L-13-376, Addendum to the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1, Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:30, 19 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Addendum to the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1, Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report
ML14028A263
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 01/27/2014
From: Emily Larson
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-13-376
Download: ML14028A263 (88)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:FENOC' Beaver Valley Power Station P.O. Box 4 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Shippingport, PA 15077 Eric A. Larson 724-682-5234 Site Vice President Fax: 724-643-8069 January 27, 2014 L-13-376 10 CFR 50.54(f) ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852

SUBJECT:

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Addendum to the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1, Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRG) issued a letter titled, "Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident," to all power reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status. Enclosure 3 of the 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter contains specific Requested Actions, Requested Information, and Required Responses associated with Recommendation 2.3 for Seismic Walkdowns. By letter dated November 27, 2012, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) submitted the 180-day response to the 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter. The required seismic walkdown reports were provided for Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1; Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 2; Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station; and Perry Nuclear Power Plant. During the seismic walkdowns, certain plant areas were inaccessible due to conditions expected during normal power operation. FENOC committed to submit a supplemental report documenting the results of the additional seismic walkdowns performed during a specified refueling outage. As committed for Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1, the additional seismic walkdowns were completed during the fall 2013 refueling outage. FENOC hereby submits the enclosed addendum to the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1, Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report.

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 L-13-376 Page 2 There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if additional information is required, please contact Mr. Thomas A. Lentz, Manager-Fleet Licensing, at 330-315-6810. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January ;;>+, 2014. Sincerely, t: Ci;/~ Eric A. Larson

Enclosure:

Addendum to Beaver Valley Power Station Unit 1 Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Revision 1 cc: Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) (w/o Enclosure) NRC Region I Administrator (w/o Enclosure) NRC Resident Inspector (w/o Enclosure) NRR Project Manager (w/o Enclosure) Director BRP/DEP (w/o Enclosure) Site BRP/DEP Representative (w/o Enclosure)

Addendum to BeaverValleyPower$tationUnit1 Near-Terun TaskForce Hec$mffiendation 2'3 SeismicWalkdownRepsrtoRev1 Dated$eptember4,2013 November 1, 2013 Preparedby: Reviewedby: Approvedby: FirstEnergyNuclearOperatingGompany(FHNOC)

Purpose:

In responseto the NRC Letter 50.54(0 Section2.3, FirstEnergyNuclear Operating Company (FENOC) submittedits responseto the Nuclear RegulatoryCommission (NRC) in November 2012 for its Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS) Unit 1. Additionally, the Revision 0 repofi was revisedin September2Ol3basedon the feedback receivedfrom NRC audit at BVPS conductedin July 2013.Pages248 & 291 of the submittalreport Table 6-3 identified 13 componentsthat were not accessibleduring the time initial walkdowns were performedwhile the plant was in operation.A commitment was addedin the report stating that these 13 items will be walked down during the next refueling outage. The purposeof this addendumto the report is to documentthe findings of those 13 componentsthat were walked down during the September/October2013 (IR22) refueling outage. Attachments: 1 . Revisedpage 284, Section6.1 to identify the 13 inaccessiblecomponentsthat were walked down during the September/October2013 refueling outageand also to indicatethree additionalcomponentsthat were walked down. Also adds referenceto additionalTable 6-5 mentionedin item 3 below.

2. Revisedpage 291 and292Table 6-3 and TabIe6-4 to includethe additional3 componentswalked down during the September/October2013 refueling outage.
3. Added page292A to include an additionalTable 6-5 to identify areaswalked by inside the ContainmentBuilding during the September/October 2013 refueling outage.
4. SeismicWalkdown Checklistsfor l3 componentsthat were identified as inaccessiblein the original submittal report and also for 3 additional components walked down.
5. Area Walk-By Checklistsassociatedwith the componentsstatedin item 4 above.

Findings: No potentially adversefindings were identified for thesecomponentsand in the associatedrooms. The findings are documentedin the attachedSeismicWalkdown Checklists(SWC) and the associated Area Walk-By Checklists(AWC).

6-5 and Table 6-6. The tablesdocument"potential" issuesthat would be adverseto quality. In general,they are a documentationof varying degreesof experienceand use of engineering judgments. The basisfor excluding an issuefrom being a condition report is documentedin the walkdown checklistto ensureretrievability. 6.0

SUMMARY

OF THE WALKDOWN RESULTS 6.1 Wam DowNIrnus ANDWllr-Bv Anpa,s The SWEL 1 included a total of I 13 components,and SWEL 2 included a total of 8 components. From this totalof 12I components,108 componentswere walked down and 13 componentswere inaccessibleand will require walkdown during the next plant's refueling outage.Notification No. 600788346was generatedto have thesewalkdowns performed during the next refueling outage. (These 13 componentswere walked down during the September/October2013 refueling outage as indicated in the footnote to Table 6-3 on page 291.) Three additional components(PCV-IIA-117,PT-IRC-402, and MOV-1CH-310) were walked down during the September/October 2013 Refueling Outageas they were located in the samevicinity of the areaof scheduledwalk downs. Table 6- 1 and Table 6-2 rdentify the walkdown items and walk-by areas,respectively,and Table 6-3 presentsa list of items on the SWEL which are inaccessiblewhile the plant is in operation. Three motor operatedvalves MOV-1QS-1018, MOV-15I-8608, and MOVE-15I-862A were part of the SEL componentsto be walked down. As noted on their respectivechecklists, the valves themselveswere inaccessible,but the operators were accessible.The operators were walked down, but the in line valves were not. The areaswalk-by and the walkdown items are cross correlatedon the respectiveSWCs and AWCs. TabLe6-4 provides the list of equipment that was walked down, by EPRI equipment class.Table 6-5 identifies the walk-by areasin the ContainmentBuilding which areinaccessiblewhile the plant is in operation. Table 6-1: BeaverValley 1 NTTF 2.3 Walkdown Items (SWEL I+2) Floor Equipment ID No Equip. Class BIdg Area Description EI ICC-E-1A 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers AXLB 735 PrimaryAux. Blde 735'6" IEE-EG-1 17. EneineGenerators DGBX 735 DG Room Train A IEE-EG-2 17. Eneine Generators DGBX 735 DG Room Train B IFC-E-1A 21. Tanks and Heat Exchansers FULB 735 Fuel Buildine Rev 1 pg:284 l

Table 6-2: BeaverVallev 1 NTTF 2.3 Walk-Bv Areas* Area Bldq Floor El Prim.Aux.Bldg.735'6 AXLB 735 QS-AFW Pump Room SFGB 735 RelayRoom AXLB 713 ServiceBuilding Floor 725' SRVB 725 Valve Pit 688' SFGB 747 West CableVault - SE Corner SFGB 735

  • Doesnot includeareasin Containment Building.(Forareasin ContainmentBuildingseeTable6-5 on pg292l\)

Note:Equipmentlocatedin eitherSFGor MSCV areall designated to be in SFGB. Table 6-3: BeaverValley I NTTF 2.3InaccessibleItems on SWELI+Z* Equip. ID Description Blde BI Area Description REACTOR NITROGENACCUMULATOR GN-TK-18 RCBX 767 CONTAINMENT TANK GN-TK-IB BUILDING SG1ABIP NARROWRANGE OUTSIDE1A STEAM GEN LT-1FW-475 LEVEL TRANSMITTERLT- I FW- RCBX 718 CUBICLE 415 PORVBLOCK VALVE MOV-RC-MOV-1RC-535 RCBX 767 PRESSURIZER CUBICLE 535 PCV-IRC-PZRPORVPCV-RC-455D RCBX 767 PRESSURIZER CUBICLE 455D REACTOR CNMT AIR COMPR CHILLED PCV-CC-101 RCBX 7 1 8 CONTAINMENT WATER SUP PRESSCONT BUILDING REACTORCOOLANTWIDE PT-IRC-403 RCBX 692 701 KEYWAY WALL RANGEPRESSURE, PT-RC-403 RH-P-1A RHR PUMP RH-P-IA RCBX 707 RHR PLATFORM RECIRCSPRAYHEAT RS-E-1D RCBX 718 RECIRCSPRAYCLRS EXCHANGERRS-E-ID RS-P-1A INSIDE RECIR. PUMP RS-P-IA RCBX 692 AT CNMT SUMP LOOP 2 COLD LEG SI SUP CHECK SI-24 RCBX 7 1 8 AT 18 LOOP CUB VALVE ST-24 SOV-1RC- ON PZR CUBICLE SOV-RC-103B RCBX 767 103B OUTSIDEWALL RCP 1A THERM BARR CCR OUT -A RCPPPCUBICLE-TV-1CC-107 A RCBX 718 ISOL.TV-CC-107A REACTOR CNMT RECIRC AIR COOLERS TI-1CC-131C RCBX 692 CONTAINMENT INLET LOOP #3 BUILDING (690) Rev 1 pg:29l

