ML043170125

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Draft - Section a Operating (Folder 2)
ML043170125
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/22/2004
From: Christman R
Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, Entergy Nuclear Northeast
To: Conte R
NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
Shared Package
ML041450472 List:
References
ES-C-1, NUREG-1021, R09
Download: ML043170125 (59)


Text

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility: Indian Point 2 Task No: 3430040103 Task

Title:

Determine minimum staffing requirement and determine from Operations schedule which personnel cadcannot be called in WA

Reference:

GKA2.1.5 (2.3/3.4) Job Performance Measure No: RO-1 Examinee: NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator: Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance X Actual Performance Classroom X Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: Today is August 12. Ken Garnache called in sick. Frank Spagnuolo has become ill and is being sent home.

Task Standard: All of the ROs on the schedule have been evaluated and a determination made regarding who can be called in without violating requirements.

Required Materials: IP-SMM-OP-103, Overtime Scheduling Guidelines Ops Schedule handout General

References:

I P-SMM-OP-103, Overtime Scheduling Guidelines Initiating Cue: Review the attached schedule and determine who can or cannot be called in for replacing the leaving RO without waiving overtime requirements.

Time Critical Task: NO Validation Time: 15 minutes 1 Of4 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Appendix C 2 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step: Reviews the Ops Schedule and IP-SMM-OP-103 requirements.

Standard: Schedule and procedure reviewed.

Comment:

42. Performance Step: Determines the following personnel can work the entire shift without any violations:

Standard: Cosentino, Gorman, Gaspar identified as able to work the entire shift without any violations.

Comment:

d 3. Performance Step: Determines the following personnel would result in a violation if called in for the entire shift.

Standard: Rowland (any hours worked before 1900 on 8/12 would exceed required hours)

Campbell (worked the midnight shift and went home. Needs an 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> break between shifts)

Owen (Scheduled to work the oncoming night shift. Any hours before 1500 today would exceed the 16/24 limit.)

Comment:

Terminating Cue: Personnel available to call in identified.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 2 of 4

Simulator Setup VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. RO-1 Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

3 of 4

INITIATING CUES:

1. Today is August 12.
2. Ken Garnache called in sick.
3. Frank Spagnuolo has become ill anG ,A being sen iome.
4. Review the attached schedule and determine who can or cannot be called in for replacing the leaving RO without waiving overtime requirements.
5. Who can work the entire shift?

TASK STANDARD:

Personnel who can and cannot work the entire shift identified and reasons why stated.

RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility: Indian Point 2 Task No: 3430040103 Task

Title:

Determine minimum staffing requirement and determine from Operations schedule which personnel canhannot be called in WA

Reference:

GKA2.1.5 (2.3/3.4) Job Performance Measure No: SROI-1 Examinee: NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator: Date:

Method of testina:

Simulated Performance X Actual Performance Classroom X Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: Today is August 12. Ken Garnache called in sick. Frank Spagnuolo has become ill and is being sent home.

Task Standard: All of the ROs on the schedule have been evaluated and a determination made regarding who can be called in without violating requirements.

Required Materials: IP-SMM-OP-103, Overtime Scheduling Guidelines Ops Schedule handout General

References:

IP-SMM-OP-103, Overtime Scheduling Guidelines Initiating Cue: Review the attached schedule and determine who can c :annot be called in for replacing the leaving RO without waiving overtime requirements.

Time Critical Task: NO Validation Time: 15 minutes 1 of4 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Amendix C 2 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step: Reviews the Ops Schedule and IP-SMM-OP-103 requirements.

Standard: Schedule and procedure reviewed.

Comment:

~ ~~

4 2. Performance Step: Determines the following personnel can work the entire shift without any violations:

Standard: Cosentino, Gorman, Gaspar identified as able to work the entire shift without any violations.

Comment:

d 3. Performance Step: Determines the following personnel would result in a violation if called in for the entire shift.

Standard: Rowland (any hours worked before 1900 on 8/12 would exceed required hours)

Campbell (worked the midnight shift and went home. Needs an 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> break between shifts)

Owen (Scheduled to work the oncoming night shift. Any hours before 1500 today would exceed the 16/24 limit.)

Comment:

Terminating Cue: Personnel available to call in identified.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 2 of 4

Simulator Setup VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. SROI-1 Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

3 of 4

INITIATING CUES:

1. Today is August 12.
2. Ken Garnache called in sick.
3. Frank Spagnuolo has become ill and is being sent home.
4. Review the attached schedule and determine who can or cannot be called in for replacing the leaving RO without waiving overtime requirements.
5. Who can work the entire shift?

TASK STANDARD:

Personnel who can and cannot work the entire shift identified and reasons why stated.

RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED

AUG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Remarks 8 9 29 Cosentino, Mike RO ~ 27__ _ _ -

27 27 0_ _ _ _ 0 0 __- -

26 26 26 v__

~

29 Gorman, Jim RO V V.- _____ V

- 0 __ 0___ 0 26 26 26 Rowland, Roy RO 27 27 27 0 0 26 26 26 26 2c Campbell, Pete RO 0 T T T T T 0 27 27 2c Gaspar, Joe RO 0 T T T T T 0 27 27 2c Owen, Dave RO 0 T T T T T 0 27 27 2E Garnach, Ken RO 26 0 2E Rohla, Ross RO 0 0 2E Spagnuolo, Frank RO 27 0 0 26 26 26 26 0 0

AUG AUG 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 26 0 0 0 0 0 __0 0 _ _

V

_ ~ ~ .-

v ~

V -__ 0 26 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 26 26 26 26 26 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 26 26 0 27 0 26 0 I--

26 - ---

26 26 26 26 0 0 0 27 0 0 o i -. ___

27 0 0 26 0 27 27 27 27 0 0 27 27 27 0 0 0 27 27 27 27 27 27 0 0 27 27 0 0 27 27 27 27 0 26 26 0 26 26 0

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility: Indian Point 2 Task No: 0100010401 Task

Title:

Application of Technical Specifications, determine that tripping bistables will cause a reactor trip.

WA

Reference:

GKA2.1.12 (2.9/4.0) Job Performance Measure No: RO-2 Examinee: NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator: Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance Actual Performance X Classroom Simulator X Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: Pressurizer Pressure Channel 1 failed low. Applicable actions of AOP-INST-1 complete. Subsequently, the Loop 2 NR Tcold instrument has failed low. Loop 2 Tave and Loop 2 Delta-T have been defeated and Rod Control and Charging Pump speed controls have been returned to Automatic per AOP-INST-1.

Task Standard:

Required Materials: 2-AOP-INST-1 Technical Specifications General

References:

2-AOP-INST-1 Technical Specifications Initiating Cue: CRS has directed you to evaluate Technical Specifications to determine required actions and place the associated bistables to trip.

Time Critical Task:

Validation Time: 25 minutes NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Appendix C 2 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step: Reviews AOP-INST-1 actions for failed temperature channel Standard: AOP-INST-1 actions reviewed.

Comment:

42. Performance Step: Reviews Technical Specification 3.3.1, RPS Instrumentation Reviews Table 3.3.1 -1 and determines that Function 5 and Function 6 each have one inoperable channel.

Determines 3.3.1 Condition E applies requiring placing the channel in trip within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />, or be in Mode 3 within 78 hours9.027778e-4 days <br />0.0217 hours <br />1.289683e-4 weeks <br />2.9679e-5 months <br />.

Standard: Function 5 and Function 6 identified. Condition E applicability identified. 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> LCO identified.

Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 2 of 7

Appendix C 3 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark) d 3. Performance Step: Reviews Technical Specification 3.3.2, ESFAS Instrumentation Reviews Table 3.3.2-1 and determines that Function 1.f and Function 4.d each have one inoperable channel.

Determines 3.3.2 Condition D applies requiring placing the channel in trip within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />, or be in Mode 3 within 78 hours9.027778e-4 days <br />0.0217 hours <br />1.289683e-4 weeks <br />2.9679e-5 months <br />.

Standard: Function 1.f and Function 4.d identified. Condition D applicability identified.

72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> LCO identified.

Comment:

~ _ _ _ ~

CUE: You have been directed to determine which bistables to trip and then trip them.

d 3. Performance Step: Reviews 2-AOP-INST-1 Attachment 9 Determines that tripping the (Loop 2) Overtemp Trip bistable will actuate a reactor trip.

Standard: Determines that tripping the (Loop 2) Overtemp Trip bistable will actuate a reactor trip.

CUE: SM directs you to leave the (Loop 2) Overtemp Trip bistable untripped.

Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 3 of 7

Appendix C 4 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark) 4 4. Performance Step: Places the (Loop 1) Overpwer Trip and (Loopl) Lo TAVG bistables to TRIP Standard: ONLY the two bistables placed in TRIP. Reactor trip does NOT occur.

CUE: If necessary, cue the candidate that SM directs him to review Technical Specification applicability with the untripped (Loop 1) Overtemp Trip bistable.

Comment:

.\I 5. Performance Step: Reviews Table 3.3.1 -1 and Table 3.3.2-1 and determines that now with two channels of OT-Delta-T inoperable, there is no specification, therefore LCO 3.0.3 applies.

Standard: Determines that LCO 3.0.3 applies.

L, Comment:

Terminating Cue: Technical Specifications reviewed and LCO entry identified due to inability to trip all required bistables.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 4 of 7

Appendix C 5 Form ES-C-1 VERI FICAT10N 0F COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. SROI-2 Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 5 of 7

Simulator Setup Reset simulator to IC-129 Insert malfunction:

Actions of INST-1 completed for failed PRZ CH-1 low, and Loop2 Tcold failed low with Loop 2 tave and delta-T defeated, rods in auto and Chg in auto.

