ML19093A178

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:16, 22 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Annual Report 1980.
ML19093A178
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 02/23/1981
From: Chandrasekaran E, Kohl K
Eberline Instrument Corp
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
References
Download: ML19093A178 (74)
v • d • e


Text

,,

'0ETS MASTEtl§ f; ~ V _:.fti>

1 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT 1980 Submitted by EBERLINE INSTRUMENT CORPORATION Midwest Facility West Chicago, Illinois ( .*----1

_.._ **** u,,.*.,,.-.*J .*-*7*~"'"'*'**"* ... ***,_. :../.:

~* '")

SURRY POWER STATION OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM Annual Report JANUARY 1 - DECEMBER 31, 1980 Prepared for VIRGINIA ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY By EBERLINE INSTRUMENT CORPORATION NUCLEAR SERVICES DIVISION - MIDWEST FACILITIES 245. WEST ROOSEVELT ROAD BLDG. 2, SUITE 9 WEST CHICA~O, IL 60185 i

as a contractor to VIRGINIA ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY Compiled by:

Written, Reviewed and Approved by:

E.S., PhD, Manager

. TABLE OF CONTENTS

.. Page No

  • SECTION 1 - Preface 1 Y*

SECTION 2 - Sampling Program 5 SECTION 3 - Analysis Program 10 SECTION 4 - Results and Discussion 23 SECTION 5 - Data Tables 37 SECTION 6 - Quality Assurance Data 66

.... *- .. - ... . -:-**-- i

  • I SECTION I PREFACE 1

ABSTRACT This report presents the data obtained from the analyses of environmental samples collected through the Virginia Electric Power Company Surry Station Environmental Radiological Surveillance Pro_gram for the period 01 January 1980 through 31 December 1980.

The activity present above detection limits in the routinely collected sample media was observed to be of natural and atmospheric fallout origin. The results show that the radiation dose to a member of the general population did not exceed the technical specifications of 1% of the 10 CFR 20 limit*during 1980. ,.

2

INTRODUCTION

'!'he Surry Power Station of Virg.inia Electric and Power Company- consists of two Westinghouse pressurized water reactors each with a generating capacity of 788 MWE. The station is located on a peninsula in the James River approxi-mately 25 miles upstream of the Chesapeake Bay. Cooling water is taken in down-stream of the site and discharged 5.7 miles upstream of the intake. The Surry Power Station has been designed to minimize radioactive releases and insure that radiation doses attributed to the operation of the station will be "as low as reasonably achievable".

Various environmental samples are collected at indicator and controlor background locations and analyzed_ to determine if changes in radioactivity levels may bti attributable to the operation of the station. This environmental radio-

logical monitoring progrrim provides surveillance to assure compliance with the NRC Regulations and the -Surry Power Station Technical Specifications.

The program outlined in Tables 1 and 2 has in some cases more freqcent collecliun and unalysis of certain samples than called for in the Technical Spccificntions. The accompanying map shows the plant environs. Table izes the results of the radiological environmental surveillance measurements during calendar year 1980.

3

SUMMARY

1980 Environmental monitoring results showed that the radiation dose to a member of the general population did not exceed Technical Specifications of 1% of the 10 CFR 20 limit during 1980.

Radionuclides released to the air and water from Surry Station may con-tribute to the radiation background through both external and internal ex-posure.

The mo~t signif~cant environmental dose pathways are direct dose from the gaseous effluent and thyroid dose due to ingestion of milk. The area contains only a very small milk shed which limits general population dose potential from this sour:ce and since James River water is not used for drinking, dose potential from this source is also minimal.

Table 4 summarizes the range and average concentrations for measurements at the indicator and,control l~cations, and the location.with the highest*

annual mean. Complete information is given in the Sample Data Tables.

(Appendix I)

Specific findings for various environmental media are discussed in Section 4.

4

~*

SECTION 2 SAMPLING PROGRAM 5

All samples are collected by VEPCO Environmental Services Personnel and shipped to the Eberline laboratory in West Chicago, Illinois.

Upon receipt of the samples, the laboratory staff enters the samples in a log book identifying them as to sample type, collection date, and sample code number or location, then verifies the specific analyses to be performed on each sample. The samples are then stored,

~

awaiting analysis; on shelves expressly for this purpose to assure accountability through the laboratory processes.

Table .1 lists the sampling locations and frequencies. Figure 1 I

shows the locations.of the various sampling environs.

6

t

-~.TABLE 1 Monitoring or Sampling Locations and Frequencies Air Ambient . Well Surface Particulate Radiation Precipitation Milk Water Water Soil Surry Station w (a) M SA A Hog Island Reserve w SA Bacon's Castle w M(2 ea.) .SA A Chippokes Creek SA Alliance w A Colonial Parkway w M A Williamsburg SA Jamestown SA Dow w A Fort Eustis w A Newport News w M SA Scotland Wharf Lee Hall M Routes 10 and 676 .t Smithfield M SA Guard Booth Station Intake Kings Mill Budweiser Station Discharge BW *- Bi-weekly M - Monthly BM - ~t-monthly Q - Quarterly SA - Semi-annually A - Annually A(3) - Annually corn, peanuts, and soybeans SM - Sununer Months (two Samplings: July - September)

(a) Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are monitored quarterly. A full listing of the 43 locations is shown on page 63.

TABLE 1 (continued)

James River Crops Fowl Water. Silt Oyster Clams Fish Crab Bacon's Castle A(3)

Hog Island Reserve SA Jamestown BM Newport News BM SA BM Chickahominy BM SA BM Station Discharge BM SA BM Hog Island Point BM SA BM Station Intake BM SA SA SM La'lo.'lles Creek BM Deep Water Shoals BM 00 Point of Shoals SA BM BW - Bi-weekly M - Monthly BM - Bi-monthly Q - Quarterly SA-Semi-annually A - Annually A(3) - Annually corn, peanuts, and soybeans SM - Summer Months (three Samplings: July - August - September)

CHARLES CITY COUNTY A SURRY STATION B HOG ISLAND C CHIPPOKES STATE PARK D BACONS CASTLE* ,, /

E TOWN OF SURRY F HERON ROOKERY /

G FERRY ( SCOTLAND GI-JAMESTOWN G2 l H JAl.!ESTOWN ISLAND .

I WILLIAMSl!IURG J BUSCH GARDENS K YOHKTOWN BATTLEFIELD L COLONIAL .PARKWAY 0. 5 M FORT EUSTIS

  • MILEAGE N JAMES RIVER BRIDGE .

P TUNNEL R C08HAMBAY Figure 1: Environs of Surry Power Station.

9

SECTION 3 ANALYSIS PROGRAM 10

~I

Table 2 lists the sample analysis prpgram - sample class, frequency, and the type of analysis required.

Table 3 lists the LLD's (Lower Limits of Detection) for the analytical program. These LLD's are based on Regulatory Guide .4.8. For analyses not required in Regulatory Guide 4.8, Federal EPA, former re-quirements for similar programs, or other appropriate guides are used.

The LLD's are calculated as per RG 4.8 at the 3cr level.

The Guide specifically states that the LLD's are a priori NOT a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. When, however, RG 4.8 or*other LLD's have not been achieved, a footnote giving

.* a brief explanation has .been inserted.

11

TABLE 2 Environmental Measurement and Sample Analysis Program Sample Class, Frequency Analysis Air Particulate Weekly Gross alpha and beta (1)

Quarterly Comp. Gamma Isotopic (2)

Airborne Iodine Weekly Iodine-131 Thermoluminiscent Quarterly Radiation Dose Dosimetry (TLD)

Precipitation Monthly Gross beta (3)

Tritium Quarterly Comp. 1 Gross beta Tritium Milk Monthly Iodine-131 Sr-89/90 Gamma Isotopic Stable Calcium Soil Annually Gamma Isotopic*

Crops Annually Gamma Isotopic Sr-89/90 Surface*Water Semi-annually Gross alpha and beta Tritium Well Water Semi-annually Gross alpha and beta Tritium Fowl Semi-annually Gamma Isotopic (4)

James River Water Bi-monthly Gamma Isotopic Semi-annual. Tritium Comp *._

Oysters and Clams Bi-monthly Gamma Isotopic (4)

Crabs 3 summer months Gamma Isotopic Silt 5@li-annually Gamma Isoto_pic Fish Semi-annually Gamma Isotopic 12

NOTES TO TABLE 2 (1) Gamma isotopic analysis if gross beta exceeds 10 pCi/~ 3 *

(2) Quarterly composites of weekly air particulate samples will be analyzed for gamma emitters in three groups as follows:

Stations SS and HIR analyzed as one sample.

Stations BC, ALL, CP, DOW, and FE analyzed as one sample.

Station NN analyzed as one sample.

Strontium-90 determined radiochemically if significant amounts of fission products attributable to the Station are detected by the gamma isotopic analysis.

(3) Perform gamma isotopic analysis if gross beta exceeds 15 nCi/m 2 *

(4) Entire sample analyzed for gamma emitters. Sr-90 to be determined if a significant amount of fission ~roducts attributable to the Station are noted in the gamma analysis.

13

-- ....... _... _"- ..... *. --- ....... ____ ., ... _.._ ....... --~ ____ ,.. **-*

Table 3 Lower Limits of Detection

-(LLD'a)

LLD Sample Class Analysis 3a Units Airborne Gross Beta 0.01 pCi/m 3 .

Particulates Gross Alpha 0.01 pCi/m 3 Gamma Isotopic 0.01 pCi/m 3 Iodine-131 0.07 pCi/m 3 Background Gamma dose 0.5 mR/wk Radiation (TLD)

Precipitation Gross Beta 5 nCi/m 2 LS Tritium 500 pCi/1 Enriched Tritium 330 pCi/1 Other Waters Gross Beta 2 pCi/1 Gross Alpha 1 pCi/1 LS Tritium

.Enriched Tritium Gamma Isotopic

- 500 330 pCi/1 pCi/1 Cs'-134/137 15 pCi/1 La/Ba-140 15 pCi/1 Co-58/60

  • 15 pCi/1 Mn-54. 15 pCi/1 Zr/Nb-95 10 pCi/1 Fe-59, Zn-65 30 pCi/1 Strontium-89 5 pCi/1 Strontium-90 2 pCi/1 Milk Iodine-131 1 pCi/1 Strontium-89 5 pCi/1 Strontium-90 2 pCi/1 Cs-137 15 pCi/1 La/Ba-140 15* pCi/1 Oysters, Clams, Cs-134/137 130 pCi/kg wet Crabs, Fish Mn-54 130 pCi/kg wet Co-58/60 130 pCi/kg wet Fe-59, Zn-65 260 pCi/kg wet Strontium-89 20 pCi/kg wet Strontium-90 10 pCi/kg wet Silt, Soil Cs-134/137 150 pCi/kg dry Fowl Cs-134/137 80 pCi/kg wet Vegetation Cs-134/137 80 pCi/kg wet Strontium-89 20 pCi/kg wet*

Strontium-90 10 pCi/kg wet 14

/

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Samples received at the laboratory are analyzed for the various radio-active components by standard radiochemical methods. These methods are equal (1) to, and in most cases, identical with, those of the U.S.D.O.E. or those of (2)

.: the Federal E.P.A

  • Brief descriptions of analytical procedures are available in the Labor-atory Procedures Manual available at Surry Station and the radioanalytical contractor's laboratory.

Air Particulate Filters Gross Beta - Exposed air particulate filters are counted in low back-ground Geiger or proportional flow beta counters using anti-coincidence background suppression after the short-:-lived naturally-occuring radon and thoron daughters have decayed. Filters are counted long enough to ensure that the'required sensitivity (LLD) will be met

... Gamma Isotopic - Quar.terly composites of air particulate filtecs are counted in high resolution (GeLi) gamma spectrometers for periods of time loµg enough to ensure that the required program sensitivity (LLD) is met. (See also introduction to data tables, Section 5.)

Water Samples (Includes Surface, We~l, Precipitation, James River)

Gross Beta - A measured aliquot of sample is digested, "wet-ashed",

evaporated, transferred to a tared 47mm stainless steel planchet, dried, and weighed. The planchetted sample is counted long enough in a low background beta counter to ensure that the LLD of the program will be met.

(1) HASL Procedures Manual, edited by John H. Harley, Health and Safety Laboratory, US Atomic *Energy Commission, 1972 edition, revised annually.

(2) National Environmental Research Center, Environmental Protection Agency; Handbook of Radiochemical Analytical Methods. Program Element" lHA 325.

Office of Research and Development, Las Vegas, Nevada 89114.

15

Gamma Isotopic - a measµred aliquot of the sample is evaporated to a small controlled volume and counted in a standard geometry in a high resolution (Geli) gamma spectrometer long enoungh to ensure meeting the sensitivity requirements of the program. See also the Introduc~ion to Data Tables.

Strontium-89 and Strontium carrier strontium is added to a measured aliquot of sample. The strontium is then separated.and purified by either ion exchange chromatography (EPA method) or straight wet chemistry (HASL 1

method). The chemic al yield for strontium is determined by atomic adsorp-tion spectrometry or gravimetric methods. After a suitable period (usually 14 days) to allow for ingrowth of Y-90 the sample is counted in a.low background beta counter (equilibrim or tot~l. Sr count). The strontium is next put-into solution, carrier yttrium added, and the strontium and yttrium fractions separated.*The yttrium is counted and from the Y-90 (sr~9o daughter) count,. th_e sr-.:..90 concentration can be .determined. The differenc*e between .the* total strontium concentration as determined by the equilibri~m count and the Sr-90 concentration as determined from the Y-90 count is the Sr-89 concentration. Equations are available to permit calculation of Sr-89 and Sr-90 by counting the purified Sr fraction at two points during ingrowth of the Sr-90 daughter Y-90. While either.\

method is acceptable, we find the former method to provide more consistent results.

Tritium - tritium as tritiated water is analyzed by liquid scintillation counting after distillation. If high sensitivity is not required (ie. LLD

~soo pCi/1) the sample is distilled, mixed with the appropriate counting phosphors and counted with no further treatment. If higher sensitivity is required (ie. <~300 pCi/1) the sample is isotopically enriched in tritium concentration prior to liquid scintillation counting.