Table 6-3: BeaverValley I NTTF 2.3 InaccessibleItems on SWELI+2* Equip. ID Description Blde EI Area Description RCBX 767 OUTSIDE PCV-1IA-II7 PRESSCONTROLVALVE RCBX 767 CRANEWALL PT-IRC-402 REACTORCOOLANTWIDE RCBX 718 RCBX 718OUTSIDE RANGEPRESURE CRANE WALL MOV-ICH- REGENHX CHG HDR OUT ISOL. RCBX 692 BASEMENT 310 NORMAL CHARGINVALVE

  • These componentswere walked down during the September/October2013 refueling outage.

Table 6-4: BeaverValley I NTTF 2.3 ComponentsCategorizedby EPRI Classes EPRI Components EquipmentDescription Cat No. Walked Down 0 Other 7 I Motor Control Centersand Wall-Mounted Contactors 7 2 Low Voltage Switcheearand BreakerPanels 3 3 Medium Voltage, Metal-Clad Switchgear 2 4 Transformers 4 5 Horizontal Pumps 10 6 Vertical Pumps 4 7 Pneumatic-Operated Valves 15 8 Motor-Operatedand Solenoid-OperatedValves I7 9 Fans 2 10 Air Handlers I ll Chillers 0 L2 Air Compressors 0 13 Motor Generators 0 I4 Distribution Panelsand Automatic TransferSwitches 6 l5 Battery Racks 2 I6 BatteryChargersand Inverters 6 L7 EngineGenerators 2 18 Instrument(on) Racks 8 r9 TemperatureSensors 2 20 Instrumentationand Control Panels t7 2l Tanks and Heat Exchangers 9 Rev 1 pg:292

Table 6-5: BeaverValley I NTTF 2.3 Walk-By Areasin the ContainmentBuilding. Area Blde Floor El Basement RCBX 692 PressurizerCubicle RCBX 767 PRT Cubicle RCBX 718 RCBX 767 Ottside CraneWall RCBX 767 RCBX 718 OutsideCraneWall RCBX 718 RCBX "A" Cubicle RCBX 718 RCBX "B" Cubicle RCBX tr8 RHR Platform RCBX 707 Rev 1 pg:2924

SheetI of56 Paul C. Riuzo Assrrciatcs. Inr:. [:..(,lfifLlti tr Ll,]N!l jI 1\\1\ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. GN-TK-IB Equip.Class21. TanksandHeatExchangers EquipmentDescription NITROGEN ACCUMULATOR TANK GN-TK.IB Location:Bldg. RCBX FloorEl. 767 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgments and findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorageconfigurationverificationrequired(i.e., is the item one X of the 50o/o of SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

GN-TK-L8 consistsof a -4ft tall, -18 inch diametertank mountedto an adjacentwall via a horizontal tube section. This tube section is directly welded to a steelplate which is anchoredto the wall via 4-1" diameteranchors.

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Tank and anchoragefound in good condition.

4. Is the anchorasefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? X (Note: This questiononly appliesif the item is one of the 50o/ofor which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Sheet2 of56 Patrl C. Rizzo Assor:iatcs, Irr{:. ls(;lNt t_ltt .rr { rl}i\t :t1.\\1.\ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. GN-TK-IB Equip.Class21. TanksandHeatExchangers EquipmentDescription NITROGENACCUMULATOR TANK GN-TK.IB Interaction Effects N/A

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X N/A
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseontothe equipment?

N/A

9. Do attachedlineshaveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X Attachedpiping identified with adequateflexibility.

10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects? Other AdverseConditions I l. Haveyou lookedfor andfoundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additional pagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby:  :-ffi,//&& Date: t0n0t20t3 EddieM. Guerra etfu r0lr0l20t3 Brian A. Lucarelli

Sheet3 of56 Paul C. Rizso Associates, Inc. Status: @ N U SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. gN{K-lB Equip.Class 21. TanksandHeat Exchangers EquipmentDescription NITROGEN ACCUMULATOR TANK GN-TK-IB Other supportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if*?ny): File Name: l-67-934jpg

Description:

ComponentID Tag File Name: l-68-934jpg

Description:

GeneralView of Component

Sheet4 of56 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcsr lrrc. EIi(;INEERS {i C{}NST !LTAIfI5 Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. GN-TK-IB Equip.Class21. TanksandHeat Exchangers EquipmentDescription NITROGEN ACCUMULATOR TANK GN-TK-IB File Name: l-69-935jpg

Description:

View of ComponentAnchorage

pc-tt? Sheet5 of56 Paul c. Rizz. Associ*rcs, Inc-l:,\(.lt(Lt_Rs \ { LIN\ltLr,\\t} Status: @ N U SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. LT-IFW-475 Equip.Classl8. Instrument(on) Racks EquipmentDescription SGIA BIP NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTERLT-IFW-475 Location:Bldg. RCBX FloorEl. 718 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage YN

l. Is the anchorage configurationverificationrequired(i.e.,is the item one X of the 50% of SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

This is a lighnueigfu e5 b), wall-mountedtransmitter. Thewall mountingconsistsof a steelplate welded to a steel tube which is attachedto the wall via I -3/8" diameter anchor bolts. YN U N/A

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X YNUN/A
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?

YNUNiA

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X YNUN/A
5. Is the anchorage configurationconsistent with plantdocumentation? X (Note:This questiononly appliesif the item is oneof the 50% for which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)

YNU

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Sheet6 of56 ry Paul c. Riu. Associatcs, I'r:. h*(;lN[E_R5 s ( (']N]1,rt-LrNl 5 Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. LT-lFW-475 Equip.Class18.Instrument(on) Racks EquipmentDescription SGIA BIP NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTERLT-IFW-475 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?
9. Do attachedlineshaveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X A nachedI ines identffied w ith adequatefl exibility.

10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects? Other AdverseConditions I l. Haveyou lookedfor and foundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffect the safety functionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additional pagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: ffi/,w r0lt0l2013 EddieM. Guerra tuful Brian A. Lucarelli r0/10/2013

Sheet7 of 56 Patrl C. Rizeo Assoc:iatc.s,Inr:. []"{;lNttltl il ( t}N!1rLfASl! Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. LT-lFW-475 Equip.Class18.Instrument(on) Racks EquipmentDescription SGIA BIP NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTERLT-IFW-475 Othersupportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if FileName:l-67-885jpg

Description:

ComponentID Tag F i l eN a m e :Il --68-88s 6 8 - 8 8 jjpe 5p g

Description:

GeneralView of Component

Sheet8 of56 Paul C. Riz.zo Asscrciatcs, Inc. 

                   &, {:0N5t rt-TAs-I5 tNGtNET.RS Status:  @ N   U SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC)

EquipmentID No. LT-lFW-475 Equip.Class18.Instrument(on) Racks EquipmentDescription SGIA BIP NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTERLT-IFW-475 File Name: l-69-885jpe

Description:

View of ComponentMountingConfiguration

pc\? Sheet9 of56 Paul c. Ilizro Ass*ciares, ['r:. l N(;lNf I Rt s L r,lNll.j t_IAr'I-\ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. MOV-lRC-535 Equip.Class8a. Motor-OperatedValves EquipmentDescription PORV BLOCK VALVE MOV.RC-535 Location:Bldg. RCBX FloorEl. 767 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configurationverificationrequired(i.e.,is the item one X of the 50o/oof SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

This MOV is in line with a very well-supportedinsulatedpipe. P&lD RM-00378 indicatespipe diameteris 3". Yokewas observedto be sfficiently strong to prevent shaft binding.

