ML20148T833
ML20148T833 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 11/30/1978 |
From: | NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20148T793 | List: |
References | |
REGGD-05.058, REGGD-5.058, NUDOCS 7812060092 | |
Download: ML20148T833 (9) | |
Text
-. -.
i i
OCT 2 1978 l l
i l
y
- i
[ MEMDRANDUM FbR: Harold D. Thornburg, Director, DRCI, IE FROM: GIy Ag Arlotto, Director, DES, SD 1
SUBJECT:
STANDARDS REVIEW REQUESTS I have mytewed your memorandum dated August 23,1978 staung that IE has found a sizeable fraction of standards developed under the aegis of the Amerfcae National Standards Institute (ANSI) tutorial rather than i specific. # u observe that most of the standards in this category are sponsored by the American Nuclear Society (ANS), and you cita two recent examples ANSI N658/ANS-51.7 and ANSI N403/ANS-6.4, suggesting that the NRC not endorse these particuQ staasrds with regulatory guides.
I agree with your observation that a standard lacking specific require-
..g meets'is difficult, if not impossible, to enforce and that, in general, c such standards shouldinet.be endorsed by reguTatory guides.- In fact, we 6 continua to amphasfae- this point te. correspondence with ANS as well as
~ with other societies uhe satunft standards lacking sufficient speciffeity. l Furtier#more, I share your observations concerning the two example stan- 1 dards cit.ad;'neither standard contains a great number of specific require-monts that are faspectable or veriffable, and design adequacy would be i difficult to vertfy without access to more detailed specifications or design docummets. At the same time, we 1e Standards recognize that we
.are a service orgaafzation and serve several customers. For the two staedards you. referenced, one of our customers, NRR, believes the stan-dards have sufficient merit to be endoned. -On this basis, we intend !
to go fomard.
t Concerning your suggestion to better monitor standards work, i agree that we should not spend significant amounts of staff time on standards not meeting NRC needs. To this end, most working groups preparing ANS stan-
- dards include wNRC mesher. In addition to providing technical input,
! the NRC member has the Mspntsibility to assure that a standard under i preparation will be of value to NRC; otherwise the member has a respon-l sibility to withdraw fMm participation.
I
! CONTACT: M. S. Medeiros, Jr.
l 443-5913 omce > l __f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . _ _ I I _ _____=
I I su = *we > ___ _ ______.______ _____________.________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
oarc > .._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . .___________________________L_________.
NRC Form 318 (2 76) NRCM 02040 f v.s. so V E RNMEN T O FON TIN G C P FIC E: 1976_634 7 g.
i glo&6 con ~~ M
, H ,D. Thornburg 007 - 37^
In sumary, let me assure you that we are comitted to encouraging the development of standards that are specific and e orceable. As evidence of this comitment, Mr. Minogue used your numrandum to emphasize this point in a presentation to the ANSI Nuclear Standards ;
Management Board on September 14, 1978.
- oriz:=1 do ; b 3. ' /.M.to Guy A. Arlotto, Director Division of Engineering Standards Office of Standards Development cc: N. C. Moseley R. Vollmer, NRR W. Kreger, DSE l
j bcc: R. B. Minogue R. G. Smith G. A. Ariotto W..M. Morrison -
D..F.-Sullivan _
J.. A.' Nortierg M. R. Fleishman '
M.. S..tiedeiros, Jr. (3)
DISTRIBUTION ' ~i CENTRAL FILE
- SD ALPHA -
SD RD RSSB SUBJ RSSB RD RSSB WR Record Note: Memo was revised to emphasize our commitment to development of standards that are specific and enforceable.
i
! Task No: NA File: ANS-50
- ~'*
- SD:RSSB SD:RSSB l SD:GES SD' E ,,
OF FICE > ..... ........-.-- -.~ --~. - ~ .-- ....---- ~ ~. - -.~ .? . . .g ~ ~ . -..~.~ ~....~..................
- SEE P9EVIOUS CONCUF RENCES****** 3 Arlotto SURNAME > &--Medei4"06-- -Or-40-M-$VaP- -@r-UtM4 sob-- .-- ~ ~ - -- -- ~ - - - - - " " - " - - - - ' " " - - - - " - " "
9/ /78 9/'/78 I.
o ate >
o j..:./..../. 7. 8......... .o /... ./. ........
.. 78 ................... ...'.. ............................... ........-......
6 N RC F ORtA 318 (&77) 1lr U. S. GOVE RNME NT PRINTING OF FICE 1977-237-025 I N 3..I L w. _
5 j a$p 99s:,g..M;eRL.y .s 7?."hf;g.p? ~^*Q$f%*%,Q pc %.fsM a. Q M;n&> * ,
' f:n c?.%ifs h51;g;.htu
- Bp f.
v: y
,,q., %g . y '
4.
n ,.;.. .
l t
Wg< r:&r:w&$,;pa;,g
- x. ..q % g;W:f*~p.c V$ %qx % .;. %Q1@g&nMPls,.&w;w $. W WQf .: hW;i . g %q
~
i a hg& % m%M.& g n, t%Ky:M %
wg v 4 g&s.;k h ':&g~~
1 tx i
x ?g' . FIR:f treMg4Tesemburg." Director? s. W & cf R m .. W;26 9 qq
'w O,pqpg, .g q & p g. + ;&
w ygg,p ,, ng,yg%wy% d. .a ;;c j -
i 'Pk E @,E b N.WRAriettoRDfracterd sSD3 MM gy.$ 4 TT
- p g 3 pg* Wam m.c, an+ ,;;ggw .. ,. ,
i . "Fil&;; YEET$k:k 3NjdNy Mi948M&yhk%g:g i$ff,) .F:? % .
