|
---|
Category:License-Operator
MONTHYEARIR 05000416/20243012024-01-16016 January 2024 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000416/2024301 ML23130A2732023-05-10010 May 2023 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML23102A1482023-04-12012 April 2023 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2024301 ML22342B2592022-10-14014 October 2022 10 Post Examination Analysis ML22342B2602022-10-14014 October 2022 10 Public Forms ML22075A3442022-03-16016 March 2022 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML21342A2702021-12-0808 December 2021 GG-2022-10 Corp Notification Ltr - Cco, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station - Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2022301 ML21349A1562021-10-25025 October 2021 GG-2021-10 Public Forms ML21333A2532021-10-25025 October 2021 GG-2021-10 Post Exam Analysis ML21280A0732021-10-0707 October 2021 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000416/2021301 ML21106A1512021-04-16016 April 2021 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2021-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML21106A2842021-04-14014 April 2021 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results March 2021 ML21041A5352021-02-11011 February 2021 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2021301 ML20072L2192020-03-12012 March 2020 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2020-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML20069C2262020-03-0909 March 2020 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2020302 ML20058J8102020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Post Examination Analysis ML20058H6182020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Written Examination ML20058H6142020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Operating Test ML20058H6152020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Outlines ML20058H6172020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Written Examination Comments ML20058H6112020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Operating Test Comments ML20058H6242020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Final Written Examination ML20058H6222020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Final Outlines ML20058H6212020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Final Operating Test ML20058H6262020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Outline Comments ML20058J8112020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Public Forms ML19135A6642019-05-15015 May 2019 Units 2 & 3; River Bend, and Waterford 3 - Response to RIS 2019-02, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML19128A1582019-05-0808 May 2019 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2020301 ML19045A3732019-02-12012 February 2019 March 2019 GFE Cover Letter Riv ML19011A3712019-01-10010 January 2019 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2019 ML18116A2382018-04-26026 April 2018 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2018-02, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations. ML18009A9852018-01-0808 January 2018 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2018 ML18061A1652017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Final Outlines ML18061A1722017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Public Forms ML18050A0562017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Post-Exam Analysis ML18050A0542017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Final Written Exams ML18061A1702017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Written Exam Comments ML18061A1672017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Operating Tests ML18061A1712017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Written Exams ML18050A0552017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Final Operating Tests ML18061A1682017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Outline Comments ML18061A1662017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Operating Test Comments ML18061A1692017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Outlines IR 05000416/20173022017-11-30030 November 2017 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000416/2017302 ML17135A4262017-05-12012 May 2017 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2017302 GNRO-2017/00031, NRC Form 536 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2017-032017-05-0404 May 2017 NRC Form 536 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2017-03 ML17013A5482017-01-13013 January 2017 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2017 ML16291A2602016-10-13013 October 2016 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2017301 ML16272A1472016-09-28028 September 2016 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results Sept 2016 GNRO-2016/00042, NRC Form 536 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-09, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 12016-07-29029 July 2016 NRC Form 536 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-09, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 2024-01-16
[Table view] Category:Part 55 Examination Related Material
MONTHYEARIR 05000416/20243012024-01-16016 January 2024 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000416/2024301 ML23130A2732023-05-10010 May 2023 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML23102A1482023-04-12012 April 2023 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2024301 ML22342B2602022-10-14014 October 2022 10 Public Forms ML22342B2592022-10-14014 October 2022 10 Post Examination Analysis ML22075A3442022-03-16016 March 2022 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML21342A2702021-12-0808 December 2021 GG-2022-10 Corp Notification Ltr - Cco, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station - Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2022301 ML21333A2532021-10-25025 October 2021 GG-2021-10 Post Exam Analysis ML21349A1562021-10-25025 October 2021 GG-2021-10 Public Forms ML21280A0732021-10-0707 October 2021 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000416/2021301 ML21106A1512021-04-16016 April 2021 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2021-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML21041A5352021-02-11011 February 2021 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2021301 ML20072L2192020-03-12012 March 2020 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2020-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML20069C2262020-03-0909 