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Valvefound in good condition.

4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X
5. Is the anchorage configurationconsistent with plantdocumentation? X (Note:This questiononly appliesif the item is oneof the 50ohfor which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Sheetl0 of56 f" Parrl c-. Rizz. Ass.t:iarcs, [nc. ISr;f Xrf.fr'l u (l:'i>fT'l rlfr SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. MOV-1RC-535 Equip. Class8a. Motor-OperatedValves EquipmentDescription PORV BLOCK VALVE MOV-RC-535 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?
9. Do attachedlineshaveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X Attachedlines identified with adequateflexibility.

10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects? Other AdverseConditions 11.Haveyou lookedfor and foundno otherseismicconditionsthatcould adverselyaffect the safety functionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additional pagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedbv: t0tr0t20r3 EddieM. Guerra er# Brian A. Lucarelli t0lt0l20l3

Patrl C. Rirzo Assor:iatcs, Inr:. SheetI I of56 [\..(;lN[tRS.\ r r)){!tII IA}-Ii Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC) EquipmentID No. MOV-lRC-535 Equip.Class8a.Motor-Operated Valves EquipmentDescription PORV BLOCK VALVE MOV-RC-535 Othersupportingor relevantdocumentsand File Name: l-68-963jpg

Description:

ComponentID Tag t-67-e63jpe File Name: l-67-963jpg

Description:

GeneralView of Component

Sheet12of56 Paul C. Rizzo Assot:iatr:s, Irrc" t l'-(;lNuf.tts s Lilfilt rl 1..r.\Is SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PCV-lRC-455D Equip.Class7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves EquipmentDescription PZR PORV PCV-RC-455D Location:Bldg. RCBX FloorEl. 767 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

l. Is the anchorageconfigurationverificationrequired(i.e., is the item one X of the 50%o of SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

This valve has a 3ft toll actuator and is in line with a 3" pipe. l/ertical and lateral supportsare provided near the valve body.

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is morethan mild surface X oxidation?

Valvefound in good condition.

4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? X (Note:This questiononly appliesif the item is oneof the 50%ofor which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Paul C. Rizzo Assor:iatcs, Inc. I s(;tf(t:F.Rs -! r il\it rt I^\1\ Status: @ N SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PCV-lRC-455D Equip.Class7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves EquipmentDescription PZR PORV PCV-RC-455D Interaction Effects Y N U

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X N U L Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?

N U

9. Do attachedlineshaveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X Attachedlines identified with adequateflexibility.

Y N U 10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects? Other Adverse Conditions I 1. Haveyou lookedfor and foundno otherseismicconditionsthat could N U adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedbv: Date: r0n0t20t3 EddieM. Guerra 6*/fu BrianA. Lucarelli Date: r0n0t20t3

Sheet14 of56 Paul C. Rizzo Assor:iatr:s, Inc:. tli(;lN[ F.Rss ( {}Nst :l.L\N-I'5 Status: @ N U SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PCV-lRC-455D Equip.Class7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves EquipmentDescription PZR PORV PCV-RC-455D Othersupportingor relevaqtdocumentsand FileName: l-67-943jpg

Description:

GeneralView of Component

pC-? Sheet15 of56 Paul-c. Ri;r* Ass'ciarcs,Irrr:. tN(:lN[ f.li: tr i.t]lisl :l-tt\*l t SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC) Equipment ID No. PCV-CC-101 Equip.Class7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves EquipmentDescription CNMT AIR COMPRCHILLED WATER SUPPRESSCONT Location:Bldg. RCBX F l o o rEl . 718 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

l. Is the anchorageconfigurationverificationrequired(i.e., is the item one X of the 50o/oof SWEL items requiringsuchverification)?

This valve is coveredin insulation. Thepipe supporting PCV-CC-l0l is laterally supportedto an adjacentframe which is mountedto a grating platform at elevation 7 18. Y N/A

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X N/A
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is morethanmild surface X oxidation?
4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? X (Note: This questiononly appliesif the item is one of the 50o/ofor which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

pc-e Sheet PatrlC. Rirz* Ass.r:iatcs, Inei [\t;lfil t_RSs { r!fi!l.:t,I.\\] } Status: SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PCV-CC-101 Equip.Class7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves EquipmentDescription CNMT AIR COMPRCHILLED WATER SUPPRESSCONT Interaction Effects Y

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X Y
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtilesand lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?

Y

9. Do attachedlines haveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X Y

10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects? Other Adverse Conditions I 1 Have you lookedfor and foundno otherseismicconditionsthat could Y adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: Date: 1012512013 EddieM. Guerua fu{fu BrianA. Lucarelli Date: r0l2sl2013

Sheetl7 of 56 W Paul c. Riez* Assrrr:iatcs, Inr:. t ti(;tNlr.R5 L, ( rlNlt :l-T,\Ilt Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. PCV-CC-l0l Equip.Class7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves EquipmentDescription CNMT AIR COMPRCHILLED WATER SUPPRESSCONT Othersupportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any): FileName: I 00_04s0jpe

Description:

General View of Component F i l e N a m e : I 00_0454jpe

Description:

General View of Component Area

Sheetl8 of56 PCef".,r c.nl"r"n"".' IN{il:\i[L_[tS & ['f]l\]i.:t.l\51 i Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PT-lRC-403 Equip.Class18.Instrument(on) Racks EquipmentDescription REACTOR COOLANT WIDE RANGE PRESSURE.PT-RC-403 Location:Bldg. RCBX FloorEl. 692 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage Y

l. Is the anchorageconfigurationverificationrequired(i.e., is the item one X of the 50Voof SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

This is a lighnueight C5 lb), wall-mountedpressuretransmitter. Thewall mounting consistsof a steelplate welded to a steel tube which is attqchedto the wall via 4 -3/8" diameteranchor bolts.

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X Y
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Y

4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X Y N/A
5. Is the anchorage configurationconsistent with plantdocumentation? X (Note: This questiononly appliesif the item is one of the 50Yofor which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)

Y

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Sheet19 of56 Paul C. Rizro Assot:iatc,r, fnr:. [ \{.;tN[LR5 tr ({}lr!LiLL{S Ii SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC) EquipmentID No. PT-1RC-403 Equip.Class18.Instrument(on) Racks Equipment Description REACTOR COOLANT WIDE RANGE PRESSURE,PT.RC-403 Interaction Effects N/A

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X N o interaction concernsidentified.
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?
9. Do attachedlineshaveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X A ttached I ines identified with adequatefl exibility.

10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects? Other AdverseConditions I 1. Have you lookedfor and foundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffect the safety functionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedbv: 10125120t3 EddieM. Guerra G*J# r0t25t20t3 Brian A. Lucarelli

Sheet20 of 56 Patrl C. ltizzu Associar(:$, [nq:. t N(ilNt:t lt5 {r l,'t!}iSt ;t l,\}1\ Status: @ N U SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC) EquipmentID No. PT-I RC-403 Equip.Class18.Instrument (on)Racks EquipmentDescription REACTORCOOLANT WIDE RANGE PRESSURE, PT-RC-403 Othersupportingor relevantdocumentsandphotos(if any): FileName:100_0423jpg

Description:

GeneralView of Component File Name: 100_0425jpg

Description:

View of Anchorage

Sheet2l of 56 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcsr Inc. Status: N SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PT-IRC-403 Equip. Class I E. Instrument(on) Racks Equipment Description REACTORCOOLANTWIDERANGEPRESSLJRE, PT-RC-403 File Name: 100_0426.1pg

Description:

GeneralView of ComponentArea

pcle- Sheet22 of 56 PaulC. Risz.Ass.ciittcs, ['r:. [:a(;ll\ilIltts s i c]N\l :t_I.rl-t.s SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC) EquipmentID No. RH-P-IA Equip.Class6. VerticalPumps EquipmentDescription RHR PUMP RH-P.IA Location:Bldg. RCBX FfoorEl. 707 Manufacturer.Model. Etc. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgments and findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorageconfigurationverificationrequired(i.e., is the item one X of the 50o/oof SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

Themotorfor this vertical pump extendsaround 7ftfrom thepipe center line. The pipe in line with thepump is directly bolted to adjacentwideflanges located near the pump.