6 of 7

INITIATING CUES:

1. Pressurizer Pressure Channel 1 failed low.
2. Applicable actions of AOP-INST-1 complete.
3. Subsequently, the Loop 2 NR Tcold instrument has failed low.
4. Loop 2 Tave and Loop 2 Delta-T have been defeated and Rod Control and Charging Pump speed controls have been returned to Automatic per AOP-INST-1. Step 4.141 is in progress.

TASK STANDARD:

CRS has directed you to evaluate Technical Specifications to determine required actions and place the associated bistables to trip. Identify all applicable LCOs, Conditions, required actions, and completion times.

RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLEmD

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility: Indian Point 2 Task No: 0100010401 Task

Title:

Application of Technical Specifications, determine that tripping bistables will cause a reactor trip.

WA

Reference:

GKA2.1.12 (2.9/4.0) Job Performance Measure No: SROI-2 Examinee: NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator: Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance Actual Performance Classroom Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: Pressurizer Pressure Channel 1 failed low. Applicable actions of AOP-INST-1 complete. Subsequently, the Loop 2 NR Tcold instrument has failed low. Loop 2 Tave and Loop 2 Delta-T have been defeated and Rod Control and Charging Pump speed controls have been returned to Automatic per AOP-INST-1.

Task Standard:

Required Materials: 2-AOP-INST-1 Technical Specifications General

References:

2-AOP-INST-1 Technical Specifications Initiating Cue: CRS has directed you to evaluate Technical Specifications to determine required actions and place the associated bistables to trip.

Time Critical Task:

Validation Time: 25 minutes 1 Of7 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Appendix C 2 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step: Reviews AOP-INST-1 actions for failed temperature channel Standard: AOP-INST-1 actions reviewed.

Comment:

~ __ ~~

42. Performance Step: Reviews Technical Specification 3.3.1, RPS Instrumentation Reviews Table 3.3.1 -1 and determines that Function 5 and Function 6 each have one inoperable channel.

Determines 3.3.1 Condition E applies requiring placing the channel in trip within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />, or be in Mode 3 within 78 hours9.027778e-4 days <br />0.0217 hours <br />1.289683e-4 weeks <br />2.9679e-5 months <br />.

Standard: Function 5 and Function 6 identified. Condition E applicability identified. 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> LCO identified.

Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 2 of 7

Appendix C 3 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark) d 3. Performance Step: Reviews Technical Specification 3.3.2, ESFAS Instrumentation Reviews Table 3.3.2-1 and determines that Function 1.f and Function 4.d each have one inoperable channel.

Determines 3.3.2 Condition D applies requiring placing the channel in trip within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />, or be in Mode 3 within 78 hours9.027778e-4 days <br />0.0217 hours <br />1.289683e-4 weeks <br />2.9679e-5 months <br />.

Standard: Function 1 .f and Function 4.d identified. Condition D applicability identified.

72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> LCO identified.

Comment:

CUE: You have been directed to determine which bistables to trip and then trip them.

4 3. Performance Step: Reviews 2-AOP-INST-1 Attachment 9 Determines that tripping the (Loop 2) Overtemp Trip bistable will actuate a reactor trip.

Standard: Determines that tripping the (Loop 2) Overtemp Trip bistable will actuate a reactor trip.

CUE: SM directs you to leave the (Loop 2) Overtemp Trip bistable untripped.

Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 3 of 7

Appendix C 4 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

~ ~

d 4. Performance Step: Places the (Loop 1) Overpwer Trip and (Loopl) Lo TAVG bistables to TRIP Standard: ONLY the two bistables placed in TRIP. Reactor trip does NOT occur.

CUE: If necessary, cue the candidate that SM directs him to review Technical Specification applicability with the untripped (Loop 1) Overtemp Trip bistable.

Comment:

d 5. Performance Step: Reviews Table 3.3.1 -1 and Table 3.3.2-1 and determines that now with two channels of OT-Delta-T inoperable, there is no specification, therefore LCO 3.0.3 applies.

Standard: Determines that LCO 3.0.3 applies.

Comment:

Terminating Cue: Technical Specifications reviewed and LCO entry identified due to inability to trip all required bistables.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 4 of 7

Appendix C 5 Form ES-C-1 VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. SROI-2 Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 5 of 7

Simulator Setup Reset simulator to IC-129 Insert malfunction:

Actions of INST-1 completed for failed PRZ CH-1 low, and Loop2 Tcold failed low with Loop 2 tave and delta-T defeated, rods in auto and Chg in auto.

6 of 7

INITIATING CUES:

1. Pressurizer Pressure Channel 1 failed low.
2. Applicable actions of AOP-INST-1 complete.
3. Subsequently, the Loop 2 NR Tcold instrument has failed low.
4. Loop 2 Tave and Loop 2 Delta-T have been defeated and Rod Control and Charging Pump speed controls have been returned to Automatic per AOP-INST-1. Step 4.141 is in progress.