16

  • ' ....... ., ..... *'**- *-*...:*,*-*'* .. -"**;.,..,_~.u-.. .., .:..:,,;::. ---**"'**
  • Isotopic enrichment is done by the classical method of Ostlund w~ich involves alkaline electrolysis of a purified aliquot of sample under

\

controlled conditions of temperature and electrode current density.

Milk Samples I-131 - measured amounts of carrier iodide.are added to a known volume of milk and the iodine extracted on anion exchange resin. The iodine is recovered and *ourified by classical iodine chemistry methods which are similar to those given in former Regulatory Guide 4.3. The yield or recovery of iodine is measured gravimetrically and the precipitated sample is mounted and counted in a low level beta detector for a long enough period to ensure that the required LLD is met.

Gamma Isotopic - a measured aliquot of 'Sa,mple is evaporated and oven dried to a standard volume and counted in a fixed geometry in a high resolution (GeLi) gamma spectrometer for a long enough*period to ensure that the requ1red LLD's -are reached (see also Introduction to data Tables).

Sr-89 and Sr Stable strontium carrier is added to an aliquot of the sample which_is then dried and ashed at high temperature ()700°cJ. The ash is dissolved and the solution treated from this point on in the same manner as are water.samples (Q.v.).

Organic Samples (including Clams, Oysters, Fish, Crabs, Food Crops and Fowl).

Gamma Isotopic Analysis - a measured aliquot of sample is oven dried or ashed as appropriate, plnced in a controlled Rcomctry and counted in a high resolution (GeLi) gamma spectrometer for a period long enough to ensure that the LLD's of the program will be met (see also intro. to Data Tables).

17

.,:i-. *-**.*.. -*. ..;. ... : .... .;.:.:-.: -~-------**= ...... :......... -~. ~ ..........:;*_..:~... :.--.:. . . .:. ...*.- .............__ ...

In the case of samples such as fish and fowl, the edible flesh is sepa-rated from bones and entrails prior to drying.

Sr-89 and Sr stable strontium carrier is added to a weighed aliquot ~ I of the sample and the sample is ashed at high temperature (>700°c). The ashed sample is then di~solved and processed in the same manner as are water or milk samples.

Soil and Silt Samples Gamma Isotopic Analysis - the sample is oven dried to facilitate handling and then sieved to remove pieces of stone and/or other large pieces of material. An appropriate sized, weighed aliquot of the sample is then transferred into a standard geometry container and counted for a period long enough to ensure that the LLD of the program will be met .* (See also Introduction to Data Tables).

Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLD)

Environmental radiation doses are measured using badges comprizing five ,'

chips sealed in plastic protective holders having a density of 50 mg/cm 2

  • The TLD chips are 1/8 11 x l/8 11 x 1/32 LiF (thallium activated) known commc".'cially as Harshaw-100. The chips are all selected to provide uniform response to with-in 5% of th~ mean for the batch~

Prior to installation, the chips are annealed by a standard cycle of 60 minutes at 400°c and immediate cooling to ambient temperature by placing the tray containing the annealed chips on an aluminum block 12" x 12 11 x l".

After exposure the chips are read on an Eberline Instrument Corporation Model TLR-6 reader. The system employs a preheat cycle which removes Low temperature pea~s and integrates and digitizes only the light output in a selected temperature range.

18

The dose is calculated from the average light output for the five chips and the statistical uncertainty is the standard deviation of the five readings.

Control badges are used to detect any unusual exposure to the badge.which might occur during shipment.

19

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM A. Design of Plan Quality of product or service has always been a primary ke~ to in-crease is sales, customer satisfaction, and profit. The management of

.Eberline Instrument Corporation recognizes the ever increasing demand for higher quality and reliability for services related to protection of workers and the environment. It is our firm belief that in orde: to judge the worth of a support service, one must know the philosophy behind it. Eber-line will provide only those services for which it is qualified and these will be provided in a manner that is reiiable, with a quality assurance ~rogram that maintains a high degree of client confidence. This quality assurance program has been prepared consistent with the following specifications, per the Technical and Quality Assurance Requirements for Special Purposes.

ANSI-N45.2, American National Standards Institute NRC Branch Technical Position of November 1~79.

NRC Regulatory Guide 4.15, *Revision 1 of February 1979.

n. lntercomparison Program Results of Eberline's Midwestern Facility participation in the USEPA's Crosscheck Program will be included in the monthly reports provided to the client. Other intercomparisons in which we routinely participate include:

I Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Measurement Lab DOE Quality Assessment Program Battelle Northwest Laboratories IAEA Analytical Quality Control Service US National BurCUJu of Standard~

Eberline'& Albuquerque Laboratory.

Each of the laboratory managers is responsible for preparing &Pikes and blanks to be run routinely. Every tenth sample is a spike, a blank, or a split sample.

Regular QC reports are prepared by the laborary.manager on a monthly 20

schedule and forwarded to each client. Each report routinely includes:

results _from EIC interlaboratory comparison, results from EPA Crosscheck program, and results from other intercomparison programs.

Results are reviewed by the laboratory manager. If a problem is in-dicated by the data, the nature of the problem is investigated and corrective steps taken immediately. A copy of each report is also _provided to the Quality Assurance Manager of the Nuclear Services Division.

C. Quality Assurance Plan The Quality Assurance Program follows the requirments of Company and Division Manuals. The discussion below outlines Quality Assurance Programs as conducted in the laboratory and as required in our QA Manual.

Procedure Approval Each procedure goes through a vigorous evaluation and review pcocess before it is incorporated into the EIC Procedures Manual. Established pro-cedures of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the Environmental

  • -:Measurements Laboratory of the US Department of Energy (E}.lL) are used unless
    • thorough testing has demonstrated that an alternate procedure is equal to or better than the EPA or EML procedure. Uniform procedures arc used at both laboratories to the fullest extent possible, except when deviations are necessary to meet the specific requirements of the client. The ma~Jger of each laboratory and the quality assurance manager review and approve signif-icant procedural changes before they arc implemented.

Equipment Calibration and Maintenance Equipment usc<l for <1uulitativc or quantitative 111casurco1<.mls is care-fu) ly calibrated and maintained with records of each calibration or main-terancc action kept in appropriate logbooks. To the extent possible, cettified standards are used for all pri1;Dary calibrations. The following standards are used for the application indicated:

21

Measurement *Calibration Standard Gross Beta Solution of Standard 137cs certified Qy-NBS or Amersham Searle Tritium Solution standard of 3H certified by NBS Gamma Solution standards of various gamma emitters Spectrometry. certified by NBS or Amersham Searle. Standards are used to calibrate each counting geometry used.

Strontium-89 Solution standards of 90sr certified by Amersham and 90 Searle or NBS Gross Alpha Solution standards of 239 Pu certified by NBS or Amersham Searle.

  • 137 Radiation Dose Cs gamma source cross-referenced with NBS using R-meters. 226Ra is used for some special application *

. When suitable standards are not available for a specific gamma emitter, quantitative gamma isotopic analysis is based on an energy calibration .of the gamma spectrometer and the gamma energy and abundance information provided in Table of Isotopes, Sixth Edition ,

i I

I by Ledrer., Hollander, and Perlman. i The results of the Quality Control Programs are sununarized in Section 6.

- I I

22

..... - . * . * - r: *.

SECTION 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 23

Table 4 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Sununary Name of Facility: Surry Power Station Docket Number: 50-280, 50-281 Location of Facility: Surry Virginia Reporting Period: 01 January - 31 December 1980 County State Medium or Pathway Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Control Number of Sampled Total Number of Locations Hi2.hest Mean Locations Non-routine (Unit of of Analyses Detection *. Mean 1 Mean Meanl Reported Measurement) Performed (LLD) *: (Ran2.e). Name (RanRe) (Ran2e) Measurei:ients Air Particulates ~ross B 423 0.01 o.*04 (343/370) Surry 0.05 (53/53) 0.05 (52/53) 0 (pCi/m 3 ) 0.01-0.30. Station 0.01-0.17 0.01-0.14 Gross a 423 0.01 0.01 (6/370) Bacon*s 0.01 (2/52) 0.01 (2/53) 0 0.01 .. Castle 0.01 0.01 Zr/Nb-95 12 0.01 ' 0.01 (1/4) 0

. All LLD. Not Applicable 0.01 Other y 12 0.01 All LLD Not Applicable All LLD 0 Airborne Iodine t-131 421 0.07

  • All LLD Not Applicable All LLD 0 (pCi/m 3 ) -

Background y Dose 181 0.5 1.2 (163/169) Surry 9.5 (4/4) 0.8 (12/12) 0 Radiation (TLD) 0.4-15.8 Station 6.8-15.8 o. 3-1. 2 (mR/wk)

Precipitation Gross B 28

  • 5.0 All LLD Not Applicable All LLD 0 (nCi/m 2 ) B -

(pCi/1) HTO LS HTO 21 500 624 (5/9) Surry 654 (5/9) 913 (2/12) 0 400/1100 Station 400-1100 860-966 '

Enr. HTO 1 330 400 (1/4) 0 All LLD

  • Not Applicable 400 Milk I-131 58 1.0 All LLD Not Applicable All LLD 0 (pCi/1)

Sr-89 58 5.0 All LLD Not Applicable All LLD 0 l Mean and range based on detectable measure~ents only. Fractions indicated in parentheses ..

"'

  • I Table 4 (continued)

Facility: Surry Power Station i

I i

Medium or Path\.*ay Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Control Number of  ;*

i Sampled Total Number of Locations Highest Mean Locations Non-routine i (Unit of of Analyses Detection

  • Meanl Mean Mean 1 Reported I I

Measurement) Performed (LLD) (Range) Name (Range) (RanS?e) Measurements I I

Bacon's ,.

Milk (continued) Sr-90 58 2.0 4.6 (34/46) Castle 5.8 (12/12) 4.8 (10/12) - 0  !

2-12 *

(pCi/1) (Judkins) 2-12 3-11 Cs-137 58 15.0 All LLD Not Applicable All LLD O' Ba-La-140 58 15.0 All LLD Not Applicable All LLD 0 River Water Cs-137 25 15.0 All LLD Not Applicable All LLD 0 (pCi/1) - ,,

La-Ba-140 N

Cs-134 0 I V, 15.0 All LLD Not Applicable All LLD Co-58-60 25

~n-54 Zr-Nb-95 25 10.0 All LLD Not Applicable All LLD 0 Fe-59 30.0 All LLD Not Applicable All LLD 0 Zn-65 25 HTO 5 500 All LLD Not Applicable Not Measured 0 HTO 4 .330 310 (2/2) Newport 310 (2/2) 295 (2/2) 0 ..

280-340 , News 280-340 220-370 Sr-89 5 5 All LLD Not Applicable Not Measured 0 ..

Sr-90 5 2 All LLD Not Applicable Not Me~sured 0 Clams Cs-134-137 '

(pCi/kg) Mn-54 25 130 All LLD Not Applicable All LLD 0 Co-58-60 1 Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parentheses.

~ - - - ____ _ _ _ _ j

Table 4 (continued)

Facility: Surn* P.:,-i:er Station Mediu::t or Pa ::h,,ay

  • Type and LO\,er Limit All.Indicator Location with Control Nur.1bcr of *1 Sa~pled Total Number of  ; Locations Hir,hest Hean Locations Non-routine (Unit of of Analyses Detection Hean 1. Mean Mcanl Reported Measurewent) Performed (LLD) . *(Range) Name (Range) (Range) Measurements Clams (continued) Fe-59 25 260 'I! ~

All LLO.

  • Not Applicable All LLD 0 (pCi/kg) Zn-65 Sr-89 2 20 All. LLD Not Applicable Not Measured 0 Sr-90 2 10 20 (1/2)' Station 20 (1/2) Not Measured 0 20 Discharge 20 Oysters Cs-134-137 (pCi/kg) ~tn-54 15 130 All.. LLD Not Applicable Not Measured 0 Co-58-60 -. I Fe-59 Not Measured
  • zn-65 15 260 All LLD Not Applicable 0 Fish Cs-134-137 (pCi/kg) ~-54 4 130 All LLD Not Applicable Not Measured 0 Co-58-60 Fe-59 Zn-65 '* 260 All LLD Not Applicable Not Measured 0 Crabs Cs-134-137 ..

(pCi/kg) ~-54 1 130 All LLD Not Applicable Not Measured 0 Co-58-60 Fe-59 0 1 260 All LLD Not Appl:!..:able  ?!~t Measured Zn-65 Silt Cs-134 12 150 . All LLD Not Applicable All LLD 0 ,, .

(pCi/kg)

Cs-137 12 150 893 *(7/10) Station 1155 (2/2) 820 (2/2) 0 190-1210 Discharge 1100-1210 690-950 l Mean*and range based on detectable measurements only. ,

Fractions indicated in parentheses.

Table 4 (continued)

Facility: Surr\' Po"*er Station Medium or Path\..*ay Type and Lm,er Li~it All Indicator Location with Control Nur.1ber of Sampled Total .:umber of Locations Highest Mean Locations Non-routine (Unit of of Analyses Detection Mean 1 Mean Me.inl Reportec Measurer.1ent) Performed (LLD) (Ran~e) Name (Ran2e) (Ran~e) Measurements Silt (continued) Co-60 12 150 3220 (1/10) Point of 3220 (1/2) All LLD 0 (pCi/kg)

  • 3220 Shoals 3220 Soil Cs-134 6 150 All LLD
  • Not Ap'plicable Not Measured 0 (pCi/kg)

Cs-137 6 150 478 (6/6) Colonial 1040 (1/1) Not Measured 0 200-1040 Parkway 1040 Fowl Cs-134 (pCi/kg) Cs-137 2 80 All LLD Not Applicable Not Measured 0 I

Food Crops Cs-134 6 80 All LLD Not Applicable Not Measured 0 N

(pCi/kg)

Cs-137 6 80 All LLD Not Applicable Not Measured 0 Sr-89 6 20 All LLD Not Applicable Not Measured 0 Sr-90 6 10 68 (4/6) Slades 70 (2/3) Not Measured 0 10-120 Farm 20-120 Well Water Gross B 8 2 7.3 (6/6) Surry 9 (2/2) 3 (2/2) 0 (pCi/1) 3-12 Station 9 3 ..