l i [wr Q Mr:M ~ 35 $',.L "%pM f CM y?iiM n f.y&];esummating:es? %ibE%fhp@ht Qygd Rs
~
,; hted' t ti'sesfange@gyyd A W
l j 4)ths l'ssesstyF1hur amme suessetsMr 7 b)(g#
Q V
Loff
$q' ' -
y
- ~~ 'g{ lQ 2 ' - &4
- 3gg 'gpqq q4*y 11 8A WW
}kg
<x c, . #,\
, u l p a
%;., y-
~p> ,,
,=\
.g.
- ,i
- tt g
F l
8 ' l l s
. :l t
7 J-m ,
! v.
b
?
- ss
.g
. N* '. l 3
9s e: '
3 s , ' b%g [,
.--'.. (
l *h?
'i b ._
T. ~ T -? g g I 1 ; n .:
i
- Ngg puugr;
/ame
etSureatjless
. 'W: it.$fiefd Systemsn9J ' %;4% .$
i ^ 'i9 &gr.have'the DQ % #d(% M % YdGiMi}M.4 &CW tW$9D f.Q;E4V{ W 4 hrth.: % %ll%= MiM OP ava
- a. st w st a.r4 med .
- .x
'5 $ W A BRC.m== tarN17lconstttee
. banottog and uki4
. pside presespy.ander review by-f'erned the ACRS. t I
- % d $ 2thesleJflee~.af i " g.r M r & astavthat W received a' cony /er, a asserender prepared by-Wtil.. ' -
I ?M,pefCfah$sk refInsispess . year Augustr 21 memorandust and dish reaff'irms-NtR -
l 2 W5%sspeertJeP4the SSTstandardsitha RIR meeerender expiafasfim detaf1, .
< $A g$the basisKt(%supportAus,tgNi 2 RW :n ~
- ge v .
~ .
w ;L + m.wn t -yu .f. m . & ~::v4 m;; vty ? q~.O,, qAynp ; p } w .xw-'._3 : g; 5,$Gf M./ n .D/ /
j VfGjQ% y.m ;hp,$$w.iQf ;@ ,' H.-
4- : CONTACTv -MOSp Hedeiros;" Jris ' % _ ,
- ^
'i ** d. 443-5913. w . .- -
r
[ ._
. OFFICE >
.s
,,,_,,,_.,,./,,
, . . ,,;. a .-s 4,,,,,,,___ _ _ _
^* 4I Q
- cl '[ ; I { w..l1 '
.0{.
-SUftNAME >
~
> ~*' -
DATE >
NRC Form 318 (2 76) NHCM 02040 s # U.S. GOV ERNMLN T PRIMTIN G OFFtC Es 1976-684-762
. . m u w,,, a w ac , _ 4.v N J l.m h ' 1 -
m se NDndw mi.e ,ei,. . - - -
t- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ . _ _ .___ _ . _ _. _ _ . _ _ .
p= ~ ,
- N1. Thornburg I, , .
- l l
- 2. Standard N658-lhlits is a design standard which has been prepared by a working group with NRC membership and which has received staff review. On September 14, 1978, an " approve with coments" ballot was issued by the NRC representative on ANS Comittee ANS-52. A copy of the ballot, the forwarding letter and the detailed coments are i attached for your information and use.
In sumary, bot standards delineate design criteria rather than detailed s9ecifications, nd as such, do not easily lend themselves to " cookbook" type use during spection. However, both standards are considered valuable as refer ces for adequate design and therefore I expect both i standards to be e rsedbyRegulatoryGuJd's. e l9ur continued assistance I in reviewing these tandards is appreci ed.
l l
- Guy A. Arlotto, Director i
Division of Engineering Standards Office of Standards Development
Enclosure:
Letter from R. .Baer(NRR)to l
- B. G. Schul (S ) forwarding l ballot and ts ANSI.N658
- s.
l cc: N. C. Moseley a -
l R. Yollmer, -
, W. Kruger .
bec: R. B. Minog e R. G. Smit !
G. A. Ar1 to W. M. Mo icon D. F. Su 1iyarL -
M. S. M deiros (3)' e >
CISlRIBUTION i CENTRAL FILE SD ALPHA k
SD RD RSSB SUBJ RSSB RD
- RSSB WR I
6
[ Task No: NA File: ANS-50 9-25-78Mge>
oFFi ..R..S.S..B...<1..... .R.S. .S.B... .. .*.d . ..A.D..: G E S..k....
.. . . . ...vgf.
g ,
I'
$URNAMFb ..ll.UedeiraS..D...$.u]l1.V.an...W.'..%r.r.iscn... ..G' . Ar + t4... .................. ........... ....
oare > :. 9/2.k.7,8,,,,,,, ,,9/,M 7,8,,,,,,, g j, g,3,,,,,,,,, ,,g/h,7JL,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,...,,
N PC F ORM 318 n6-77) 237-025 W U. S. GCVE RNMENT PRINTING CF FICE 197d7 memu,,
-