INVESTIGATION OF 5/19/85 TRIP & EQUIP FAILURES. ALTHO DOCKET NO.: 050-00255 BASED UPON TS THERE WERE NO LCO VIOLATIONS. THIS WAS BASED UPON QUESTIONABLE EQUIP RELIABILITY. POOR SALP FACILITY: PALISADES IN MAINT & TO ENSURE NO U muE RISK TO PUBLIC HEALTH &

SAFETT.

SACNFIT ISSUE SUBSTANCE:

UN 5/15/55.PAITSADETTNTPPED ON HIGH PRESSURE. THE PLANT RESPOWED NORMALLY SUT SEVERAL COM*0NENTS DID NOT OPERATE AS EXPECTED. THE iURSINE SYPASS VALVE A m ONE ATMOSPHERIC DUMP VALVE DID NOT OPEN; A LETDOWN INTERMEDIATE PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE FAILED: A ROD SOTTOM LIGHT DID NOT LIGHT; A DETERMINATION DATE (PREDICTED): 88/05/22 CNARGING PUMP COULD NOT BE STARTED DESPITE NUMEROUS ATTEMPTS AND A PRESSURIZER SPRAY VALVE FAILED TO RESEAT.

DETERMINATION DATE (COMPLETED): 88/05/22 ON $/21/86 RIII DIRECTED THE PALISADES TO SHUT DOWN PENDING COMPLETION OF AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE CAUSE OF THE REACTOR SACKFIT DETERMINED: YES TRIP A m EQUIPMENT FAILURE. PERMISSION OF THE RA REQUIRED TO RESTART. SEE 5/21 (CAL) FOR DETAILS.

DETERMINATION SUBSTANCE DETERMINATION ORG: RII/DAP AC N IrtcIIser. Int LTCENSEE TO S/D IS COVERED BY BACKFIT RULE SINCE WAS A NEW POSITION. THIS ACTION WAS IMPOSED TO DETERMINATION OFFICIAL: MORELIUS.C ENSURE NO UNDUE RISK TO PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY AS DOCUMENTED IN A 5/21/86 CAL & S/18/86 RA. THIS ACTION HAD CONCURRENCE REG. ANALYSIS COMPLETE DATE: 86/08/08 OF NRR & IE.

APPEAL DATE (PREDICTED):

APPEAL DESCRIPTION / STATUS:

APPEAL DATE (COMPLETED): RFAFFEAL APPEAL ORGANIZATION:

APPEAL OFFICIAL:

CLOSING ACTION DATE (PREDICTED): 86/10/13 CLOSING ACTION DESCRIPTION-CLOSING ACTION DATE (COMPLETED): -

AUTRRTZAIION To NEsTART INE PALISADES PLANT * -

CLOSING ACTION ORGANIZATION: RIII/DAP CLOSING ACTICM O'F!CIAL: KEPPLER, J.

O l Duxn POWER GoMPANY P.O. BOX 33180 CHARLorTE. N.C. 28242 HAI, H. TUCKEH TE12 PHONE m......

mm. . (704) ora 4m August 13, 1985 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: Ms. E. G. Adensam, Chief Licensing Branch No. 4

Subject:

McGuire Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 '

Response to NRC Request for Additional Information-E-MAX Isolation Devices for the McGuire SPDS

Dear Mr. Denton:

Ha. E. C. Adensam's letter of May 15, 1985 indicated that NRC Review of McGuire's Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS) Safety Analysis and Impicmentation Plan submittals (i.e. my March 9,1984. November 2,1984, and February 8, 1985 letters) finds that these submittals do not address the E-MAX Electrical Isolators used on the Radiation Monitoring Inputs to the SPDS. Consequently, the letter transmitted a supplemental request

., for additional information regarding the McGuire SPDS needed for the NRC to complete its review of Electrical Isolation Aspects of the SPDS.

In response to this request, the attached information addressing the

' Electrical Isolation Characteristics of the SPDS is provided. Please advise if there are any further questions concerning this matter.

Ital B. Tucker PBN/hrp Attachment cct Dr. J. Nelson Crace, Regional Administrator Hr. Darl llood, Project Manager U. S. Nucicar Regulatory Commission Div. of Project Management Region 11 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Atlanta, Georgia 30323 U.S. Nuclent Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. W. T. Orders Senior NRC Resident Inspector i McGuire Nuclear Station

-gswo+so-

o ,-

  • l

. Duke Power Company McGuire Nuclear Station RESPONSE TO NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION E-MAX ISOLATION DEVICES FOR THE McGUIRE SPDS

, August 13. 1985 The following additional information is needed regarding the E-MAX isolators used on the radiation monitoring inputs to the SPDS:

a. For the E-MAX device used to accomplish electrical isolation, describe the specific testing performed to demonstrate that the .

device is acceptable for this application. This description should include elementary diagrams when necessary to indicate the test configuration and how the maximum credible faults were applied to the device. ,

RESPONSE ,

1. Input to output surge-withstand-capability (SWC) testing was performed by E-MAX.
2. Input to output dielectric withstand tests at 2500 volts RMS were performed satisfactorily. *
3. These isolators were tested in the transverse modo as shown on Figure 1. A thirty (30) ampere source fused at twenty (20) amperes was applied across the signal output connections with the isolator energized. A storage type oscilloscope was used to monitor any propagation of the fault to the input signal circuitry. When the fault was applied to the output signal circuitry the following occurred: ,
a. Resistors in the output circuit fused open.