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Anchoragefor thepump to the supportingpipe was identified in good condition

4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X
5. Is the anchorage configurationconsistent with plantdocumentation? X (Note: This questiononly appliesif the item is one of the 50o/ofor which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

pC? Sheet23 of56 Paul C. RizzoAss.r:iatcs, Itrr:. I N(.lfit f.H! ar I tfNll l.f.{.\.. l ! SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC) EquipmenttD No. RH-P-IA Equip.Class6. VerticalPumps EquipmentDescription RHR PUMP RH.P-IA Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X No interaction concernsidentffied in the vicinity of this pump.
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X andmasonryblockwalls not likely to collapseontothe equipment?

N/A

9. Do attachedlineshaveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X 10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects?

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Haveyou lookedfor andfoundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffect the safetyfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: r0/r0/2013 EddieM. Guerra fu{ful Brian A. Lucarelli t0lt0l20r3

Sheet24 of 56 Paul C. Riszo Associatcs,Inc. rlic lNEr.Rs& clfNst rtT.4"lrTs Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. RH-P-lA Equip.Class6. VerticalPumps EquipmentDescription RHR PUMP RH-P-IA Other supportingor relevantdocumentsand FileName: I 881jpg

Description:

ComponentID Plate FileName:I 881jpg

Description:

GeneralView of PumpMotor

Sheet25 of 56 SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. RH-P-lA Equip.Class6. VerticalPumps EquipmentDescription RHR PUMP RH-P-IA File Name: I 881 jpg

Description:

GeneralView of BaseConnection FileName:I 881jpg

Description:

View of ComponentAnchorage

Sheet26 of 56 PC)" Il.,l C. Riiz'Associatc-s, Inc. t,\i;llitr.R! {r Lr,}N!I.,:LL{rTS SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. RS-E-lD Equip.Class21. TanksandHeatExchangers EquipmentDescription RECIRCSPRAY HEAT EXCHANGERRS-E-ID Location:Bldg. RCBX FloorEl. 718 Manufacturer.Model. Etc. Instructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdown of an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configurationverificationrequired(i.e.,is the item one X of the 50% of SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

This vertical heat exchanger is around 30ft tall and runs through Elevations 692 and 7I8. It is supportedat El. 692 by a rigid steel tubeframe. At El. 7I 8, it is supportedby four stffined legs anchoredvia 2- I " diameter bolts to thefloor. N/A

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Mild surfacecorrosion identified at the bottomplate of the heat exchanger. judged not to be a seismic/structuralconcern. N/A

4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X N/A
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? x (Note:This questiononly appliesif the item is oneof the 50% for which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Sheet27 of56 PC? Paul C. Riat* Associatcs, Inc:. t:..t,tXffffi SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC) EquipmentID No. RS-E-ID Equip.Class21. TanksandHeatExchangers EquipmentDescription RECIRCSPRAYHEAT EXCHANGERRS-E-ID Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X scaffolding at El. 692 is well braced andiudged not to presentan interaction
!;Z:#
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X andmasonryblock walls not likely to collapseontothe equipment?
9. Do attachedlineshaveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X 10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects?

Other AdverseConditions I L Haveyou lookedfor and found no otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedasnecessary) Evaluatedby: t0tr0t20t3 EddieM. Guena 6*{fu Brian A. Lucarelli t0n0t2013

Sheet28 of 56 Patrl C. Riczo Associatcs,Inc. El*C I NFt RS dr CONSU I-T.{NTS Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC) EquipmentID No. RS-E-lD Equip.Class21. TanksandHeatExchangers EquipmentDescription RECIRC SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER RS-E-ID Othersupportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if an File Name: l-67-891jpg

Description:

GeneralView of Componentfrom Elevation6g2 File Name: I 8e0 jpe

Description:

View of Supportat El. 692 (Pictureis for RS-E-lC which hasidenticalsupport conditionas RS-E-ID)

Sheet29 of 56 Paul C. RiEro Assoc:iatcs, Irrt:. tsr;lNttRt e ( ftNttiLTAtils Status: @ N U SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC) ID No. Equipment RS-E-lD Equip.Class2l . TanksandHeatExchangers EquipmentDescription RECIRCSPRAYHEAT EXCHANGERRS-E-ID FileName: I 890 jpg

Description:

GeneralView of Componentfrom Elevation718 (Pictureis for RS-E-I C which hasidenticalsupportconditionas RS-E-r D) File Name: l-72-890jpg

Description:

View of Anchorage at El. 718 (Pictureis for RS-E-I C which hasidenticalsupportconditionas RS-E-I D)

Sheet30 of 56 Paul C, Rizzo Associatcs. Inc. lN{iltift Rt ti ( rlNtt :1T.{\-t t SeismicWalkdown Checklist(swc) EquipmentID No. RS-P-lA Equip.Class6. VerticalPumps EquipmentDescription INSIDE RECIR.PUMP RS-P-IA Location:Bldg. RCBX Floor El. 692 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

l. Is the anchorageconfigurationverificationrequired(i.e., is the item one X of the 50%o of SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

This vertical pump is bolted to skidwith 4 - I"diameter bolts. Thedistancefrom top of the motor to thepipe center line is about 10ft.

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is morethan mild surface X oxidation?

N/A

4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? X (Note:This questiononly appliesif the item is oneof the 50ohfor which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Sheet3l of56 Patrl C. Riaztr Associarcs, Irrc. [ ]-{iINtf,Rt s. r{l:\51 :l_I-/\fij l SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. RS-P-lA Equip.Class6. VerticalPumps EquipmentDescription INSIDE RECIR. PUMP RS-P-IA Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X Pump motor is in closeproximity to steelframe (-2" gap) This isjudged not to be a seismicconcernsince relative motor displacementat this level of the structure will be minimal under seismicaction.
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles andlighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?

N/A

9. Do attachedlines haveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X 10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects?

Other AdverseConditions 11.Haveyou lookedfor and foundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselvaffect the safetvfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: r0lr0l20r3 EddieM. Guerra 6*/fu Brian A. Lucarelli t0lr0l2013

Sheet32 of 56 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcsr Inc. ENG I NEERS & CONSU LTAFTTS Status: SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. RS-P-lA Equip.Class6. VerticalPumps EquipmentDescription INSIDE RECIR.PUMP RS-P-IA Other supportingor relevantdocumentsand File Name: l-67 -864.5pg

Description:

GeneralView of Component File Name: l-69-865jpe

Description:

View of Anchorage (Pictureis for RS-P-I B which hasidenticalsupport conditionas RS-P-I A)

Patrl C. Riezo Associatcs, Inc. Sheet33 of 56 ENG I NEE RS {i ('{.)NSLI LTJIIfT,T Status: @ N U SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. RS-P-lA Equip.Class6. VerticalPumps EquipmentDescription INSIDE RECIR.PUMP RS-P-IA File Name: l-7l-865jpg

Description:

View of SteelFramein Vicinity of PumpMotor (Pictureis for RS-P-I B which hassameconfigurationas RS-P-r A)

Sheet34 of 56 pc-\e Patrlc. Rizz*A.ss.ciatcs, [*r:. t r..(;lNtLRS.! l (!:{!l.rI_IA}AS SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. Sl-24 Equip.Class0d. OtherCheckor ManualValve EquipmentDescription LOOP 2 COLD LEG SI SUPCHECK VALVE SI-24 Location:Bldg. RCBX F fo o rEl . 718 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. lnstructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage l Is the anchorageconfigurationverificationrequired(i.e., is the item one X of the 50% of SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)? This valve is coveredin insulation and is in-line with an -8" pipe. Thesegmentof the pipe running through elevation 738 is laterally supportedabout 6ftfrom the valve's location.

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?
4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X N/A
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? X (Note:This questiononly appliesif the item is oneof the 50% for which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverse seismic conditions?

pc\te Sheet35 of56 Paulcl. Rizz.Associarss, Inc:. [\(; tt\it F_tts$. ( rtNs1.,L'Ii1II.i SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. Sl-24 Equip.Class0d. OtherCheckor ManualValve EquipmentDescription LOOP 2 COLD LEG SI SUP CHECK VALVE SI-24 Interaction Effects N/A

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X N/A
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?