TASK STANDARD:

CRS has directed you to evaluate Technical Specifications to determine required actions and place the associated bistables to trip. Identify all applicable LCOs, Conditions, required actions, and completion times.

RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility: Indian Point 2 Task No: 2000360101 Task

Title:

Conduct an emergency tagout removal WA

Reference:

GKA 2.2.1 3 (3.6/3.8) Job Performance Measure No: RO-3 Examinee: NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator: Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance X Actual Performance Classroom Simulator X Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: 25 Fan Cooler Unit was tagged out for vibration survey. Subsequently, 21 Containment Spray Pump was determined to be inoperable. The SM has determined that an emergency removal of the 25 FCU tagout is required.

Task Standard: Conduct an Emergency Tagout Removal in accordance with OAP-022 Section 4.8.6 Required Materials: Tagout, Copy of OAP-022 General

References:

OAP-022 Protective Tagging Initiating Cue: Perform an emergency removal of the tagout on 25 Fan Cooler Unit Time Critical Task: No Validation Time: 20 minutes NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Appendix C 2 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step: Obtain copy of tagout tag removal sheet Standard: Tagout in hand Comment: CRS gives examinee the tagout d 2. Performance Step: Remove tag from 25 FCU Control Switch Standard: Tag removed.

Comment:

.\, 3. Performance Step: 25 FCU Control Switch placed in AUTO Standard: Switch in AUTO Comment: If necessary, inform candidate that the CRS has directed the BOP RO to start 25 FCU after the tagout removal is complete.

d 4. Performance Step: 25 FCU Normal Outlet Control Switch Caution Tag Removed Standard: Tag removed.

Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 2 of 5

Appendix C 3 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

45. Performance Step: 25 CRF LOCAUREMOTE Switch tag removed.

NOTE: This switch is located in the plant (the others are all in the CCWSimulator. The candidate will display his ability to utilize the tagging procedure with the first two tags, so the third tag is not required.

CUE: Direct candidate to state the location of the switch. Then inform the candidate that the tag is removed.

Standard: Location of switch is known. Candidate states that the switch is in the 480V room (on the west wall)

Comment: Tag is now removed.

46. Performance Step: Document as left position on tagout sheet.

Standard: Complete tagout sheet documentation.

Comment:

47. Performance Step: Notify CCR that tagout has been removed.

Standard: Calls CCR Comment: Acknowledge as CCR that tagout has been removed.

Terminating Cue: Emergency Tagout removal is completed.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 3 of 5

Appendix C 4 Form ES-C-1 VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. RO-3 Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 4 of 5

INITIATING CUES:

25 Fan Cooler Unit was tagged out for vibration survey.

Subsequently, 21 Containment Spray Pump was determined to be inoperable.

The SM has determined that an emergency removal of the 25 FCU tagout is required TASK STANDARD: Perform an emergency removal of the tagout on 25 Fan Cooler Unit RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility: Indian Point 2 Task No: 2000100202 Task

Title:

Conduct an emergency tagout removal WA

Reference:

GKA 2.2.1 3 (3.W3.8) Job Performance Measure No: SROI-3 Examinee: NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator: Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance Actual Performance xx xx Classroom Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: 25 Fan Cooler Unit was tagged out for vibration monitoring.

Subsequently, 21 Containment Spray Pump was determined to be inoperable. The SM has determined that an emergency removal of the 25 FCU tagout is required.

Task Standard: Conduct an Emergency Tagout Removal in accordance with OAP-022 Section 4.8.6 Required Materials: Tagout, Copy of OAP-022 General

References:

OAP-022 Protective Tagging Initiating Cue: Perform an emergency removal of the tagout on 25 Fan Cooler Unit Time Critical Task: No Validation Time: 20 minutes 1 Of5 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Appendix C 2 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step: Obtain copy of tagout Standard: Tagout in hand Comment: Give examinee the tagout

~

d 2. Performance Step: Obtain copy of OAP-022 Standard: Examinee locates section 4.8.6 of OAP-022 Comment:

d 3. Performance Step: Evaluate whether the tagout can be safely released.

Standard: Examinee determines no work has actually started and system is available.

Comment: No physical work has started and system is intact.

.( 4. Performance Step: Sign off all tagout holders and work order holders.

Standard: Examinee signs off all indicated tagout holders and work order holders.

Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 2 of 5

Armendix C 3 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark) d 5. Performance Step: Document reason for emergency release on tagout.

Standard: Write reason for release on tagout.

Comment:

~~

46. Performance Step: Notify all tagout and work order holders of the tagout removal Standard: All holders notified.

Comment: Acknowledge candidates statements that all tag and work order holders are notified.

