ML043170077

Change Summary, Ncr/Facility Comments with Form ES-401-9 (Folder 2)

ML043170077
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	10/05/2004
From:	Altic B Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Conte R, Todd Fish NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
Shared Package
ML041450472	List: ML043170077 ML043170098 ML043170125 ML043170132 ML043170136 ML043220135 ML050350303 ML050350306 ML050350313
References
Download: ML043170077 (8)

Text

ENTERGY - I N D I A N P O I N T ENERGY CENTER TO: TODD FISH, CHIEF EXAMINER FROM B I U ALTIC, AUTHOR - IP2 OPERATING EXAMINATION

SUBJECT:

CHANGE

SUMMARY

DATE: 10/5/2004 SCENARIOS Scenario I :

Removed Event 4,23 RCP High Vibration. BOP operator Task, not needed. Renumbered all subsequent events.

Reworded Critical Task 3 to Stop all SI pumps within 45 minutes of SI actuation. Original wording is valid for initiation from 100% power only. 45 minute limit is per the IP2 UFSAR.

Revised the initial conditions to provide turnover with Main Feedwater already in service. This eliminates the actions to shift from Auxiliary Feedwater to Main Feedwater; task not needed.

Scenario 2:

Added note to event description for events 1 and 2 to indicate that these events require SRO Technical Specification reference.

Changed scenario initial conditions to provide a required BOP operator action to start a Non-Essential SWP after loss of Bus 6A. Added note to setup to ensure that 23 S W P is in service.

Scenario 3:

Added note to event description for events 2 and 3 to indicate that these events require SRO Technical Specification reference.

Revised wording of event description for event 7 to more accurately reflect the malfunction.

Both recirculation pumps will not start vice fail to auto start. Added further clarification that RHR will be used for low head recirculation.

Added to shift turnover instructions: Reactor Engineer recommends that control rods be withdrawn 10 steps prior to continuing dilution.

Scenario 4:

Added note to event description for event 2 to indicate that this event requires SRO Technical Specification reference.

Swapped sequence of events 2 and 3 to improve scenario flow path.

Added a new event number 5: AFW Flow Control Valve to faulted SG does not close from the Control Room. Renumbered subsequent event.

JPMS Sim-D Replaced RCP MalfunctionJPM with a bank JPM. New task has better discriminatory value.

Simplified initial conditions and initiating cue to improve/clarifj directions for applicant. Added critical step to attempt start of 23 Aux F W Pump.

Increased scope of task to include removal of instrument control power. Additional steps improve discriminatory value of the JPM.

Phnt-I Replaced JPM with new task to improve discriminatory value. New task is also a new alternate path JPM.

Admin RO-2 Removed SRO level steps from task performance. JPM includes only RO level actions.

2

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-9 Review Worksheet

[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix 6 for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]

1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.

2. - - -

Enter the level of difficulty (LOD)of each question using a 1 5 (easy difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 4 range are acceptable).

3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:

The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

One or more t@wmedistractors is not credible.

One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradictedby stem).

4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

The question is no! linked to the job requirements @e., the question has a valid WA but, as written, is.not peerational in content).

The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific f0.r the c!osed reference test mode (i.e.., it is not required to.be known from memory).

The question contains data with an unrealistic !eve1 of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved WA and those that are desianated SRO-only (WA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

6. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

7. At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

33 of 34 NUREG-I 021, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9 Explanation 34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9 34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9