N/A

9. Do attachedlineshaveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X 10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects?

Other AdverseConditions I l. Haveyou lookedfor and foundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedbv: t0lzsl2013 EddieM. Guerra 1012s12013 BrianA. Lucarelli

Sheet36 of 56 Paul C. Rizao AssociatcsrInc. Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. Sl-24 Equip.Class0d. OtherCheckor ManualValve EquipmentDescription LOOP 2 COLD LEG SI SUP CHECK VALVE SI-24 Other supportingor relevantdocumentsand File Name: 100_0463 jpe

Description:

GeneralView of Component(Below Grating) File Name: I SI 24 Uninsulatedjpg

Description:

GeneralView of Component (Picturefrom Valve TeamDocumentationProvided by PlantPersonnel)

pc-tte Sheet37 of 56 Paulc. Rizz.Assor:iatcs, Ir*:. t N{:tfilt_tis e, coN$.rLr.{NTs SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. SOV-lRC-1038 Equip.Class88. SolenoidValves EquipmentDescription SOV.RC.I03B Location:Bldg. RCBX Floor El. 767 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configurationverificationrequired(i.e.,is the item one X of the 50% of SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

This SOV is approximatelyI ft tall and is in line with a well supported l " diameter pipe Piping is supportedto the wall about 2 ftfrom the valve in one direction and about 5ft from the valve in the other direction by double-anglesupports.

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Valvefound in good condition.

4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? X (Note:This questiononly appliesif the item is oneof the 50% for which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Sheet38 of56 Paul C. Rizzo Asscrt:iatcs, lnr:. t s{ilfit}.Rt & l L}N!t_rf_r.{\-I \ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. SOV-lRC-103B Equip.Class88. SolenoidValves EquipmentDescription SOV-RC-I03B Interaction Effects N/A

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X Gap betweensolenoid operator andwall is approximately2 inches. The lateral restraint provided by thepipe supportsisjudged to be sfficient to prevent impact betweenoperator and wall.

N/A

8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?

NiA

9. Do attachedlineshaveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X Attachedlines identified with adequateflexibility.

10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects? Other AdverseConditions I l. Have you lookedfor and foundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffect the safety functionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: r0n0t2013 EddieM. Guerra 6*/fu Brian A. Lucarelli t0/r012013

Sheet39 of 5b Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Int:. E.r..(; I Ntf. RS $, uilNsl : t_l,rrNt t Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC) EquipmentID No. SOV-lRC-103B Equip.Class8B. SolenoidValves EquipmentDescription SOV-RC-I03B Othersupportingor relevantdocuments FileName:l 966.5pe

Description:

View of ComponentandID Tag e66j pe FileName:ll-67-966jpg

Description:

GeneralView of ComponentArea

Sheet40 of 56 Paul C. Rizzo Asrociatcs, Int:. Eli{ilNtt-Rs s r'oN51,:Lr.{sI.i SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. TV-lCC-107A Valves Equip.Class7. Pneumatic-Operated EquipmentDescription RCP IA THERM BARR CCR OUT ISOL.TV.CC-IO7A Location:Bldg. RCBX FloorEl. 718 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage L Is the anchorageconfigurationverificationrequired(i.e., is the item one X of the 50o/oof SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)? ThisAOV is about 4ft tall and is in line with a well supported-2" diameterpipe. It is also laterally supportedfrom adjacentwall. N/A

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X 3.ls the anchorage freeof corrosionthat is morethanmild surface X oxidation?

Valvefound in good condition.

4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? X (Note:This questiononly appliesif the item is oneof the 50% for which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Sheet4l of 56 Paul C. Riezo Assot:iatcs. f nc. [],1(;ll.ilf tis r\ t'1--]N!1.,1.L1$t ! SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. TV- I CC-107A Valves Equip.Class7. Pneumatic-Operated EquipmentDescription RCP IA THERM BARR CCR OUT ISOL.TV-CC.IO7A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?
9. Do attachedlineshaveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X A ttached I i nes i dentffied w it h adequateJl exibi Iily.

10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects? Other AdverseConditions I l. Haveyou lookedfor andfoundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby:

-ffi,twpL Date: t0lt0l20l3 EddieM. Guerra 6*/M Date: rclr0l20r3 BrianA. Lucarelli

Sheet42 of 56 ryPaul c. RizzoAssociatcs, Inc. ENGINEERS & C1)NSUITAIfT$ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. TV-ICC-I07A Equip. Class7. Pneumatic-OperatedValves EquipmentDescription RCP 1A THERM BARR CCR OUT ISOL.TV-CC-IO7A other supportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any): File Name: r-67-902.tp9

Description:

GeneralView of Component File Name: l 902.5p9

Description:

View of Additional LateralSupportat Valve Base

pC-? Sheet43 of56 

             &gl-c. RiezoAssociatcs, t Ni;lNIr n( a\ ( (llt\t I rrr,.

I_IAI..]\ SeismicWalkdown Checklist(SWC) Eq uipm ent I D No. T I-l C C -l 3 l C Equip.Class19.Temperature sensors Equipment Description CNMT RECIRCAIR COOLERSINLET LOOP #3 Location:Bldg. RCBX FloorEl. 692 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configurationverificationrequired(i.e.,is the item one X of the 50%o of SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

Small instrumentmountedon insulatedpipe - 8" diameter.Pipe is observedto be well supported. NiA

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?
4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? X (Note:This questiononly appliesif the item is oneof the 50Yofor which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Sheet44 of 56 PC-? Paul C, Rizztt Ass'r:iatcs, ltrt:. E\t;llr;[ER! ar I r ]N!1.: I-Lrr}fI.i SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. TI-1CC-l3lC Equip.Class19.Temperature sensors EquipmentDescription CNMT RECIRCAIR COOLERSINLET LOOP #3 Interaction Effects N/A

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X No potential interaction concernswere identified in the area.

N/A

8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?
9. Do attachedlineshaveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X 10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects?

Other AdverseConditions I l. Haveyou lookedfor andfoundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additional pagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: t0lr0l2al3 EddieM. Guerra 6*J# r0lr0l2013 Brian A. Lucarelli

Sheet45 of 56 R Pattl c' Rizzo Assoc:iatcs,Inc. [li(; I N[:t_ Rs &. {]{}NSt,r I-TA!\"I 5 Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. TI- I CC-l3 I C Equip.Class 19.Temperaturesensors EquipmentDescription CNMT RECIRC AIR COOLERSINLET LOOP #3 Othersupportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any): File Name: I 85ejpe

Description:

GeneralViewof Component

Sheet46 of 56 PCte Paul c, RiezoAssor:iarus, Inr:, I \ ( . l N I r . R l . ! r r l t i 5 t -l _ r . \ \ I s SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PCV-1IA- I I 7 Valves Equip.Class7. Pneumatic-Operated EquipmentDescription PRESSCONTROL VALVE PCV-IA.I 17 Location:Bldg. RCBX FloorEl. 767 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

l. Is the anchorageconfigurationverificationrequired(i.e., is the item one X of the 50% of SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

This is a small valve in line with a I " diameterpipe. Pipe is well supportedto the adjacentwall.

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Valvefound in good condition.

4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? X (Note: This questiononly appliesif the item is one of the 50o/ofor which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Sheet47 of 56 Paul C. Riezo Assor:iatcs, Irrc. FS(ilr.;tF_ttss foNst.rI.T'{tiI.i SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PCV-IIA-I l7 Valves Equip.Class7. Pneumatic-Operated EquipmentDescription PRESSCONTROL VALVE PCV.IA-I 17 Interaction Effects N/A

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X Adjacent scaffolding associatedwith the outageis temporary but well braced and judged not to present an interaction concern.
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?
9. Do attachedlines haveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X 10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects?

Other AdverseConditions I l Haveyou lookedfor andfoundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additional pagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: t0lr0l20t3 EddieM. Guerra 6*,rful r0lr0l20r3 Brian A. Lucarelli

Sheet48 of 56 Status: @ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist(SWC) E q u i p m e n tI D N o . P C V - II A - I I 7 Valves Equip.Class7. Pneumatic-Operated EquipmentDescription PRESSCONTROLVALVE PCV-IA-I I7 Other supportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if an F i l eN a m e :l - 6 8 - 9 aI j p g

Description:

GeneralView of Component

pC? Sheet49 of 56 Paul C. RizzoAss'ciatts,-I'c-tN(,tNIr R\ $. I r.!lt\1,' l_I.\\l'! SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PT.lRC-402 Equip.Class18.Instrument(on) Racks EquipmentDescription REACTOR COOLANT WIDE RANGE PRESSURE.PT.RC-402 Location:Bldg. RCBX FloorEl. 718 Manufacturer.Model. Etc. Instructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgments and findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

l. Is the anchorageconfigurationverificationrequired(i.e., is the item one X of the 50% of SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

This is a lightweight instrumentmountedon a steel rack. The rack is top braced to the wall by a steel angle and is bolted to the steelplatform below via 4-l/2" diameter bolts.

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?
4. Is the anchoragefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X N/A
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? X (Note:This questiononly appliesif the item is oneof the 50% for which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

pC-? Sheet50 of 56 Paul C. RiezoAss*ciatcs,Inc:. t:s(;ll.,il f lts s L o:isi. Lr,\\-I ! Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PT-1RC-402 Equip.Class18.Instrument(on) Racks EquipmentDescription REACTOR COOLANT WIDE RANGE PRESSURE,PT.RC-402 Interaction Effects N/A

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X Smallplastic container related to outageactivities identified adjacentto instrument rack. Potential interaction isjudged to be non-damaging,so this is not a seismic/structural concern.
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X andmasonryblockwalls not likely to collapseontothe equipment?

N/A

9. Do attachedlines haveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X Attachedlines identiJiedwith adequateJlexibility.

10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects? Other Adverse Conditions

11. Haveyou lookedfor and foundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffect the safetyfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additional pagesmay be addedas necessary)

Evaluatedbv: t0/1012013 EddieM. Guerra C*{fu BrianA. Lucarelli r0tr0t20t3

Sheet5l of56 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc. ENGIN EELC & (A)NSU TTA IfTf; Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PT-IRC-402 Equip.Class18.Instrument(on) Racks Equipment Description REACTORCOOLANTWIDE RANGEPRESSURE, PT-RC-402 Other suppgrti

Sheet52 of 56 Paul C. Riszo Associatcs,Inc. E&*CI NEf llS &. CONSI.! I.TAlrT$ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PT-IRC-402 Equip.Class18.Instrument(on) Racks EquipmentDescription REACTOR COOLANT WIDE RANGE PRESSURE,PT-RC.4O2

Description:

View o

Description:

View o

Sheet53 of 56 Paul C. Rizso AssociatcsrInc. N SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. PT-lRC-402 Equip.Class18.Instrument(on) Racks Equipment Description REACTORCOOLANTWIDERANGEPRESSURE, PT-RC-402 

                                                 @ounting           Configuration

pc\e Sheet54 of56 Paulc. RiezoAssociatcs, I*r:. [!{;lNfLR5 {* { ilNll.:l.I^}irS Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. MOV-I CH-3l0 Equip.Class8a. Motor-OperatedValves EquipmentDescription REGEN HX CHG HDR OUT ISOL,NORMAL CHARGING VALVE MOV.CH.3IO Location:Blde. RCBX FloorEl. 692 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the SeismicWalkdownof an item of equipmenton the SWEL. The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings.Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingothercomments. Anchorage

l. Is the anchorageconfigurationverificationrequired(i.e., is the item one X of the 50o/oof SWEL itemsrequiringsuchverification)?

The distancefrom the top of the actuator to the pipe center line is -3 ft This MOV has a Limitorque actuator and is laterally supportedto an adjacentwall by a steel brace member. N/A

2. Is the anchoragefree of bent,broken,missingor loosehardware? X
3. Is the anchoragefree of corrosionthat is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Valvefound in good condition.

4. Is the anchorasefree of visible cracksin the concretenearthe anchors? X
5. Is the anchorageconfigurationconsistentwith plant documentation? X (Note:This questiononly appliesif the item is oneof the 50% for which an anchorageconfigurationverificationis required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverseseismic conditions?

pct? Sheet55 of56 Paul c. Iliez* Associarr.s, I'c. t:\(;lNtltRl s ( oN\1.:t-I^lil.s Status: @ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. MOV- I CH-3l0 Equip.Class8a.Motor-Operated Valves EquipmentDescription REGENHX CHG HDR OUT ISOL.NORMAL CHARGING VALVE MOV-CH.3IO Interaction Effects N/A

7. Are soft targetsfree from impactby nearbyequipmentor structures? X
8. Are overheadequipment,distributionsystems,ceilingtiles and lighting, X and masonryblock walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?
9. Do attachedlines haveadequateflexibility to avoid damage? X A ttached I ines i dentifi ed wit h adequatefl exibil i ty.

10.Basedon the aboveseismicinteractionevaluations, is equipmentfree X of potentiallyadverseseismicinteractioneffects? Other AdverseConditions 11.Haveyou lookedfor and foundno otherseismicconditionsthat could adverselyaffect the safetyfunctionsof the equipment? X Comments(Additional pagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: t0lr0l2013 EddieM. Guerua e*{/ BrianA. Lucarelli Date: r0lt0l2013

Sheet56 of 56 SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC) EquipmentID No. MOV-ICH-310 Equip.Class8a.Motor-Operated Valves EquipmentDescription REGEN HX CHG HDROUT ISOL. NORMAL CHARGING VALVE MOV-CH.3IO Othersupportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any):

Description:

Gen omponent

pc-.e Pattl C. Riretr Assoc:iatcs. Irrrr. 

            !\(:tNl_ Ettt ai ( rllisl.rt_1,\:r..T*

Sheet1 of24 Status: @ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room BASEMENT Floor El. 692 Bldg. RCBX Instructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the Area Walk-By nearone or more SWEL items.The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings. Additionalspaceis providedat the endof this checklistfor documenting othercomments. Y

l. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of X potentiallyadverseseismicconditions(if visiblewithout necessarily openingcabinets)?
2. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of significant X degradedconditions?

Mild surface corrosion identified at baseplate of heat exchangersRS-E-IA, RS-E-]B, and RS-E-lC andjudged to not be a seismic/structuralconcern.

3. Basedon a visualinspectionfrom the floor, do the cable/conduit X racewaysand HVAC ductingappearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismicconditions(e.g.,conditionof supportsis adequate andfill conditionsof cabletraysappearto be insideacceptable limits)?

Y

4. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismicspatial X interactionswith otherequipmentin the area(e.g.,ceilingtiles and lighting)?

Relatedequipmenton SWEL for this area: RS-P-IA TI-ICC-I3IC PT-1RC-403 RS - E - I D MO V - I CH- 310

Parrl C. Riezo Assor:iatcs, Inc. I st,nt rjtr,i r rrs.LLr..rrL* Status: @ N Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room BASEMENT FloorEl. 692 Bldg. RCBX Interaction Effects N

5. Does it appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causeflooding or sprayin the area?

No concernsidentified regardingflood sources. Y N

6. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causea fire in the area?

No concernsidentffiedregardingfire sources. Y N U

7. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices,storageof portable equipment,andtemporaryinstallations (e.9.,scaffolding,leadshielding)?

Scaffoldingin the area identified to be well braced. Unrestraineddrums observedto be temporarily stored in vicinity of I VS-E-I Cfor outageactivities. Any potential interaction isjudged to be non-damagingon adjacent piping, thereforethis is not a signfficant interaction. N

8. Have you lookedfor and found no other seismicconditionsthat could X adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipmentin the area?

Comments (Additional pagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedbv: Date: t0/10t20r3 EddieM. Guerra Date: r0/t0/2013 BrianA. Lucarelli

Sheet3 of 24 I N(rlNr].Rt .\ {t}!{st-rl TAFIT Status: @ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room BASEMENT FloorEl. 692 Bldg. RCBX Othersupportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any): F i l eN a m e :l - 7 1 - 8 5 3 j p g

Description:

GeneralView of Area File Name: I 853 jpg

Description:

BarrelsJudgednot a SignificantInteraction

pc'\e Sheet4 of24 P*trl c. Riiz. Associatcs,I-'ri t \r. tNL[.ltss I,r]:t\L. t_L\N1r Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room PRESSURTZER CUBICLE FloorEl. 767 Bldg. RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the Area Walk-By nearone or more SWEL items.The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgments and findings. Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingother comments. N/A

1. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of X potentiallyadverseseismicconditions(if visiblewithout necessarily openingcabinets)?