Terminating Cue: Emergency Tagout removal is completed.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 3 of 5

Appendix C 4 Form ES-C-1 VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. SRO-3 Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 4 of 5

INITIATING CUES:

25 Fan Cooler Unit was tagged out for vibration survey.

Subsequently, 21 Containment Spray Pump was determined to be inoperable.

The SM has determined that an emergency removal of the 25 FCU tagout is required TASK STANDARD: Perform an emergency removal of the tagout on 25 Fan Cooler Unit RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED

Tagout Tag L(

Clearance: 2C;  !!1!!!!1!!!!1 DO NOTHANG OR CLEAR TAGS U Indian ~ .2 THE TAGOUT TAG LIST !111!!!1111 08/19/2004 14:02

~ - -

Tag Serial No.

~

-I Tag ?Equipment Type 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1

/* Equipment Description Equipment Location

_ I __

Place. 1st Place. 2nd Verif Verif DatelTirne DatelTime 3est Restoration Seq Configuration

  • Notes As Left Rest. 1s Configuratior Verif Datemirr test. 2nd Verif latemime 0 /Danger HC-25CRF-1S 1 PULLOUT 3 AUTO AUTO 1

I I* 25 FAN CNTMT RECIRC 480 V BUS 6A CCR CONTROL SWITCH

  • RESTORE AS PER 25CRF AS PER SOP COL 10.3 and SOP I PANEL SB-2 10.3, THEN APPLY 10.3

/* IP2-CB TAGOUT 2 CLOSED CLOSED I ......................... ---------------_

  • 25CRF NORMAL OUTLET CCR
  • RESTORE AS PER CONTROL SWITCH COL 10.3 and SOP I  ;* IP2-CCR 10.3 0 IDanger HC-25CRF-2S 1 REMOTE REMOTE j_ - - ----- --------------- - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - ----------------
  • 25CRF LOCAUREMOTE SWITCH I /* IP2-CB I--- -

I - .- _ _ _ . ~

Component Print Number hCY5CRF-1S 2-COL-10.3 Step 3.4 1111!111!1!11 &Q NQTHANG QR CLEAR TAGS USING THE TAGOUT TAG LlST 11111111111 Page I of I

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility: Indian Point 2 Task No: 0680010101 Task

Title:

Calculate and Record a Liquid Radioactive Release for #I 4 Liquid Waste Distillate Storage Tank WA

Reference:

Job Performance Measure No: RO-4 Examinee: NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator: Date:

Method of testing:

Simulated Performance Actual Performance X Classroom X SimuIator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: The Unit is operating at 100% power. All radiation monitors are operable. Liquid Waste Distillate Storage Tank #14 is to be discharged, tank level, as reported by the NPO, is 71 inches. LWDST has been isolated and on recirc for the past 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />. R-54 is aligned to #14 WDST. R-54 High Alarm setpoint is 4e-4 uci/cc Task Standard: Radioactive liquid waste release calculation completed, release permit (Attachment 1 to SOP-5.1.5) filled out, and ready for start of release.

Required Materials: 2-SOP-5.1.5, Calculation and Recording of Radioactive Liquid Releases Waste Distillate of Frac Truck Activity data sheet.

General

References:

2-SOP-5.1.5 Initiating Cue: You have been directed by the Shift Manager to calculate and approve a radioactive liquid waste release using the manual method.

Time Critical Task: NO Validation Time: 35 minutes 1 of8 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Appendix C 2 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step: DETERMINE the required recirculation time for the tank to be released Standard: Determine minimum recirc time to be 208 minutes from Table 1 Comment:
2. Performance Step: Ensure tank isolated and recirculated two tank volumes before sampling; Checks recirculation rate, dates and times on Permit Cue: Tank was isolated and placed on recirc 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> ago at 150 gpm recirc rate Standard: Two tank volumes recirculation verified; rate, dates and times entered on Permit Comment:
3. Performance Step: Calls and obtains Watch Chemist sample information Cue: Sample Number 4906; Time 15 minutes ago; Activity for Sample 1: 4E-5 pCi/cc Cue: If requested, R-54 activity is 2.4E-5 pCi/cc Cue: If requested, iodine activity is less than minimum detectable activity.

Standard: Enters Watch Chemist information on Permit Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 2 of 8

Appendix C 3 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

4. Performance Step: DETERMINE the total dilution flow rate (T), by summing the flow of the pumps in service using Table 2 CUE: 6 CWPs in fast speed, 3 SWPs and 1 RWP are in operation.

