ML20224A143

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:18, 7 October 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Resolution Document SA-103
ML20224A143
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/18/2019
From:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
To:
Joe O'Hara
Shared Package
ML20183A152 List:
References
Download: ML20224A143 (2)


Text

Comment Resolution Document External comments Summary of Comments for Interim SA-103, Reviewing the Non-Common Performance Indicator, Technical Staffing and Training Sent to the Agreement States, NRC NMSS, NRC Regions I, III, and IV for Comment in STC-19-079, December 18, 2019 Comment Source Location Comment Accepted Remarks No.

1 JGoodman; V.C.4.a. The Agreement State program? No The term Radiation Control NJ Does NRC care about the number Program is used to be in of x-ray inspectors or nuclear power alignment with The Agreement plant emergency response State Program Policy Statement.

positions? Ms. Goodmans No change made.

comment refers to the term Radiation Control Program 2 JGoodman; V.C.4.b. Same. Comment refers to the term No The term Radiation Control NJ Radiation Control Program Program is used to be in alignment with The Agreement State Program Policy Statement.

No change made.

3 JGoodman; V.D. This might be appropriate because N/A Comment Noted.

NJ management may have authority over all radiation programs.

4 JGoodman; Appendix A Just program to be consistent with No The term Radiation Control NJ SA102? Comment refers to the Program is used to be in term Radiation Control Program alignment with The Agreement State Program Policy Statement.

No change made.

5 PPeterson; General: While we understand that the Yes Efforts have been taken to address CO Applies to all revision and authoring of these these differences.

Interim SA procedures is a multi-organization procedures process involving many individuals,

when looking at the collection there seems to be a multitude of different voices and writing styles and as a result it lacks uniformity.

6 PPeterson; General: Specifically, it appears that many of Yes Please note that most of the CO Applies to all the appendices address common appendices in the interim Interim SA items and it would be appropriate to procedures (i.e., the Examples of procedures use common titles for the Less than Satisfactory Findings of appendices and to keep them in a Program Performance from the common order if possible. common and non-common IMPEP performance indicators; the casework summary sheets, and inspector accompaniment summary sheets, will be posted on the IMPEP toolbox at:

https://scp.nrc.gov/impeptools.html) have been removed and will be placed on the SCP Web site to allow for dynamic revisions.

7 PPeterson; General: Additionally, during the drafting Yes Comment Incorporated. Agreement CO Applies to all process the idea of consistency State comes first. Procedure Interim SA within these procedures regarding revised accordingly procedures the phrase" Agreement State or NRC..." vs. "NRC or Agreement State..." was discussed. This should be made uniform throughout the procedures.

ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBERS PACKAGE: ML20183A152 COMMENT RESOLUTION DOCUMENT:

ML20224A143