N/A

2. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of significant X degradedconditions?

N/A

3. Basedon a visual inspectionfrom the floor, do the cableiconduit X racewaysand HVAC ductingappearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismicconditions(e.g.,conditionof supportsis adequate and fill conditionsof cabletraysappearto be insideacceptable limits)?
4. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismicspatial X interactions with otherequipmentin the area(e.g.,ceilingtiles and lighting)?

Relatedequipmenton SWEL for this area: MOV - lRC- 535 PCV.IRC-455D SOV-IRC-I 03B

pc\e Sheet5 of24 PatrlC. RiezoAsscrr:iatcs, I'r:. I \il lNF r_R5 at {. LlNSl I LT,{:\--I-s Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room PRESSURIZERCUBICLE Floor El. 767 Bldg. RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causeflooding or sprayin the area?

No concernsidentified regardingflood sources.

6. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causea fire in the area?

No concernsidentified regardingfire sources.

7. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices,storageof portable equipment,andtemporaryinstallations (e.g.,scaffolding,leadshielding)?

Severaltools and maintenanceequipmentassociatedwith the outagewere identified in the area. Thesedid not present a credible or significqnt interaction concernsince they were not closeenoughto the componentsin the areq.

8. Haveyou lookedfor andfoundno otherseismicconditionsthatcould X adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipmentin the area?

Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: t0ll0l2013 EddieM. Guera t0lt0l2013 Brian A. Lucarelli

Sheet6 of24 Paut C, Riezo Associatc*r, In(:. Eli(;tNIE RS S, r]0NSl. ;Lr,{!f-I 5 Status: @ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room PRESSURIZERCUBICLE Floor El. 767 Bldg. RCBX Othersupportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any): File Name: l-67-964.5p9

Description:

GeneralView InsideCubicle File Name: l 954.Spg

Description:

TemporaryEquipmentandPlatformNot InteractionConcerns

pc\" Sheet7 of24 Paul c. Rirz* Asxrciatcs,Im:. t \(,lfltI_tls $, I rllilI. t.r.\\I \ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room PRT CUBICLE Floor El. 718 Bldg. RCBX Instructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the Area Walk-By nearone or more SWEL items.The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgments and findings. Additionalspaceis providedat the endof this checklistfor documenting othercomments.

l. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of X potentiallyadverseseismicconditions(if visiblewithoutnecessarily openingcabinets)?
2. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of significant X degradedconditions?
3. Basedon a visualinspectionfrom the floor, do the cable/conduit X racewaysand HVAC ducting appearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismicconditions(e.g.,conditionof supportsis adequate andfill conditionsof cabletraysappearto be insideacceptable limits)?

N/A

4. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismicspatial X interactions with otherequipmentin the area(e.g.,ceilingtiles and lighting)?

Relatedequipmenton SWEL for this area: RS . E - 1D

8 of 24 PC" Paut C. Rizz. Associatcs,lnr:. E \-(, I N[l lts -\ r. t]N51,: I f ,ttr't I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room PRT CUBICLE FloorEl. 718 Bldg. RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causeflooding or sprayin the area?

No concernsidentified regardingflood sources.

6. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causea fire in the ared?

No concernsidentified regardingfire sources.

7. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices,storageof portable equipment,andtemporaryinstallations (e.9.,scaffolding,leadshielding)?

Scaffoldingin area identified to be well braced. Temporaryequipmentassociated with the outageis stagedin a laydown area awayfrom componentsand doesnot pose an interaction concern.

8. Have you lookedfor and found no other seismicconditionsthat could X adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipmentin the area?

Comments (Additional pagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: Date: tOlt0l20r3 EddieM. Guerra Date: r0tr0t20r3 Brian A. Lucarelli

Sheet9 of 24 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc. t Nc I NEt lts {i coNSI.t I.TAtfTs Status: @ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room PRT CUBICLE FloorEl. 7t8 Bldg. RCBX Other supportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any): r-67-e76jpe File Name:l-67-976jpg

Description:

View of Scaffoldingin Area File Name: r-68-e76 jpe l-68-976jpg

Description:

Laydown Area Away from Components

Sheetl0 of24 Paul C. Riezo Associatcs. Inc, [ \{;l}itElti $, t i}li!1,]l-f.r\ 1! Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RCBX 767 - OUTSIDECRANE WALL Floor El. 767 Bldg. RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the Area Walk-By nearoneor moreSWEL items.The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings. Additionalspaceis providedat the endof this checklistfor documenting othercomments. I . Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of X potentiallyadverseseismicconditions(if visiblewithoutnecessarily openingcabinets)?

2. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of significant X degradedconditions?
3. Basedon a visualinspectionfrom the floor, do the cable/conduit X racewaysand HVAC ductingappearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismicconditions(e.g.,conditionof supportsis adequate and fill conditionsof cabletraysappearto be insideacceptable limits)?
4. Doesit appearthatthe areais freeof potentiallyadverseseismicspatial X interactions with otherequipmentin the area(e.g.,ceilingtiles and lighting)?

Relatedequipmenton SWEL for this area: GN-TK.IB PCV-ll{-r17

of 24 PC\4 P..l c. Riezo 4::-r:lgl!,.: t\(,ttitLRt N { iI{!l l_L\-\Ii Status: Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RCBX 767 . OUTSIDECRANE WALL FloorEl. 767 Bldg. RCBX Interaction Effects Y

5. Does it appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causeflooding or sprayin the area?

No concernsidentified regardingflood sources. Y N/A

6. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causea fire in the area?

No concernsidentified regardingfire sources. Y

7. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices,storageof portable equipment,andtemporaryinstallations (e.9.,scaffolding,leadshielding)?

Scaffolding in area identffied to be well braced. Varioustemporary equipmentstaged in areafor outageactivities. No significantpotential interactionsidenttfied,as temporary equipmentis generally stored along outsidewallwhile componentsare located along inside wall. Y

8. Haveyou lookedfor and found no other seismicconditionsthat could X adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipmentin the area?

Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: Date: r0ll0l20r3 EddieM. Guerra Date: r0lr0l20r3 Brian A. Lucarelli

Sheet12 of 24 Paul C. Rizeo Associatcs, Inc. EItiG I NEE TT$& Cf}NSU TTA'liT$ Status: @ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RCBX 767 - OUTSIDE CRANE WALL FloorEl. 767 Bldg. RCBX Other supportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any): File Name: l-67-978jpg

Description:

GeneralView of Area File Name: l-68-978ipg

Description:

View of TemporaryEquipmentStagedfor Outage

pce Sheet13 of24 PautC. llizt* Associatcs, I,.,c-t\(; IHf ERS e Lt.}Nlt.j I_IAS-I-i Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RCBX 7I8 - OUTSIDECRANE WALL Floor El. 718 Bldg. RCBX Instructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the Area Walk-By nearoneor moreSWEL items.The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings. Additionalspaceis providedat the endof this checklistfor documenting othercomments.

l. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of X potentiallyadverseseismicconditions(if visiblewithout necessarily openingcabinets)?
2. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of significant X degradedconditions?
3. Basedon a visual inspectionfrom the floor, do the cable/conduit X racewaysand HVAC ductingappearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismicconditions(e.g.,conditionof supportsis adequate and fill conditionsof cabletraysappearto be insideacceptable limits)?
4. Doesit appearthatthe areais freeof potentiallyadverseseismicspatial X interactions with otherequipmentin the area(e.g.,ceilingtilesand lighting)?

Relatedequipmenton SWEL for this area: PC V . CC- I O I LT-1FW-475 PT-IRC-402

pc\? Sheetl4 of24 Paul c. RizzoAssociatcs, I'c. [\i, tNLtR$ {r r]ONiLr f-rA:;1 t Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RCBX 718 - OUTSIDE CRANE WALL FloorEl. 718 Bldg. RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causeflooding or sprayin the area?

No concernsidentified regardingflood sources.

6. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causea fire in the area?

No concernsidentified regardingfire sources.

7. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsassociated with housekeepingpractices,storageof portable equipment,andtemporaryinstallations (e.g.,scaffolding,leadshielding)?

Temporaryscaffoldingand equipmentfor outageactivities were identified in the area. No significant potential interactionsidentified, as temporary equipmentis generally stored along outsidewall while componentsare located along inside wall.

8. Haveyou lookedfor andfoundno otherseismicconditionsthat could X adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipmentin the area?

Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedbv: r0n0t20r3 r0n0l20t3 Brian A. Lucarelli

Sheet15 of 24 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcsr Inc. []a(; I NEt RS {5. f ONstJ LT.{tt"I s Status: @ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RCBX 718 - OUTSIDE CRANE WALL FloorEl. 7r8 Bldg. RCBX Othersupportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any): l-67-e7s File Name: r-67 -975jpe jpg

Description:

GeneralView of Area r-68-97s File Name: l-68-975 jpe jpg

Description:

GeneralView of Area

Sheet16of24 Paul C. Riezo Associatr:s, [ut:, lN(;tl{[r.E! $ L i]N\t' t r,\\]-t Status: @ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RCBX 718- A CUBICLE Floor El. 718 Bldg. RCBX Instructionsfor CompletingChecklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the Area Walk-By nearone or more SWEL items.The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings. Additionalspaceis providedat the endof this checklistfor documenting othercomments.

l. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of X potentiallyadverseseismicconditions(if visiblewithoutnecessarily openingcabinets)?
2. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of significant X degradedconditions?
3. Basedon a visual inspectionfrom the floor, do the cable/conduit X racewaysand HVAC ductingappearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismicconditions(e.g.,conditionof supportsis adequate and fill conditionsof cabletrays appearto be insideacceptablelimits)?
4. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismicspatial X interactionswith otherequipmentin the area(e.g.,ceilingtilesand lighting)?

Relatedequipmenton SWEL for this area: TV - I CC- I O 7A

Sheet17of 24 Paul C. Rizzo Assot:iatcs, Irrc, I N(;llil !_Rt a* ( (lNst ll l-r\sl\ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RCBX 718 - A CUBICLE Floor El. 718 Bldg. RCBX Interaction Effects N/A

5. Doesit appearthatthe areais freeof potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causeflooding or sprayin the area?

No concernsidentified regardingflood sources. N/A

6. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causea fire in the area?

No concernsidentified regardingJire sources.

7. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsassociated practices,storageof portable with housekeeping equipment,andtemporaryinstallations (e.g.,scaffolding,leadshielding)?

Scaffoldingin area identified to be well braced.

8. Haveyou lookedfor andfoundno otherseismicconditionsthat could X adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipmentin the area?

Comments(Additional pagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: lall0/2013 EddieM. Guerra r0ll0l20r3 Brian A. Lucarelli

Sheetl8 of24 Paul C. Rizeo Associatcs, Inc. EN-CI N EERS e, (a)NSt-! I.TAifTS Status: @ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) IIAIICUBICLE Room RCBX 718 - FloorEl. 718 Bldg. RCBX Other supportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any): File Name: l-67 -977.Spe

Description:

GeneralView InsideCubicle FileName: l-68-977.Spg

Description:

View of Scaffoldingin Area

pct? Sheet19 of24 Patrlc. Rizz. Ass'ciatcs,Inc, t\(.tNI F_R!r\ LON\l l.I_\\ l ! Status: @ N Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RCBX 718. B CUBICLE FloorEl. 718 Bldg. RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the Area Walk-By nearone or more SWEL items.The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings. Additional spaceis providedat the end of this checklistfor documentingother comments. N U N/A

l. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of X potentiallyadverseseismicconditions(if visiblewithoutnecessarily openingcabinets)?

Y N U N/A

2. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of significant X degradedconditions?

Y N N/A

3. Basedon a visual inspectionfrom the floor, do the cable/conduit X racewaysand HVAC ductingappearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismicconditions(e.g.,conditionof supportsis adequate and fill conditionsof cabletraysappearto be insideacceptable limits)?

Y N U NiA

4. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismicspatial X interactions with otherequipmentin the area(e.g.,ceilingtilesand lighting)?

Relatedequipmenton SWEL for this area: sr-24

Sheet20 of24 PC-? laul C. Riez. Ass.t:iatcs, I*t:. []-{;lN[].lit .! l {!N!1.:Lti\\1S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RCBX 7I8 - B CUBICLE Floor El. 718 Bldg. RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causeflooding or sprayin the area?

No concernsidentified regardingflood sources.

6. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causea fire in the area?

No concernsidentified regardingfire sources.

7. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsassociated with housekeepingpractices,storageof portable equipment,andtemporaryinstallations (e.9.,scaffolding,leadshielding)?

Scaffoldingin area identffied to be well braced. Insulation stored in area identified to beproperly restrained.

8. Haveyou lookedfor andfoundno otherseismicconditionsthat could X adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipmentin the area?

Comments(Additionalpagesmay be addedas necessary) 

                                                           -r Evaluatedby:                                                                          Date: 10t25t2013 EddieM. Guerra Date: t0/2s/2013 BrianA. Lucarelli

Sheet2l of 24 Patrl C. Rizzo Associatcs, [nr:. IN(;lNf ERS sa t i]NSt:l-T,{NTl Status: @ N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RCBX 718. B CUBICLE FloorEl. Bldg. RCBX Othersupportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any): File Name: 100_0435 jpg

Description:

GeneralView InsideCubicle File Name: 100_0437qpg

Description:

View of InsulationStorageArea

pc.t? Sheet22 of 24 Paul c. Riet. Assqrciatcs, Irrr:. L S{ilNt:r.Rs.! r r}liJt.t t_IA51 5! Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RHR PLATFORM Floor El. 707 Bldg. RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be usedto documentthe resultsof the Area Walk-By nearone or more SWEL items.The spacebelow eachof the following questionsmay be usedto recordthe resultsofjudgmentsand findings. Additionalspaceis providedat the endof this checklistfor documenting othercomments. I . Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of X potentiallyadverseseismicconditions(if visiblewithoutnecessarily openingcabinets)?

2. Doesanchorageof equipmentin the areaappearto be free of significant X degradedconditions?

N/A

3. Basedon a visual inspectionfrom the floor, do the cableiconduit X racewaysand HVAC ductingappearto be free of potentiallyadverse seismicconditions(e.g.,conditionof supportsis adequate andfill conditionsof cabletraysappearto be inside acceptable limits)?

N/A

4. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismicspatial X interactions with otherequipmentin the area(e.g.,ceilingtiles and lighting)?

Relatedequipmenton SWEL for this area: RH.P-IA

Sheet23 of24 PC.'te Patrlc. Riz:' l$ggetrr 1u., [ !i(;lti[ERS $. I r))i\L: LI\51 t Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RHR PLATFORM Floor El. 707 Bldg. RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causeflooding or sprayin the area?

No concernsidentified regardingflood sources.

6. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsthat could causea fire in the area?

No concernsidentified regardingfire sources.

7. Doesit appearthat the areais free of potentiallyadverseseismic X interactionsassociated practices,storageof portable with housekeeping equipment,and temporaryinstallations(e.g.,scaffolding,leadshielding)?
8. Haveyou lookedfor andfoundno otherseismicconditionsthat could X adverselyaffectthe safetyfunctionsof the equipmentin the area?

Comments(Additional pagesmay be addedas necessary) Evaluatedby: t0lt0l2al3 EddieM. Guerra 

                            &"tf-li                                                   t0lr0l20t3 Brian A. Lucarelli

Sheet24 of 24 Paul C. Rizzo Arsociatesr Inc. Status: Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Room RT{RPLATFORM Floor El. 707 Bldg. RCBX Other supportingor relevantdocumentsand photos(if any): File Name: l-69-t79jpg

Description:

GeneralView of Heat Exchangeron Platform File Name: l-67-880jpg

Description:

View of Rigidly SupportedPiping}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=L-13-376,_Addendum_to_the_Beaver_Valley_Power_Station,_Unit_No._1,_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3_Seismic_Walkdown_Report&oldid=2634952"