Standard: Determine canal flow rate based on current pump combinations to be 871,000 gpm Comment:

5. Performance Step: ASSIGN the permit number. The permit number is the next sequential number listed in the Liquid Waste Release Book located in the Central Control Room (CCR)

CUE: Inform operator next Permit number is 2004-008 Standard: Obtains next permit number Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 3 of 8

Amendix C 4 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

6. Performance Step: RECORD the following data on the Liquid Waste Release Permit:

0 Permit Number (2004-008)

Tank to be released (14 WDST)

Volume contained in the tank to be released (16,351 gal)

Recirculation rate, dates and times of start and completion (150 gpm, 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />)

Sample data (4906,4e-5, -1 5 minutes ago)

Partition factor Total dilution flow rate and Units contributing flow credit (871,000, Unit 2)

Standard: Information recorded on the permit Comment:

47. Performance Step: CALCULATE the Curie content (C) of the tank to be released Standard: Curie content determined to be 2.475E-3 Ci and recorded on Permit Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 4 of 8

Appendix C 5 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

48. Performance Step: CALCULATE the allowable Release Rate (R), in gallons per minute Standard: Release Rate determined to be 69,680 gpm Comment:
9. Performance Step: SIGN the release permit authorizing the liquid waste release CUE: CRS has also reviewed and signed permit. Continue. ..

Standard: Permit signed Comment:

10. Performance Step: INFORM the Operator of the calculated release rate (R)

CUE: NPO acknowledges release rate.

Standard: NPO notified.

Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 5 of 8

Appendix C 6 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

11. Performance Step: VERIFY that the applicable operable radiation monitor is source checked CUE: R-54 has been source checked.

Standard: R-54 source check status verified and recorded on permit.

Comment:

12. Performance Step: VERIFY the discharge flow meter and recorder are operable, and RECORD on the release permit CUE: Discharge flow meter and recorder are operable Standard: Operability checked and recorded on permit.

Comment:

Terminating Cue: Radioactive liquid waste release calculation completed, release permit (Attachment 1 to SOP-5.1.5) filled out, and ready for start of release.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 6 of 8

Simulator Setup VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. RO-4 Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

Reset simulator to IC-,

Insert malfunction:

7 of 8

INITIATING CUES:

1. The Unit is operating at 100% power. 6 Circulators in fast speed, 3 service water pumps, and 1 River Water pump are operating on Unit 2
2. Ail radiation monitors are operable.
3. Liquid Waste Distillate Storage Tank #14 is to be discharged. NPO reports tank level is 71 inches.
4. LWDST has been isolated and has been on recirc for the past 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.

The recirc started at 0800 and concluded at 1215.

5. R-54 has been source checked and is aligned to # I 4 WDST. R-54 High Alarm setpoint is 4e-4 uci/cc. R-54 was reading 4.2 e-5 uci/cc while on recirc.
6. R-49 activity is 1e-7 uci/cc. R-49 Hi Alarm setpoint is 1e-4 uci/cc.
7. You have been directed by the Shift Manager to calculate and approve a radioactive liquid waste release using the manual method.

TASK STANDARD:

Radioactive liquid waste release calculation completed, release permit (Attachment 1 to SOP-5.1.5) filled out, and ready for start of release.

RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED

CALCULATION AND RECORDING O F 2-SOP 5.1.5 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID RELEASES Rev. 29 ATTACHMENT 1, RADIOACTWE LIQUID RELEASE PERMIT WRC: 5.3.11 NOTES 0 The Primary level indicator for 13 WDST iis CT 976 LI and CT-977 LI for 14 WDST. the backup indcators are CT-967 MI and CT-974 LXl respectively.

0 A static condition is required when recordling tank levels from CT-976 LI and CT-977 LI.

(1 0 Volume discharged =(Initial Tank Level (iin gallons from Table I-Final Tank Level (in gallons from Table 1) l PERMIT 2'3O'i- V U k TANK I f ! l~.dflNITIALTK LEWEL 7 (Inches) INITIAL TK VOLUME (V) ' b 3 ' (gdlons) I RECIRC RATE& (gpm) STARTED A T - f Arf *#@(Time) kocab.g (Date)

COMPLETED B i v d p prime) 3.1 (Date)

SAMPLEACTIVITY(S,) LI e - Is' pci/cc SAMPLE IODINE pci/cc PARTITIONFACTOR tr TOTAL DILUTION FLOW (T) F 71 Joo (GPMI) FROM UNIT@) d& 2 L,

TANK CURIE CONTENT C = /@ 3 I V

R-54 HIGH ALARM SETPOINT e -ci (pCi/cc))

R-54 SOURCE CHECKED R-54 OPERABLE - J YES -NO (IF NO, COMPLETE ATTACHMENT 3)

DISCHARGE FLOW METER & RECORDER OPEFaABLE Z Y E S -NO (IF NO, COMPLETE ATTACHMENT 3)

RELEASE INITIATED (Time) (Date)

RELEASE TERMINATED (Time) (Date)

FINAL TK LEVEL (Inches) FINAL TK VOLUME (gallons)TOTAL VOLUME RELEASED (gallons) 1 Page 18 of 25

Z 0

k I-

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility: Indian Point 2 Task No: 0680010102 Task

Title:

Review and Approve a Liquid Radioactive Release WA

Reference:

Job Performance Measure No: SROI-4 Examinee: NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator: Date:

Method of testina:

Simulated Performance Actual Performance X Classroom X Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: The Unit is operating at 100% power. R-54 is 00s. Liquid Waste Distillate Storage Tank #14 is to be discharged, tank level, as reported by the NPO, is 71 inches. LWDST has been isolated and on recirc for the past 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />. .