. b. Output operational amplifiers leads fused open.

c. Printed Circuit Board (PCB) foil in the output circuit fused open.
d. Output transistors were overheated and deformed.
e. Secondary side leads to the output circuit power supply - .

transformer (intheisolator)fusedopen.

f. The 20 amp fuse in the fault generation circuit did not blow. This can be attributed to the inherent current limiting design of the output circuit in which the components fused open, i
g. A 147 millivolt noise spike of a few milliseconds duri-tion was recorded on the input oscilloscope.

l l h. No damage was sustained by the input circuitry.

I

, - _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _._ . _ . _ A

y - .. . _

The isolators were proven to provide acceptable isolation to the maximum credible fault. The 147 millivolt spike recorded on the input leads can be attributed to noise generated by the fusing open of the output component!

The level of noise generated was not detrimental to the input circuit. Thi!

is due to the fact that the SPDS radiation monitor circuits themselves have

,. several stages of buffering and isolation, so that short-duration pulses

~ and noise would be attenuated and cause no effects on the Class 1E circuits.

b.

Provide data to verify that the maximum credible faults applied during the test were the maximum voltage / current to which the device could be exposed, and define how the maximum voltage /

current was determined.

RESPONSE

The cabinets and cable trays interfacing with these devices were studied and a 120 volt AC source in series with a 20 ampere current-interrupting device was found to be representative of the conditions to which the isolators could be exposed. In fact, most of the circuits involved are actually limited to lower current fault values, but this current was chosen as a viable test value,

c. Provide data to verify that the maximum credible fault was appited to the output of the device in the transverse mode (between signal and return) and the other faults were considered (i.e., _open and short circuits).

RESPONSE

1. Figure 1 shows the setup for the transverse mode fault test.

Results of the test are discussed in (a) above.

2. The output of the isolator is designed to be powered with the output signal leads open in order to facilitate system testing.
3. A short circuit of the output signal leads could cause failure of the output transistors and resistors. By design this could not propagate back to the input circuit.

1 -

4. Input and output circuits have their own individual isolated regulated power supplies. A fault on one supply would not pro-pagate to the other. .
d. Define the pass / fail acceptance criteria for this device.

RESPONSE

The pass / fail criteria for the transverse mode test was that upon application of the fault to the output circuitry the input circuitry must input.sustain no damage and the fault should not propagate to the

7

e. ' State whether or not the isolation devices comply with environmen i qualification requirements (10 CFR 50.49) and with the seismic qualification requirements which were the basis for plant licensing.

RESPONSE

The optical isolators were designed and tested to verify function-ability in the environmental and seismic service conditions to which they are exposed in compliance with the requirements of NUREG-0588 and McGuire FSAR Section 3.10. as detailed in Duke Power Company's response to NUREG-0588 for McGuire Nuclear Station and the McGuire FSAR, respectively.

f.

Provide a description of the measures taken to

  • protect the safety systems from electrical interference (i.e.. Electrostatic Coupling, EMI, Common Mode and Crosstalk) that may be generated by the SPDS.

kESPONSE '

The measures implemented to protect the Class IE radiation monitor l circuits from electrical interference include extensive cable shield-ing and cabinet grounding per Duke Power Company installation specifications for electronic equipment. All cable trays are also properly grounded. In addition, the Class IE circuits have several stages of buffering and isolation to attenuate ahd remove any such electrical interference. The o>erator-afd computer utilized for the SPDS functions has its own buffering circuit and utilizes a proven scanning method for reading SPDS inputs as a further filtering method so that signals are not propagated back into Class 1E circuits.

  • The E-MAX isolators are optical devices and therefore, have some inherent filtering characteristics for eliminating the propagation I of noise from output-to-input. Also refer back to question a.,

items 1 and 2 to note that the isolators were successfully tested for surge-withstand-capability and dielectric withstand performance.

i I

l

\

I

- _ _ . _ . . - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ -- _ - - _ . - . _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ . _ . __ _ ._ . _ _ . __. A

o 4

E ' 3o w

~

mtWt I l switch

' 20 A fuse a -

1 5-C I

Scope Power Supply 2 6-

' ~'

Analog "

l Isolator

-3 7-120 VAC 3 120 VAC Power Supply .

-4 Power Supply 8=

input output FIGURE 1: Test Set up '

ge0TE: Power Supplies A, 8 and C are all separate sources.

O I

S m

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20207B551&oldid=3052200"