ML17095A216

From kanterella
Revision as of 04:56, 30 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2016 LaSalle County Station Initial License Examination Forms ES-301-4
ML17095A216
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/16/2016
From: Chuck Zoia
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML15274A403 List:
References
Download: ML17095A216 (3)
v • d • e


Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-30I-4 Facility: LaSalle Date of Exam: 10/'17116 Scenario Numbers: 7 Operating Test Number:

lnitials OUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b. c#

The intial conditions are realistic, n that some equpment and/or instrumentaton may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators nto expected events. lill- I'l*\ Oo,

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. AÉ t.n a
3. Each event descrption consists of r the point in the scenario when it s to be initiated r the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to nitiate the event r the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew r the expected operator actons (by shift position) o the event termnation point (if applicable) \fil/ / O*
4. The events are valid wth regard to physics and thermodynamics. Fl\ll- 4 ø a

,^,

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain 5.

complete evaluaton results commensurate with the scenario objectives. \Y!L 't) 4*

6. lf time compresson techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators nave sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue tme constrants.

Cues are given. \f¿ htt q*

7 The simulator modeling is not altered. \l, n 0-) 9ct

8. The scenarios have been valldated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open smulator @

performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidellty is maintained while running the planned scenarios. fl / Aø

9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

l, All oiher scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. F'tlL/ Lttt 4o'

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). $st o.t A.^

11 The scenario set provides the opportunty for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating iactors. (Competency Fiating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3) F$L &ø Øa 12 Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events o specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). s{L çD çl*

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew posltion. lf,t /rll 9; Target Quanttatve Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5'd) Actual Attributes 1 Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1

\q, AAJ' A.-

2. Abnormal events (2-4) 4 nÂl 1Å, br
3. Major transients (1-2) 2 FfiI '"t)
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 $L ø4 (tt -..

7

5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 çrt A' t^
6. Crtical tasks (2-3) 2 sv 'ø) A. ^-.

NOTE: . The facility sgnature is not applicable for NRo-developed tests.

  1. lndependent NRC reviewer initial tems in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.

on-Sl 4.

O vttt bc øn le,*J a vA, ES-301, Page 25o27

)g ES-301 Simulator Scenario Qual Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: LaSalle Date of Exam: 10/17116 Scenario Numbers: 1 l2l3 Opeøling est Number: 2016301 lnitials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b. c#

The nital conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators nto expected events. \t- /lil øT

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. '\u- /tt, (
3. Each event descrption consists of r the pont n the scenario when it is to be initiated o the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event o the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew o Drf.L the expected operator actions (by shift position) r the evnt terminaton point (if applicable)

ü, k

4. The events are valid with regard to physcs and thermodynamics. it /ø a. I 5 Sequencing and tming of events is reasonable, and allows the examnation team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ltlt-, lttb 0, I
6. lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected actvties wthout undue time constraints.

Cues are given. il^" ttif ç.t 7 The simulator modeling is not altered ,$A //t, lt

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator o performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelty is maintained while running the planned scenarios. un UA r{

L Every operator will be evaluated usng at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance wth Section D.5 of ES-301 . \r dr, ø 10 All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verif ied using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). w tlf, r {

11 The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3) úl //Jh v

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events o

specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). fr., Al 0 II

13. The level of difficulty is approprate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. \^ ut) a Target Quantitatve Attrbutes (Per Scenario; See Secton D.5.d) Actual Attributes 1 Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 11111 .arr, o
2. Abnormal events (2-4) 41314 l$L 4l¿ a{
3. Major transients (1-2) 2t112 \lu- ,4j/ '0. I
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantve actions (1-2) 2/112 ril, t/b 'a
5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1t112 (I' 'ttlb 'ot Å
6. Critical tasks (2-3) 2t3/3 FflA 4t, n-I NOT: . The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

/

  1. lndependent NRC reviewer inital tems in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.

@w;tt bø ø-etole) .rin1 on-,ík v. t e n<

ES-301, Page 25 ot 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Qualitv Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: LaSalle Dâte of Exam: 10117116 Scenario Numbers: 41516 Operating Test Number: 2016301 lnitals QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b. c#

The inital conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. N4¿-, ttlú O a¿

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. l\.rr ,TAT) a--
3. Each event description consists of o the point n the scenario when t is to be initated o the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event r the symptoms/cues that wll be visible to the crew lfr' o the expected operator actions (by shift position) o the event termination pont (if applicable) 4t A* 7
4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. \\h tl 11. *
5. Sequencing and timng of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain ,N complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. fl- /
6. lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given. lfr lt rl ot 7 The smulator modeling is not altered. l'$tP ' (V ott

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator

'(

performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. $' /ø td, o Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenaro.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance wth Section D.5 of ES-301. tfp /h ítl

10. All individual operator competencies can be valuated, as verf ied using Form ES-301-6 /

(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). U'L qtl) øÚ 11 The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3) sr" û o/r 12.

13.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submt the form with the simulator scenarios).

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew positon v

N,

,&1 lb rt

// '(1nr-a Target Quantitatve Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes 1 Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 21112 0^ .il^r) ll, t*

2. Abnormal events (2-4) 41414 t.ÑI /4t O

'rs

3. Major transents (1-2) 2t112 il,^ itth O r*l
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantve actions (1-2) 21213 lfl" z At*
5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) o/ol1 l{\r tA) Or*

a

6. Critical tasks (2-3) 2/212 \(b 'g'8 '(rrn NOTE: . The facility sgnature is not applicable for NRO-developed tests.
  1. lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.

A Wl bo c.o^plolo) ^! wt-çik ual)4o.t.

ES-301, Page 25 o 27

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17095A216&oldid=2009394"