Task Standard: Radioactive liquid waste release calculation completed, release permit ready to begin release.

Required Materials: 2-SOP-5.1.5, Calculation and Recording of Radioactive Liquid Releases Completed Attachment 1 ready for review SRO Chemistry Data Sheet 'Waste Distillate of Frac Truck Activity" Attachment 3 handout with R-54 00s General

References:

2-SOP-5.1.5 Initiating Cue: You have been requested by the RO to review and approve a radioactive liquid waste release using the manual method.

Time Critical Task: NO Validation Time: 35 minutes 1 Of7 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Appendix C 2 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step: DETERMINE the required recirculation time for the tank to be released Standard: Verifies minimum recirc time to be 208 minutes from Table 1 Comment:
2. Performance Step: Ensure tank isolated and recirculated two tank volumes before sampling; Checks recirculation rate, dates and times on Permit Cue: If necessary, cue that Tank was isolated and placed on recirc 4.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> ago at 150 gpm recirc rate Standard: Verifies Two tank volumes recirculation verified; rate, dates and times entered on Permit Comment:

~~

3. Performance Step: Calls and obtains Watch Chemist sample information Cue: If requested, R-54 activity is 2.4E-5 pCi/cc Cue: If requested, iodine activity is less than minimum detectable activity.

Standard: Verifies Watch Chemist information on Permit Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 2 of 7

Amendix C 3 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark) d 4. Performance Step: DETERMINE the total dilution flow rate (T), by summing the flow of the pumps in service using Table 2 CUE: 6 CWPs in fast speed, 3 SWPs and 1 RWP are in operation.

Standard: Verifies canal flow rate based on current pump combinations to be 871,000 gpm Determines that an error has been made and T should be 871,000 instead of 886,000 as recorded.

Comment:

5. Performance Step: ASSIGN the permit number. The permit number is the next sequential number listed in the Liquid Waste Release Book located in the Central Control Room (CCR)

CUE: Inform operator next Permit number is 2004-008 Standard: Verifies next permit number obtained Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 3 of 7

Appendix C 4 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

6. Performance Step: RECORD the following data on the Liquid Waste Release Permit:

0 Permit Number (2004-008) 0 Tank to be released (14 WDST)

Volume contained in the tank to be released (16,351 gal) 0 Recirculation rate, dates and times of start and completion (150 gpm, 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />)

Sample data (4906,4e-5, -1 5 minutes ago) 0 Partition factor 0 Total dilution flow rate and Units contributing flow credit (871,000, Unit 2)

Standard: Verifies Information recorded on the permit Comment:

47. Performance Step: CALCULATE the Curie content (C) of the tank to be released Standard: Verifies Curie content to be 2.475E-3 Ci and recorded on Permit Comment:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 4 of 7

Appendix C 5 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark) 4 8. Performance Step: CALCULATE the allowable Release Rate (R), in gallons per minute Standard: Release Rate determined to be 69680 gpm. Value on permit determined to be in error due to incorrect Dilution Flow Rate.

Comment:

9. Performance Step: SIGN the release permit authorizing the liquid waste release Standard: Corrections made and then permit signed.