Gross c 8 1 2 (3/6) Bacon's 3 (1/2) 0 1-3 Castle 3 All LLD HTO 8 330 All LLD Not Applicable All LLu 0 Surface Water Gross B 8 2 3.1 (6/6) Chippokes 4 (2/2) 7 (2/2) 0 (pCi/1) 2-5 Creek 3-5 4-10 1 Mean and range based on detectable measurements on~y. Fractions indicated in parentheses.

Table 4 (continued)

Facility: Surr~ Po~er Station

l Mediu
n or Pa~hway Type and lo...-er Lir.iit All Indicator Location with Control Number o(

Sar:ipled Total Number of * 'Locations Highest Hean Locations Non-routine (Unit of of Analyses Detection *. * :: Meanl *

  • Mean Meanl Reported Measure:nent) Performed (LLD) . :* (Ran~e) Name (Range)* (Range) Measurements Surface Water Cross a 8 1 1.4. (5./6)

Williamsburg 2 (2/2) 1 (1/2) 0 (continued) 1.:..;3 Reserve 1-3 1

... .~. .

(pCi/1) .'

HTO 8 500 808 * . (5/6) Williamsburg 805 (2/2) 690 (2/2) 0 350~1260 Reserve 350-1260 500-880 00

.1 Mean and range bas~d on detectable measurements only. Fractions indicated in parenthcs,es.

Results of all the analyses for January through December 1980 are presented in full in Section 5, Data Tables pages 40 through 65.

Table 4 summarizes the range and average concentrations for me~sure-ments at the indicator and control locations wi~h the highest annual mean.

Environmental monitoring results showed that the radiation dose to a member of the general population did not exceed Technical Specifications of 1% of the 10 CFR 20 limit during 1980.

Specific findings for the various environmental media are discussed AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES Atmospheric particulate matter at a field location is accumulated for a one-week period on a glass fiber filter using a low-volume air sampler at a collection rate of one cubic. foot per minute. This particu-late matter contained on the filter is counted for beta activity in a low-background counting system after th~ short-lived naturally-occuring radon and thoron daughters have decayed.

The average gross beta concentration for the year for all indicator stations was 0.04 pCi/m 3 , and for the control location it was 0.05 pCi/m 3

  • Data for analyses of individual filters are given on pages 40 through 45 in Section 5. Small elevations in the gross beta activity for all locations during December is attributed to atmospheric fallout.

The gross alpha concentrations for the indicator and background stations remained at or below the detection limit of 0.02 pCi/m 3

  • 29

. _ _ -~:;::... ....

Gamma spectrometry of quarterly composites of air particulate filters

, indicated that the concentrations of Cs-134 and Cs-137 were below 0.01 pCi/m3 throughout the year. Small amounts (0.01 p<;:i/m 3 ) of Zr-Nb-9.5 detect-ed in the 4th quarter is attributable to atmospheric fallout *

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETRY Measurements of environmental dose rates were made at 54 locations in the first quarter and at 43 locations in the remaining quarters of 1980.

The results are tabulated on pages 62 through 65 of Section 5.

As observed in previous years, the Surry Station location displays clearly elevated dose rates throughout-the year. Other on-site locations appear to be only very slightly above nearby locations and the badges located near the station intake and dischai::ges consistently give some of the lowest readings observed. The.major fraction of the dose at the Surry Station* *1-ocation is undoubtedly. due to operatiol) of the station. The doses at other*-on:..site locations may be partially due to the station, but *only by a few tenths of a millirem per week at most. *Doses due to the plant at locations away from the site, if they exist, are masked by doses from the natural environmental sources such as uranium, thorium, and their

\

daughters, and possibly worldwide fallout.

30

PRECIPITATION SAMPLES

. Precipitation samples collected at the Surry Station and at Newport News are analyzed on a monthly basis and as quarterly composites

- . for gross beta depositions and tritium concentrations. Data are summarized in page 47 of Section 5.

Gross beta measurements, the only measurement other than tritium required on these samples, are not capable of indfcating whether the differences are due to station operations or not. The gross beta levels at the control location were higher in the first and second quarter, compared to the indicator location. The levels in general were in the range to be expected from measurements of these nuclides in this medium and does not indicate to be attributable to releases from Surry Station.

The tritiLtJil levels were comparable at both the indicator and control*location throughout the year, and were generally in the range to be expected from measurements of this nuclide in this medium.

MILK SAMPLES Radionuclides Cs-137 and I-131 were below the detection limits (15 pCi/~ for Cs-137 and 1.0 pCi/1 for I-131) for all milk samples collected during the year. Sr-90 was detected in the usual low and variable concentrations to be expected in most of the milk samples collected during the year. Sr-89 and Ba-La-140 were below the detection limits (5 pCi/1 for Sr-89 and 15 pCi/1 for Ba-La-140) in all samples collected.

Radioactivity attributable to oper~tion of Surry Station was not detected in any milk samples collected during the year.

31

Comparisons of the average concentrations for all nuclides assayed and other statistical information are given in Table 4 and the data aummary on each sample by location are given on pages 48 through 50 of Section 5.

  • JAMES RIVER WATER SAMPLES Samples of water from the James River are collected bi-monthly from five locations including the station inlet and discharge and are analyzed for gamma emitters. ,Semi-annual composites of the collections from the Chickahominy and Newport News locations are also ,analyzed for tritium.

Samples collected quarterly from the discharge are split with a state agency and are analyzed for tritiup1~ Sr-89, Sr-90~ and gauuna emitters.-

Analytical data are presented in pages 51 through 53 -t:Jf Section 5.

Gamma *emitters were below*the detection limits of this program in all samples collected bimonthly.

Sr-89, Sr-90, and tritium were below the detection limits in all of the station discharge (State Split) samples.

Tritium levels in the semi-annua~ composites for Chickahominy and Newport News were slightly above the detection limit of 3~0 pCi/1.

These levels were in the range to be expected from measurements of this nuclide in this medium.

CLAM SAMPLES Clam samples are collected bi-monthly from five locations near the station including the station discharge and are analyzed for gamma emitters.

32

Samples from the station discharge are frequently designated "State Split Samples" and such samples are analyzed for Sr-89 and Sr-90 as well as gamma emitters.

Gamma emitters were below the detection limits of the program in all samples collected during the year.

Analysis of state split clam samples for radiostrontium revealed the presence of only Sr-90.,at levels attributable to world-wide fallout in one sample (November).

Analytical data are presented in pages 54 and 55 of Section 5.

OYSTER SAMPLES Samples of oysters are collected from Deep Water Shoal, Point of Shoal, and Newport News on a bi-monthly basis and analyzed for gamma emitters. Analytical data are presented in page 56 of Section 5.

Gamma emitters were below the detection limits of the program in all samples collected throughout the year.

FISH SAMPLES Fish samples are collected in the vicinity of the station twice a year and analyzed for gamma emitters. Data are presented in pag~ 57 of Section 5.

Gamma emitters were below the detection limits of the program specifications.

CRAB SAMPLES Samples of crab in the vicinity of Surry Station are collected in September and analyzed for gamma emitters. The gamma emitters were below the detection limits of the program and are listed in page 57 of Section 5.

33

SILT SAMPLES .

Silt samples **are ~ollected semi-annually from six locations._{ five indicato,; and one control location) and analyzed for gamma emitters.

Silt is one of the few environmental media in which radioactive -effluents *<*

from nuclear power stations are usually detected.

Most of the samples collected contained measurable concentrations of Cs-137 and one indicator sample contained Co-60 above the detection limit. The levels of activity measured are generally comparable with those encountered in the previous years. Co-60 presence could be due to station operation. Data are summarized on page 59 of Section 5.

SOIL SAMPLES Soil samples are collected annually from six locations and analyzed by gamma spectrometry for gamma emit~ers *

.The only nuclide detected at concentrations greater than the detection limit for. the program .was -Cs-137.. The concentrations of Cs-137 have been quite variable th9ughout the years as is illustrated in tile table below. The is probably due to the well recognized difficulty of obtaining truly representative samples of soil. Modified sampling techniques by station personnel appear to have eliminated this problem

\

from 1978 to 'the present. There are no clear trends and the origin of the cesium is unclear.

Cs-137 Concentrations is Soil Samples 10 2 eci/ks*

(Aug) (Sept) 1975 1976 1977 1978 1978 l2Z2. 1980 Surry Station 35 l 17 <2 4 2 2 Fort Eustis 18 10 -17 18 2 4 Dow 10 2 2 (2 3 <2 2 Bacon's Castle 8 24. 2 23 9 11 10 Alliance 2 3 2 <2 3 3 6 Colonial Parkway ~5 12 22 7 (2 4

  • Data rounded to nearest whole unit, statistical errors omitted.

34

Long and short term worldwide fallout are probably the major factors and contributions to the total by the station cannot be ruled out. If however the major fraction were due to the station, significant amounts of Cs-137 and Co-60 might be expected in the samples, but this was not the case. Detailed analytical data are presented in page 60 of Section 5.

FOWL SAMPLES A Mallard duck from the Hog Island Reserve was collected.in March and a coot was obtained from the*same location in October. They were analyzed for gamma emitters, specifically for Cs-134 and Cs-137.

Concentrations of these nuclides were below the detect.ion limit of 80 pCi/kg for both samples. Data are given in page 60 of Section 5.

CROP SAMPLES Samples of food crops (corn, peanuts, and soybeans) are collected from two farms in the area and analyzed for gamma emitters, Sr-89, and Sr-90*. Gamma emitters and Sr-89 were below the detection limits of the program.

!ir-90 was detected in most of the samples in low and variable concentrations. Long and short term worldwide fallout deposits are probably the reason for this.

The results are tabulated in page 60 of Section 5.

WELL ~'ATER SAMPLES Samples of water were collected from each of four wells (three indicator and one control location) once in April (spring) and once in October (fall). These were analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium.

....... ~ .... ~* . *- -** .*. *- *-*--~- .. -*---~ ........., .... _,.._,. -* . -:.-.~** ...

Gross alpha and beta activity were detected in most of the samples at the usual low levels encountered in environmental media. There was no statistically significant difference in concentrations, which were similar to those measured previously, between indicator and background stations and the activity is attributable to naturally occuring nuclides.

Tritium concentrations were at or below the detection limits in samples collected during the year.

Analytical data are given in page 58 of Section 5.

SURFACE WA!ER SAMPLES Surface water samples were collected in April (spring) and October (fall) from each of four locations. They.were analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium.

Gross alpha and .gross beta levels were* all at the low concentrations usually expected *to be'found in environmental *surface water, with no significant differences between indicator and background stations or concentrations measured in the previous years.

Tritium concentrations were above the detection limits of the program both in spring and fall collections. The fall collections were somewhat higher than the spring collections. The levels of tritium measured were comparable at both indicator and background locations, and were generally in the.range to be expected from measure-ments of this nuclide in this medium.

36

SECTION 5 DATA TABLES 37

VEPCO LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES 1980 Expected Collection Sample Type Location Date Reason-Milk CP January Lost in trans-tt.

AP/CC FE 05/06 Out of order.

Precipitation ss June No rainfall.

Clams All stations July Damaged and lost in UPS shipment.

Oyster 9 All stations July Damaged and lost in UPS shipment.

Crabs ss July, August Damaged and lost in UPS shipment.

James River Water All stations July Damaged and lost in UPS shipment.

Precipitation ss August No rainfall.

Milk CP August Missing.

Precipitation ss I December, Lost in UPS shipment.

4th Quarter 39

VEPCO AIRBOR?IB IODINE-131, GROSS ..'ALPHA and.BETA.in AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS (Weekly.Collections) 10-2 J2Cilm3 ss SURRY STATION HIR HOG ISLAND RESERVE BC BACON'S CASTLE Collection Volume Gross Gross Volume Gross Gross Volume Gross Gross Date (m3) Al:eha Beta I-131 (ni3) Al:eha Beta I-131 (m3) Al:eha Beta I-131 01/02/80 155 <l 3+/-1 <7 i70 <1 3+/-1 <7 160 <1 3+/-1 . (7 01/08/80 130 <l 4+/-1 <7 120* .* <l 4+/-1 <7 140 <l 3+/-1 (7 01/15/80 150 (1 6+/-1 <7 170 <1 4+/-1 <7' 160 <1 6+/-1 (7 I :*/

01/22/80 155 <l 5+/-1 (a) 170 <l 3+/-1 <7 160 (1 3+/-1 (7 y' 01/29/80 310(a) (1 4+/-1 <7 170 <1 1+/-1 <7 160 <1 3+/-1 (7, 02/05/80 150 <l 2+/-1 <7 170 (l 4+/-1 (7 150 <1 3+/-1 <7 02/12/80 150 (1 3+/-1 <7 170

<l 3+/-1 . <7 165 (l 2+/-1 (7 02/19/80 165 (l 17+/-2 <7 165 <l 5+/-1 <7 165 <1 6+/-1 (7 02/26/80 150 <.l. 3+/-1 (7 160 <l 4+/-1 <7 160 <l 3+/-1 <7 03/07/80 180 <l 4+/-1 (7 215 <1 2+/-1 <7 175 <1 3+/-1 <7 03/12/80 125 <l 4+/-1 <7 150 <1 2+/-1 (7 135 <1 3+/-1 <7 I 03/18/80 145 (1 2+/-1 ,_ - <7 165 <1 1+/-1

<7 160 <l 2+/-1 (7 I 150 <l 1+/-1 (7 165 <l 5+/-1 (7

~

I. 03/25/80 310 <1 1+/-1 (7 0 04/01/80 295 (1 2+/-1 (7 170 <l <1 <7 165 <l <1  : (7

\I (1 04/08/80 305 <l 4+/-1 (7 180 <l 3+/-1 <7 165 3+/-1 (7 04/16/80 285 - <1 4+/-1 <7 195 <1 '3+/-1 <7 190 (1 '3+/-1 <7 04/22/80 330 (1 3+/-1 <7 155 <1 4+/-1 <7 140 <1 4+/-1 <7 04/29/80 205 .(1 4+/-1 * <7 155 <1 5+/-1 <7 160 (1 3+/-1 <7 05/06/80 280 (1 3+/-1 <7 170 (1 4+/-1 <7 165 (1 2+/-1 .. <7 05/14/80 345 <1 4+/-1 <7 190 (1 4+/-1 <7 185 (1 4+/-1 (7 05/20/80 250 <1 3+/-1 (7' 145 (1 1+/-1 <7 135 (1 1+/-1 (7 05/27/80 295 (1 3+/-1 <7 165 <1 3+/-1 <7 160 <1 3+/-1 <7 06/04/80 275(b) (1 4+/-1 <7 155 <l <1 (7 180 <1 4+/-1 <7 06/10/80 265 <1 4+/-1 <7 115 <1 3+/-1 (7 140 1+/-1 3+/-1** <7 06/17 /80 285 <1 4+/-1 <7 135 (1 1+/-1 <7 160 <1 4+/-1 <7 06/24/80 280 <1 4:!:l (7 135 <1 3+/-1 <7 155 <1 3+/-1 (7 (a) Charcoa-r cartridge in field 01/15-29/80.

(h) Collected 06/03/80

VEPCO A!RBOIUIE IODINE-131, GROSS ALPHA and BETA in AIR PAnTICULATE FILTERS (Weekly Collections}

10- 2 . Ci/m 3 ss (I) SURRY STATION HIR (I) HOG ISLAND RESERVE BC (I) BACON'S CASTLE Collection -Volu:.:e Gross Gross Volume Gross Gross Volume Gross Gross Date (m3) AlEha Beta I-131 (m3) AlEha Beta I-131 (m3) AlEha Beta I-131 07/01/80 07/08/80 280 290

<1

<1 4+/-1 3+/-1

<7

<7 130 130

. <1

<1 4+/-1 3+/-1

<7

<7 155 160

<1'

. <1 3+/-1 3+/-1 (7

<7 07/15/80 255 <1 4+/-1 <7 140 <1 2+/-1 <7 170 <1 2+/-1 <7 07/22/80 260 <1 3+/-1 <7 130 <1 4+/-1 <7 160 (1 3+/-1 (7 07/29/80 270 <1 1+/-1 <7 135 <1 9+/-1 <7(a) 150 <1 3+/-1 <7 08/05/80 280 <1 6+/-1 <7 135 1+/-1 5+/-1 <7 140 l:tl 9+/-1 <7 08/12/80 305 <1 4+/-1 <7 160 <1 3+/-1 <7 140 <1 4+/-1 <7 08/19/80 265 <1 3+/-1 (7 140 <1 3+/-1 <7 175 <l 3+/-1 <7 08/26/80 270 (1 3+/-1 <7 285 (1 2+/-1 <7 285 <1 2+/-1 (7

. 09/02/80 250 . <1 5+/-1 (7 120 <1 3+/-1 <7 175 (1 5:tl (7 09/09/80 275 (1 3+/-r * - (7 105 <1 3+/-2 <7 155 <1 5+/-1 <7 09/16/80 250 (1 5+/-1 (7 110 <1 2+/-1 , (7 155 (1 4+/-1 <7

~

09/23/80 280 (1 6+/-1 <7 135 <1 3+/-1 <7 150 <1 5+/-1 <7 .

09/30/80 270 1+/-1 5+/-1 (7 135 (1 0+/-1 <7 155 <1 3+/-1 (7 10/08/80 285 (1 3+/-1 (7 175(b) <1 5+/-1 (7 175 (1 3:tl (7 10/14/80 240 (1 6+/-1 <7 270 (1 2+/-1 <7 135 (1 6+/-2 <7 10/21/80 255 (1 6+/-1 o* 130 <1 4+/-2 (7 145 (1 5+/-2 (7 10/28/80 255 <l 4+/-1 (7 135 <1 <1 (7 145 (1 2+/-1 (7 11/04/80 245 (1 4+/-1 (7 135 <1 4+/-2 (7 150 (1 3+/-1 (7

  • 11/12/80 285 <l 6+/-1 (7 350 (1 3+/-1 (7 345 (1 8+/-1 (7  ;

11/18/80 380 <1 4+/-1 (7 405 <l 4+/-1 (7 405 (1 5+/-1 -<7 11/25/80 260 (1 7+/-1 (7 250 <1 4+/-1 (7 285 <l 5+/-1 <7 12/03/80 285 (1 8+/-1 (7 245 * <1 1+/-1 (7 330 <1 7+/-1 (7 12/09/80(c) 235 <1 15+/-1 (7 215 <1 13+/-1 (7 240 <1 13+/-1 <7 12/16/80 210 <1 17+/-2 <7 .245 (1 13+/-1 (7 250 <1 15+/-1 <7 12/23/80 230 <1 11+/-1 (7 255 <1 12+/-1 <7 255 (1 10+/-1 (7 12/30/6iJ 230 (1 8+/-1 (7 24.:, <1 H+/-l (7 235 <1 8+/-1 (7 (a) Read as one sample with FE.

(b) HIR collected 10/09/80.

(c) SS collected 12/10/80.

VEPCO  :

1 AIRBORNE IODINE-131, .GROSS *ALPHA and BETA in AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS (Weekly Collections)
  • . 10- 2 Ci/m 3 ALL ALLIANCE CP COLONIAL PARKWAY DOW Collection Volume Gross Gross Volume . Gross Gross Volume Gross Gross Date (m3) Alpha Beta I-131 (m3) Alpha Beta I-131 (m3) Alpha Beta I-131 01/02/80 180 (1 3+/-1 (7 300  : ~1 3+/-1 (7 150 (1 (1 (7 01/08/80 155 <1 4+/-1 (7 260.*  : (1 1+/-1 (7 130 <l <l (7 01/15/.80 180 <l 5+/-1 (7 300 .. <1
  • 9+/-1 (7 150 <l (1 . <7 I
  • 01/22/80 180 (1 3+/-1 (7 300 <l 5+/-1 (7 150 (1 (1 (7 01/29/80 180 . <1 6+/-1 (7 300 <l 5+/-1 (7 170 <1 (1. <7-02/05/80 180 <l 2+/-1 (7 280* <1 3+/-1 <7 155 (1 (1 (7*

02/12/80 180 <l 2+/-1 (7 260 <l. 7+/-1 <7 165 (1 3+/-1 (7 02/19/80 200 <l 4+/-1 (7 16~- <l 3+/-1 <7 155 (1 6+/-1 <7 02/26/80 190 (1 2+/-1 <7 150 <1 2+/-1 <7 165 (1 -3+/-1 <7 03/07/80 185(a) <l 3+/-1 (7 185(a) <l 3+/-1 <7 180 <l 2+/-1 (7 03/12/80 *215 <l 4+/-L _ , <7 110 (1 4+/-2 <7 140 (1 3+/-1 <7 03/18/80 285 <l 2+/-1 (7 150 <l 2+/-1 (7 170 <l 2+/-1 <7

.r:,. 03/25/80 160 <l 1+/-1 <7 305 (1 2+/-1 <7 165 (1 <l <7 N

04/01/80 285 <l 1+/-1 <7 150 <l I 1+/-1 <7 150 (1 1+/-1  : (7 04/08/80 280 <l 3+/-1 <7 155 <1 ' 4+/-1 <7 335 <1 1+/-1 <7 04/16/8_0 *305 <l 2+/-1 <7 180 <1 '1+/-1 (7 155 <1 3+/-1 (7 04/22/80 255 <1 4+/-1 <7 135 <1 4+/-1 <7 140 <1 5+/-1 <7 04/29/80 300 (1 2+/-1 <7 . 155 <l 2+/-1 (7 135 <1 2+/-1 . <7 05/06/80 250 <1 2+/-1 (7 150 <1 7+/-1 (7 185 <1 2+/-1 <7 05/14/80 345 <1 - 3+/-1 <7 180 <1 4+/-1 <7 195 <1 3+/-1 <7 (7 130 <1 <1 <7 160 <1 1+/-1 (7 05/20/80 245 <1 1+/-1 (7

<°I 3+/-1 (7 160 <1- 3+/-1 <7 185 <1 2+/-1 05/27/80 250 1+/-1 5+/-1 <7 180 <1 4+/-1 <7 210 <1 <1 <7 06/04/80 340 <7

<1 3+/-1 (7 .,

135 (1 3+/-1 (7 160 <1 <1 06/10/80 255

<1' 7+/-1 <7 140 <1 4+/-1 <7 185 <1 2+/-1 (7*

- 06/17/80 150 (7

<1 4+/-1 <7 145 <1 3+/-1 <7 180 (1 2+/-1 06/24/80 245 (a) Timer malfunction; calculation based on estimated average volume.

VE?CO AIRBORNE IODINE-131, GROSS ALPHA and BETA in AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS (W~ekly Collections) 10- 2 Ci/i:1 3

  • TT h.~w (I} ALLIANCE CP {I} COLOiiIAL PARKWAY DOW {I}

Collection Volume Gross Gross Volume Gross Gross Volume Gross Gross Date (m3) Alpha Beta I-131 (m3) Alpha Beta I-131 (~3) Alpha Beta I-131 07/01/80 250 <1 4+/-1 (7 130 <1 5+/-1 <7 165 (1 2+/-1 <7 07/08/80 245 <1 4+/-1 (7 145 (1 3+/-1 <li(a) 185 <1 2+/-1 <7 07/15/80 265 <1 3+/-1 (7 140 <1 4+/-1 (7 160 <l 1+/-1 <7 07/22/80 280 (1 3+/-1 <7 140 (1 3+/-1 (7 160 (1 1+/-1 (7 07/29/80 280 <1 2+/-1 <7 150 (1 2+/-1 (7 170 <1 5+/-1 <7 08/05/80 285 <1 6+/-1 (7 150 <1 6+/-1 <7 175 <l 2+/-1 <7 08/12/80 175 (1 5+/-1 (7 145 (1 4+/-1 (7 175 <1 4+/-1 <7 08/19/80 240 <1 4+/-1 <7 140 (1 3+/-1 <7 165 (1 2+/-1 (7 08/26/80 335 <1 2+/-1 (7 135. <1 4+/-1 <7 160 <1 2+/-1 <7 09/02/80 270 <1 4+/-1 (7 135 <1 4+/-1 <7 175 (1 (1 <7 09/09/80 165(b) <1 <1 <7 145 (1 4+/-1 <7 175 <1 <1 (7 09/16/80 140 <l 2+/-1... (7 125 <1 7+/-1 <7 150 <1 <1 <1 09/23/80 280 <1 4+/-1 <7 145 <1 4+/-1 <7 175 <1 1+/-1 <7

.t,.

w 09/30/80 250 <1 3+/-1 <7 145 (1 4+/-1 <7 160 (1 2+/-1 <7 10/08/80 280 <l 3+/-1 <7 160 <1 3+/-1 <7 190 <l 2+/-1 <7 10/14/80 250 <1 5+/-1 <7 135 <1 t. 7+/-2 <7 110 <1 3+/-2 <7 10/21/80 245 <1 5+/-1 <7 140 <1 5+/-2 <7 170 <1 <1 <7 10/28/80 240 <1 3+/-1 <7 140 <1 <1 <7 170 <1 <1 (7 11/04/80 245 (1 5+/-1 <7 145 <1 4+/-1 <7 175 <1 <1 <7 11/12/80 285 <1 7+/-1 <7 320 <l 7+/-1 <7 325 <l 2+/-1 <7 11/18/80 385 <l 6+/-1 <7 350 <1 4+/-1 <7 375 (1 4+/-1 (7 11/25/80 270 (1 4+/-1 <7. 295 (1 3+/-1 (7 305 (1 3+/-1 (7 12/03/80 290 (1 6+/-1 <7 315 (1 7+/-1 <7 O(c) <1 <l <7 12/09/80 200 (1 14+/-1 <7 235 <1 15+/-1 <7 245 <1 13+/-1 <7 12/16/80 235 <1 14+/-1 <7 290 (1 . 12+/-1 (7 295 <1 12+/-1 (7 12/23/80 240 <1 11+/-1 <7 290 <1 12+/-1 (7 295 <1 7+/-1. <7 12/30/80 290 <l 7+/-1 (7 285 <1 12+/-1 <7 295 <1 8+/-1 (7 (a). Lower sensitivy due to low sample volume (b) Calculation based on average volume.

(c) Pump found inoperable.

VEPCO AIRBORNE IODINE-131, GROSS-ALPHA and BETA in AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS (Weekly Collections)

. 10- 2 pCi{m 3 FE FORT EUSTIS NN NEWPORT NEWS Collection Volume Gross Gross Volume Gross Gross Date (m3) Alpha Beta I::-131 * (m3) Alpha Beta I-131 01/02/80 315 (1 1+/-1 <7 150 <1 3+/-1 <7 01/08/80 125 <1 4+/-1 *<7. 130 <1 4+/-1 <7 01/15/80 165 <1 2tl* . <7 150 <1 6+/-1 *o 01/22/80 170 <1 3+/-i * <7 150 <1 4+/-1 <7 01/29/80 170 <1 6:H* <7 150 <1 4:!:l <7 02/05/80 180 <1 4+/-1 <7 140 <1 3+/-1 <7 02/12/80 170 <1 3+/-1  : <7 150 <1 4+/-1 <7 02/19/80 155 <1 . 6+/-1 <7 140 (1 5+/-1 <7 02/26/80 165 <l 2+/-1. <7. 165 <1 4+/-1 <7 03/07 /80 . 185 <1 3+/-1 <7' 180 <1 4+/-1 <7 03/12/80 140 <1 2+/-1 <7 110 <1 4+/-2 <7

,t,. 03/18/80 170 - <l <1 . <7 170 <1 3+/-1 <7

,t,.

03/25/80 140 <1 7+/-2 <7 170 0.9+/-0.4 4+/-1 <7 04/01/80 165 <l <1 .. (7 175 <1 1+/-1 <7 04/08/80 170 <1 3+/-1* <7 , 170 <l 3+/-1 <7 04/16/80 190 <1 3+/-1 <7 -175 <1 3+/-1 (7 04/22/80 145 <1 2+/-1 <7 130 <1 5+/-1 <7 04/29/80 60 <1 1+/-1 .(7 150 <1 3+/-1 <7 05/06/80 (a) 140 <1 4+/-1 <7 05/14/80

  • 115 <1 4+/-1 *(7 165 <1 <1 <7 05/20/80 135 <1 <1 <7 120 <1 4+/-2 <7 05/27/80 155 <1 3+/-1 (7 145 <1 3+/-1 <7 06/04/80 185 <1 2+/-1 *o 175 <1 5+/-1 <7 06/10/80 140 1+/-1 4+/-1 *o 130 <1 3+/-1 (7 06/17/80 150 <1 5+/ .. (7 135 <1 6+/-1 <7 06/24/80 145 <1 3+/-1 (7 140 <1 4+/-1 <7

. / ..

(a) See Listing of Missed Samples page_:*,,

VE~CO "

A~RB0ffi1E IODINE-131, GROSS ALPHA and BETA in AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS (Weekly Collections) 10- 2 ECi/m 3 FE {I} FORT EUSTIS NN (C) NEWPORT NEWS Collection Volu.":!.e Gross Gross Volume Gross Gross Date (m3) AlEha Beta *1-131 (m3) AlEha Beta. I-131 07/01/80 140 <1 3:!:l <7 140 <1 4+/-1 <7 l i

'.\

07/08/80 140 <1 2:!:l <7 170 <1 3+/-1 <7 07/15/80 135 <1 2+/-1 <7 130 <1 2+/-1 <7 07/22/80 150 <1 3+/-1 <7 140 <l 3+/-1 <7 07/29/80 150 <1 <1 <7(a) 145 <1 3:!:l <7 08/05/80 155 <1 1+/-1 <7 145 <l 6:!:l <7 08/12/80 90 <1 5:!:l <7 155 (1 3+/-1 <7 08/19/80 95 <l 2+/-2 <7 145 <1 4+/-1 <7 08/26/80 130 <1 3+/-1 <7 145 (1 3+/-1 <7 09/02/80 135 - - <l 4+/-1 <7 135 (1 5:!:l <7

~

VI 09/09/80 150. <1 3:!:l <7 150 <1 2:!:l <7 09/16/80 130 <l . 4:!:l <7 125 <1 5:!:l <7 09/23/80 140 <1 4:!:l <7 1:50 <1 5:!:l <7 09/30/80 135 <1 5:!:l <7 140 1+/-1 5+/-1 <7 10/08/80 160 <1 2+/-1 <7 175 <1 3+/-1 <7 10/14/80 110 <l 2+/-2 <7 140 <1 4:!:l <7 10/21/80 130 <l 3+/-1 <7 170 (1 6+/-1 <7 10/28/80 130 <l 2+/-1 <7 185 <1 3:!:l <7 11/04/80 135 <l 4:!:l <7 180 <l 4+/-1 <7 11/12/80 285 <1 6+/-1 <7 320 <l 6+/-1 <7 11/18/80 355 <1 2+/-1 <7 220 <1 7+/-1 <7 11/25/80 285 <1 4+/-1 <7 275 <l 5+/-1 <7 12/03/80 245 <l 4+/-1 <7 320 <1 5+/-1 <7 12/09/80 250 (1 30:!:2 <7 215 <l 12+/-1 <7 12/16/80 280 <1 16+/-1 <1 255 (1 14:!:l <7 12/22/80 285 <1 12+/-1 <7 2.'.>U <l 11+/-1 <7 12/30/80 280 <l 7+/-1 <7 260 <1 8+/-1 <7 (a) Read as one sample with HIR.

VEPCO - Surry GAMMA EMITTERS IN* AIR PARTICULATE FILTER COMPOSITE.

(Quarterly Composites of Bi-Weekly Collections)

Stations in composite: SS, HIR Collection 10- 2 pCi/m 3 Period X Emitters 1st Quarter <0.01 2nd Quarter <0.01 3rd Quarter <0.01 4th Quarter <0.01

~

Stations in composite: BC, ALL, CP, DOW, FE Collection 10- 2 eCi/m 3 Period* r Emitters

  • 1st Quarter <0.01 2nd Quarter (0.01 3rd Quarter <0.01

,. 4th Quarter <0.01 Stations 'in composite: NN Collection 10- 2 pCi/m 3 Period y Emitters 1st Quarter <0.01 2nd Quarter (0.01 3rd Quarter <0.01 4th Quarter <0.01, Zr-Nb-95 a 0.01+/-0.01 46

VEPCO - Surry

..,- GROSS BETA DEPOSITION AND TRITIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN PRECIPITATION SAMPLES (Monthly* Collections)

Surrr Station (I) Ne~ort News (C)

. .. Collection Period Gross 8 pCi/1 Gross B nci/ni 2 Tritium pCi/1 Gross B pCi/1 Gross S nCi/m 2 Tritium pCi/1 January 9+/-2 0.14+/-0.02 (500 130+/-10 1.60+/-0.20 (500

  • .February 4+/-1 0.07+/-0.03 (500 57+/-6
  • 0.86+/-0. )5 (500 March 3+/-1 o. 90+/-0. 30 400+/-340 12+/-2 0.9+/-0.2 (500 April 3+/-1 0.12+/-0.04 (500 71+/-4 2.2+/-0.2 (500 May 7+/-2 <0.10 1110+/-350 8+/-2 <0.1 860+/-350 June (a) 3+/-2 0.04+/-0.03
  • 966+/-376 July 31+/-3 1.00:t0.10 <500 10+/-2 0.6+/-0.1 <5oo August (a) 3+/-1 0.14+/-0.05 (500 September 39+/-4 0.22+/-0.02 400+/-400 6+/-2 0.10+/-0.U4 (500 October 6+/-2 0.23+/-0.07 860+/-340 6+/-2 0.42+/-0.14 (500 November <2 <0.76 500+/-400 6+/-2 0.29+/-0.10 (500 December (a) 11+/-2 0.14+/-0.03 (500 I

GROSS BETA DEPOSITION AND TRITIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN PRECIPITATION SAMP~ES (Quarterly *composites of Monthl_y

  • Collections)

Surry Station (I) Newport Ne ;.,s (C)

Collection Gross 13 Gross 13 Tritium Gross 13 Gross S Tritium Period pCi/1 nCi/m 2 pCi/1 pCi/1 nCi/m 2 pCi/1 1st Quarter 6+/-1 0.7+/-0.1 <330 44+/-4 8.0+/-0.8 <330 2nd Quarter 2+/-1 0.2+/-0.1*

  • 300+/-100 30+/-3 4.1+/-0.4 400+/-100 3rd Quarter 43+/-4 1.6+/-0.2 <330 21+/-2 2.6+/-0.3 (330 4th Quartet{a) 8+/-2 0.1+/-0.l (330 (a) See Listing of Missing Samples page.

47

VEPCO - Surry

  • RADIOACTIVITY IN MILK SAMPLES

'(Monthly Collections)

(I) Bacon's Castle (EPPS) - State Selit Sam2les Collection :eCi/1 as of collection date g/1 Date. I-131 Sr-89 Sr-90 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 Stable Ca 01/14/80 <l <5 2+/-1 <15 <15 0.9 02/11/80 <l <5 (2 (15 (15 .1. 7 03/10/80 <l . <5 <2 (15 (15 1.6 04/07/80 <1 <5 2+/-2 (15 <15 1.2 05/05/80 <l (5 3+/-2 (15 <15 1.6 06/02/80* <l <5 <2 (15 (15 1.5 07/08/80 (1 (5 3+/-2 (15 (15 0.9 08/11/80 (1 <5 <2 (15 (15 1.6 09/02/80 (1 <5 <2 <15 (15 0.8 10/14/80 (1 (5 5+/-2 (15 (15 1.6 11/03/80 <l (5 10+/-3 <15 (15 1.3 12/01/80 . (1 <5 4+/-1 (15 (15 1.3 (I) Bacon's Castle (Judkins)

eCi/1 as of collection date g/1 I-131 Sr-89 Sr-90 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 Stable Ca

.OI/08/80 . <l (5 . 6+/-2 (15 (15 1.6 02/12/80 <1* <5 6+/-2 (15 (15 1.4 03/12/80 .<l <5 3+/-2 <15 (15 1.4 04/25/80 <l. (5 5+/-2 <15 (15 1.1

.\

05/27 /80 * .. <I <5

  • 10+/-2 (15 (15 1.6 06/10/80 <l (5 3+/-2 (15 <15 1.2 07/08/80 (1 (5 12+/-3 (15 (15 1.4 08/12/80 (1 (5 6+/-3 (15 . <15 1.4 09/09/80 <l <5 2+/-1 (15 <15 1.4 10/14/80 (1 (5 3+/-1 (15 (15 1.8 11/12/80 <l (5 3+/-1 (15 (15 2.1 12/09/80 (1 <5

\

10+/-2 (15 (15 1.4 48

VEPCO - Surry RADIOACTIVITY IN MILK SAMPLES (Monthly Collections)

(C) "Smithfield (Gwaltnez)

Collection ECi/1 as of collection date g/1 Date l"'."'131 Sr-89 Sr-90 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 Stable Ca 01/16/SO (1 (5 3+/-1 (15 (15 0.9 02/26/80 (1 . (5 3+/-1 (15 (15 1.4 03/19/80 *<1 (5 4+/-2 (15 (15 1. 7 04/25/80 (1 (5 11+/-6 (15 <15 1.4 05/20/80 <3(b) (5 6+/-3 (15 (15 1.4 06/17/80 <l <5 (2 (15 (15 2.2 07/25/80 (1 (5 4:t2 (15 (15 1.0 08/26/80 <l (5 (2 (15 <15 1. 7 09/16/80 <l <5 4+/-1 (15 (15 1.5 10/21/80 <1 <5 5+/-2 (15 (15 2.1 11/18/80 <1 <5 3:tl (15 (15 1.6 12/16/80 <1 <5 5:t2 (15 <15 0.8

. (I) Colonial Parkwai {Smith}

ECi/1 as of collection date g/1

. I-131 Sr-89 Sr-90 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 Stable Ca January(a) 02/12/80 <l <5 4+/-2 <15 <15 1. 7 03/11/80 <1 <5 7+/-2 (15 <15 1.3 04/08/80 <1 <5 O(b) (15 (15 1.3 05/14/80 (1 <5 (2 (15 <15 1.4 06/10/80 <l <5 4+/-3 (15 <15 1.5 07/08/80 (1 (5 <2 (15 <15 2.0 09/09/80 <l <5 5+/-2 <15 (15. 2.0 10/14/80 <l <5 '5+/-2 (15 (15 1.4 11/12/80 <1 (5 '3+/-2 (15 <15 2.2 12/09/80 <1 (5 4+/-2 (15 <15 0.9 (a) See Listing of Missing Samples page.

(b) Lower sensitivity due to low chemical yield.

49

VEPCO - Surry RADIOACTIVITY IN MILK SAMPLES (Monthly Collections)

(I) Lee Hall ~Ross) - State SElit Sameles Collection bCi/1 as of collection date g/1 Date 1-131 Sr-89 Sr-90 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 Stable Ca 01/14/80 <1 <5 2+/-2 <15 <15 1.2 02/11/80 <l (5 2+/-2 (15 (15 1.5 03/10/80 <l <5 8+/-5 <15 (15 1.1 04/07/80 <l (5 (2 <15 (15 1.6 05/05/80 <l <5 <2 <15 <15 2.4 05/12/80 <l <5 2+/-2 <15 <15 1.3 06/02/80 <l <5 ~:t2 <15 <15 1.8 07/08/80 <l <5 (2 <15 <15 1.2 08/11/80 <l <5 8+/-3 <15 <15 1. 9 09/02/80 <1 <5 (2 (15 (15 0.9 10/14/80 <1 <5 2:tl <15 <15 1.0 11/03/80 <l <s 2+/-2 <15 <15 1.6 12/01/80 <1 <5 2:tl <15 <15 1.6 50 I

I, ...

  • VEPCO - Surry GAMMA EMITTERS IN JAMES RIVER WATER SAMPLES (Bimonthly Collections)

Month Ci/1 Collected Ba-La-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 Zr-Nb-95 Co-58 Mn-54 Zn-65 Co-60 Fe-59 CHICKAHOMINY (C)

January <15 (15 <15 <10 (15 <IS <30 <15 <30 March (15 (15 (15 <10 (15 <15 <30 (15 <30 May (15 (15 <15 <10 <15 <15 <30 (15 <30 July (a)

September (15 <15 <15 <10 <15 <15 <30 (15 <30 November (15 (15 (15 <10 <15 <15 00 (15 00

\J1 HOG ISLAND POINT (I)

January <15 (15 (15 <10 <15 (15 <30 <15 <30 March (15 <15 (15 (10 t . (15 (15 (30 (15 <30 May <15 <15 (15 <10 <15 <15 <30 (15 <30 July (a)

September (15 (15 <15 <10 (15 (15 (30 (15 (30 November <15 (15 <15 (10 (15 (15 <30 <15 {30 NEWPORT NEWS (I)

January <15 (15 <15 <IO <15 <IS <30 (15 (30 March (15 * (15 <15 <10 (15 <IS <30 (15 (30 May (15 <15 <15 <10 <:!..S (15 (30 (15 <30 July (a)

September <15 (15 (15 <10 (15 <15 <30 (15 <30 November <15 (15 <15 <10 <15 (15 <30 (15 (30 (a) see Listing of Missing Samples page.

i VEPCO -Surry i

t GAMMA EMITTERS IN JAMES.RIVER WATER SAMPLES

  • I (Bimonthly Collections)

Month Collected Ba-La-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 Zr-Nb-95 Ci/1 'Co-58 Mn-54 Zn-65 Co-60 Fe-59 STATICJN INTAKE (I)

January (15 (15 (15 ,: <fo (15 (15 (30 (15 (30 March (15 <15 (15 <io * * (15 (15 (30 (15 (30 May (15 (15 <15 (10 <15 <15 (30 (15 (30 July (a)

September (15 (15 (15 <io <15 <15 <30 (15 (30 November (15 (15 (15 *: <10 <15 (15 <30 (15 (30 V1 N STATION DISCHARGE (I)

January <15 (15 (15 <10

, (15 (15 (30 (15 (30 March <15 (15 (15 <10 (15 (15 <30 <15 (30 May <15 (15 (15 <10 (15 (15 (30 (15 (30 July (a)

September <15 (15

<15 (10 (15 (15 (30 (15 (30

  • November <15 (15 "(15 (10 (15 (15 (30 (15 (30 (a) See Listing of Hissing Samples page.

VEPCO Sm;ry RADIOACTIVITY IN JAMES RIVER WATER SAMPLES FROM THE STATION DISCHARGE

-STATE SPLIT SAMPLES-

  • I (Quarterly Collections)

Collection Date: 01/11/80 04/08/80 07/07/80 12/01/80 Nuclide Ci/1 Sr-89 <5 <5 <5 <5 Sr-90 <2 <2 (2 <2 Tritium (500 (500 (500 <500 Ba-La-140 <15 (15 <1.5 <15 Cs-134 <15 <15 <15 <15 Cs-137 (15 (15 <15 <15 Zr-Nb-95 <10 <10 (10 <10 Co-58 <15 <15 (15 . <15 Mn-54 <15 <15 <15 (15 Zn-65 <30 <30 <30 (30 Co-60 (15 <15 <15 (15 Fe-59 <30 <30 <30 (30 TRITIUM IN JAMES RIVER WATER SAMPLES (Semiannual Composites of Bimonthly Samples) pCi/1 Sample Location 1st half 1980 2nd half 1980 Chickahominy 220+/-116 370+/-190 Newport News 340+/-110 280+/-130 RADIOACTIVITY IN,JAMES RIVER WATER Collected 12/01/80 from the Lower Chippokes

-State Split Sample-pCi/1 Tritium (500 Ba-La-140 <15 Cs-134/137 (15 Zr-Nb-95 (10 Co-58/60 (15 Mn-54 <15 Zn-65 (30 Fe-59 (30 Sr-89 (5 Sr-90 (2 53

  • -*~-------- __.................. ___ ,. .:* ..... _*.*_... .----~----*: --* *--. **-*

VEPCO - Surry GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM SAMPLES (Bi-Monthly Collections)

Sample Month ECi/kg Wet Weight Site Collected Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 CHICKAHOMINY January <130 <260 (130 <130 <260 <130 <130 (C) March (130 <260 <130 <130 <260 <130 (130' May (130 (260 <130 (130 <260 (130 (130 July (a)

September <130 <260 (130 (130 (260 <130 (130 November <130 <260 <130 <130 <260 <130 <130 LAWNES CREEK January <130 <260 <130 <130 <260 <130 <130 (I) March (130 (260 <130 (130 <260 <130 <130 May (130 (260 (130 <130 <260 <130 <130 July (a)

September <130 <260 <130 <130 <260 <130 <130 November <130 <260 (130 <130 <260 <130 <130 JAMESTOWN January <130 <260 <130 (130 <260 <130 (130 (I). March * (130 (260 (130 (130 (260 (130 (130 May (130 <260 (130 <130 (260 <130 <130

. July (a)

. September . -~<130. (260 (130 <130 <260 * <130 <130 November. *, (130 <260 <130 <130 <260 (130 (130 HOG ISLAND POINT January '(130 (260 (130 <130 (260 (130 (130

{I) March (130 , (260 (130 (130 (260 .(130 (130 May <130 (260 (130 (130 (260 (130 (130 July {a)

September <130 (260 (130 (130 (260 <130 (130 November (130 (260 (130 <130 (260 <130 <130 STATION January <130 (260 (130 <130 (260 (130 (130 DISCHARGE March (130 (260 <130 (130 (260 (130 (110 (I) May '(130 (260 (130 (130 (260 <130 (130 July (a)

September See State Split results next page.

November See State Split results next page.

(a) See Listing of Missing Samples page.

54

VEPCO - Surry GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM SAMPLES State Split.Samples from Station Discharge

~

., Month Collected Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58

  • Eci/kg Wet Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-1-37 July(a)

September <130 <260 (130 <130 <260 (130 (130 November <130 <260 <130 <130 .<260 <130 (130

=

Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Clams (State Split Samples from Station Discharge)

Collection pCi/kg Wet Weight Date Sr-89 Sr-90

~~ly(a)

September (20 (10 November (20 20+/-10 (a) See Listing of Missed Samples page.

55

VEPCO - Surry GAMMA EMITTERS IN OYSTER SAMPLES (Bi-Monthly Collections)

Month ECi/kg Wet Weight Location Collected Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 .Cs-137 Deep Wafer January (130 (260 <130 <130 <260 <130 <130 Shoal March (130 <260 (130 (130 (260 <130 <130 (260 (130 (130 (130 *..

  • (I) May <130 <130 <260 July (a)

September <130 (260 (130 (130 <260 <130 (130 November (130 (260 (130 (130 <260 (130 <130 Point of January (130 (260 (130 . (130 (260 (130 (130 Shoal March (130 (260 <q_o <136 <260 <130 <130 (I) May <130 <260 (130 <130 (260 (130 . <130 July (a)

September <130 <260 (130 (130 <260 <130* (130 November <130 <260 <130 <130 <260 (130 (130 Newport January - <130 (26Q (130 (130 (260 <130 (130 News March (130 <260I (130 (130 (260 (1;0 <130 (I) May (130 (260 (130 (130 <260 <130 (130 July * (a)

September (130 (260 <130 (130 (260 (130 (130 November (130 (260 (130 <1~0 (260 (130 (130 (a) See Listing of Missing Samples page.

56

VEPCO - Surry GAM.MA EMITTERS IN FISH SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF SURRY STATION (I)

(Semi-Annual Collection)

  • Collection Sample ECi/kg Wet Weight Date Type Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 02/80 Catfish <130 <260 <130 -<130 <260 <130 <130 Perch <130 <260 <130 <130 <260 <130 (130 08/80 Catfish (130 <260 <130 <130 <260, <130 <130 Perch <130 <260 <130 <130 (260 <130 (130 GAMMA EMITTERS IN CRAB SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF SURRY STATION (I)

(July, August, September Collection)

Month pCi/k~ Wet Weight Collected Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 . Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 July (a)

August (a)

. September (130 <260 (130 <130 <260 (130 <130 (a) See Listing of Hissing Samples page.

57

VEPCO - Surr_y RADIOACTIVITY IN WELL WATER SAMPLES (Semi-Annual Collections) 1st Half Coll~ : April 2nd Half Coll: .October ECi/1 ECi/1 Gross a Gross B Tritium* Gross a Gross e Tritium*

(!)Surry Station <1 9+/-2 <330 1+/-1 9+/-2 <330 (I)Hog Island Res. 2+/-1 12+/-3 <330 <1 3+/-1 <330

(!)Bacon's Castle <1 7+/-2 300+/-120 3+/-1 4+/-1 <330 (C)Jamestown <1 3+/-2 <330 <1 3+/-2 030

  • Tritium Analyzed by enrichment method.

-RADIOACTIVITY .IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES (Semi-Annual Collections) 1st Half Coll.: April 2nd Half Coll. October ECi/1 ECi/1 Gross a Gross B Tritium* Gross a Gross 8 Tritium*

(I)Chippokes Creek l:!:l 3+/-1 <soo 1+/-1 5+/-2 1220+/-370

(!)Williamsburg Reserve 1+/-1 2+/-1 350+/-350 3+/-1 3+/-2 1260+/-370

(!)Newport News Reserve 1+/-1 3+/-1 '730+/-350 <1 3+/-1 480+/-360 (C)Smithfield 1+/-1 4+/-2 500+/-350 <1 10+/-2 880+/-360

  • Tritium Analyzed by direct L. S. Counting.

58

VEPCO - Surry GAMMA EMITTERS IN SILT SAMPLES (Semiannual Collections)

Collection Period: 03/12-27/80 pCi/kg dry*

  • (C)Chickahominy (150 950+/-100*

(!)Station Discharge (150 1210+/-120

(!)Hog Island Point (150 760+/-80

(!)Station Intake (150 (150

(!)Point of Shoals <150 190+/-40

(!)Newport News (150 (150 Collection Period: 09/19-29/80 Chickahominy (150

... 690+/-160 Station Discharge (150 1100+/-250 Hog Island Point (150 (150 Station Intake (150 1070+/-210 Point of Shoals (150 1430+/-410, Co-60 = 3220+/-410 Newport News <150 490+/-140 59

.... *,--.:..-,., .... ,* .. - ***- **--**--**--. -.-,.':..-..:..;.*_ *-~------- - - -** -- ..

VEPCO - Surry GAMMA EMITTERS IN SOIL SAMPLES

(~nual Collection)

Samples Collected: 08/05/80 pCi/kg Location  : *cs.;..f34 Cs-137 (I)SS (150 200+/-50 (I)BC (150 420+/-50 (I)ALL (150 230+/-30 (I)CP (150 1040+/-100 (I)OOW (150 600+/-70 (I)FE (150 380+/-50 GAMMA EMITTERS IN FOWL (Semi-Annual Collections)

Collection Month ~ample pCi/kg Area Collected Type Cs-134 Cs-137 (I)HIR ... March Mallard Duck .(80 <30 H!R October Coot <BO <BO RADIOACTIVITY IN FOOD.CROPS (Annual Collection)

State Split Samples Date pCi/k~h Wet Weight Collected Farm Type Cs-134 Cs-137 Sr-89 Sr-90 10/21/80 (I) Slades Peanuts (80 <BO (20 10+/-10 10/21/80 Sl.udcs Corn(a) (80 (80 <20 2C:+/-10 10/21/80 (!)Brocks Peanuts(a) (80 <BO (20 ~10 10/21/80 Brocks Corn <BO (80 <20 * <10 12/03/80 Brocks Soybeans <BO <SO (20 120+/-10 Slades Soybeans <80 <BO (20 120+/-10 (a) State split.

60

I I I I I. ** I I,,

  • I i VEPCO *- Surry GAflHA RADIATION TOTAL mR/QTR. USING THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS VEPCO-AREA TLD'S 1980 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter *4th* Om\rter Date Annealed: 12/21/79 03/24/80 06/20/80 . 09/i9/80 08/19/80 ,

Date Read: 05/05/80 10/24/80 01/20/81

.' I Location .. *mR/wk EmR EmR mR[wk I:mR mR/wk EmR mR/wk*

Control -00 12. 2+/-1.1 0.6+/-0.1 33.3+/-2.3 1. 6+/-0.1 5.3+/-0.8 0.3j!:0.1 10. 3+/-1.1 0.6+/-0.1 Training Center -01 22.2+/-2.0 1.1+/-0.1 23.6+/-3.9 1.1+/-0. 2 11.4+/-1. 4 0.6/!=0.1 15.8+/-2.1 0.9+/-0.1

. Admin Bldg Entrance-02 35.9+/-3.2 1,8+/-0.2 32.1+/-2.2 1. 5+/-0.1 18.5+/-5.3 1.1+/-0. 3 26.1+/-1.5 1.5+/-0.1 I

Admin Bldg Recep -03 47.0+/-2.9 2.4+/-0.1 41. 9+/-4 .1 2.8+/-0.2 28.0+/-3.0 1. 6~0. 2 37.8+/-8.8 2.1+/-0.5 Admin Bldg Kitchen -04 32.2+/-3.3 1. 7+/-0. 2 "28.6+/-5.7 1. 4+/-0. 3 18.2+/-3.5 1. 0+/-0. 2 24.3+/-3.3 1.4+/-0.2 Admin Bldg (Men) -05 40.6+/-4.7 2.1:!:0.2 31.6+/-3.9 1. 5+/-0. 2 23.7+/-3.0 1. 3+/-0. 2 32.7+/-4.2 1. 9+/-0. 2 Admin Bldg Conf -06 29.5+/-2.5 1. 5+/-0.1 29.0+/-12.3 1.4+/-0.6 18.1+/-2.5 1. 0+/-0.1 25.4+/-2.8 1.4+/-0.1 Cafeteria -07 37.9+/-2.3 2.0+/-0.1 34.6+/-6.4 1. 6+/-0. 3 21. 5+/-1.6 1. 2+/-0.1 26.7+/-1.4 1.5+/-0.1 Haintenance Shop -08 29.5+/-3.9 1. 5+/-0. 2 26.2+/-2.3 1. 2+/-0.1 19.5+/-2.9 1.1+/-0. 2 21. l:!:9.0 1. 2+/-0.1 Storeroom East End -09 missing 76.0+/-16.8 t 3.6+/-0.8 21. 7+/-2.6 1.'2+/-0.1 27.5+/-4.3 1. 6+/-0. 2 Storeroom West End -10 36.1+/-4.4 1. 9+/-0. 2 30.8+/-8.3 '1.5+/-0.4 19.7+/-2.5 1. l+/-0.1 20.6+/-1.5 1. 2+/-0*.1 Contr~l Room East -11 21. 2+/-2. 4 1.1+/-0.1 23.3+/-4.9 1.1+/-0. 2 12.0+/-1.8 0.7+/-0.1 16.2+/-3:3 0.9+/-0.2 Control Room West -12 18.8+/-2.7 1.0+/-0.1 16.9+/-2.7 0.8+/-0.1 8.4+/-0.8 0.5+/-0.1 10.7+/-3.5 --0.6+/-0. 2 Intrument Shop -13 432.0+/-75.0 22.3+/-4.1 305.6+/-86.6 14.5+/-4.1 310.6+/-12.0 17.5+/-0.7 336.3+/-14.8 19.1+/-0.8 Clenn Change Room -14 61. 2+/-0. 4 3.2+/-0.4 49.4+/-3.7 2.3+/-0.2 39.9+/-3.3 2.~+/-0.2 43.1+/-3.5 2.5+/-0.2 Security Bldg. -15 74.1+/-3.8 3.8+/-0.2 57.9+/-6.2 2.7+/-0.4 47.5+/-9.9 2.7+/-0.5 37.0+/-3.R 2.1+/-0.2 East Fence -16 14.4+/-1. 3 1. 0+/-0.1 73.3+/-6.4 3.5+/-0.3 76.6+/-5.2 4.3+/-0.3 78.3+/-10.7 4.4+/-0.6 North Fence -17 14.3+/-1.5 14.3+/-1.3

1. 0+/-0.1 Ca>

West Fence -18 0.7+/-0.1 South Fence -19 14.8+/-1.7 0.8+/-0.1 Electrical Shop -20 237.7+/-55.7 12.3+/-2.9 \,

(a) Stations 17-20 deleted as of 2nd quarter.

VEPCO - Surry

  • GAMMA RADIATION TOTAL mR/QTR. USING THERMOLUMINISCENT DOSIMETERS VEPCO-ENVIRONMENTAL. Tl.D'S 1st Quarter 1980 Date Annealed: 12/10/79, 12/21/791:

Date Read: 05/05/8J Location EmR mR/wk Location EmR mR.'wk Vcpc-00

  • 12.3+/-1.5 0.6:!:0.1 Vepe-28 10.9+/-2.1 0.5+/-0.1

-01 )': 306+/-33 15. 8+/-1. 7 -29 9. 7+/-1. 7 0.5+/-0.1

-02 ~ 13.4+/-2.7 0.7+/-0.1 -30 14. 9+/-1. 5 0.7+/-0.1

-03

  • 27.3+/-2.0 1. 4+/-0.1 -31 missing

-04

  • 15. 0+/-1.1 0.8+/-0.1 -32 14.0+/-2.0 0.7+/-0.1

-05 missing I -33 12. 0+/-1. 7 0.fi::0.1

-06

  • 14. 8+/-1. 2 0.8+/-0.1 -34 13.8+/-3.5 0.7+/-0.2

-07 ,.. missing : -35 12.0+/-2.5 0.6+/-0.1

~oa ',

. missing -36 14.9+/-1.5 0.7+/-0.1

.-09 *

  • 23.1+/-2.4 -~*1.2+/-0.1 -37 13.7+/-2.3 0.7+/-0.1

-10 ** *1"8.9+/-3.0 1. 0+/-0. 2 -38 15. 4+/-1. 8 0.7+/-0.1

-11

  • 15.9+/-1.6 1. 0+/-0.1 -39" 13.9+/-2.2 0.7+/-0.1

-12 "I< 16.8+/-3.0 1. 0+/-0. 2 -40 14.6+/-2.3 o. 7~:0.1

-13 *1 16.9+/-3.9 1. 0+/-0. 2 -41 13.9+/-2.4 0.7+/-0.1

-14  : 17.4+/-2.3 1. 0+/-0.1 -42 5.9+/-0.9 0.3+/-0.1

-15 ~; 6.0+/-0.9 0.3+/-0.1 -43 13. 3+/-1. 3 0.6+/-0.1

-16 )': 6.1+/-0.9 0.3+/-0.1 -44 14.7+/-2.3 0.7+/-0.1

-17 )': 10.8+/-1.8 0.6+/-0.1 \ -45 missing

-18 )'( 12.3+/-4.9 0.6+/-0.3 -46 12.0+/-2.8 0.6+/-0.1

-19

  • 11.0+/-1.5 0.6+/-0.1 -47 15.4+/-2.2 o. 7~.0.1

-20

  • 10.3+/-2.5 0.5:!:0.1 -48 15. 8+/-1. 6 0.8+/-0.1

-21

  • 6.1+/-0.6 0.3+/-0.1 -49 11. 8+/-1. 3 0.6+/-0.1

-22 .,, 6.2+/-0.7 0.3+/-0.1 -so 7.4+/-0.7 0.4+/-0.1

-23

  • 11. 9+/-2. 2 0.6+/-0.1 -51 7.4+/-0.7 0.4+/-0.1

-24 10.3+/-2.5 0.5+/-0.1 -52 7.4+/-0.9 0.4+/-0.1

-25 13.6+/-1.4 0.6+/-0.1 -53 7.4+/-0.7 0.4+/-0.1

-26 13. 0+/-1. 7 0.6+/-0.1 -54 7 .1+/-0.8 o. 3:!.0.1

-27 11.2+/-3.3 0.5+/-0.2 62

VEPCO - Surry GAMMA RADIATION TOTAL mR/QTR. USING THERMOLUMINISCENT DOSIMETERS VEPCO-ENVIRONMENTAL TLD'S 1980 2nd 'quarter Date Annealed: 03/24/80

  • Date Read: 08/19/80 Location EmR mR/wk Control (Site) -00 14.7+/-2.7 0.7+/-0.1 Surry Station -01 185.6+/-10.4 8. 8+/-C. 9 WNW -02 41.3+/-7.5 2.0+/-0.4 Discharge Canal -03 24.7+/-6.6 1. 2+/-0. 3 NNW -04 33.3+/-3.3 1.6+/-0.2 North -OS 33.2+/-5.5 1. 6+/-0. 3 NNE -06 31.8+/-8.3 1. 5+/-0. 4 NE -07 32.4+/-5.6 1.5+/-0.3 ENE -08 34.1+/-3.7 1. 6+/-0. 2 Enst exclusion area -09 35.3+/-3.8 1. 7+/-0.2 WEST -10 43.6+/-9.3 2.1+/-0.4 WSW -11 41.9+/-5.8 2.0+/-0.2 SW -12 51.1+/-~.8 2. 4+/-0. 3.

SSW -13 47.4+/-5.3 2.2+/-0.3 South -14 44.5+/-7.3 2.1+/-0.3 SSE -15 48.5+/-4.3 1. 9+/-0. 2 SE -16 37.8+/-2.1 1.8+/-0.1 Ea$L -17 36.7+/-4.9 1. 7+/-0. 2 Intake Canal -18

  • 29.9+/-2.2 1. 4+/-0.1 Hog Island Reserve -19 33.1+/-2.5 1. 6+/-0.1 Bacons Castle -20 30.7+/-4.4 1.5+/-0.2 Route 633 -21 31.0+/-1. 7 1. 5+/-0 .1 Alliance -22 29.8+/-3.2 1.4+/-0.2 Surry -23 31.0+/-4. O 1.5+/-0.2 Routes 637 & 635 -24 29.3+/-3.1 1. 4+/-0.1 Sc,iL l ,:mc.J Wlwrf *-25 30.4+/-4.5 1. 4+/-0. 2 Jwn<.!stown -26 28.5+/-2.6 1. 3+/-0.1 Colonial Parkway (NW) -27 27.3+/-2.1 1. 3+/-0.1 Route 617 & 618 -28 26.9+/-2.5 1. 3+/-0.1 Kingsmill (North) -29 26. 8+/-1. 5 1. 3+/-0.1 Williamsburg -30 34.2+/-2.0 1. 6+/-0.1 Kingsmill (NNE) -31 28.8+/-6.7 1. 4+/-0. 3 Hurlw<.*is<.*r -32 30.8+/-7.4 1.5+/-0.4 W,1t<.!r Pl.ant -33 29.J+/-J.6 l. 4+/-0. 2 IJ1Jw Chemical -34 30. 4+/-1. 9 1. 4+/-0.1 1:c!<.' llall -35 34.9+/-8.2 1. 7+/-0. 4 fooia: IslumJ -36 31.6+/-3.4 1. 5+/-0. 2

/'urL Eustis -37 27.5+/-5.9 1. 3+/-0. 3 lfowport News -38 29.3+/-4.3 1. 4+/-0. 2

/;ontrol (J .R. Bridge) -39 25.2+/-4.3 1. 2+/-0. 2

,:onl rul (Benn's Church)-40 22.3+/-2.9 1.1+/-0.1

Smithfield -41 25.4+/-2.7 1.2+/-0.1 Rushmere -42 24.1+/-3.2 1.1+/-0. 2
  • Roule 628 -43 23.2+/-2.1 1.1+/-0.1 63

VEPCO - Surry GAMHA RADIATION TOTAL mR/QTR. USING THERMOLUMINISCENT DOSIMETERS VEPCO-ENVIRONMENTAL TLD'S 1980 3rd quarter Date Annealed: 06/20/80 Date Read:. 10/25/80 Location EmR mR/wk (C) Control (Site) -oo 6.1+/-0. 7 0.3+/-0.1 Surry Station -01 123.0+/-22.0 6. 8+/-1. 2 WNW -02 14.1+/-1. 9 0.8+/-0.1 Discharge Canal -03 7.8:!:0.l 0.4+/-0.1 NNW -04 13.8:!::l.0 0.8+/-0.1 North -05 14.4+/-0.6 O.R+/-0.1 NNE -06 14. 7+/-1.5 0.8+/-0.1 NE -07 14. 2+/-1. 6 0.8+/-0.1 ENE -08 13.9+/-2.0 0.8+/-0.1 E:1s t exclusion area -09 missing WEST -10 14. 5+/-1. 8 0.8+/-0.1 WSW -11 15.2+/-1.4, 0.8+/-0.1 SW -12 14. 3:!:1.7 0.8+/-0.1 SSW -13 14.0:!:l.6 0.8:!:0.J,.

Sc:rnth -14 13. 7:!:l. 4 0.8:!:0.1 SSE -15 13.6:!:0.4 0.8+/-0.1 SE. ~16 13.2:!:2.8 0.7:!:0.2 East .-17 *13.3:!:l.6

  • 0.7+/-0.1 Intake Canal ..'., -18 8.9:!:0.4. 0.5+/-0.1 Hog Island Reserve. -19 13.1+/-0.8 0.7+/-0.1 Bacons Castle -20 11. 4:!:2. 4
  • 0.6+/-0.1 l{outc 633 -21 11. 2:!:l. 9 0.6+/-0.1 Al Hance -22 10. 3:!:l. 2 0.6+/-0.1 Surry -23 9. 9+/-1. 7 0.6+/-0.1 Rn11tcs 637 E,, 635 -24 10.4+/-1. 7 0.6+/-0~1 Sc11Ll~nu Wharf -25 '.9. 8+/-2 .1 0.5+/-0.1 Jamestown -26 il.1+/-1.8 0.6+/-0.1 Colonial Parkway (NW) -27 11.3+/-1.3 0.6+/-0.1 l<ou t c 617 E,, 618 -28 11. 4+/-1.8 0.6+/-0.1 Kini.;smill (North) -29 8.8+/-1.5 0.5+/-0.1 Williamsburg -30 10.5+/-1.0 0.6+/-0.1 Kingsmill (NNE) -31 10. 9+/-1.5 0.6+/-0.1 lh,<lwl* iHl'r -32 11.8+/-1.4 0.7+/-0.1 Wiitl!r P J :mt -))
11. 8+/-2. 6 0.7+/-0.2 Uow Chemical -34 12.9+/-0.9 0.7+/-0.1 LC!l! llall -35 13.* 4+/-3.0 0.7+/-0.2 C:ousc h,lunc.J -36 14.5+/-0.8 0.8+/-0.1 1-'orL Eustis -37 12.2+/-1.6 0.7+/-0.1 N<.!wport News -38 13.0+/-1. 7 0.7+/-0.1 (C) Control (J .R. Bridge) -39 11. 4+/-0. 6 0.6+/-0.1 (C) ConLrol (Benn's Church)-40 8.1+/-0.3 0.5+/-0.1 Smithfield -41 9. 8+/-1. 3 0.5+/-0.1 ...

Rushmere -42 11. 6+/-1.6 0.6+/-0.1 RouLc 628 -43 9. 5+/-1.1 0.5+/-0.1 64

VEPCO - Surry GAM!>JA RADIATION TOTAL rrul/QTR. USING THERMOLUMINISCENT DOSIMETERS VEPCO-ENVIRONMENTAL TLD'S 1980 4th Quarter Date Annealed: 09/19/80 Date Read: 01/19/81 Location [mR mR/wk Control (Site) -00 11.1+/-4.4 0.6+/-0.3 Surry Station -01 198.4+/-6.1 6.S+/-C.3 WNW -02 24.5+/-3.6 1.4+/-0.2 Discharge Canal -03 16.1+/-1.9 0.9+/-0.1 Nt-..1'W -04 23. 8+/-1. 6 1. 4+/-0.1 North -OS 23.5+/-1.3 1. 4+/-0.1 NNE -06 24.4+/-4.7 1. 4+/-0. 3 NE -07 25.0+/-3.4 1. 4+/-0. 2 ENE -08 23.8+/-2.0 1. 4+/-('1, 2 East exclusion area -09 28.3+/-3.6 1.6+/-0.2 WEST -10 19.2+/-3.0 1.1+/-0.2 WSW -11 19. 2+/-1. 9 1.1+/-0.1 SH* -12 19. 9!1. 9 . 1.1+/-0.1 SSW

. South

-13

-14

20. 2+/-1. 2 21.1+/-2. 2 1.2+/-0.1
1. 2+/-(' .1 SSI~ -15 20.1+/-1. 5 1.2+/-0.1

, SE -16 21. 9+/-4. 0 1. 3+/-0. 2 East -17 22.1+/-2.0 1. 3+/-0.1 Intake Canal -18 12. 8+/-1. 5 0.7+/-0.6 Hog Island Reserve -19. 18.8+/-2.1 1.1+/-0.1 Bacons Castle -20 21.5+/-4.1 1. 2+/-0. 2

!{011 l C 633 -21 17.1+/-1.9 1. 8+/-(' .1 A1 I lance -22 13.9+/-0.5 0.8+/-0.1 Surry -23 20. 8+/-1. 3 1.2+/-0.1 Routes 637 & 635 -24 18. 8+/-1. 8 1.1+/-0.1 Scotland Wharf -25 18. 7+/-1.4 1.1+/-0.l Jamestown -26 40.6+/-4.3 2.3+/-0.2 Colonial Parkway (NW) -27 20.2+/-5.0 1.2+/-0.3 Route 617 & 618 -28 18.5+/-2.9 1.1+/-(. 2 Kingsmill (North) -29 17.7+/-1.8 1. 0+/-0.1 Williamsburg -30 18.7+/-2.4 1.1+/-0.1 Kingsmill (NNE) -3) 15.7+/-2.2 ' 0.9+/-0.1 g11dwci8l r 0

-32 22.0+/-3.9 1.3+/-0.2 W.i tli r Plant -33 20.4+/-3.1 1.2+/-0.2 IJow Chl!micul -34 22.7+/-2.4 1. 3+/-0.1 l.1 'I' llall -35 21.6+/-1. 7 l.2+/-(J. l

(;oo:;L* ls I.unu -36 24.1+/-3.6 1.4+/-0.2 For L Eustlt.. -37 19.6+/-1.9 1.1+/-0.1 Newport Ne\1s -38 17 .9+/-1.0 1. 0+/-0.1

' Control (J .R. Bridge) -39 Control (Benn's Church)-40 18.9+/-3.6 15.4+/-2.3 1.1+/-0. 2 0.9+/-0.1 Smithfield -41 17.4+/-2.3 1.0+/-0.1 Rushmere -42 19.4+/-2.1 1.1+/-0.1 Routt! *628 -43 16 .. 9+/-1. 2 1. 0+/-0.1 65

i:.>

~*-

SECTION 6 QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA 66

TLD Intercomparison Badges Irrodiatcd by Bottelle Northwest Labs 1980 Tofal mR less transEortation control 1st Qtr . 2nd Qtr 3rd gtr 4th gtr Llndgc.: Known Measured Known Measured Known Measured Known Measured A 8 5+/-1 10 10.1+/-3.4 100 102.0+/-15.0 100 94+/-9 il 16 13:!:2 20 21.0+/-4.1 10 10.2+/-2.6 50 47+/-6 C 24 22:!:7 30 29.0+/-5.5 15 15.5+/-3.8 25 24:!:5 D 100 103:!:10 60 63.4+/-8.6 30 29.3:!:9.0 25 23:!:2

  • E 80 77:!:6 70 62.8+/-5.9 35 32.5+/-8.8 50 47:!:6 F 64 59:!:6 100 91. 8+/-14. 4 45 41.4+/-7.2 75 66:!:7 G 28 27:!:3 30 26.6:!:5.3 60 56.9+/-7.1 100 97+/-11 H 32 29:!:3 40 37.5:!:3.8 80 74.3:!:10.6 75 67+/-7 J 40 36:!:4 60 52.2+/-6.5 10 8. 4:!:l. 3 25 26:!:5

\

K )7 38:!:4 80 10. 4:no. 5 I

100 82.4+/-12.4 50 48:!:7 67

-. QUALITY CONTROL ANALYSES

SUMMARY

1980 The., tables below summarize results of samples run for process quality c.:onLrol purposes during the subject month. These listings are in add-ition to such measurements as detector backgrounds, check source values, r.,

r.n<lio:netric-gravimetric comparisons, system calibrations, etc. Detailed lb:t:in 6 s of each measurement are maintained at the laboratory and are available for inspection if required.

BLANK SAMPLES

uc.: l.i<le Number of Number of analyses exceeding An<1lyzed Determinations the LLD for that analysis r.ros:, beta 68 0 r:ros:5 al*,,ha 43 0 Strontiun-89 49 0 S ::rn:1 tiun-90 178 0 l <id i.:H:-J.:n 152 0 Trlt::.u.':1 87 0 G.,r:;l':n emitters 46 0 SPLIT SAMPLES Nuc 1.i<lc Number of No. agreeing No. agreeing No. differing

. /\n:i ryzccl Det'ns within.20 within 3a by> 3a

  • I I

~ I

  • ' r::r*oss beta** *. 99 9,4 5 0 G ~o~: r; al!>ha 25 23 1 0 i; t r.011 L"i.u1:1-89 48 /18 0 0

~; Lron Li u1:1-90 L18 /18 0 0

'J' 1" i. l:.~ Ul'.l 134 lJli 0 0 Iod ! n*~-131 77 77 0 0 C.";11.11:1.1 cmi.ttcn, 121 120 0 0 c.iJ c i.11r.:-:, 5 2 :L 1 0 SPIKED;SAMPLES Nuclide No. of Within 2a Within 3a differing from Analyzed Det'ns of known of known known by> 3c, C:rc.,:;1: been /1/1 ,,3 l O*

!i l run tiu1':'l-fl9 23 23 2 0

~; t ron::ium-90 73 73 4 0

  • 1:r i l i 1am 52 51 1 0 Co11:1n:1 cmi tlcn; 29 29 0 0 lotlinu-131 29 27 2 0 68

EPA INTERCOMPARISON RESULTS 1980 Control MWF I:*

~ample Agency Limits Measured Txee Anal::z:sis Value (3a 1 n*l2 +/-2a error Units

' -Water I-131 53 15 49+/-5 oCi/1 Air Filter Gross a 10 15 11+/-1 pCi/fi.lter Air Filter Gross B 31 15 34+/-3 pCi/filter Air Filter Sr-90 10 5 6+/-1 pCi/filter Air Filter Cs-137 12 15 16+/-4 pCi/filter Water Gross u 21 15 26+/-3 pCi/1 Water Gross 8 49 15 50+/-5 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 7 5 8+/-1 pCi/1 Water Co-60 33 15 37:!:4 pCi/1 Water Cs-134 5(> 15 58+/-6 pCi/1 Water Cs-137 0 0 <5 pCi/1 Water Gross Cl 12 15 13:!:l pCi/1 Water Gross 8 27 15 29+/-3 pCi/1 Air Filter Gross Cl 24 6 29+/-3 pCi/filter Air Filter Gross B 28 5 41:!:4 pCi/filter Air Filter Sr-90 8 2- 9+/-1 pCi/ f .i.lter Air Filter Cs-137 12 5 14+/-2 pCi/filter

  • Water H-3 2040 1040 2260+/-230 pCi/1

.Air Filter Gross a 10 5 11+/-1 pCi/ filter Air Filter* Gross f3 29 5 33+/-3 pCi/filter Air Filter Sr-90 9 1.5 10+/-1 pCi/filter Air Filter Cs-137 10 5 12+/-1 pCi/filter Water Gross a 30 8 30+/-3 pCi/1 Water Gross 8 45 5 45+/-5 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 10  ; 5 <5 pCi/1 Wat<!r Sr-90 20 1.5 20+/-2 pCi/1 Water H-3 1750 341 1600+/-160 pCi/1 Milk Sr-89 10 5 <5 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 25 1.5 18+/-3 pCi/1 Milk I-131 0.01 0.1 <5 pCi/1 Milk Cs-137 40 5 43+/-4 pCi/1 Milk Ba-140 0.01 0.1 <10 pCi/1 Milk K 1600 80 2000+/-200 t>Ci/1 Water Gross Cl 13 5 14::U pCi/1 Water Gross B 22 5 23+/-2 pCi/1 Air Filter Air Filter Air *Filter Cross u Gro!it.

Sr-90

,~ 15 41 10 1.5 5

5 18+/-2 50+/-5 10+/-1 pCi/filter pCi/flltcr pCi/filter Air Filter Cs-137 20 5 23+/-2 pCi/Hlter Water I-131 44 5 35+/-4 pCi/1 L Water H-3 3400 360 3030+/-300 pCl/1

{

Water Sr-89 5 5 <2 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 12 1.5 12+/-1 pCi/1

\fa tcr H-3 2000 345 2300+/-200 pCi/1

. Water Gross Cl 36 9 34+/-3 pCi/J Water Gross B 38 5 42+/-4 pCi/1 Water H-3 1210 329 1100+/-100 pCi/1 69

EPA INTERCOMPARISON RESULTS 1980 (continued)

Control MWF s~1rnple Agency Limits Measured i'_,

Type Analysis Value (3a,n=l) ::!:2a error Units

!~atcr Sr-89 24 8.6 27:::3 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 15 2.6 14!1 pCi/1 Water H-3 3200 625 3400:!:300 pCi/1 Water Cr-51 86 8.6 <100 pCi/l Water Co-60 16 8.6 19+/-5 pCi/l Water Zn-65 25 8.6 40+/-10 pCi/1 Water Ru-106 46 8.6 <SO pCi/1 Hater Cs-134 20 8.6 24+/-5 nCi/1 Water Cs-137 12 8.6 15+/-3 pCi/1 Water Gross a 32 8.0 31+/-3 pCi/1 Water Gross e 21 5.0 22+/-2 pCi/1

\foter Gross a 16 8.6 21+/-2 pCi/1

\fo t (! .- Gross B 13 8.6 19+/-3 pCi/1 Air filter Gross a 24 10.0 25+/-3 pCi/filter*

Air filter Gross f3 10 8.6 17+/-2 pCi/filter J\ir filter Sr-90 0 0.0 <1 pCi/filter Air filter Cs-137 10 8.6 10+/-1 pCi/filter 70

JJ ...

USDOE QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 1980 Sample Measured I . ,. Tx:ee Nuclide Known  :!:2a error __!Inits Air (80-4) Be-7 0.272 E+o3 0.260+/-0.044 E+o3 pCi/filter Air (~0-4) Mn-54 0.720 E+o2 0.645:!:0.095 E+o2 pCi/filter

~ Air (80-4) Sr-90 0.199 E+o2 0.143+/-0.094 E+o2 pCi/filter

'Air (80-4) Zr-95 0. 720 E+o2 0.605+/-0.094 E+o2 pCi/filter Air (80-4) Sb-125 0.258 E+o4 0.180+/-0.026 E+o4 pCi/filter Air (80-4) Cs-137 0.257 E+o3 0.230:!:0.034 E+o3 pCi/filter Air (80-4) Ce-144 0.376 E+o4 0.339:!:0.048 E+o4 pCi/filter Air (80-10) Be-7 0.230 E+o4 0.270+/-0.038 E+o4 pCi/filter Air (80-10) Co-60 0.200 E+o3 0.225+/-0.032 E+o3 pCi/filter Air (80-10) Sr-90 0.107 E+o2 0.105:!:0.016 E+o2 pCi/filter Air (80-10) Cs-134 0.247 E+o4 0.215:!:0.031 E+o4 pCi/filter Air (80-10) Ce-141 0.404 E+o3 0.475:!:0.068 E+03 pCi/filter Air (80-10) Ce-144 0.346 E+o4 0.280:!:0.040 E+o4 pCi/filter Water (80-4) H-3 0.103 E+02 0.097:!:0.017 E+o2 pCi/ml Water (80-4) Na-22 0.107 E+ol 0.095:!:0.014 E+Ol pCi/nil Water (80-4) Cr-51 0.137 E+ol ... 0.170:!:0.029 E+Ol pCi/ml Water (80-4) Co-57 0.337 E 00 0.600:!:0.140 E 00 pCi/ml Water (80-4) Co-60 0.922 E 00 0.900:!:0.127 E 00 pCi/ml C.

Water (80-4) Sr-89 0.240 E-01 0.267:!:0.172 E-01 pCi/ml Water (80-4) Cs-137 0.978 E 00 0.850:!:0.127 E 00 pCi/ml

  • Water (80-4) u 0.283 E-01 0.200:!:0.173 E-01 µg/ml Water (80-10) H-3 0.149 E+o2 0.133:!:0.017 E+o2 pCi/ml Water (80-10) Co-60 0.197 E+ol 0.207:!:0.036 E+ol pCi/ml Water (80-10) Sr-89 0.218 E 00 0.803+/-0.263 E-01 pCi/ml
  • Water (80-10) Sr-90 0.216 E-01 0.230:!:0.069 E-01 pCi/ml Water (80-10) Cs-134 0.244 E+ol 0.283+/-0.052 E+Ol pCi/ml Water (80-10) Cs-137 0.226 E+ol 0.263:!:0.045 E+ol pCi/ml Soil (80-4) K-40 O. 770 E+ol 1.100+/-0.341 E+ol pC!/g Soil (80-4) Sr-90 0.374 E 00 0.300+/-0.172 E 00 pCi/g Soil (80-4) Cs-137 0.680 E+ol 0.507+/-0.087 E+ol pCi/g Soil (80-10) K-40 0.207 E+o2 0.273:!:0.053 E+o2 pCi/g '

Soil (80-10) Co-60 0.100 E 00 0.100+/-0.100 E 00 pCi/g Soil (80-10) Sr-90 0.460 E 00 0.333:!:0.172 E 00 pCi/g Soil (80-10) Cs-137 0.110 E+o2 0 .110:!:0. 017 E+o2 pCi/g Tissue (80-4)

  • K-40 0.143 E+o2 0.207:!:0.036 E+o2 pC:./g Tissue (80-4) Co-60 0.386 E+ol 0.373:!:0.056 E+ol pCi/g

.t

'!'issue (80-4) Sr-90 0.182 E+o2 0.180:!:0.034 E+o2 pCi/g Tissue (80-4) Cs-137 0.122 E+o2 0.103:!:0.018 E+o2 pCi/g L

Tissue (80-10) K-40 0.170 E+ol 0.550:!:0.143 E+ol pCi/g Tissue (80-10) Co-60 0.874 E+ol 0.950:!:0.141 E+ol pC1./g

' Tissue (80-10) Sr-90. 0.387 E+o2 0.250+/-0.042 E+o2 pC:.../g Tissue (80-10) Cs-137 0.275 E+o2 0.270:!:0.044 E+o2 pCi/g 71 I

USDOE QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM--continued ..

Sample Measured Type Nuclide Known +/-2a error Units Vegetation (80-4) K-40 0.317 E+o2 0.457:t0.083 E+o2 . pCi/g Vegetation (80-4) Sr-90 0.246 E+o2 Q.243+/-0.039 E+o2 pCi/g *{'.l Vegetation (80-4) Cs-137

  • 0.171 E+o2 0.147+/-0.025 E+o2 pC:_/g

(

Vegetation (80-10) K-40 0.225 E+o2 0.303+/-0.053 E+02 pCi/g

. Vegetation (80-10) Co-60 0. 272 E+o,l 0.297+/-0.052 E+ol pCi/g Vegetation (80-10) Sr-90 0.138 E+o2 0 .133:tO. 030 E+o2 . pCi/g Vegetation (80-10) Cs-137 0.961 E+ol 0.967+/-0.167 E+ol pCi/g 72

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19093A178&oldid=2503288"