March 2020 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2020302 ML20058H6182020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Written Examination ML20058H6242020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Final Written Examination ML20058H6172020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Written Examination Comments ML20058H6142020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Operating Test ML20058H6212020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Final Operating Test ML20058H6262020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Outline Comments ML20058H6152020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Outlines ML20058J8112020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Public Forms ML20058J8102020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Post Examination Analysis ML20058H6222020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Final Outlines ML20058H6112020-02-10010 February 2020 GG-2020-02 Draft Operating Test Comments ML19135A6642019-05-15015 May 2019 Units 2 & 3; River Bend, and Waterford 3 - Response to RIS 2019-02, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML19128A1582019-05-0808 May 2019 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2020301 ML18116A2382018-04-26026 April 2018 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2018-02, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations. ML18009A9852018-01-0808 January 2018 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2018 ML18061A1722017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Public Forms ML18061A1672017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Operating Tests ML18061A1712017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Written Exams ML18061A1702017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Written Exam Comments ML18061A1682017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Outline Comments ML18061A1692017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Outlines ML18050A0552017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Final Operating Tests ML18050A0562017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Post-Exam Analysis ML18050A0542017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Final Written Exams ML18061A1652017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Final Outlines ML18061A1662017-12-11011 December 2017 2017-12 Proposed Operating Test Comments ML17135A4262017-05-12012 May 2017 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2017302 GNRO-2017/00031, NRC Form 536 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2017-032017-05-0404 May 2017 NRC Form 536 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2017-03 ML16291A2602016-10-13013 October 2016 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000416/2017301 ML16272A1472016-09-28028 September 2016 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results Sept 2016 GNRO-2016/00042, NRC Form 536 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-09, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 12016-07-29029 July 2016 NRC Form 536 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-09, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 ML15351A0282015-12-17017 December 2015 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2016 ML16028A0202015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Draft Op Tests ML16028A0212015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Draft Op Test Comments ML16028A0222015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Final Outlines ML16028A0242015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Public Forms 2024-01-16
[Table view] |
Text
DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility: Grand Gulf First Exam Date: 6/28-7/02/2010 Written Exam Outline (Date)
Comment Resolution 1 No Comments 2
3 4
5 Administrative JPM Outline (Date)
Comment Resolution On the RO Conduct of Ops JPM, include Title will be added on following revisions.
1 the title (i.e. what is the JPM) 2 3
4 5
Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Date)
Comment Resolution ES-301-2 for SRO-I: The SRO-Is dont No resolution needed.
have anything to test Safety Function 6.
It doesnt appear there is an opportunity to evaluate their ability to manipulate 1 electrical distribution/controls. There is an extra JPM that could address this (Battery Charger lineup).
The outline for the SRO-Is meets the 1021 safety function requirements.
There are only 4 alternate path JPMs A fifth alternate path JPM will be added.
which is the minimum allowable. Add 2
one alternate path JPM so there are a total of 5.
JPM f involves transferring RPS power Facility will verify where these actions are from normal to/from alternate. Confirm taken, and make changes accordingly.
3 these actions can be performed in the simulator and not a talk-through.
4 It is not clear from the outline how JPM I Per 1021 this is a safety function 7. No OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
is a safety function 7. Followup with the further action needed.
exam author.
5 Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Date)
Comment Resolution In Scenarios 1 and 2, the first event Discussed with exam authors. Will review as (Normal) give credit to RO 1 and 2 for part of the exam validation.
shifting Recirc Pumps to Fast Speed and placing a Feed Pump on the Master Level Controller in their BOP position.
The action following these is for the ATC to raise power with control rods. Is there 1
any chance the SS will direct the ATC to do both actions in series? How do they train their SS for prioritization on this?
Concern is that if the SS directs the ATC to do these, followed by pulling rods, the BOP will not get their Normal evolution credit per the ES-301-5.
Any concerns with exposing operators to The number of scenarios will be decreased to 2 ATWS scenarios? Are they dissimilar address overlap issues.
2 enough? Examples: SRO-I 2 in Scenarios 1 and 3, RO 2 in Scenarios 3 and 5, SRO-I 3 in Scenarios 3 and 5 ES-301-5: If the sixth scenario is A surrogate will be provided.
needed, it would put the applicants in a fourth scenario that may be unneeded.
3 If it is needed for the applicants in addition to the five scenarios, are there surrogates in standby for support?
With 5 candidates, only 3 scenarios plus The facility will review the content and see if 4 a spare are needed to administer the the exam can be accomplished with 3 exam. scenarios vice 5/6.
Scenario 1 comments/questions: This scenario will not be used.
- 1. Is shifting RR pumps typically done by the BOP?
- 2. What operator actions are required for the FHA rad monitor failure?
- 3. Because SLC will fail to inject 5
boron, it cannot be used to mitigate the ATWS event.
Therefore, attempting to initiate SLC is not a critical task.
- 4. Change critical task 1 to Insert control rods either by scram or via RC&IS. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
- 5. What actions are required in response the EHC fluid leak by the ACRO?
- 6. What actions are taken by the ACRO in response to the failure of the A FZ level indicator?
Scenario 2 comments/questions: Text changes will be made. Questions
- 1. What actions are taken by the resolved. Will be reviewed in validation.
ACRO for the rod drift?
- 2. Raising power 5% with control rods will take a long time.
- 3. The wording for event 4 implies the HPCS pump will trip without any operator actions. What actions will the BOP be required to take for event 4.
- 4. Change the first critical task to Open at least 7 SRVs prior to RPV level reaching -210 inches on the FZ range.
- 5. Change the second critical task to Manually initiate Division II ECCS prior to RPV pressure going below 300 psig.
- 6. What is the 300 psig limit in the second critical task based on?
- 7. What size LOCA is the main event? I.e., if there is a rapid depressurization then there is no need to ED and this would not be a critical task. If there is no rapid depressurization then RCIC and main feedwater should be available for maintaining level.
- 8. What actions is the ACRO expected to take in response to the Division II failure to auto start?
Scenario 3 comments/questions: Text changes will be made. Questions
- 1. What actions are required for the resolved. Will be reviewed in validation.
failure of the RHR Hx bypass valve?
- 2. Scenario 1 has the BOP operating the RR system and this scenario has the ACRO operating the same system. Which operator is responsible for RR?
- 3. Event 5 has the ACRO responding to the loss of heater drain pumps. What are the ACRO actions?
- 4. Is the FW rupture in the drywell OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
basically the same event as the LOCA in the drywell in scenario 2?
- 5. With a FW rupture in the drywell, why is an ED necessary (since the rupture will depressurize the RPV)?
- 6. If the FW rupture does not rapidly depressurize the RPV then why can level not be maintained with HPCS?
Scenario 4 comments/questions: Scenario 4 will not be used.
- 1. What are the actions for the ACRO on the control rod drifting out?
- 2. The control rod drift is basically the same event as event 3 in scenario 2 (just different directions).
- 3. It is not clear from the critical tasks as written, what the actual tasks are. Rewrite the critical tasks so they are specific and measurable.
- 4. With power initially at 5%, it would seem there would be no need to pull rods to increase RPV pressure - just increase the pressure setpoint for the bypass valves.
- 5. This scenario does not meet the minimum bean count for events for the BOP.
- 6. Can RCIC be manually isolated during event 4/5?
Scenario 5 comments/questions: Text changes will be made. Questions
- 1. What actions are required by the resolved. Will be reviewed in validation.
BOP for events 2, 3, and 8?
- 2. This scenario does not meet the minimum bean count for events for the BOP.
- 3. The main event for this scenario is basically the same as scenario 1.
- 4. Change critical task 1 to Insert control rods either by scram or via RC&IS.
- 5. The HPCS jockey pump event exercises the same TS as event 4 in scenario 2.
- 6. Events 6 and 7 are the same event - delete event 7. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
- 7. From the wording, it appears SLC will fail to inject boron and cannot be used to mitigate the ATWS event. Therefore, attempting to initiate SLC is not a critical task.
- 8. It does not seem like scramming the reactor as a result of thermal hydraulic instabilities meets the critical task threshold. Discuss with exam author.
Scenario 6 comments/questions: Text changes will be made. Questions
- 1. What size LOCA is the main resolved. Will be reviewed in validation.
event? I.e., if there is a rapid depressurization then there is no need to ED and this would not be a critical task. If there is no rapid depressurization then HPCS should be available for maintaining level.
- 2. It is not clear what reduced injection systems in event 6 means.
- 3. Change the first critical task to Open at least 7 SRVs prior to RPV level reaching -210 inches on the FZ range.
- 4. Change the second critical task to The crew restores RPV level to greater than -191 inches.
- 5. The main event is basically the same as scenario 2 and probably scenario 3.
- 6. What would happen if the operators took no action for events 5, 6, and 7? OBDI 202 - IOLE Process