Comment:

~~~~

Terminating Cue: Permit ready for start of release.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 5 of 7

Simulator Setup VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. SROI-4 Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

Reset simulator to IC-,

Insert malfunction:

6 of 7

INITIATING CUES:

1. The Unit is operating at 100% power.
2. 6 Circulators in fast speed, 3 SWPs and 1 RW pump in service on unit 2
3. Liquid Waste Distillate Storage Tank #14 is to be discharged, tank level, as reported by the NPO, is 71 inches.
4. LWDST has been isolated and on recirc for the past 4.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. The recirc started at 0800 and concluded at 1215.
5. R-54 is out of service. R-49 is reading le-7 uci/cc. The R-49 Hi alarm is 1e-4 uci/cc.
6. You have been directed by the RO to perform a verfication of a radioactive liquid waste release using the manual method.

TASK STANDARD:

Radioactive liquid waste release calculation completed, permit ready for start of release.

RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED

CALCULATION AND RECORDING OF 2-SOP 5.1.5 RADIOACTIVE LlQUID RELEASES Rev. 29 ATTACHMENT 3-EQUIPMENT OUT OF SERVICE LOG DISCHARGE FLOW METER OR RECORDER OUT OF SERVICE [OR NOT AVAILABLE)

RELEASE RATE (GPM) = [(VJ-(VF))/

WHERE:

WO#: DATE:

DATE TIME TANK VOLUME RELEASERATE R-54 OUT OF SERVICE Sample No. q 4 0 h a t e Sample N o . 4 9 0 7 Date Release Calculations verified by Release Calculations verified by Release line up verified by Release line up verified by

-Time ' L h o A c t i v i t y Time 'bL @ctivity3.?

C'GCi/cc e e$ki/cc Name/date Name/dale Nameldate Name/date Page 20 of 25

CALCULATION AND RECORDING OF 2-SOP 5.1.5 RAD IOACTIVE L1QUI D RELEASES Rev. 29 ATTACHMENT I, RADIOACTIVE LIQUID RELEASE PERMIT {NRC: 5.3.7)

NOTES 0 The Primary level indicator for 13 WDST is CT 976 LI and CT-977 LI for 14 WDST. the backup indcators are CT-967 LXI and CT-974 UI respectively.

0 A static condition is required when recording tank levels from CT-976 LI and CT-977 LI.

0 Volume discharged =(Initial Tank Level (in gallons from Table I-Final Tank Level (in gallons from Table 1)

RECIRC RATE& (gpm) STARTEDAT 840 virne) PO^ (Date)

PARTITION FACTOR 0 e /@

R-54 HIGH ALARM SETPOINT (pCi/cc)

R-54 SOURCE CHECKED R-54 OPERABLE -YES - 6 0 (IF NO, COMPLETE ATTACHMENT 3)

DISCHARGE FLOW METER & RECORDER OPERABLE =YES -NO (IF NO, COMPLETE ATTACHMENT 3)

RELEASE AUTHORIZED BY/DATE ab'- ","?

f f?g

"* 'b ,I RELEASE INITIATED (Time) (Date)

RELEASE TERMINATED (Time) (Date)

FINAL TK LEVEL (Inches) FINAL TK VOLUME (gallons) TOTAL VOLUME RELEASED (gallons) 1 Page 18 of 25

Appendix C Job Performance Measure Form ES-C-1 Worksheet Facility: Indian Point 2 Task No: 3440030503 Task

Title:

Emergency Plan Classification (following scenario)

WA

Reference:

GKA2.4.41 (2.3/4.1) Job Performance Measure No: SROI-A5 Examinee: NRC Examiner:

Facility Evaluator: Date:

Method of testina:

Simulated Performance Actual Performance Classroom Simulator Plant READ TO THE EXAMINEE I will explain the initial conditions, which steps to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Initial Conditions: The plant has undergone the Event that has just been presented in the preceding scenario.

Task Standard: Event correctly classified per IP-EP-120, Emergency Classification Required Materials: IP-EP-120, Emergency Classification IP-EP-AD13, IPEC Emergency Action Level Technical Bases General

References:

IP-EP-120, Emergency Classification IP-EP-AD13, IPEC Emergency Action Level Technical Bases Initiating Cue: Identify the highest applicable emergency classification level (if multiple EALs are exceeded) for which an EAL has been met or exceeded.

Time Critical Task: Yes (15 minutes)

Validation Time: minutes 1 Of4 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Appendix C 2 Form ES-C-1 PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Denote critical steps with a check mark)

1. Performance Step: Locate and use the IPEC Emergency Action Levels chart Standard: Uses either of the charts located in the CCR or uses the attachment 1 to IP-EP-120 Comment: Log Start time:

d 2. Performance Step: Evaluate the event per IP-EP-120, Emergency Classification Standard: Identifies the correct EAL within 15 minutes of start of JPM Scenario 1: Alert EAL 3.1.2, Primary system leakage exceeding the capacity (> 75 gpm) of a single charging pump Scenario 2: NUE EAL 6.1.1 , Unplanned loss of power to all 480V busses for > 15 min.

If >15 minutes elapsed prior to start of 22EDG, then Alert EAL 6.1.2, Loss of AC power to all 480V buses for > 15 min.

Scenario 3: Alert EAL 3.1.2, Primary system leakage exceeding the capacity (> 75 gpm) of a single charging pump Scenario 4: SAE EAL 1.1.2, RED Path in Sub-criticality AND ALL Manual attempts at tripping the reactor from the Control Room have failed to reduce power range c 5%

Comment: Log completion time:

Elapsed time must be less than 15 minutes.

Terminating Cue: EAL Classification complete and Part 1 form completed NUREG-1021, Draf-t Revision 9 2 of 4

~~

Simulator Setup VERIFICATION OF COMPLETION Job Performance Measure No. SROI-A5, Emergency Plan Classification (following scenario)

Examinees Name:

Date Performed:

Facility Evaluator:

Number of Attempts:

Time to complete:

Question Documentation:

Question:

Response

Result: SAT or UNSAT Examiners signature and date:

3 of 4

INITIATING CUES:

1. The plant has undergone the Event that has just been presented in the preceding scenario
2. Identify the highest applicable emergency classification level (if multiple EALs are exceeded) for which an EAL has been met or exceeded.

TASK STANDARD:

Event correctly classified RETURN THIS TO EXAMINER WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED