|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24149A3532024-05-24024 May 2024 Change in Estimated Review Schedule for Nextera Common Emergency Plan Amendment ML24122C6922024-05-0101 May 2024 NextEra Fleet EP Amendment - Demonstration Drill ML24115A2362024-03-28028 March 2024 Acceptance Review: Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code for Examination of Control Rod Drive Mechanism (Rod) Housing H-4 Canopy Seal Weld ML23173A1522023-06-22022 June 2023 Request for Additional Information NextEra Fleet Emergency Plan Amendment Request ML23156A3042023-05-31031 May 2023 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Remove Period of Applicability from Pressure Temperature Limits and Low Temperature Over Pressure Protection Curves ML23109A1862023-04-19019 April 2023 and Turkey Point Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Proposed Alternative to Asme Section XI Authorizing Implementation of Asme Code Case N-752-1 ML23066A1892023-03-0303 March 2023 OEDO-22-00419: Email Dated 3-3-2023 to Petitioner on Seabrook ASR Petition ML23066A0892023-02-24024 February 2023 OEDO-22-00419 - Email Dated 02/24/2023 to Petitioner on Seabrook Unit 1 ASR Petition ML23020A9392023-01-19019 January 2023 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Cooling Tower Service Water Loop or Cell Requirements (EPID L-2022-LLA-0183) (Email) ML23011A3082023-01-11011 January 2023 Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request 4RA-22-001 (L-2022-LLR-0074) ML22341A0012022-12-0606 December 2022 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request 4RA-22-001, Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) ML22333A7452022-11-22022 November 2022 OEDO-22-00419 - Email: C-10 Response on PRB Initial Assessment - C-10 Petition on Seabrook ASR Concrete Degradation ML22287A1472022-10-13013 October 2022 2.026 Petition Screen-in Email ML22228A0552022-08-15015 August 2022 Request for Additional Information Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report Review ML22200A1082022-07-19019 July 2022 Acceptance Review for TSTF-577 Amendment ML22153A4152022-05-31031 May 2022 Request for Additional Information Re 120V Inverter LAR from TS Branch - Final ML22116A2442022-04-26026 April 2022 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request 3IR-18 and 3IR-19 for End of Third 10-Year ISI Interval for Examinations with Limited Coverage ML22048B5522022-02-17017 February 2022 LTR-22-0010 Reply to Geoff Gilbert Email Concern About Seabrook Station Concrete Degradation ML22062B6642022-02-0707 February 2022 Request for Additional Information 120V Inverter LAR from the Electrical Branch ML22063A0002022-01-25025 January 2022 Requests for Additional Information from Risk Branch Regarding 120V Inverter LAR ML22020A2542022-01-20020 January 2022 LTR-22-0010 Geoff Gilbert, E-mail Concern About Seabrook Station Concrete Degradation ML21097A2512021-04-0707 April 2021 Request for Additional Information Regarding Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report Review for RFO 20 (EPID L-2020-LRO-0066) (Email) ML21054A0482021-02-23023 February 2021 Request for Additional Information Regarding Heat Flux Hot Channel Requirement Amendment Request ML20343A0942020-12-0303 December 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding Seabrook (COVID-19) Part 73 Force-on-Force Exemption Request (L-2020-LLE-0219) ML20273A2812020-09-22022 September 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Resolve Non-Conservative Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor Requiments ML20258A1502020-09-14014 September 2020 Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request Regarding One-Time Change to the AC Sources Operating TS ML20260H4932020-09-11011 September 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Comanche Peak - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action - Request to Use Later Code Edition of ASME OM Code ML20230A2962020-08-14014 August 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Allow a One-Time Change to the AC Sources Operating TS ML20167A1842020-06-11011 June 2020 Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request Regarding TSTF-411 and TSTF-418 (L-2019-LLA-0237) ML20124A0012020-05-0101 May 2020 Cancellation of Call with Seabrook on Steam Generator Tube Inspections ML20114E1592020-04-23023 April 2020 Email and Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request to Degraded Voltage Time Delay Setpoint (L-2020-LLA-0012) ML20101N0932020-04-10010 April 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re Relief Request to Defer ASME Inspections Due COVID-19 (EPIDs L-2020-LLR-0055, -56, and -57) ML20101L0402020-04-10010 April 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request to Use Code Case OMN-13 with 2012 Edition of the OM Code ML20101H3912020-04-0808 April 2020 Verbal Authorization for Seabrook Relief Request 3IIR-7 ML20087K8262020-03-27027 March 2020 Upcoming Steam Generator Tube Inservice Inspection ML20063J9792020-02-28028 February 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Degraded Voltage Time Delay Setpoint ML19347C6732019-12-13013 December 2019 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-418 ML19296D9122019-10-23023 October 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook Inverter Amendment (L-2019-LLA-0216) ML19295F5422019-10-15015 October 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Onsite Power Distribution Requirements ML19275G7832019-10-0101 October 2019 Limited Appearance Statement from New Hampshire State Representative, Robert Harb Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application ML19270E6512019-09-27027 September 2019 Limited Appearance Statement from Joanna Hammond Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application ML19270E6542019-09-26026 September 2019 Limited Appearance Statement from Brian Campbell Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application ML19196A3592019-07-15015 July 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise the Emergency Core Cooling System Accumulator Technical Specifications ML19169A2412019-06-13013 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Requests for the Containment Building Spray Pump Flow and Vibration Testing (Epids L-2019-LLR-00 and L-2019-LLR-00) ML19162A0662019-06-0404 June 2019 Reply to Mr. Rick Jakious'S E-mail of 5-29-2019 to Stephen B. Comley Sr., We the People with Attachments ML19112A1782019-04-22022 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Point Beach; Seabrook; Turkey Point - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-563 ML19101A4042019-04-11011 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Point Beach; Seabrook; St. Lucie; Turkey Point - Acceptance of Licensing Action Relief Request to Use Encoded Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination Techniques for Ferritic and Austenitic Welds ML19070A2382019-03-10010 March 2019 LTR-19-0088 Maura Healey, Attorney General, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Ltr NextEras Requests for a License Amendment and Twenty-year Extension Prior to Issuance of a Final Decision in Adjudicatory Hearing on Concrete Degradation at ML19056A4602019-02-25025 February 2019 Comment from Lisa Conti Regarding the Emergency Petition Filed by C-10 on February 13, 2019 ML19056A4582019-02-25025 February 2019 Comment from Deborah A. Jones Regarding the Emergency Petition Filed by C-10 on February 13, 2019 2024-05-24
[Table view] |
Text
Lew, David From: Raymond, William Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 12:23 PM To: Conte, Richard; Barkley, Richard; Dean, Bill; Lew, David Cc: Burritt, Arthur; Plasse, Richard; Miller, Ed; Pinkham, Laurie; Matakas, Gina; Modes, Michael; Chaudhary, Suresh; Miller, Chris; Wilson, Peter; Gray, Harold
Subject:
RE: New Letter in from C-10 Hi Rich, You covered it pretty well and I can add only a few minor points.
Prior to the license renewal activities and our inspection of the topic, NextEra was in the process of upgrading the structures monitoring program as a result of an INPO AFI. In response to the AFI, NextEra revised procedures to incorporate ACI-349 into the maintenance rule (MR) program. Per Engineering Manager Rick Noble, Seabrook would have taken cores using the newly adopted ACI 349 criteria and found the ASR under the MR program "sooner or later." it is a matter of speculation if and when that would have occurred absent the license renewal initiative.
So, in response to the C-10 question, we can say that Seabrook likely would have found the ASR by adopting the latest industry standards as a result of industry initiatives. Unfortunately, I am not aware of any NRC initiatives that would have driven the issue. There should be. ACI 349 was written in the mid 1990's in response to the maintenance rule and to specifically upgrade the structures monitoring program. It is not clear the NRC's initial or subsequent inspections of the maintenance rule programs adequately covered structures monitoring - NRC missed the failure to scope the ITS/DTS into the program at Seabrook. I am willing to help develop an OP Exp smart sample to better inform our MR inspections.
While this helps address the C-1 0 question specific to ASR, we still need to address the broader question on upgrading to industry standards.
Bill From: Conte, Richard Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 12:50 PM To: Barkley, Richard; Dean, Bill; Lew, David Cc: Burritt, Arthur; Plasse, Richard; Miller, Ed; Raymond, William; Pinkham, Laurie; Matakas, Gina; Modes, Michael; Chaudhary, Suresh; Miller, Chris; Wilson, Peter; Gray, Harold
Subject:
RE: New Letter in from C-10 What is absolutely amazing is, ifthey didn't read our reports and the TIA they would have any questions yet they criticize us for weaknesses in our oversight (not sure if this referral matter or not).
Some preliminary facts for Rich Barkley's benefit-.
Question 1 on Would they have detected the degradation if it wasn't for license renewal and ifthe question is yes there are a whole bunch of other questions and if no, will the industry and NRC revise its inspection and testing programs so as to detect concrete degradation in the future.
- This is a speculative question, perhaps we should decide whether we would speculate or not.
Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, exemptions --
FOJA. .n1
We can say that the latest ACI standard (349-3R, Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures) does look for evidence of ASR. I believe DRP has some inside information that an outside group was pushing them to use it even before license renewal. However, we will be soon find us right back to the question of why there isn't an automatic upgrading of standards used in the CLB or Quality Assurance Program. She makes some assertions on the need to use latest ASTM standards. The simple answer is we would have to go through a backfit analysis for such upgrading. Since they are not compliance backfits, then a cost benefit vs safety analysis would be needed. SRAs may have more on this topic.
- Perhaps we can focus on the information notice and the stated reasons we issued it.
Question 2 Is about whether the TIA has been answered. The answer is no and when it is answered it will be publicly released. Expected time frame is February 2012.
Question 3 is about the public being denied access to material that would be otherwise available because Seabrook's owner has enabled NRC headquarters staff to access material remotely. The answer is that material would not normally available since it is owner controlled information that is normally kept on site. The access was permitted on voluntary basis in the interest of efficiency on a rapidly developing situation - some of the information is not finalized and is work in progress in order to give NRC staff a sense of direction they are heading. The licensee's engineering evaluation on the problem will be publicly available through the license renewal process.
From: Barkley, Richard Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 11:55 AM To: Dean, Bill; Lew, David Cc: Burritt, Arthur; Conte, Richard; Plasse, Richard; Miller, Ed; Raymond, William; Pinkham, Laurie; Matakas, Gina
Subject:
New Letter in from C-10 This came in my mail today - Bill Dean, Bill Raymond, and John Lamb should have also received copies.
Copies were also cc: to Congressmen Edward Markey and John Tierney.
I'll discuss this matter with Rich Conte and Rick Plasse tomorrow and early next week. C-1 0 is asking a series of questions related to the concrete ASR issue at Seabrook, many related to the TIA between NRR and the Region on this issue.
We'll track this in the RA Action Item system. I'll take the lead at writing it, with input from DRS and NRR.
Richard S. Barkley, PE Technical Communications Assistant 2